It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 3:18 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 789 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
denisdman wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Neither Republicans nor Democrats have a leg to stand on when it comes to hypocrisy.

Some are able to be objective about it and criticize their party and some are not.



Thank you Peeps.

You are a great American.


Poster of the year in 2016 from an objective observer. :wink:


Upvoted.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It seems very odd that many of the same people who have decried the concept of "American exceptionalism" for so long suddenly seem to be embracing it.


Funny how that works. The Republicans were in favor of free trade until the Obama administration completed TPP. You know that "gold standard" trade deal?


They were literally in favor of Obamacare and they loved patriotism too. One president made them reconsider.



No one was in favor of Obamacare except Obama and his party. And I think most Republicans still favor TPP. It's Trump that does not. And it was Hillary Clinton who called it "the gold standard". Let's keep these facts straight.

But back to my point, if you don't think America is exceptional and you don't believe American values are better than any other values, where is your moral high ground in criticizing Putin? Aren't his ideas just as good as any?


There you go again getting the facts wrong. Obamacare is virtually identical to the Republicans proposal in the 90's and it's identical to the healthcare plan Hillary ran on in 2008 and Obama trashed.

Something tells me that you'll become patriotic again in the next 4 to 8 years. Right now Putin is great.


Correct. Obama's health care plan was a '90's Republican idea that was an alternative to single payer. If you don't think the president who was an advocate of the ACA was huge reason it suddenly became "unpopular," you are ignoring reality. And that's coming from someone who thinks the ACA was a disaster.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33243
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
leashyourkids wrote:
Perhaps they feel that way because they believe our way is better but that it isn't our job or moral obligation to spread what we think is better to the rest of the world through force.


My stance in a nutshell. I would equate it to leading by example.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
denisdman wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Perhaps they feel that way because they believe our way is better but that it isn't our job or moral obligation to spread what we think is better to the rest of the world through force.


My stance in a nutshell. I would equate it to leading by example.


Nice sentiment but do you think leading by example will help against North Korea or Iran?

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:40 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't hate Obama. But his foreign policy has been an unmitigated disaster. Like so many liberals he assumes that everyone else is just like him and wants the same things he does, that people are reasonable and rationale. He reached out a hand to all these foreign governments and he drew back a figurative stump and now we're going to somehow figure out a way to blame Trump. Remember when "the world hated us because of George Bush." You couldn't have gotten it any more wrong. All the bowing and scraping of Obama and the world hates us more than ever.

If America doesn't want to lead, somebody else is going to. You have to decide, is our way the best way and worthy of being spread globally or should we be humble because our way is no different morally than anyone else's way. If you choose the latter you should shut the fuck up about Vladimir Putin.


Logical fallacy. False equivalency. You name it.

You are making an assumption that those who think we should be humble believe so because our way is no different than anyone else's way. Perhaps they feel that way because they believe our way is better but that it isn't our job or moral obligation to spread what we think is better to the rest of the world through force. There's so many assumptions being made, there's not enough room to list them.


If we're not going to spread our values you can bet your bottom dollar people like Putin will be more than willing to step in to spread theirs.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:40 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:

I don't believe that Barack Obama was an exceptional president. Therefore, I have no moral high ground to criticize Nazis. Exact same logic, right?


Not quite. In fact, not at all.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33243
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Hank Scorpio wrote:
denisdman wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Perhaps they feel that way because they believe our way is better but that it isn't our job or moral obligation to spread what we think is better to the rest of the world through force.


My stance in a nutshell. I would equate it to leading by example.


Nice sentiment but do you think leading by example will help against North Korea or Iran?


No, but has anything we have done with North Korea worked? They have ignored every agreement we signed with them to stop them from developing nukes.

I suspect we'll find out that Iran kept working on nukes to, but it's too soon for us to know on that. The Koreans duped Clinton, so we'll see how Obama fares with Iran.


