Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
JORR I will give you credit for your commitment to your character.
Look, I think it's petty for the President of the United States to be concerned with this type of bullshit, but that's who this guy is. But he wasn't necessarily wrong in his feelings. It was pretty ironic that she ended her rant with, "When the powerful use their position to bully others, we all lose." What was she doing if not using her power to bully? These wealthy and powerful actors haven't figured out that people who have real everyday problems don't want to be lectured by those who live in Malibu mansions with a bunch of servants.
Here's the thing though. Why does Trump as POETUS even exist? Because he was a celebrity running his mouth about politics. Inconvenient but unavoidable fact. So the Trumpkins really should have no complaint here other than for the most part they have skin thinner than Chas and don't like other opinions.
I disagree with you there. Trump himself has thin skin, obviously, but I think we've seen post-election which supporters are really thin-skinned.
I think anyone who is objective can see that Trump is being covered differently and not in a positive way. The answer to that seems to be a dismissive, "Well, he is different" as if that's justification.
You don't strike me as an Establishment guy. I realize Establishment types have a prototype for who they would like as president, someone who has "experience", which I guess means having been a governor or a senator. Trump isn't the anti-Establishment guy you or I would have liked, but I think we should recognize that much of the heat he is taking is based on him not being a traditional candidate, not being a creature of the status quo. Having said that, of course he is often his own worst enemy. Why does the most powerful man in the world need to concern himself with the star of
She-Devil?
I think anybody who is objective can acknowledge if the press had covered Trump the same way they covered the Hill Dawg he's not PEOTUS.
The special snowflakes on the left that need their safe room need to grow up, as do the Trumpkins who can't take any criticism and facts about him.
I know the board hates hypotheticals (when it goes against them at least), but riddle me this:
HRC wins, and it is likely that Putin released info about DJT to help influence voting
She names DWS and Jordan Hoffner as her Chiefs of Staff
She names Chelsea's husband as a senior advisor
She names DeRay and his vest as AG
She fills the Cabinet with Goldman execs and donors to the Clinton Foundation
Oh and she wants them all approved before the FBI and ethics reports are done.
Do you really think that would be met with the resounding "meh" and shrug we are currently seeing from Congress and the Right?
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
This might be a bit much.