It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:36 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 258 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Would Jordan be considered the greatest if Krause didn't fleece Seattle for Scottie?


Normally because circumstance is so pivotal to athletes the answer would be no, but this is Jordan. Of course the answer is yes. Nobody was stopping that guy in the 90s.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
Even though RR, ltg, Jorr, and Dr Ken are wrong about basically everything I'm gonna need them to weigh in on that English/Melo question.



I never was a big Alex English fan. He scored a lot of points but I always felt his was a product of Doug Moe's offense more than his individual greatness. They had a helluva a lot of talent in Denver and never made noise. I didn't really think of him as much of a go to scorer either strangely enough.

As 3 men went I didn't have him in my top 5 during the early mid 80's.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Brady had a much quicker release and much better decision making than Rodgers. I've watched a ridiculous amount of Green Bay games obviously. He has flaws. It's silly when people say "Rodgers is the best at every facet of being QB". That's not close to true. I'd take Jordy Nelson and Davante Adams over Edelman and Malcolm Mitchell every day of the week. Obviously coaching is a huge mismatch. You're going for an A+++ to a C- there.

I'll give an edge to Brady on decision making, but Rodgers has as much arm talent as anyone who's ever played.

Rodgers has as much overall talent as anyone who's ever played. The mental part is obviously more important with QBs than any other. For years Brady's consistently crazy quick releases, great stats, ever changing cast, consistently top of the conference record, etc just highlights his talent. Of course coaching had a huge hand in all that and Belichick deserves all the credit he gets. But reading this thread I almost think Brady is still underrated and the idea of that is fuckin insane. Guys in this thread acting like he's a glorified system QB. circumstance always has an under appreciated role in athletes's careers but given what we know about him and what we've seen from him I'm fine saying he would've been a great QB either way, and made his way up either way. Being paired with Belichick means he turned into he GOAT (of QBs, GOAT of football will always be Jerry Rice)


Jim Brown. The greatest football player can't be a wide receiver, he's way too dependent on those around him. Brown was the best player in the sport every year of his career.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Secretariat is the GOAT hands down. Gretzky second.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Even though RR, ltg, Jorr, and Dr Ken are wrong about basically everything I'm gonna need them to weigh in on that English/Melo question.



I never was a big Alex English fan. He scored a lot of points but I always felt his was a product of Doug Moe's offense more than his individual greatness. They had a helluva a lot of talent in Denver and never made noise. I didn't really think of him as much of a go to scorer either strangely enough.

As 3 men went I didn't have him in my top 5 during the early mid 80's.

Can I get a Butler/English comp? :bball:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Even though RR, ltg, Jorr, and Dr Ken are wrong about basically everything I'm gonna need them to weigh in on that English/Melo question.



I never was a big Alex English fan. He scored a lot of points but I always felt his was a product of Doug Moe's offense more than his individual greatness. They had a helluva a lot of talent in Denver and never made noise. I didn't really think of him as much of a go to scorer either strangely enough.

As 3 men went I didn't have him in my top 5 during the early mid 80's.


He probably wasn't. Bird, Older Dr. J, Dantley, Aguirre, Bernard King and Worthy were all probably better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
FavreFan wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Brady had a much quicker release and much better decision making than Rodgers. I've watched a ridiculous amount of Green Bay games obviously. He has flaws. It's silly when people say "Rodgers is the best at every facet of being QB". That's not close to true. I'd take Jordy Nelson and Davante Adams over Edelman and Malcolm Mitchell every day of the week. Obviously coaching is a huge mismatch. You're going for an A+++ to a C- there.

I'll give an edge to Brady on decision making, but Rodgers has as much arm talent as anyone who's ever played.

Rodgers has as much overall talent as anyone who's ever played. The mental part is obviously more important with QBs than any other. For years Brady's consistently crazy quick releases, great stats, ever changing cast, consistently top of the conference record, etc just highlights his talent. Of course coaching had a huge hand in all that and Belichick deserves all the credit he gets. But reading this thread I almost think Brady is still underrated and the idea of that is fuckin insane. Guys in this thread acting like he's a glorified system QB. circumstance always has an under appreciated role in athletes's careers but given what we know about him and what we've seen from him I'm fine saying he would've been a great QB either way, and made his way up either way. Being paired with Belichick means he turned into he GOAT (of QBs, GOAT of football will always be Jerry Rice)


I don't think he would have been great without Drew Bledsoe forgetting to step out of bounds, and the opportunity falling into Brady's lap. There is no way to quantify that hypothetical tho.