My stance is that your army is for defense. I liked what we did after the Taliban ran planes into our buildings. We drove them quickly from power. I wish we would have left after that. You show force when provoked. I am not in favor of defending the South China Sea or Taiwan. I don't want to intervene for Japan or South Korea. I don't don't want to defend Eastern Europe either. Yes, it's naive.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

I don't believe that Barack Obama was an exceptional president. Therefore, I have no moral high ground to criticize Nazis. Exact same logic, right?


Not quite. In fact, not at all.


Please explain why. Your basic premise was that if you don't believe in "American Exceptionalism" (which carries connotations with it that we needn't even address, such as manifest destiny, a mandate by God, the height of human civilization), you have no moral ground to criticize anyone.

Am I misinterpreting what you said or is that pretty much it?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:45 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hank Scorpio wrote:
denisdman wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Perhaps they feel that way because they believe our way is better but that it isn't our job or moral obligation to spread what we think is better to the rest of the world through force.


My stance in a nutshell. I would equate it to leading by example.


Nice sentiment but do you think leading by example will help against North Korea or Iran?


Probably not. Here's the problem, MANY rightfully believe that we shouldn't be the world police and doing so is one of the MANY reasons our country is crumbling. If we aren't leading by example, we have to lead with our military strength. At some point that will lead to our downfall.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Nas wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
denisdman wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Perhaps they feel that way because they believe our way is better but that it isn't our job or moral obligation to spread what we think is better to the rest of the world through force.


My stance in a nutshell. I would equate it to leading by example.


Nice sentiment but do you think leading by example will help against North Korea or Iran?


Probably not. Here's the problem, MANY rightfully believe that we shouldn't be the world police and doing so is one of the MANY reasons our country is crumbling. If we aren't leading by example we have to lead with our military strength. At some point that will lead to our downfall.


I believe there's an argument to be made (whether I agree or not) that the big dog makes the rules, and the U.S. is as benevolent a big dog as we could hope for in a world such as ours. What I find ridiculous is the assertion that if one doesn't hold this view, they excuse the actions of every other entity on Earth. It's nonsense that doesn't take into account the idea by some - right or not - that it's not our job to police the world or that the rest of the world can work out the details of what is appropriate without the constant intervention of the U.S. Hell, that stance is one held by Trump himself.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Nas wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
denisdman wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Perhaps they feel that way because they believe our way is better but that it isn't our job or moral obligation to spread what we think is better to the rest of the world through force.


My stance in a nutshell. I would equate it to leading by example.


Nice sentiment but do you think leading by example will help against North Korea or Iran?


Probably not. Here's the problem, MANY rightfully believe that we shouldn't be the world police and doing so is one of the MANY reasons our country is crumbling. If we aren't leading by example we have to lead with our military strength. At some point that will lead to our downfall.


The funny thing is that I'm one of them. I don't think we should be Team America: World Police. I also realize that if shit is going to go down, we are the logical and oftentimes needed player to come in and get involved.

Sure we could pull defense spending back, and get all of troops back on home soil. We could cut a huge chunk of aid sent to other countries. All that money could be spent at home to build new roads, bridges, schools, hospitals etc. That would make America better. It's what we probably should do. I just don't know if we realistically CAN do it.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
And I say all that knowing that we sort of suck "helping" out. We drone strike civilians, we depose leaders that we don't like. Its all BS but we think we know better and at the end of the day if a country is going to depose leaders, I trust the USA over China or Russia.


Yes, I realize how stupid this all sounds. I'm tying myself in knots and arguing both sides.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:58 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

I don't believe that Barack Obama was an exceptional president. Therefore, I have no moral high ground to criticize Nazis. Exact same logic, right?


Not quite. In fact, not at all.


Please explain why. Your basic premise was that if you don't believe in "American Exceptionalism" (which carries connotations with it that we needn't even address, such as manifest destiny, a mandate by God, the height of human civilization), you have no moral ground to criticize anyone.

Am I misinterpreting what you said or is that pretty much it?


First, I would disagree that American exceptionalism is necessarily related to Manifest Destiny, although it certainly was used as a justification for such.

