Russia knew that Hillary was so scandal tainted all they had to do was throw another log on the fire to get things really cooking! Hillary had a 92% chance of winning at one point (polls). They didn't care about Trump, he was never going to win.

All you people thinking HRC would be this tough guy against Russia seem to forget she brokered the deal for Russia to gain control over our Uranium deposits when she was SOS. The Russians hacked the DNC and released it, so that shows they favored Trump,okay. The Saudis gave the Clinton Foundation Millions. So did the government of Mexico. So I would say they favored her, but that is okay I guess.
How much was the Chinese contribution to the Clinton foundation? Over $5 million for just one donor. That is one of the main reason the Foundation is being investigated. but that is okay.
Russia probably hacked both sides but they did not release information they had that would damage the guy they would rather have in their, so they choose not to get that much more involved. We got to stop like we are all innocent ,we interfere in other countries elections all the time. Now someone got caught doing it to us. Plus, what about all the lobbyists that work D.C. and ply Congressmen and Senators with cash and gifts to help out their clients,some of them Nations States?
All this is one more attempt by the left to not accept that the American people did not choose their pick for President. Anyone notice that in the recounts Trump is seeming to be getting more votes?

We are now to the point where we acknowledge Russian interference in our election but kind of shrug our shoulders and say "what does it matter".

Scary what MANY people will accept.

That's not right. I assume outsiders try to influence the U.S. all the time. I doubt this was the first time. The point here is that the story is not being played as a way to prevent something from happening in the future, but rather as a way to undermine an incoming president.

What do you think should be done? Should we assume that without Russian assistance Clinton would have won and install her in office? What do you want to happen?

All you people thinking HRC would be this tough guy against Russia seem to forget she brokered the deal for Russia to gain control over our Uranium deposits when she was SOS.

The Russians hacked the DNC and released it, so that shows they favored Trump,okay. The Saudis gave the Clinton Foundation Millions. So did the government of Mexico. So I would say they favored her, but that is okay I guess.

How much was the Chinese contribution to the Clinton foundation? Over $5 million for just one donor. That is one of the main reason the Foundation is being investigated. but that is okay.

Russia probably hacked both sides but they did not release information they had that would damage the guy they would rather have in their, so they choose not to get that much more involved. We got to stop like we are all innocent ,we interfere in other countries elections all the time. Now someone got caught doing it to us.

Plus, what about all the lobbyists that work D.C. and ply Congressmen and Senators with cash and gifts to help out their clients,some of them Nations States?

All this is one more attempt by the left to not accept that the American people did not choose their pick for President. Anyone notice that in the recounts Trump is seeming to be getting more votes?

The Obama administration leaked classified info to directly undermine the next President. That's cool.

What information was leaked by the Obama administration? The FBI and CIA briefed our elected officials and those officials did what they normally do.

Reuters

The overseers of the U.S. intelligence community have not embraced a CIA assessment that Russian cyber attacks were aimed at helping Republican President-elect Donald Trump win the 2016 election, three American officials said on Monday.

While the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) does not dispute the CIA's analysis of Russian hacking operations, it has not endorsed their assessment because of a lack of conclusive evidence that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton, said the officials, who declined to be named.

The position of the ODNI, which oversees the 17 agency-strong U.S. intelligence community, could give Trump fresh ammunition to dispute the CIA assessment, which he rejected as "ridiculous" in weekend remarks, and press his assertion that no evidence implicates Russia in the cyber attacks.

Is this your proof? Maybe you need someone to read these things to you my friend. Our intelligence community briefed our elected representatives and they started sharing with the press. There is NOTHING that you posted that says the Obama administration leaked information.

The Clintons have been the most investigated group in politics over the past 25 years. Not close. They have never been found guilty of anything. As far as the Clinton Foundation goes it doesn't survive without rich donors. If they have influenced policy then your argument is legit. I don't know of one instance in which it has. As far as the Saudis go they are our allies remember. Same with China. Russia isn't and they have a leader that commits War crimes, ignores agreements, and overthrows govts. He also has never stopped fighting the Cold War.

As far as the Uranium stuff goes that is legit but it's one thing to do a deal but it is another to be an ally. It is also quite another thing to have a leader that is allowed to influence your govt. From the Campaign Manager to now the Exxon Mobile guy you cant ignore this.

Did the Russians maybe release information that was detrimental to HRC maybe. They at least where covert about it. The fucking Mexican government went official in going after Trump and plugging for HRC but that is okay

no that is something new

this is old news:

WASHINGTON — American intelligence agencies have concluded with “high confidence” that Russia acted covertly in the latter stages of the presidential campaign to harm Hillary Clinton’s chances and promote Donald J. Trump, according to senior administration officials.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/09/us/ob ... -hack.html

Thank you. I was wrong. Our elected officials leaked the same stuff to the Washington Post.

Thank you. I was wrong. Our elected officials leaked the same stuff to the Washington Post.

All this bluster and no one can even say what exactly the Russians did. And even if they could there isn't any evidence to support the claim.

Of course, none of that is the point