The Patriots use a lot of air raid concepts, and blend in a power running game especially when the playoffs roll around. Brady has mastered this offense, and I do hold him in high regard as far as the GOAT discussion.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Powerhouse233 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Brady had a much quicker release and much better decision making than Rodgers. I've watched a ridiculous amount of Green Bay games obviously. He has flaws. It's silly when people say "Rodgers is the best at every facet of being QB". That's not close to true. I'd take Jordy Nelson and Davante Adams over Edelman and Malcolm Mitchell every day of the week. Obviously coaching is a huge mismatch. You're going for an A+++ to a C- there.

I'll give an edge to Brady on decision making, but Rodgers has as much arm talent as anyone who's ever played.

Rodgers has as much overall talent as anyone who's ever played. The mental part is obviously more important with QBs than any other. For years Brady's consistently crazy quick releases, great stats, ever changing cast, consistently top of the conference record, etc just highlights his talent. Of course coaching had a huge hand in all that and Belichick deserves all the credit he gets. But reading this thread I almost think Brady is still underrated and the idea of that is fuckin insane. Guys in this thread acting like he's a glorified system QB. circumstance always has an under appreciated role in athletes's careers but given what we know about him and what we've seen from him I'm fine saying he would've been a great QB either way, and made his way up either way. Being paired with Belichick means he turned into he GOAT (of QBs, GOAT of football will always be Jerry Rice)


Jim Brown. The greatest football player can't be a wide receiver, he's way too dependent on those around him. Brown was the best player in the sport every year of his career.

Yeah before good players started playing (I'm kidding JORR)

What Rice did compared to his peers to this day outweighs what Brown has done vs his. And arguably any position vs their peers. He's probably the most underappreciated athlete of the past 50 years and that's with everyone recognizing him as the greatest WR ever

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Powerhouse233 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
Would Jordan be considered the greatest if Krause didn't fleece Seattle for Scottie?



Yes. The younger and strangely much blacker Jordan was better than the Championship Jordan. Didn't have the Championship pedigree but that Jordan was an outright bastard on the court.

I can remember Doug Collins placing him at the point for a string of games and Jordan damn near avg a triple double.


I don't necessarily agree with this. Jordan was at the absolute peak of his powers in my opinion from 1991-1993 but he was also the best player in the league before that when he wasn't winning championships. In 1989 Collins put Jordan at Point as you said and he tore the league apart. He was clearly the best player in the league that season but he wasn't better in 1989 than he was in 1992.



If you pull up his rosters from those years there was no way in hell he should have made the playoffs and he was winning playoff series. He was both the best offensive and defensive player in the league. Those were the "Jordan Rule" years. Everyone knew he was the best player in the league then but they used the whole "championship"argument against him.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Jbi11s wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Brady had a much quicker release and much better decision making than Rodgers. I've watched a ridiculous amount of Green Bay games obviously. He has flaws. It's silly when people say "Rodgers is the best at every facet of being QB". That's not close to true. I'd take Jordy Nelson and Davante Adams over Edelman and Malcolm Mitchell every day of the week. Obviously coaching is a huge mismatch. You're going for an A+++ to a C- there.

I'll give an edge to Brady on decision making, but Rodgers has as much arm talent as anyone who's ever played.

Rodgers has as much overall talent as anyone who's ever played. The mental part is obviously more important with QBs than any other. For years Brady's consistently crazy quick releases, great stats, ever changing cast, consistently top of the conference record, etc just highlights his talent. Of course coaching had a huge hand in all that and Belichick deserves all the credit he gets. But reading this thread I almost think Brady is still underrated and the idea of that is fuckin insane. Guys in this thread acting like he's a glorified system QB. circumstance always has an under appreciated role in athletes's careers but given what we know about him and what we've seen from him I'm fine saying he would've been a great QB either way, and made his way up either way. Being paired with Belichick means he turned into he GOAT (of QBs, GOAT of football will always be Jerry Rice)


I don't think he would have been great without Drew Bledsoe forgetting to step out of bounds, and the opportunity falling into Brady's lap. There is no way to quantify that hypothetical tho.

The Patriots use a lot of air raid concepts, and blend in a power running game especially when the playoffs roll around. Brady has mastered this offense, and I do hold him in high regard as far as the GOAT discussion.

Kurt Warner went from bagging groceries to winning a super bowl because he was that damn good (and again circumstances but he also went to another with a different team years later and almost won). Something tells me Brady would've made it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Powerhouse233 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Even though RR, ltg, Jorr, and Dr Ken are wrong about basically everything I'm gonna need them to weigh in on that English/Melo question.