My premise is that if you don't believe America and American ideals and values are exceptional, why would the thought of Putin taking the lead upset you? Isn't his leadership just as good as anyone else's?

But here's where the phony baloney comes in. A person can fly a terrorist flag as an avatar but we all know he would never want to live under Hamas.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:01 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
Nas wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
denisdman wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Perhaps they feel that way because they believe our way is better but that it isn't our job or moral obligation to spread what we think is better to the rest of the world through force.


My stance in a nutshell. I would equate it to leading by example.


Nice sentiment but do you think leading by example will help against North Korea or Iran?


Probably not. Here's the problem, MANY rightfully believe that we shouldn't be the world police and doing so is one of the MANY reasons our country is crumbling. If we aren't leading by example we have to lead with our military strength. At some point that will lead to our downfall.


I believe there's an argument to be made (whether I agree or not) that the big dog makes the rules, and the U.S. is as benevolent a big dog as we could hope for in a world such as ours. What I find ridiculous is the assertion that if one doesn't hold this view, they excuse the actions of every other entity on Earth. It's nonsense that doesn't take into account the idea by some - right or not - that it's not our job to police the world or that the rest of the world can work out the details of what is appropriate without the constant intervention of the U.S. Hell, that stance is one held by Trump himself.


I don't believe a nation can be as wealthy and powerful as the U.S. and then shrink from the responsibilities such power suggests, either morally or practically. Doing so is simply allowing a Putin or someone even worse to lead.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:04 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Nas wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
denisdman wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Perhaps they feel that way because they believe our way is better but that it isn't our job or moral obligation to spread what we think is better to the rest of the world through force.


My stance in a nutshell. I would equate it to leading by example.


Nice sentiment but do you think leading by example will help against North Korea or Iran?


Probably not. Here's the problem, MANY rightfully believe that we shouldn't be the world police and doing so is one of the MANY reasons our country is crumbling. If we aren't leading by example we have to lead with our military strength. At some point that will lead to our downfall.


I believe there's an argument to be made (whether I agree or not) that the big dog makes the rules, and the U.S. is as benevolent a big dog as we could hope for in a world such as ours. What I find ridiculous is the assertion that if one doesn't hold this view, they excuse the actions of every other entity on Earth. It's nonsense that doesn't take into account the idea by some - right or not - that it's not our job to police the world or that the rest of the world can work out the details of what is appropriate without the constant intervention of the U.S. Hell, that stance is one held by Trump himself.


I don't believe a nation can be as wealthy and powerful as the U.S. and then shrink from the responsibilities such power suggests, either morally or practically. Doing so is simply allowing a Putin or someone even worse to lead.


I imagine Putin wants America to be the world police because it weakens us in just about every way.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

I don't believe that Barack Obama was an exceptional president. Therefore, I have no moral high ground to criticize Nazis. Exact same logic, right?


Not quite. In fact, not at all.


Please explain why. Your basic premise was that if you don't believe in "American Exceptionalism" (which carries connotations with it that we needn't even address, such as manifest destiny, a mandate by God, the height of human civilization), you have no moral ground to criticize anyone.

Am I misinterpreting what you said or is that pretty much it?


First, I would disagree that American exceptionalism is necessarily related to Manifest Destiny, although it certainly was used as a justification for such.


You really could have stopped there. American "Exceptionalism" was the primary basis behind the Monroe Doctrine and "manifest destiny" with all the less savory realities or beliefs that go/went with it. Morality discussions really can't be held in that area.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:06 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hank Scorpio wrote:
And I say all that knowing that we sort of suck "helping" out. We drone strike civilians, we depose leaders that we don't like. Its all BS but we think we know better and at the end of the day if a country is going to depose leaders, I trust the USA over China or Russia.


Yes, I realize how stupid this all sounds. I'm tying myself in knots and arguing both sides.


I imagine most people are close to your position outside of the hawks.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

I don't believe that Barack Obama was an exceptional president. Therefore, I have no moral high ground to criticize Nazis. Exact same logic, right?


