It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 2:34 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 162 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Of course a black man and/or a woman has a harder time becoming President than a white man. It's crazy to disagree with that.
Hillary didn't though. She had every political position she ever had gift wrapped to her.

I mean, people were honestly arguing during the election that being first lady is more experience than being a Senator!

She was gifted her Senate seat because of it and then proceeded to get outworked and beaten in two other national elections.

I mean, she literally almost won the Presidency simply because her husband was President before.


Honestly. She was so experienced as a first lady, except when it was something negative. Then she should not be blamed for his mistakes.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Last edited by WaitingforRuffcorn on Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:36 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
He had to work very hard to make the majority comfortable. He wasn't on an equal playing field as everyone else.


Doesn't every candidate? And don't you think that he enjoyed some advantages such as record African American support and some media cheerleading? I don't think being black proved to be an obstacle.


No disrespect but of course you don't think it was an obstacle. Many whites feel that way and you're wrong.


The you will never understand what it's like argument.
If you have some sort of primordial knowledge due to the accident of your heritage then there will always be a divide. I believe these divisions are of our own creating, and that if we really want to solve race issue this special status needs to go away as well. People can understand what it is like to be mistreated, bullied or overlooked. Is it exactly the same? Probably not, but to claim white people will never understand is putting this into the status of religion and original sin.


You can believe whatever you want. I'm sure it makes you feel good and sleep well at night but it's wrong. Talk to any successful minority and you'll more likely than not hear stories about how they had to work harder and overcome many more obstacles than a white man. Talk to successful women over 50 and you'll hear similar stories. This is reality. It's not groups of people pretending to be victims.


Stories of working hard don't change the argument, which has become an emotional one. Right now based on income figures, Asian Americans are the most successful group in the United States. If whites were this unified group looking to hold minorities down in the United States, how would this be the case? Should I not sleep well at night because I was born white, which means I have blood on my hands for sins that occurred before my lifespan?

If all black people feel like whites are going to pull the carpet out whenever they feel like it, it's so self-defeating that there will always be a racial divide. I am not sure what the benchmark has to be reached to change this perception. A black man was elected president, yet that is being discredited because he "made people comfortable".

I don't think that the accident of my heritage provides me with any special insight into past sins, and we seem to be venturing into a realm past "equality" whatever that means. Would reparations make things better? I honestly do not know because the goalposts keep moving.


You can continue to dismiss these stories and sleep well at night because you don't have to live it. Having a skill that MANY lack will create exceptions this isn't hard to understand.

Recent and not so recent history gives MANY blacks and women valid reasons to be suspicious.

Go fuck yourself with that tired reparations argument.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
long time guy wrote:
[No you wouldn't.


you know you are pretty irritating sometimes. you don't know me from shit. I don't lie.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Of course a black man and/or a woman has a harder time becoming President than a white man. It's crazy to disagree with that.
Hillary didn't though. She had every political position she ever had gift wrapped to her.

I mean, people were honestly arguing during the election that being first lady is more experience than being a Senator!

She was gifted her Senate seat because of it and then proceeded to get outworked and beaten in two other national elections.

I mean, she literally almost won the Presidency simply because her husband was President before.

But she didn't win. And besides, like I already mentioned, I'm looking at the whole picture, not just individual political races.
You said "becoming President". We can only look at individual political races.

No. You could look at all the data for candidates and look at the entire congress and other things like that to get a better idea of who's more likely to become a major candidate. That wouldn't help your argument though. What you are doing here is the equivalent of looking at a 3 game sample size in sports and saying it's more predictive than the entire seasons worth of results.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:37 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Of course a black man and/or a woman has a harder time becoming President than a white man. It's crazy to disagree with that.



Really? Obama had an easier time than McCain, didn't he?

Yes. On an individual level there are exceptions. On the macro scale the numbers overwhelmingly support Nas in this debate.



That's the thing though. There is no "macro level" when we're talking about running for president. Every person who is even a consideration is a highly privileged individual regardless of sex, race, or anything else.

Your last sentence is true but it's not a rebuttal to my post. Look at all the Presidents in history. Look at all the current Senators and House Reps. Look at all the major candidates for office over the past 20 years. I have yet to see you or anyone else make a reasonable case that a white person does not have an advantage when running for President. Until you can find something else to say besides Obama he's clearly the exception that proves the rule.


Obviously for most of those years only a white man could be president. For many of them blacks and women couldn't even vote.

Fast forward to the 21st Century and I think it's about individuals. The sample of people who will ever run for president is small. Any woman and any black person in the 2017 class at Harvard or Yale has an advantage over you or me when it comes to running for president.

