It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 9:28 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 789 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 27  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:43 pm
Posts: 2220
pizza_Place: ....
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.

Shit, since Wikileaks has been putting in the Good Lord's work, those guys are looking more and more mainstream.

Its no longer a "theory" if there actually is a conspiracy afoot.


Yes and WikiLeaks has also posted false documents and clearly picked sides in this election. People celebrate places like Anonymous and WikiLeaks until they cross a line that offends them. Neither should be respected or encouraged.

Fuck that - they are Saints.

False documents, huh? What about all of the REAL documents?

Don't make excuses for crooks, Nas. It doesn't look good on you.

_________________
I like thinking big. . . If you're going to be thinking anything, you might as well think big.
-Donald J. Trump, BPE
FavreFan wrote:
I apologize to The Hawk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.

Shit, since Wikileaks has been putting in the Good Lord's work, those guys are looking more and more mainstream.

Its no longer a "theory" if there actually is a conspiracy afoot.


Yes and WikiLeaks has also posted false documents and clearly picked sides in this election. People celebrate places like Anonymous and WikiLeaks until they cross a line that offends them. Neither should be respected or encouraged.


Jorr already said this and someone changed the subject. It is the Dems this time that are offended.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Panther pislA wrote:
Don't make excuses for crooks, Nas. It doesn't look good on you.


Says the Trump supporter?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.

Shit, since Wikileaks has been putting in the Good Lord's work, those guys are looking more and more mainstream.

Its no longer a "theory" if there actually is a conspiracy afoot.


Yes and WikiLeaks has also posted false documents and clearly picked sides in this election. People celebrate places like Anonymous and WikiLeaks until they cross a line that offends them. Neither should be respected or encouraged.


How did they pick sides? And what false documents were posted? How were those documentss proven false? That's not snark,thats an actual question for you.

Anyways, even the major media propaganda outlets are finally walking back the initial narrative push and are actually giving the facts of the matter. Or some of them, at least.

The Soviets were masters at using our own media and political platforms against us to mount misinformation/disinformation campaigns. Today it is no different as this whole escapade has proven. The Kremlin didn't really need to do anything, in this case, chum the waters a bit and let our crazed institutions do the rest for them.

2 Old Shitty Malware Programs+ Shitty Incompetent IT+ Crazed Media and Politicians = Kremlin Total Propaganda Victory.
A nation as beat down as Russia, in a recession with a terrible economy is made to look like Mike Tyson against Spinks. All hail our Soviet Overlords! They haven't even recovered from WW2!

It's quite amazing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:43 pm
Posts: 2220
pizza_Place: ....
Peoria Matt wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Don't make excuses for crooks, Nas. It doesn't look good on you.


Says the Trump supporter?

Shit, he's more honest than anyone before him.

_________________
I like thinking big. . . If you're going to be thinking anything, you might as well think big.
-Donald J. Trump, BPE
FavreFan wrote:
I apologize to The Hawk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 7:12 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
SomeGuy wrote:
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.

Shit, since Wikileaks has been putting in the Good Lord's work, those guys are looking more and more mainstream.

Its no longer a "theory" if there actually is a conspiracy afoot.


Yes and WikiLeaks has also posted false documents and clearly picked sides in this election. People celebrate places like Anonymous and WikiLeaks until they cross a line that offends them. Neither should be respected or encouraged.


How did they pick sides? And what false documents were posted? How were those documentss proven false? That's not snark,thats an actual question for you.

Anyways, even the major media propaganda outlets are finally walking back the initial narrative push and are actually giving the facts of the matter. Or some of them, at least.

The Soviets were masters at using our own media and political platforms against us to mount misinformation/disinformation campaigns. Today it is no different as this whole escapade has proven. The Kremlin didn't really need to do anything, in this case, chum the waters a bit and let our crazed institutions do the rest for them.

2 Old Shitty Malware Programs+ Shitty Incompetent IT+ Crazed Media and Politicians = Kremlin Total Propaganda Victory.
A nation as beat down as Russia, in a recession with a terrible economy is made to look like Mike Tyson against Spinks. All hail our Soviet Overlords! They haven't even recovered from WW2!

It's quite amazing.


They clearly didn't like Hillary. I imagine suggesting we blow up Julian Assange probably didn't help. There was some email that was put out that had been altered. Not sure if WikiLeaks altered it or the source they got it from altered it. The original document(s) was put out that proved someone had made changes.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 7:13 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Panther pislA wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Don't make excuses for crooks, Nas. It doesn't look good on you.