Not quite. In fact, not at all.


Please explain why. Your basic premise was that if you don't believe in "American Exceptionalism" (which carries connotations with it that we needn't even address, such as manifest destiny, a mandate by God, the height of human civilization), you have no moral ground to criticize anyone.

Am I misinterpreting what you said or is that pretty much it?


First, I would disagree that American exceptionalism is necessarily related to Manifest Destiny, although it certainly was used as a justification for such.

My premise is that if you don't believe America and American ideals and values are exceptional, why would the thought of Putin taking the lead upset you? Isn't his leadership just as good as anyone else's?

But here's where the phony baloney comes in. A person can fly a terrorist flag as an avatar but we all know he would never want to live under Hamas.


I can't speak on behalf of Seacrest's avatar, nor do I think his or any other would be a pertinent part of this conversation.

But we must define American Exceptionalism before we could even move forward with such a debate. Here it is, from Google:

In its classic forms, American exceptionalism refers to the special character of the United States as a uniquely free nation based on democratic ideals and personal liberty.

And American ideals are most certainly not "exceptional" anymore unless you consider 99% of all wealth going to 1% of earners. That's about the only area we lead the world... oh, and in military spending. That said, American ideals are far more favorable than a good portion of the world. We still (sort of) have a Democracy. We will (sort of) believe in freedom. We still believe in the idea of education, even though we are terrible at it. But perhaps more importantly, we really do have a government that has a separation of powers that, though eroded, has strong institutions and the strong rule of law. To compare it to Vladimir Putin's beliefs is just hyperbole. One can recognize the downfalls of America without wanting Putin, a known evil and brutal individual with very little regard for human life, to "take the lead"... even though half of Conservative America loves him because they have Daddy Issues.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:33 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

I don't believe that Barack Obama was an exceptional president. Therefore, I have no moral high ground to criticize Nazis. Exact same logic, right?


Not quite. In fact, not at all.


Please explain why. Your basic premise was that if you don't believe in "American Exceptionalism" (which carries connotations with it that we needn't even address, such as manifest destiny, a mandate by God, the height of human civilization), you have no moral ground to criticize anyone.

Am I misinterpreting what you said or is that pretty much it?


First, I would disagree that American exceptionalism is necessarily related to Manifest Destiny, although it certainly was used as a justification for such.

My premise is that if you don't believe America and American ideals and values are exceptional, why would the thought of Putin taking the lead upset you? Isn't his leadership just as good as anyone else's?

But here's where the phony baloney comes in. A person can fly a terrorist flag as an avatar but we all know he would never want to live under Hamas.


I can't speak on behalf of Seacrest's avatar, nor do I think his or any other would be a pertinent part of this conversation.

But we must define American Exceptionalism before we could even move forward with such a debate. Here it is, from Google:

In its classic forms, American exceptionalism refers to the special character of the United States as a uniquely free nation based on democratic ideals and personal liberty.

And American ideals are most certainly not "exceptional" anymore unless you consider 99% of all wealth going to 1% of earners. That's about the only area we lead the world... oh, and in military spending. That said, American ideals are far more favorable than a good portion of the world. We still (sort of) have a Democracy. We will (sort of) believe in freedom. We still believe in the idea of education, even though we are terrible at it. But perhaps more importantly, we really do have a government that has a separation of powers that, though eroded, has strong institutions and the strong rule of law. To compare it to Vladimir Putin's beliefs is just hyperbole. One can recognize the downfalls of America without wanting Putin, a known evil and brutal individual with very little regard for human life, to "take the lead"... even though half of Conservative America loves him because they have Daddy Issues.


I don't believe anyone has suggested America does not have her flaws, but it sounds like you do believe in American exceptionalism.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:34 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:

I imagine Putin wants America to be the world police because it weakens us in just about every way.


What?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:

I imagine Putin wants America to be the world police because it weakens us in just about every way.


What?