If everyone is simply going to vote his or her identity, most presidents should be white females.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:38 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hatchetman wrote:
Nas wrote:
MANY times it's working hard to overcome whatever stereotype that people have of a person who looks like you. Not appearing to be a threat. Carrying yourself and speaking in ways no one else has to. Taking assignments no one else wants (with a smile) and not just doing well at them but needing to be great at them. Making everyone around you comfortable even at the expense of your own dignity because in your heart you believe this is your only shot at being successful and if you fuck it up there won't be another.


this is how MANY people feel, not just blacks. disabled, Latino, immigrant parents, POOR, whatever...we need to make this a better country by easing the path to economic success for everybody. a social media competition to decide which group is most disadvantaged and who is supposed to feel guilty about it will get nowhere.


You will get no argument from me or MANY other people with that statement. However pretending that we all have an equal opportunity to succeed is bullshit.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
We don't have to look at history. I said to keep it to the past 20 years and also look at the entire Senate and House, which is the closest to President you can get and look at the CURRENT demographics. This is a really simple debate. All the data points to one correct answer.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Your ignorance regarding her role in the Clinton White House and governorship knows no limits. Oh Yeah the Emails.
What did she accomplish?
long time guy wrote:
Giuiiani could have run for Senator and she'd have beaten him too. The gift wrapping of the spot is Conservative Republican revisionist spin.
"could have". You thought she'd beat Trump too.



So did a lot of people including you. I yeah you were just trolling when you suggest Trump would win. How was the seat gift wrapped?
I thought Hillary would win too. I underestimated just how bad she is at politics.

So what were her accomplishments as first lady?

It was gift wrapped because they spent an inordinate amount of money to win a Democratic stronghold state in an election where her opponent dropped out due to cancer.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Nas wrote:
[However pretending that we all have an equal opportunity to succeed is bullshit.



But virtually NO ONE but the criminally stupid would argue otherwise.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82996
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
I saw the movie Hidden Figures the other day with my kids. Good movie BTW. There was a clip of MLK in it. got me to be thinking afterward about his pillars of non-violence and Christianity. Two things not really front and center among "black elite" today - I use that term b/c I don't know what else to call people like Ta-Nahisi Coates and his milieu.

Interesting his quote above “Our loyalties must become ecumenical rather than national.” Instead of policing their borders, nations should “develop an overriding loyalty to mankind as a whole.”

I guess except when that comes to Catholics in South Vietnam.



Coates is not exactly a man of the people: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc ... gs/481818/



I don't dislike Coates and he made a compelling case in his reparations article, which is really what put him on the map, but one thing that he was wrong about- and it's already a meme- is that "all Trump had to do to be president was to be white and rich". That sounds nice as a soundbite designed to highlight the struggles of Obama, but upon just a tiny bit of thought, it's clearly untrue. There are many, many rich white guys who have desperately tried to be president again and again and failed. There's even a rich white woman who probably would have sold her soul to the devil to be president.

I read a quote from Obama yesterday that is a lot closer to reality. He said that he was sure that there are people who voted against him for no other reason than that he was black. But he also said that there are others who voted for him for exactly the same reason and that he undoubtedly derived political benefit as well as roadblocks due to his skin color. "It cuts both ways."


I think his point was that Obama had MANY more obstacles to overcome and had to just about be a perfect man in order to be president. I completely agree with that point. Also blacks supporting Obama because of his skin color really isn't the same as whites or Hispanics voting against him because of his skin color. There is a huge difference in the numbers.


He was very far from perfect and he still won.


He was likeable and he made the majority feel comfortable. It's not breaking news that a black man or a woman running for the highest office in our country have a higher bar to climb. As Coates put it Obama had to Jump 6 feet and Trump had to jump 2 feet. A woman probably has to jump 20.


He went wire to wire in the election.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
We don't have to look at history. I said to keep it to the past 20 years and also look at the entire Senate and House, which is the closest to President you can get and look at the CURRENT demographics. This is a really simple debate. All the data points to one correct answer.
Almost all those people have no chance of being President.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:45 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hatchetman wrote:
Nas wrote:
[However pretending that we all have an equal opportunity to succeed is bullshit.



But virtually NO ONE but the criminally stupid would argue otherwise.


That's what this thread has been about. I made a statement that I thought everyone except "the criminally stupid" wouldn't disagree with. A black man has a higher bar to climb than a white man and a woman has the highest bar to climb to become president and MANY not only disagreed but are offended at the thought of everyone not being on an equal playing field.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Nas and others are saying "It's harder for a black man or woman to be President than a white man." I think that's a completely reasonable and true statement. Rick and Jorr seem to read it as Nas saying "A white man cannot lose to a black man or woman in a race for President"



No. I won't speak for BRick, but I think it's harder for a black man to get to the point where he is a viable presidential candidate, but once he does I don't believe he has many big disadvantages and, in fact, he has many advantages.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nas wrote:
You can continue to dismiss these stories and sleep well at night because you don't have to live it. Having a skill that MANY lack will create exceptions this isn't hard to understand.

