It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 5:06 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 566 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 19  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 4:32 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I would argue, though, that harping on the bad, ugly things alleged in the (then) secret dossier--BUT NOT MAKING ANY CLAIM ABOUT ITS VERACITY--in a story about people being briefed on the existence of the document begins to deviate from ethical journalism.


No question.


I don't recall seeing you post things like this when the NYT kept breaking stories about Hillary that weren't accurate. You dust the cape off for Trump and care about fairness and objectivity now.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
http://www.cnn.com/breaking-news/jorr-h ... index.html

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
BREAKING:Real American Hero worked with Orange Revolution to knee cap Duk of Death

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

Kiev officials are scrambling to make amends with the president-elect after quietly working to boost Clinton.

By KENNETH P. VOGEL and DAVID STERN 01/11/17 05:05 AM EST

Donald Trump wasn't the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton's allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort's resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump's campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine's foe to the east, Russia.
------------------------------------------

#foxNews
#truth2power

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23568
pizza_Place: Giordano's
veganfan21 wrote:
You're conflating several things here. First of all, CNN said it could not corroborate the claims made in the dossier, which is why they didn't publish the contents.


Here are some choice quotes from the CNN piece:

"...included allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump, multiple US officials with direct knowledge of the briefings tell CNN."

"... to demonstrate that Russia had compiled information potentially harmful to both political parties, but only released information damaging to Hillary Clinton and Democrats."

"The two-page synopsis also included allegations that there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government, according to two national security officials."

Only then do they say:

"At this point, CNN is not reporting on details of the memos, as it has not independently corroborated the specific allegations."

To which they added:

"But, in preparing this story, CNN has spoken to multiple high ranking intelligence, administration, congressional and law enforcement officials, as well as foreign officials and others in the private sector with direct knowledge of the memos."

So they're not reporting on the specific details of the memos, merely reporting the contents of a synopsis of the memos they're not reporting on. Their sourcing and verification of the existence of the dossier and the synopsis, as well as the relevant briefings, are all above board. However, to spend so much time (1) on the details of the synopsis of the memos and (2) detailing the bona fides of the former intelligence agent who amassed the memos and vouch for their credibility is, I think, ethically murky.

The briefing happened, the synopsis is real (in that it exists), as is the dossier. That makes reporting of the briefing newsworthy, but I think the CNN story spends a bit too much time tacitly vouching for the credibility of the memos via the credibility of the synopsis and the dossier's creator. CNN isn't guilty of perpetuating "fake news", but I'd say they'll have quite a bit of egg on their face if this dossier turns out to be completely fake.

Quote:
I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to say here. If you're saying Buzzfeed is guilty of "publishing fake news," then you may have some grounds.


I do have grounds, and yes, that is what I am saying. IF this dossier turns out to be contrived bullshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 4:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I would argue, though, that harping on the bad, ugly things alleged in the (then) secret dossier--BUT NOT MAKING ANY CLAIM ABOUT ITS VERACITY--in a story about people being briefed on the existence of the document begins to deviate from ethical journalism.


No question.


I don't recall seeing you post things like this when the NYT kept breaking stories about Hillary that weren't accurate. You dust the cape off for Trump and care about fairness and objectivity now.


You keep repeating this without any examples. Yesterday there were "millions". You're sort of like Trump in that regard. You seem to think if you keep repeating some bullshit you can make it true.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
Image


#warandPeace
#leeOswald

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:04 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38779
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
BeerFan wrote:
Image


#warandPeace
#leeOswald



:lol: :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:06 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I would argue, though, that harping on the bad, ugly things alleged in the (then) secret dossier--BUT NOT MAKING ANY CLAIM ABOUT ITS VERACITY--in a story about people being briefed on the existence of the document begins to deviate from ethical journalism.


No question.


I don't recall seeing you post things like this when the NYT kept breaking stories about Hillary that weren't accurate. You dust the cape off for Trump and care about fairness and objectivity now.


You keep repeating this without any examples. Yesterday there were "millions". You're sort of like Trump in that regard. You seem to think if you keep repeating some bullshit you can make it true.


You probably should read more because I gave it to you. Not surprisingly you didn't respond. Besides there are many stories that were written about Obama and other people that weren't accurate.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:07 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Seacrest wrote:
BeerFan wrote:
Image


#warandPeace
#leeOswald



:lol: :lol:


+ :lol:

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:52 pm
Posts: 516
pizza_Place: Barraco's
chaspoppcap wrote:
Might be the shortest Presidency in history.