Says the Trump supporter?

Shit, he's more honest than anyone before him.


I know you're doing your thing but this is beyond false.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 7:17 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80548
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.

Shit, since Wikileaks has been putting in the Good Lord's work, those guys are looking more and more mainstream.

Its no longer a "theory" if there actually is a conspiracy afoot.


Yes and WikiLeaks has also posted false documents and clearly picked sides in this election. People celebrate places like Anonymous and WikiLeaks until they cross a line that offends them. Neither should be respected or encouraged.


This is fake news. Wikileaks has never posted false documents. You may not like their methods but they're as legitimate as a news source gets.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.

Shit, since Wikileaks has been putting in the Good Lord's work, those guys are looking more and more mainstream.

Its no longer a "theory" if there actually is a conspiracy afoot.


Yes and WikiLeaks has also posted false documents and clearly picked sides in this election. People celebrate places like Anonymous and WikiLeaks until they cross a line that offends them. Neither should be respected or encouraged.


This is fake news. Wikileaks has never posted false documents. You may not like their methods but they're as legitimate as a news source gets.


On a scale of 1-10, how much do you love Trump?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:43 pm
Posts: 2220
pizza_Place: ....
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.

Shit, since Wikileaks has been putting in the Good Lord's work, those guys are looking more and more mainstream.

Its no longer a "theory" if there actually is a conspiracy afoot.


Yes and WikiLeaks has also posted false documents and clearly picked sides in this election. People celebrate places like Anonymous and WikiLeaks until they cross a line that offends them. Neither should be respected or encouraged.


This is fake news. Wikileaks has never posted false documents. You may not like their methods but they're as legitimate as a news source gets.


On a scale of 1-10, how much do you love Trump?

Donald Trump Is Your Father.

_________________
I like thinking big. . . If you're going to be thinking anything, you might as well think big.
-Donald J. Trump, BPE
FavreFan wrote:
I apologize to The Hawk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 7:23 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80548
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.

Shit, since Wikileaks has been putting in the Good Lord's work, those guys are looking more and more mainstream.

Its no longer a "theory" if there actually is a conspiracy afoot.


Yes and WikiLeaks has also posted false documents and clearly picked sides in this election. People celebrate places like Anonymous and WikiLeaks until they cross a line that offends them. Neither should be respected or encouraged.


This is fake news. Wikileaks has never posted false documents. You may not like their methods but they're as legitimate as a news source gets.


On a scale of 1-10, how much do you love Trump?


I know you're fucking with me. It's cool. Nas just posted misinformation about Wikileaks. I corrected the record. After all, we don't want fake news out there.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Per this, the emails weren't even hacked. There was a hand off to Wiki from a pissed of Democrat that didn't like the tilting of the election away from Sanders.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... iders.html

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 7:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.

Shit, since Wikileaks has been putting in the Good Lord's work, those guys are looking more and more mainstream.

Its no longer a "theory" if there actually is a conspiracy afoot.


Yes and WikiLeaks has also posted false documents and clearly picked sides in this election. People celebrate places like Anonymous and WikiLeaks until they cross a line that offends them. Neither should be respected or encouraged.


This is fake news. Wikileaks has never posted false documents. You may not like their methods but they're as legitimate as a news source gets.


What methods? Posting stolen stuff that someone gives them without verifying any of the information? You have to be kidding me! Nothing about that is legitimate. Same with groups like Anonymous.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... are-they-/

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 7:42 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80548
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.

Shit, since Wikileaks has been putting in the Good Lord's work, those guys are looking more and more mainstream.

Its no longer a "theory" if there actually is a conspiracy afoot.


Yes and WikiLeaks has also posted false documents and clearly picked sides in this election. People celebrate places like Anonymous and WikiLeaks until they cross a line that offends them. Neither should be respected or encouraged.


This is fake news. Wikileaks has never posted false documents. You may not like their methods but they're as legitimate as a news source gets.


What methods? Posting stolen stuff that someone gives them without verifying any of the information? You have to be kidding me! Nothing about that is legitimate. Same with groups like Anonymous.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... are-they-/


You're just wrong about this. Wikileaks is extremely credible and always has been. In fact, that bullshit about "altered documents" was just something floated out there by the Clintons in their embarrassment over truth coming to light via Wikileaks. There were no altered documents.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 7:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.