I never was a big Alex English fan. He scored a lot of points but I always felt his was a product of Doug Moe's offense more than his individual greatness. They had a helluva a lot of talent in Denver and never made noise. I didn't really think of him as much of a go to scorer either strangely enough.

As 3 men went I didn't have him in my top 5 during the early mid 80's.


He probably wasn't. Bird, Older Dr. J, Dantley, Aguirre, Bernard King and Worthy were all probably better.


I have all of them as being better too.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Soccer: Is it a sport?

edit: I say no.


Last edited by America on Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:10 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
long time guy wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
Would Jordan be considered the greatest if Krause didn't fleece Seattle for Scottie?



Yes. The younger and strangely much blacker Jordan was better than the Championship Jordan. Didn't have the Championship pedigree but that Jordan was an outright bastard on the court.

I can remember Doug Collins placing him at the point for a string of games and Jordan damn near avg a triple double.


I don't necessarily agree with this. Jordan was at the absolute peak of his powers in my opinion from 1991-1993 but he was also the best player in the league before that when he wasn't winning championships. In 1989 Collins put Jordan at Point as you said and he tore the league apart. He was clearly the best player in the league that season but he wasn't better in 1989 than he was in 1992.



If you pull up his rosters from those years there was no way in hell he should have made the playoffs and he was winning playoff series. He was both the best offensive and defensive player in the league. Those were the "Jordan Rule" years. Everyone knew he was the best player in the league then but they used the whole "championship"argument against him.

Even if he willed a Pippen-less team to the finals every year I doubt he gets past the Suns or Jazz. I doubt he would have gotten past NY and the Pacers without Pippen, and I'm a HUUUUGE Jordan fan.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Ltg hook me up with a good Fat Lever/Rondo comp. you were a Rondo guy too right? The few of us gotta stick together.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Even though RR, ltg, Jorr, and Dr Ken are wrong about basically everything I'm gonna need them to weigh in on that English/Melo question.



I never was a big Alex English fan. He scored a lot of points but I always felt his was a product of Doug Moe's offense more than his individual greatness. They had a helluva a lot of talent in Denver and never made noise. I didn't really think of him as much of a go to scorer either strangely enough.

As 3 men went I didn't have him in my top 5 during the early mid 80's.

Can I get a Butler/English comp? :bball:


You'd be better off with a Jerome Kersey/Jimmy Butler comparison

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
Soccer: Is it a sport?

edit: I say no.

Of course not.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
long time guy wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
Would Jordan be considered the greatest if Krause didn't fleece Seattle for Scottie?



Yes. The younger and strangely much blacker Jordan was better than the Championship Jordan. Didn't have the Championship pedigree but that Jordan was an outright bastard on the court.

I can remember Doug Collins placing him at the point for a string of games and Jordan damn near avg a triple double.


I don't necessarily agree with this. Jordan was at the absolute peak of his powers in my opinion from 1991-1993 but he was also the best player in the league before that when he wasn't winning championships. In 1989 Collins put Jordan at Point as you said and he tore the league apart. He was clearly the best player in the league that season but he wasn't better in 1989 than he was in 1992.



If you pull up his rosters from those years there was no way in hell he should have made the playoffs and he was winning playoff series. He was both the best offensive and defensive player in the league. Those were the "Jordan Rule" years. Everyone knew he was the best player in the league then but they used the whole "championship"argument against him.


I agree completely that he was completely carrying those awful rosters and was by far the best player in the league. Even though he wasn't winning championships I believe he was clearly the greatest player in the sport, better than Bird and Magic. Despite this i still don't think he reached his peak until 1992 when the gap between him and the second best player in the league was comical.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Even though RR, ltg, Jorr, and Dr Ken are wrong about basically everything I'm gonna need them to weigh in on that English/Melo question.



I never was a big Alex English fan. He scored a lot of points but I always felt his was a product of Doug Moe's offense more than his individual greatness. They had a helluva a lot of talent in Denver and never made noise. I didn't really think of him as much of a go to scorer either strangely enough.

As 3 men went I didn't have him in my top 5 during the early mid 80's.