So Russia has info about Trump - how does that shorten his presidency?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
ChiefWampum wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Might be the shortest Presidency in history.

So Russia has info about Trump - how does that shorten his presidency?

Cablinasians4Trump say about Trump's first presser, "He's crushing it!"
Some are saying Congress should make him President for Life based on his mastery of The Worst People Inna World.

McCain says torture doesn't work. Le Grande Orange just confirmed it in his presser.

#DeardearLeader
#OrangeisNewBalck

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:28 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38779
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
ChiefWampum wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Might be the shortest Presidency in history.

So Russia has info about Trump - how does that shorten his presidency?


How are they able to use it to compromise him?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
Seacrest wrote:
ChiefWampum wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Might be the shortest Presidency in history.

So Russia has info about Trump - how does that shorten his presidency?


How are they able to use it to compromise him?

Who killed Rusty Staub? (or SomeGuy)


Image


#jimAcostaisdeadmanwalking
#KarlBurnstine

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1214
pizza_Place: Mariano's
Drudge Report front page above the fold: :lol: :lol:

Image
DEMENTED MCCAIN TURNS DIRTY...
Dossier Financed By Rival Campaigns, SuperPACs?
MEDIA AND CIA FALL FOR 'GOLDEN SHOWER' HOAX...
SPOOKS GET TROLLED!
SPY AGENCIES EXPOSED...
Russian tech expert named in report never contacted by US intel...
GREENWALD: 'Deep State' Sabotage...
EXACT REVENGE ON PRESIDENT-IN-WAITING...
SCHUMER WARNED...
Russia slams 'nonsense' claims about perverted hooker romp...
Pulp Fiction...


#ecstacy
#withoutend
#transcendental

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
You're conflating several things here. First of all, CNN said it could not corroborate the claims made in the dossier, which is why they didn't publish the contents.


Here are some choice quotes from the CNN piece:

"...included allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump, multiple US officials with direct knowledge of the briefings tell CNN."

"... to demonstrate that Russia had compiled information potentially harmful to both political parties, but only released information damaging to Hillary Clinton and Democrats."

"The two-page synopsis also included allegations that there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government, according to two national security officials."

Only then do they say:

"At this point, CNN is not reporting on details of the memos, as it has not independently corroborated the specific allegations."

To which they added:

"But, in preparing this story, CNN has spoken to multiple high ranking intelligence, administration, congressional and law enforcement officials, as well as foreign officials and others in the private sector with direct knowledge of the memos."

So they're not reporting on the specific details of the memos, merely reporting the contents of a synopsis of the memos they're not reporting on. Their sourcing and verification of the existence of the dossier and the synopsis, as well as the relevant briefings, are all above board. However, to spend so much time (1) on the details of the synopsis of the memos and (2) detailing the bona fides of the former intelligence agent who amassed the memos and vouch for their credibility is, I think, ethically murky.

The briefing happened, the synopsis is real (in that it exists), as is the dossier. That makes reporting of the briefing newsworthy, but I think the CNN story spends a bit too much time tacitly vouching for the credibility of the memos via the credibility of the synopsis and the dossier's creator. CNN isn't guilty of perpetuating "fake news", but I'd say they'll have quite a bit of egg on their face if this dossier turns out to be completely fake.

Quote:
I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to say here. If you're saying Buzzfeed is guilty of "publishing fake news," then you may have some grounds.


I do have grounds, and yes, that is what I am saying. IF this dossier turns out to be contrived bullshit.


I think you're choosing to interpret CNN vouching for the existence of the memo and detailing the credentials of the agent as tacit substantiation of the contents. What CNN is doing is nothing more than simply providing a sufficient amount of detail so as to describe exactly what is going on here. And supposing that this is tacit endorsement of the contents, it would make little sense to then undermine that endorsement by stating they are unable to verify the contents. I don't see this as ethically murky as you put it, but more so thorough - and descriptive - reporting. Finally, I think you've got it wrong when you say CNN will have egg on its face if the dossier is a complete fabrication. It is not CNN who will have egg on its face, but rather the officials and/or elected representatives who were duped into believing these documents were authentic enough to warrant alerting the highest levels of government as to their contents. CNN simply fulfilled its function by descriptively reporting what went on - whether the document that officials and elected representatives circulated among themselves is authentic or not is irrelevant to CNN, unless CNN somehow withheld knowledge regarding the veracity of the dossier.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33906
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
BeerFan wrote:
Cablinasians4Trump say about Trump's first presser, "He's crushing it!"
Some are saying Congress should make him President for Life based on his mastery of The Worst People Inna World.