Shit, since Wikileaks has been putting in the Good Lord's work, those guys are looking more and more mainstream.

Its no longer a "theory" if there actually is a conspiracy afoot.


Yes and WikiLeaks has also posted false documents and clearly picked sides in this election. People celebrate places like Anonymous and WikiLeaks until they cross a line that offends them. Neither should be respected or encouraged.


This is fake news. Wikileaks has never posted false documents. You may not like their methods but they're as legitimate as a news source gets.


On a scale of 1-10, how much do you love Trump?


I know you're fucking with me. It's cool. Nas just posted misinformation about Wikileaks. I corrected the record. After all, we don't want fake news out there.


I'll put you down for a 9.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 8:09 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.

Shit, since Wikileaks has been putting in the Good Lord's work, those guys are looking more and more mainstream.

Its no longer a "theory" if there actually is a conspiracy afoot.


Yes and WikiLeaks has also posted false documents and clearly picked sides in this election. People celebrate places like Anonymous and WikiLeaks until they cross a line that offends them. Neither should be respected or encouraged.


This is fake news. Wikileaks has never posted false documents. You may not like their methods but they're as legitimate as a news source gets.


What methods? Posting stolen stuff that someone gives them without verifying any of the information? You have to be kidding me! Nothing about that is legitimate. Same with groups like Anonymous.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... are-they-/


You're just wrong about this. Wikileaks is extremely credible and always has been. In fact, that bullshit about "altered documents" was just something floated out there by the Clintons in their embarrassment over truth coming to light via Wikileaks. There were no altered documents.


Your take on this is really weird. If I recall you were in agreement with me when it came to Anonymous and similar groups. Now you're trumpeting the virtues of WikiLeaks. They aren't legitimate. They don't vet anything they post. Now you're claiming there is no way any of the documents that were posted had been altered.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 8:39 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80548
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Your take on this is really weird. If I recall you were in agreement with me when it came to Anonymous and similar groups. Now you're trumpeting the virtues of WikiLeaks. They aren't legitimate. They don't vet anything they post. Now you're claiming there is no way any of the documents that were posted had been altered.


I've never been anti-Wikileaks and I think you and I have argued about Snowden. In any case, you're mistaken about the vetting that Wikileaks does. They have never released documents that were not authentic.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Your take on this is really weird. If I recall you were in agreement with me when it came to Anonymous and similar groups. Now you're trumpeting the virtues of WikiLeaks. They aren't legitimate. They don't vet anything they post. Now you're claiming there is no way any of the documents that were posted had been altered.


I've never been anti-Wikileaks and I think you and I have argued about Snowden. In any case, you're mistaken about the vetting that Wikileaks does. They have never released documents that were not authentic.


Congrats. This bumps you to a 10.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Your take on this is really weird. If I recall you were in agreement with me when it came to Anonymous and similar groups. Now you're trumpeting the virtues of WikiLeaks. They aren't legitimate. They don't vet anything they post. Now you're claiming there is no way any of the documents that were posted had been altered.


I've never been anti-Wikileaks and I think you and I have argued about Snowden. In any case, you're mistaken about the vetting that Wikileaks does. They have never released documents that were not authentic.


i'm pretty sure wikileaks is done, JORR. check out this little ~2-3min video from a few weeks ago and just kind of figure out what you wanna believe in your head. i know i did. only thing i can think of right now is that assange is maybe milking "is he dead?" stuff for the intrigue.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:37 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80548
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Your take on this is really weird. If I recall you were in agreement with me when it came to Anonymous and similar groups. Now you're trumpeting the virtues of WikiLeaks. They aren't legitimate. They don't vet anything they post. Now you're claiming there is no way any of the documents that were posted had been altered.


I've never been anti-Wikileaks and I think you and I have argued about Snowden. In any case, you're mistaken about the vetting that Wikileaks does. They have never released documents that were not authentic.


Congrats. This bumps you to a 10.



You can't fool me, leash. I know you love freedom as much as Julian and I do.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 11:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.

Shit, since Wikileaks has been putting in the Good Lord's work, those guys are looking more and more mainstream.

Its no longer a "theory" if there actually is a conspiracy afoot.


Yes and WikiLeaks has also posted false documents and clearly picked sides in this election. People celebrate places like Anonymous and WikiLeaks until they cross a line that offends them. Neither should be respected or encouraged.


This is fake news. Wikileaks has never posted false documents. You may not like their methods but they're as legitimate as a news source gets.