Recent and not so recent history gives MANY blacks and women valid reasons to be suspicious.

Go fuck yourself with that tired reparations argument.


We were talking Coates earlier in the thread, and that's his suggestion. But fine, if that's your argument that you know better because of your birth and go fuck yourself if you don't agree then we've reached a point that discussion is useless.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas and others are saying "It's harder for a black man or woman to be President than a white man." I think that's a completely reasonable and true statement. Rick and Jorr seem to read it as Nas saying "A white man cannot lose to a black man or woman in a race for President"



No. I won't speak for BRick, but I think it's harder for a black man to get to the point where he is a viable presidential candidate, but once he does I don't believe he has many big disadvantages and, in fact, he has many advantages.
well, that really seems to be picking nits just to argue. If I read this post correctly you agree with Nas that it's harder for a black man to become President than a white man.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:50 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:

He went wire to wire in the election.


If Hillary were a man in 2008 Obama would never have become president. He may have gotten a nice job in the administration or gotten on the ticket but he wouldn't have become president.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
We don't have to look at history. I said to keep it to the past 20 years and also look at the entire Senate and House, which is the closest to President you can get and look at the CURRENT demographics. This is a really simple debate. All the data points to one correct answer.
Almost all those people have no chance of being President.

It's obviously the closest analog to President to get more data for a better picture. But if you want to limit it to just Presidents you lose that way too. As I said earlier, you guys have yet to present any evidence outside of "Obama won twice" which is the equivalent of saying racism ended with a black president.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:52 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
"Obama won twice" which is the equivalent of saying racism ended with a black president.


I disagree with that. I don't think the fact a black man can be elected president says anything about racism ending. In fact, I think Obama's presidencies proved as much.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
He had to work very hard to make the majority comfortable. He wasn't on an equal playing field as everyone else.


Doesn't every candidate? And don't you think that he enjoyed some advantages such as record African American support and some media cheerleading? I don't think being black proved to be an obstacle.


No disrespect but of course you don't think it was an obstacle. Many whites feel that way and you're wrong.


The you will never understand what it's like argument.
If you have some sort of primordial knowledge due to the accident of your heritage then there will always be a divide. I believe these divisions are of our own creating, and that if we really want to solve race issue this special status needs to go away as well. People can understand what it is like to be mistreated, bullied or overlooked. Is it exactly the same? Probably not, but to claim white people will never understand is putting this into the status of religion and original sin.


You can believe whatever you want. I'm sure it makes you feel good and sleep well at night but it's wrong. Talk to any successful minority and you'll more likely than not hear stories about how they had to work harder and overcome many more obstacles than a white man. Talk to successful women over 50 and you'll hear similar stories. This is reality. It's not groups of people pretending to be victims.


Stories of working hard don't change the argument, which has become an emotional one. Right now based on income figures, Asian Americans are the most successful group in the United States. If whites were this unified group looking to hold minorities down in the United States, how would this be the case? Should I not sleep well at night because I was born white, which means I have blood on my hands for sins that occurred before my lifespan?

If all black people feel like whites are going to pull the carpet out whenever they feel like it, it's so self-defeating that there will always be a racial divide. I am not sure what benchmark has to be reached to change this perception. A black man was elected president, yet that is being discredited because he "made people comfortable".

I don't think that the accident of my heritage provides me with any special insight into past sins, and we seem to be venturing into a realm past "equality" whatever that means. Would reparations make things better? I honestly do not know because the goalposts keep moving.



What blacks ask for isn't necessarily equal playing field. They want an equal opportunity. Currently their isn't one existent. Yes Obama was elected but if contrast the campaign he ran versus the campaign Trump ran you see where the disparity truly exists. Obama had to be the non offending black guy. Obama was handcuffed by his race. Trump wasn't. Trump could be as divisive as he wanted to be and it still wasn't offensive to disqualify him.

When you talk about the successful level of other minority groups there is validity but it isn't necessarily overriding. Blacks have the stigma of skin color if a person really wants to term it as such. They don't have the luxury of simply changing their name as a means of assimilating (As the Trumps have done).

Is it really any accident that only black neighborhoods in Chicago are ghettos? You'd be hard pressed to find a white ghetto anywhere in this city. Do you think black unemployment is simply related to black laziness?