McCain says torture doesn't work. Le Grande Orange just confirmed it in his presser.

#DeardearLeader
#OrangeisNewBalck


Not a big fan of the name calling in these cases but Le Grande Orange is a good one.


Last edited by Spaulding on Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:26 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 34038
Pretty good interview right now with Anderson Cooper and Trump's girl. They're showing the entire interview unedited. They're coming back with the 4th segment now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:28 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Beardown wrote:
Pretty good interview right now with Anderson Cooper and Trump's girl. They're showing the entire interview unedited. They're coming back with the 4th segment now.


I love her as much as I dislike Trump. She's one of the best bullshitters you'll ever see.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:39 pm 
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I would argue, though, that harping on the bad, ugly things alleged in the (then) secret dossier--BUT NOT MAKING ANY CLAIM ABOUT ITS VERACITY--in a story about people being briefed on the existence of the document begins to deviate from ethical journalism.


No question.


I don't recall seeing you post things like this when the NYT kept breaking stories about Hillary that weren't accurate. You dust the cape off for Trump and care about fairness and objectivity now.


You keep repeating this without any examples. Yesterday there were "millions". You're sort of like Trump in that regard. You seem to think if you keep repeating some bullshit you can make it true.

So you admit Trump is full of shit? And now exactly would one prove that you didn't post something?


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13465
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I would argue, though, that harping on the bad, ugly things alleged in the (then) secret dossier--BUT NOT MAKING ANY CLAIM ABOUT ITS VERACITY--in a story about people being briefed on the existence of the document begins to deviate from ethical journalism.


No question.

Sheppard Smith wrote:
“Though we at Fox News cannot confirm CNN’s report, it is our observation that its correspondents followed journalistic standards,” Smith said. “Neither they, nor any other journalists, should be subjected to belittling and delegitimizing by the president-elect of the United States.”

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:00 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Baby McNown wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I would argue, though, that harping on the bad, ugly things alleged in the (then) secret dossier--BUT NOT MAKING ANY CLAIM ABOUT ITS VERACITY--in a story about people being briefed on the existence of the document begins to deviate from ethical journalism.


No question.


I don't recall seeing you post things like this when the NYT kept breaking stories about Hillary that weren't accurate. You dust the cape off for Trump and care about fairness and objectivity now.


You keep repeating this without any examples. Yesterday there were "millions". You're sort of like Trump in that regard. You seem to think if you keep repeating some bullshit you can make it true.

So you admit Trump is full of shit? And now exactly would one prove that you didn't post something?



I've never said Trump was anything but full of shit. This conversation is about the media. This is what I mean about a lack of objectivity. You apparently feel that anything goes if it's a person you don't like.

And we're nit talking about anything I posted. I'm still waiting for Nas to post just a few of the million fake anti-Clinton stories he claims were published by the NYT.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I would argue, though, that harping on the bad, ugly things alleged in the (then) secret dossier--BUT NOT MAKING ANY CLAIM ABOUT ITS VERACITY--in a story about people being briefed on the existence of the document begins to deviate from ethical journalism.


No question.

Sheppard Smith wrote:
“Though we at Fox News cannot confirm CNN’s report, it is our observation that its correspondents followed journalistic standards,” Smith said. “Neither they, nor any other journalists, should be subjected to belittling and delegitimizing by the president-elect of the United States.”


:lol: So now Sheppard Smith is an authority on journalistic integrity? Who are you going to quote next? Sean Hannity?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13465
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I would argue, though, that harping on the bad, ugly things alleged in the (then) secret dossier--BUT NOT MAKING ANY CLAIM ABOUT ITS VERACITY--in a story about people being briefed on the existence of the document begins to deviate from ethical journalism.


No question.

Sheppard Smith wrote:
“Though we at Fox News cannot confirm CNN’s report, it is our observation that its correspondents followed journalistic standards,” Smith said. “Neither they, nor any other journalists, should be subjected to belittling and delegitimizing by the president-elect of the United States.”


:lol: So now Sheppard Smith is an authority on journalistic integrity? Who are you going to quote next? Sean Hannity?

Surely even you realize the distinction between Smith and Hannity.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I would argue, though, that harping on the bad, ugly things alleged in the (then) secret dossier--BUT NOT MAKING ANY CLAIM ABOUT ITS VERACITY--in a story about people being briefed on the existence of the document begins to deviate from ethical journalism.


No question.