Stretching our military thin weakens us militarily and economically.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 4:29 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:

I imagine Putin wants America to be the world police because it weakens us in just about every way.


What?


Stretching our military thin weakens us militarily and economically.



There are certainly ways for a superpower to exert geopolitical influence without getting mired down in all kinds of ground wars. Coming off of eight years of Obama we have enemies that do not fear us and allies that do not trust us. That Syrian "red line" was about the worst thing Obama did.

The Libertarian idea of disengaging from the rest of the world is not practicable. We have commitments. I'm sure Kirkwood is familiar with the Budapest Security Memorandum. Ukraine and Belarus gave up their nukes in exchange for the honoring of their borders and sovereignty. Should we now allow Putin to steamroll Ukraine?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 4:52 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:

I imagine Putin wants America to be the world police because it weakens us in just about every way.


What?


Stretching our military thin weakens us militarily and economically.



There are certainly ways for a superpower to exert geopolitical influence without getting mired down in all kinds of ground wars. Coming off of eight years of Obama we have enemies that do not fear us and allies that do not trust us. That Syrian "red line" was about the worst thing Obama did.

The Libertarian idea of disengaging from the rest of the world is not practicable. We have commitments. I'm sure Kirkwood is familiar with the Budapest Security Memorandum. Ukraine and Belarus gave up their nukes in exchange for the honoring of their borders and sovereignty. Should we now allow Putin to steamroll Ukraine?


If I am not mistaken Ukraine can thank Clinton for that. So we should go to war with Russia? Russia knows that we won't attack them. Sure we can get them kicked out of the G8 and do things to hurt their economy but that's it. Clearly nothing we have done in decades have been effective.

President Obama got played when it came to the red line comment. Republicans demanded he get tough and draw a line in the sand and when he did they bscked away and said they weren't going to support a military intervention. Basically the president was on his own.

By every measure we are respected in more places around the world than we were in 2009.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 4:58 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38779
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

I don't believe that Barack Obama was an exceptional president. Therefore, I have no moral high ground to criticize Nazis. Exact same logic, right?


Not quite. In fact, not at all.


Please explain why. Your basic premise was that if you don't believe in "American Exceptionalism" (which carries connotations with it that we needn't even address, such as manifest destiny, a mandate by God, the height of human civilization), you have no moral ground to criticize anyone.

Am I misinterpreting what you said or is that pretty much it?


First, I would disagree that American exceptionalism is necessarily related to Manifest Destiny, although it certainly was used as a justification for such.


You really could have stopped there. American "Exceptionalism" was the primary basis behind the Monroe Doctrine and "manifest destiny" with all the less savory realities or beliefs that go/went with it. Morality discussions really can't be held in that area.



If you want to discuss the less savory aspects and realities of the Monroe Doctrine or American Exceptionalism, then you have already placed a moral judgement on what they ended up causing.

Which is a discussion worth having. And one you have already started.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 4:59 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
By every measure we are respected in more places around the world than we were in 2009.


What are those measures you're referencing?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:01 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
By every measure we are respected in more places around the world than we were in 2009.


What are those measures you're referencing?


Polls and cooperation.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
By every measure we are respected in more places around the world than we were in 2009.


What are those measures you're referencing?


Polls and cooperation.


Amy Poehler is funny in that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
This is all a moot point anyway. Regardless of how well we are rec'd now vs 2009, its all going to crash down when our POTUS tweets about Merkel being very overrated and ugly to boot or Hollande being a dumb loser...

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Peoria Matt wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
By every measure we are respected in more places around the world than we were in 2009.


What are those measures you're referencing?


Polls and cooperation.


Amy Poehler is funny in that.


:lol:

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:13 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hank Scorpio wrote:
This is all a moot point anyway. Regardless of how well we are rec'd now vs 2009, its all going to crash down when our POTUS tweets about Merkel being very overrated and ugly to boot or Hollande being a dumb loser...


That's strength. We all know these broads need to be put in their places.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 789 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group