What methods? Posting stolen stuff that someone gives them without verifying any of the information? You have to be kidding me! Nothing about that is legitimate. Same with groups like Anonymous.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... are-they-/


You're just wrong about this. Wikileaks is extremely credible and always has been. In fact, that bullshit about "altered documents" was just something floated out there by the Clintons in their embarrassment over truth coming to light via Wikileaks. There were no altered documents.


Actually, the big story about those email docs being fake was gleaned from a pro-Clinton Twitter troll that would put out "fake news" in an attempt to have her opponents tricked into sourcing the false reports and thus embarrass themselves. Unfortunately the Clinton campaign saw a tweet and story from this guy and ran with it themselves. Oops!

You can't make this stuff up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 12:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:43 pm
Posts: 2220
pizza_Place: ....
pittmike wrote:
Per this, the emails weren't even hacked. There was a hand off to Wiki from a pissed of Democrat that didn't like the tilting of the election away from Sanders.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... iders.html

Seth Rich agrees.

_________________
I like thinking big. . . If you're going to be thinking anything, you might as well think big.
-Donald J. Trump, BPE
FavreFan wrote:
I apologize to The Hawk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 12:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
http://www.theverge.com/2016/12/14/1396 ... s-election

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:43 pm
Posts: 2220
pizza_Place: ....
GoldenJet wrote:
http://www.theverge.com/2016/12/14/13962434/putin-russia-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-hack-us-election

This is a re-gurgitation, dippy.

Democrats - you are wrong.

Get over it.

Trump is the man, he is better than your guy was, and he is going to be the best there ever was.

Don't fight it - Stop Hatin' and recognize.

_________________
I like thinking big. . . If you're going to be thinking anything, you might as well think big.
-Donald J. Trump, BPE
FavreFan wrote:
I apologize to The Hawk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 2:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
Panther pislA wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
http://www.theverge.com/2016/12/14/13962434/putin-russia-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-hack-us-election

This is a re-gurgitation, dippy.

Democrats - you are wrong.

Get over it.

Trump is the man, he is better than your guy was, and he is going to be the best there ever was.

Don't fight it - Stop Hatin' and recognize.

But she did win the fake 'popular' vote. Seems she spent millions and millions to do it.
Good job. Good job.

Image

They also had no yard signs for walkup people who requested them at many offices. Signs were considered "not a scientific way to increase the Vote."
8)


# :lol:
#clownShow
#Grownups

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 6:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Panther pislA wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
http://www.theverge.com/2016/12/14/13962434/putin-russia-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-hack-us-election

This is a re-gurgitation, dippy.

Democrats - you are wrong.

Get over it.

Trump is the man, he is better than your guy was, and he is going to be the best there ever was.

Don't fight it - Stop Hatin' and recognize.


Yup.

And again, ero actual evidence given to support the assertion. Also important to note that (paraphrasing) "the FBI and other agencies do not share the same this view..."
Now I definitely don't expect the media propaganda outlets to give their viewers that little nugget or point out thstz after all this, there is still zero actual evidence to support their claims. But, again, that's not the point. This is about mounting a counter attack on the incoming administration.

If you didn't believe the CIA to be a politicized agency before you should probably believe it now.

There is a group trying to mount a "soft coup" and it ain't the Russians.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 6:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Also the report also, kinda sorta, admits they have zero evidence. The whole thing is based off of the CIA saying no one else could have given the direction to plant two pieces of old shitty malware on a system or two. CIA says that only the "highest of placed officials" in the Kremlin could have done this. Putin is supreme ruler ergo Putin did this.

This gets dumber and more transparent by the day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 6:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93642
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
If we really want to be innovative we should just stop reading altogether.
That is how I live my life!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:18 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38779
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
We should believe Alex Jones and Breitbart or we should just go by how we feel or we could just bury our heads in the sand whenever something happens that challenges our beliefs.



Panther and chas have questioned the validity and honesty of the mainstream media here for years. They have now been proven correct with this election cycle.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19929
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
:lol:

The CIA has now cancelled their attendance (and thusbyhe actual meetings) with Congressional intelligence committee's. They said that the President's personal investigation was more important.

So, after making another baseless assertion that alleged that Putin was personally involved they simply walk away.

Take what the piece of shit anti-democracy slimeball Josh Earnest said, mix it with what Obama said on the Daily Show and I think the picture is becoming more clear.

Amazing.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 789 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 27  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group