When people talk about Prison Reform the first place they should start is the archaic felony laws which prevent you from working if you have a felony.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
We don't have to look at history. I said to keep it to the past 20 years and also look at the entire Senate and House, which is the closest to President you can get and look at the CURRENT demographics. This is a really simple debate. All the data points to one correct answer.
Almost all those people have no chance of being President.

It's obviously the closest analog to President to get more data for a better picture. But if you want to limit it to just Presidents you lose that way too. As I said earlier, you guys have yet to present any evidence outside of "Obama won twice" which is the equivalent of saying racism ended with a black president.
If you are already going down that road you clearly aren't interested in a response.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Nas wrote:
[
That's what this thread has been about. .


I thought this thread was about MLK's legacy and perceptions thereof.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82996
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

He went wire to wire in the election.


If Hillary were a man in 2008 Obama would never have become president. He may have gotten a nice job in the administration or gotten on the ticket but he wouldn't have become president.


If, if, if...you and Coates can conjecture all you want and present it as fact, but the truth that played out does not support either of you

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:55 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas and others are saying "It's harder for a black man or woman to be President than a white man." I think that's a completely reasonable and true statement. Rick and Jorr seem to read it as Nas saying "A white man cannot lose to a black man or woman in a race for President"



No. I won't speak for BRick, but I think it's harder for a black man to get to the point where he is a viable presidential candidate, but once he does I don't believe he has many big disadvantages and, in fact, he has many advantages.
well, that really seems to be picking nits just to argue. If I read this post correctly you agree with Nas that it's harder for a black man to become President than a white man.


But we can really only look at those who have a realistic chance to be president, i.e. the major party candidates. Once a black or a woman is in one of those two slots, he or she has a good chance to be president. The individuals do matter.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:55 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
You can continue to dismiss these stories and sleep well at night because you don't have to live it. Having a skill that MANY lack will create exceptions this isn't hard to understand.

Recent and not so recent history gives MANY blacks and women valid reasons to be suspicious.

Go fuck yourself with that tired reparations argument.


We were talking Coates earlier in the thread, and that's his suggestion. But fine, if that's your argument that you know better because of your birth and go fuck yourself if you don't agree then we've reached a point that discussion is useless.


I was clear about what statement Coates made that I agreed with and yes you can definitely go fuck yourself with your condescending remarks about reparations.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

He went wire to wire in the election.


If Hillary were a man in 2008 Obama would never have become president. He may have gotten a nice job in the administration or gotten on the ticket but he wouldn't have become president.


Biden, Dodd and Edwards all ran in 2008. Hilary was runner-up because she was a woman married to the president. Obama stomped plenty of white male former Senators.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:58 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

He went wire to wire in the election.


If Hillary were a man in 2008 Obama would never have become president. He may have gotten a nice job in the administration or gotten on the ticket but he wouldn't have become president.


If, if, if...you and Coates can conjecture all you want and present it as fact, but the truth that played out does not support either of you


There is overwhelming evidence but you just choose to ignore it. Hillary got more votes than anyone in every election she was in but she lost the last 2. Imagine the outrage if that happened to Obama? We just told her to shutup and go away.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Hatchetman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
[And Sharpton may have beaten Hillary. Sad.


I know. I would have totally voted for him. :lol:

Image

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
We don't have to look at history. I said to keep it to the past 20 years and also look at the entire Senate and House, which is the closest to President you can get and look at the CURRENT demographics. This is a really simple debate. All the data points to one correct answer.
Almost all those people have no chance of being President.

It's obviously the closest analog to President to get more data for a better picture. But if you want to limit it to just Presidents you lose that way too. As I said earlier, you guys have yet to present any evidence outside of "Obama won twice" which is the equivalent of saying racism ended with a black president.
If you are already going down that road you clearly aren't interested in a response.

You're the one who seems to want to focus on one single election when there is a bigger picture to look at. That was the appropriate response.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 1:01 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hatchetman wrote:
Nas wrote:
[
That's what this thread has been about. .


I thought this thread was about MLK's legacy and perceptions thereof.


These things change in the blink of an eye.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLK Article
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 1:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

He went wire to wire in the election.


If Hillary were a man in 2008 Obama would never have become president. He may have gotten a nice job in the administration or gotten on the ticket but he wouldn't have become president.


If, if, if...you and Coates can conjecture all you want and present it as fact, but the truth that played out does not support either of you


There is overwhelming evidence but you just choose to ignore it. Hillary got more votes than anyone in every election she was in but she lost the last 2. Imagine the outrage if that happened to Obama? We just told her to shutup and go away.



Now you just seem to be complaining about the long-established way presidential elections are run. Why should there be any outrage? And again, Obama defeated white men in every election. The only election he lost was to a black guy.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 162 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group