I don't recall seeing you post things like this when the NYT kept breaking stories about Hillary that weren't accurate. You dust the cape off for Trump and care about fairness and objectivity now.


You keep repeating this without any examples. Yesterday there were "millions". You're sort of like Trump in that regard. You seem to think if you keep repeating some bullshit you can make it true.

So you admit Trump is full of shit? And now exactly would one prove that you didn't post something?



I've never said Trump was anything but full of shit. This conversation is about the media. This is what I mean about a lack of objectivity. You apparently feel that anything goes if it's a person you don't like.

And we're nit talking about anything I posted. I'm still waiting for Nas to post just a few of the million fake anti-Clinton stories he claims were published by the NYT.




viewtopic.php?f=47&t=104403&hilit=NYT&start=60

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I would argue, though, that harping on the bad, ugly things alleged in the (then) secret dossier--BUT NOT MAKING ANY CLAIM ABOUT ITS VERACITY--in a story about people being briefed on the existence of the document begins to deviate from ethical journalism.


No question.

Sheppard Smith wrote:
“Though we at Fox News cannot confirm CNN’s report, it is our observation that its correspondents followed journalistic standards,” Smith said. “Neither they, nor any other journalists, should be subjected to belittling and delegitimizing by the president-elect of the United States.”


:lol: So now Sheppard Smith is an authority on journalistic integrity? Who are you going to quote next? Sean Hannity?

Surely even you realize the distinction between Smith and Hannity.


Useful quote from Smith but I don't think it's needed - the credibility and objectivity of the CNN report is self evident. Trump and his fans can't or refuse to distinguish between what CNN did and what BuzzFeed did.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:26 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
veganfan21 wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I would argue, though, that harping on the bad, ugly things alleged in the (then) secret dossier--BUT NOT MAKING ANY CLAIM ABOUT ITS VERACITY--in a story about people being briefed on the existence of the document begins to deviate from ethical journalism.


No question.

Sheppard Smith wrote:
“Though we at Fox News cannot confirm CNN’s report, it is our observation that its correspondents followed journalistic standards,” Smith said. “Neither they, nor any other journalists, should be subjected to belittling and delegitimizing by the president-elect of the United States.”


:lol: So now Sheppard Smith is an authority on journalistic integrity? Who are you going to quote next? Sean Hannity?

Surely even you realize the distinction between Smith and Hannity.


Useful quote from Smith but I don't think it's needed - the credibility and objectivity of the CNN report is self evident. Trump and his fans can't or refuse to distinguish between what CNN did and what BuzzFeed did.



There's certainly a distinction but JLN made a point about CNN's "synopsis" of the document. There's a reason nobody else touched the story. If Sheppard Smith thinks it's legit he should report it himself, shouldn't he?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:26 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Here is Objective JORR'S reaction when something about Hillary may be wrong:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Julian Assange and the NYT are lying. Yeah, everything is a smear of the Clintons. It's a vast right-wing conspiracy.


viewtopic.php?f=75&t=101570&p=2517519&hilit=NYT#p2517519

We've all seen how he reacts even when things about Trump are true.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Nas wrote:
Here is Objective JORR'S reaction when something about Hillary may be wrong:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Julian Assange and the NYT are lying. Yeah, everything is a smear of the Clintons. It's a vast right-wing conspiracy.


http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.ph ... T#p2517519

We've all seen how he reacts even when things about Trump are true.


Image

Also, Shepherd Smith is a good cat and as far as I can remember always has been.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:32 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Here is Objective JORR'S reaction when something about Hillary may be wrong:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Julian Assange and the NYT are lying. Yeah, everything is a smear of the Clintons. It's a vast right-wing conspiracy.


viewtopic.php?f=75&t=101570&p=2517519&hilit=NYT#p2517519

We've all seen how he reacts even when things about Trump are true.


You keep hitting this theme that Wikileaks is unreliable when there's not a single instance of them releasing bad info.

And are you suggesting the story you linked isn't accurate?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:33 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Don Tiny wrote:
Nas wrote:
Here is Objective JORR'S reaction when something about Hillary may be wrong:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Julian Assange and the NYT are lying. Yeah, everything is a smear of the Clintons. It's a vast right-wing conspiracy.


viewtopic.php?f=75&t=101570&p=2517519&hilit=NYT#p2517519

We've all seen how he reacts even when things about Trump are true.


Image

Also, Shepherd Smith is a good cat and as far as I can remember always has been.


Are you a fan of Fox News now?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 566 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 19  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group