I listened to some of the news that came out about Russia's alleged hacking yesterday, and none of it is credible in proving Russia's involvement at all.

Just because communications of some Russian officials celebrating the Trump victory were intercepted does not prove that they did any cyber meddling in U.S. politics. Can't they be glad for the result itself, as millions of people were in the U.S. to see Hillary lose?? She's a terrible person and an even worse candidate.

As for the motive they are peddling, that's laughable as well. "It's retaliation for Obama questioning the legitimacy of the Putin winning the last Russian election." That's a straw-man argument they created out of thin air made to fit their accusations against Russia, rather than being grounded in any facts.

But the media does not talk about the corruption in the DNC and in the Clinton campaign itself that was exposed in the e-mails, which is the real story; rather they just focus all the time on vilifying and scapegoating Russia. Sadly, the establishment is still alive in the Lindsey Grahams, John McCains and the main stream media, and they have no qualms about beating the war drums as a diversion for their heavy defeat in the elections. They would rather take the country to war than being found out for the traitors and criminals they really are.

Even if Russia had been involved in the hacking, they did the people of the United States a great service. They did what the U.S. media failed to do by exposing the DNC and Clinton corruption.

Putin made his career by engaging in this sort of activity.

Putin made his career by engaging in this sort of activity.