FavreFan wrote:
What ultimate point are you trying to make here? Just come out and say it.
I thought I did that: Arguing about the historical "safety" of policing as a way to marginalize people identifying dangers in modern contexts is disingenuous. It leads you to ignore localized trends and maximums--even telling anecdotes--in favor of simpler statistics that so happen to conform to your worldview. The best analogy I can think of is JORR steadfastly clutching to "pitching wins" as a demonstrator of pitching ability in the face of FIP, SIERA, etc.
Quote:
Is it your assertion that America is right, that police are in more danger now
I don't know, maybe. It depends on how you quantify "danger" (like how you quantify "pitching ability"). Overall death rates, death-by-firearm rates, and multiple-shooting death incidents are all trying to quantify the same thing (danger), using the same resolution (death). Overall death rates can tell us one thing, but so can firearm rates, multiple-shooting rates, etc. Harping on overall death rates may indeed be behind the times, as you cannot say for absolute certain what else is rolled up into the statistic for which you are arguing. Is it that people are shooting at police less and less? Maybe. Could it also be that police aren't as likely to die in car accidents or from a fall chasing a suspect, but still are just as likely (at least) to get shot at and much more likely to be shot at simply for being police (and/or white)? It could be, but both of those scenarios result in the same thing (fewer police deaths), while one looks to be decidedly less dangerous than the other.
Quote:
and specifically they are in more danger because of the widespread criticism of them shooting and killing unarmed people?
I don't know, I wouldn't think so. But I would say a product of the widespread criticism, or at least a product of some of the tactics of critiquing, is a general dehumanization of police officers, almost into some kind of Oakley-wearing death machines, that may result in the people of the group (BLM, society, whatever) with more homicidal or sociopathic tendencies turning their ire towards police officers. Perhaps similar to the way radicalized Wahhabism preys on those that
could take innocent life and likely turns them into those that
will take innocent life.
Quote:
Should we ignore such stories when they come to light as to protect police officers?
I don't think so. Just in the way we shouldn't marginalize stories of radicalized people carrying out plans to murder police officers for being police officers.