Can I get a Butler/English comp? :bball:


You'd be better off with a Jerome Kersey/Jimmy Butler comparison

Don't be silly. Butler's gonna keep soaring.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
FavreFan wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Brady had a much quicker release and much better decision making than Rodgers. I've watched a ridiculous amount of Green Bay games obviously. He has flaws. It's silly when people say "Rodgers is the best at every facet of being QB". That's not close to true. I'd take Jordy Nelson and Davante Adams over Edelman and Malcolm Mitchell every day of the week. Obviously coaching is a huge mismatch. You're going for an A+++ to a C- there.

I'll give an edge to Brady on decision making, but Rodgers has as much arm talent as anyone who's ever played.

Rodgers has as much overall talent as anyone who's ever played. The mental part is obviously more important with QBs than any other. For years Brady's consistently crazy quick releases, great stats, ever changing cast, consistently top of the conference record, etc just highlights his talent. Of course coaching had a huge hand in all that and Belichick deserves all the credit he gets. But reading this thread I almost think Brady is still underrated and the idea of that is fuckin insane. Guys in this thread acting like he's a glorified system QB. circumstance always has an under appreciated role in athletes's careers but given what we know about him and what we've seen from him I'm fine saying he would've been a great QB either way, and made his way up either way. Being paired with Belichick means he turned into he GOAT (of QBs, GOAT of football will always be Jerry Rice)


I don't think he would have been great without Drew Bledsoe forgetting to step out of bounds, and the opportunity falling into Brady's lap. There is no way to quantify that hypothetical tho.

The Patriots use a lot of air raid concepts, and blend in a power running game especially when the playoffs roll around. Brady has mastered this offense, and I do hold him in high regard as far as the GOAT discussion.

Kurt Warner went from bagging groceries to winning a super bowl because he was that damn good (and again circumstances but he also went to another with a different team years later and almost won). Something tells me Brady would've made it.


Proverbial FF response: :lol:

I'm sure Marshall Faulk, Isaac Bruce, Tory Holt, and Orlando Pace would have made Trent Green look like a HoF QB as well. Don't get me wrong, Warner's accuracy was elite, but he was playing alongside 4 Hall of Famers.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Most Hall of Famers play alongside other Hall of Famers (except Brady? :lol: ) funny how that works.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
FavreFan wrote:
Most Hall of Famers play alongside other Hall of Famers (except Brady? :lol: ) funny how that works.

Aaron Rodgers? Drew Brees? What HoFer did Favre play with? Marino? Elway play with anyone who made it to Canton?

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
Ltg hook me up with a good Fat Lever/Rondo comp. you were a Rondo guy too right? The few of us gotta stick together.


Not really a Rondo guy but I respect him for speaking his mind. I also fell into the narrative trap regarding coach killing. When I went back and thought about it he had the run in with Carlisle and butted heads with Rivers but he appeared to get along with the rather difficult George Karl. He also could have been a bastard towards Stephens and wasn't. He also appears to get along with Hoiberg. He has defended him on more than a few occasions this season.

As far as players Lever was better. Better scorer and more impactful. Lever was a triple double guy in his heyday. I think Rondo was overrated even when he was considered good and he benefitted tremendously from playing with 3 Hall of Famers.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Ltg hook me up with a good Fat Lever/Rondo comp. you were a Rondo guy too right? The few of us gotta stick together.


Not really a Rondo guy but I respect him for speaking his mind. I also fell into the narrative trap regarding coach killing. When I went back and thought about it he had the run in with Carlisle and butted heads with Rivers but he appeared to get along with the rather difficult George Karl. He also could have been a bastard towards Stephens and wasn't. He also appears to get along with Hoiberg. He has defended him on more than a few occasions this season.

As far as players Lever was better. Better scorer and more impactful. Lever was a triple double guy in his heyday. I think Rondo was overrated even when he was considered good and he benefitted tremendously from playing with 3 Hall of Famers.


Prime Rondo was a better distributor and defensive player but was always obviously a liability on offense and somewhat of a malcontent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Powerhouse233 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
Would Jordan be considered the greatest if Krause didn't fleece Seattle for Scottie?



Yes. The younger and strangely much blacker Jordan was better than the Championship Jordan. Didn't have the Championship pedigree but that Jordan was an outright bastard on the court.

I can remember Doug Collins placing him at the point for a string of games and Jordan damn near avg a triple double.


I don't necessarily agree with this. Jordan was at the absolute peak of his powers in my opinion from 1991-1993 but he was also the best player in the league before that when he wasn't winning championships. In 1989 Collins put Jordan at Point as you said and he tore the league apart. He was clearly the best player in the league that season but he wasn't better in 1989 than he was in 1992.



If you pull up his rosters from those years there was no way in hell he should have made the playoffs and he was winning playoff series. He was both the best offensive and defensive player in the league. Those were the "Jordan Rule" years. Everyone knew he was the best player in the league then but they used the whole "championship"argument against him.


I agree completely that he was completely carrying those awful rosters and was by far the best player in the league. Even though he wasn't winning championships I believe he was clearly the greatest player in the sport, better than Bird and Magic. Despite this i still don't think he reached his peak until 1992 when the gap between him and the second best player in the league was comical.



Drexler was considered the 2nd best in 92. This had more to do with the level of separation than anything. I just remember Jordan having to drive the dead ass carcasses of Gene Banks, Sam Vincent, Brad Sellers, etc into the playoffs year after year. There was no way in hell that they could be expected to do anything yet he would win series and make others competitive that should not have veen.

Even the Scottie migraine series was Jordan's work. He took Detroit to 7 games without much of anything around him. Pippin wasn't ready at that point either.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
We can all certainly agree that regardless of our opinions on steroids Bonds is the best baseball player ever right? For a sport built on statistics he sure put up some video game fuckin numbers.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
long time guy wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
Would Jordan be considered the greatest if Krause didn't fleece Seattle for Scottie?



Yes. The younger and strangely much blacker Jordan was better than the Championship Jordan. Didn't have the Championship pedigree but that Jordan was an outright bastard on the court.

I can remember Doug Collins placing him at the point for a string of games and Jordan damn near avg a triple double.


I don't necessarily agree with this. Jordan was at the absolute peak of his powers in my opinion from 1991-1993 but he was also the best player in the league before that when he wasn't winning championships. In 1989 Collins put Jordan at Point as you said and he tore the league apart. He was clearly the best player in the league that season but he wasn't better in 1989 than he was in 1992.



If you pull up his rosters from those years there was no way in hell he should have made the playoffs and he was winning playoff series. He was both the best offensive and defensive player in the league. Those were the "Jordan Rule" years. Everyone knew he was the best player in the league then but they used the whole "championship"argument against him.


I agree completely that he was completely carrying those awful rosters and was by far the best player in the league. Even though he wasn't winning championships I believe he was clearly the greatest player in the sport, better than Bird and Magic. Despite this i still don't think he reached his peak until 1992 when the gap between him and the second best player in the league was comical.



Drexler was considered the 2nd best in 92. This had more to do with the level of separation than anything. I just remember Jordan having to drive the dead ass carcasses of Gene Banks, Sam Vincent, Brad Sellers, etc into the playoffs year after year. There was no way in hell that they could be expected to do anything yet he would win series and make others competitive that should not have veen.

Even the Scottie migraine series was Jordan's work. He took Detroit to 7 games without much of anything around him. Pippin wasn't ready at that point either.


Absolutely. Pippen wasn't ready to be a star in 1990 and it showed yet Jordan still nearly dragged them to the NBA finals.Jordan was really the only one to show up that game, Pippen was completely useless.The fact that some people still say Jordan didn't know how to win and didn't involve his teammates enough until 1991 still pisses me off. Jordan did as much with those rosters as any player possibly could.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
FavreFan wrote:
We can all certainly agree that regardless of our opinions on steroids Bonds is the best baseball player ever right? For a sport built on statistics he sure put up some video game fuckin numbers.

Stop trolling.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
We can all certainly agree that regardless of our opinions on steroids Bonds is the best baseball player ever right? For a sport built on statistics he sure put up some video game fuckin numbers.


Bonds and Ruth, yes. Ruth made a complete mockery of the sport, that's how dominant he was. He changed baseball as much as any one athlete has ever changed their sport.I understand that this was at a time when the sport was segregated but Baseball was still the number one sport in the country and Ruth was an all time great as a position player and as a pitcher. Before he became the most dominant hitter in history he was the best left handed pitcher in the game. There are also numerous stories of him barnstorming against negro league players and him homering off of guys like Paige. For such a prejudiced time he had a very progressive attitude.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Jbi11s wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
We can all certainly agree that regardless of our opinions on steroids Bonds is the best baseball player ever right? For a sport built on statistics he sure put up some video game fuckin numbers.

Stop trolling.

Just a bit. Unequivocally the best player of the past 30 years.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
We can all certainly agree that regardless of our opinions on steroids Bonds is the best baseball player ever right? For a sport built on statistics he sure put up some video game fuckin numbers.

Stop trolling.

Just a bit. Unequivocally the best player of the past 30 years.


Without question and the hall of fame shouldn't exist if he's not in it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 258 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group