It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 12:20 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 12:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12570
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Ping Pong: Jan-Ove Waldner
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgj_TpQkUCc

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 12:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
newper wrote:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojlxmGL9J_Y

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 1:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19347
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Had no idea this bored was full of tennis fans.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 6:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
Hard thing with tennis, much like golf, is equipment changes. Surface changes have been significant in last 30 odd years too. The grass at Wimbledon has been changed and is now more consistent making the ball skip less and allowing a base line game that was next to impossible 25 years Go. The hard courts have been changed as well with Softness taken out. Wouldn't stun me if they've messed with clay as well, even if it's just to get it to dry faster.

They've definitely started using lighter balls at Roland Garros, which increases the amount of aces you see and also contributes to surface homogenization.

I'm someone who's always defended Sampras a lot more in these discussions since the 90s were probably the last era with a really great deal of surface variety and also legitimate surface specialists who were threats throughout a bracket at a major. At this point though I find it difficult to make any sort of case against Federer. He's been a greater beneficiary of the surface changes than is often let on, but he had enough of an all-court game to succeed in any era and his longevity is ridiculous. I can still see the case for Laver if someone wants to stretch that far back but I think it's much more difficult to make one for Sampras or Borg over him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 7:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 38041
Location: ...
SpiralStairs wrote:
Had no idea this bored was full of tennis fans.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 7:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
ZephMarshack wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
Hard thing with tennis, much like golf, is equipment changes. Surface changes have been significant in last 30 odd years too. The grass at Wimbledon has been changed and is now more consistent making the ball skip less and allowing a base line game that was next to impossible 25 years Go. The hard courts have been changed as well with Softness taken out. Wouldn't stun me if they've messed with clay as well, even if it's just to get it to dry faster.

They've definitely started using lighter balls at Roland Garros, which increases the amount of aces you see and also contributes to surface homogenization.

I'm someone who's always defended Sampras a lot more in these discussions since the 90s were probably the last era with a really great deal of surface variety and also legitimate surface specialists who were threats throughout a bracket at a major. At this point though I find it difficult to make any sort of case against Federer. He's been a greater beneficiary of the surface changes than is often let on, but he had enough of an all-court game to succeed in any era and his longevity is ridiculous. I can still see the case for Laver if someone wants to stretch that far back but I think it's much more difficult to make one for Sampras or Borg over him.

I feel like a woman hearing guys talk about sports when I read these two posts. Just no fucking clue what you guys are saying.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 7:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 38041
Location: ...
FavreFan wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
Hard thing with tennis, much like golf, is equipment changes. Surface changes have been significant in last 30 odd years too. The grass at Wimbledon has been changed and is now more consistent making the ball skip less and allowing a base line game that was next to impossible 25 years Go. The hard courts have been changed as well with Softness taken out. Wouldn't stun me if they've messed with clay as well, even if it's just to get it to dry faster.

They've definitely started using lighter balls at Roland Garros, which increases the amount of aces you see and also contributes to surface homogenization.

I'm someone who's always defended Sampras a lot more in these discussions since the 90s were probably the last era with a really great deal of surface variety and also legitimate surface specialists who were threats throughout a bracket at a major. At this point though I find it difficult to make any sort of case against Federer. He's been a greater beneficiary of the surface changes than is often let on, but he had enough of an all-court game to succeed in any era and his longevity is ridiculous. I can still see the case for Laver if someone wants to stretch that far back but I think it's much more difficult to make one for Sampras or Borg over him.

I feel like a woman hearing guys talk about sports when I read these two posts. Just no fucking clue what you guys are saying.


Julie DiCaro wrote:
Guess I'll have to start in with my tennis days...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
W_Z wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Had no idea this bored was full of tennis fans.


Image


I think he just took off one of his shoes.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7939
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
In the 80's it was impossible to not follow tennis. It was huge with all the personalities. It would liken it to the interest in golf with Tiger but I don't think it was to that extent. Hard to know as I was just a youth. Parents were big fans and had my brother and I playing at a young age and the French and Wimbledon were must TV in the Squirrel household.

Laver is before my time and my memory of Borg is vague at best. I do wonder how the power players of today would adjust to the small headed wood rackets of the 70's with all the crazy surfaces. I wonder how the Ivan Lendl's of the world would have done on modern grass vs the old skipping grass. Doubt it would have helped him enough to deal with Beckers of the world but still it would be interesting. Some of the craziest matches back in the day were the ones with a serving specialist like goran ivanišević vs a return guy like Agassi on grass.

The impressive thing about Federer is he has stayed relatively dominant to an older age than many. At least as memory serves me some of the "greats" were basically done by 33 years old.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7939
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
FavreFan wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
Hard thing with tennis, much like golf, is equipment changes. Surface changes have been significant in last 30 odd years too. The grass at Wimbledon has been changed and is now more consistent making the ball skip less and allowing a base line game that was next to impossible 25 years Go. The hard courts have been changed as well with Softness taken out. Wouldn't stun me if they've messed with clay as well, even if it's just to get it to dry faster.

They've definitely started using lighter balls at Roland Garros, which increases the amount of aces you see and also contributes to surface homogenization.

I'm someone who's always defended Sampras a lot more in these discussions since the 90s were probably the last era with a really great deal of surface variety and also legitimate surface specialists who were threats throughout a bracket at a major. At this point though I find it difficult to make any sort of case against Federer. He's been a greater beneficiary of the surface changes than is often let on, but he had enough of an all-court game to succeed in any era and his longevity is ridiculous. I can still see the case for Laver if someone wants to stretch that far back but I think it's much more difficult to make one for Sampras or Borg over him.

I feel like a woman hearing guys talk about sports when I read these two posts. Just no fucking clue what you guys are saying.


I can mansplain it if you'd like.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30755
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
In the 80's it was impossible to not follow tennis. It was huge with all the personalities. It would liken it to the interest in golf with Tiger but I don't think it was to that extent. Hard to know as I was just a youth. Parents were big fans and had my brother and I playing at a young age and the French and Wimbledon were must TV in the Squirrel household.

Laver is before my time and my memory of Borg is vague at best. I do wonder how the power players of today would adjust to the small headed wood rackets of the 70's with all the crazy surfaces. I wonder how the Ivan Lendl's of the world would have done on modern grass vs the old skipping grass. Doubt it would have helped him enough to deal with Beckers of the world but still it would be interesting. Some of the craziest matches back in the day were the ones with a serving specialist like goran ivanišević vs a return guy like Agassi on grass.

The impressive thing about Federer is he has stayed relatively dominant to an older age than many. At least as memory serves me some of the "greats" were basically done by 33 years old.

I hated Borg, but only because I was such a Johnny Mac fan. I do recognize Borg's greatness and how much of a better player he was.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:16 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Hawg Ass wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
In the 80's it was impossible to not follow tennis. It was huge with all the personalities. It would liken it to the interest in golf with Tiger but I don't think it was to that extent. Hard to know as I was just a youth. Parents were big fans and had my brother and I playing at a young age and the French and Wimbledon were must TV in the Squirrel household.

Laver is before my time and my memory of Borg is vague at best. I do wonder how the power players of today would adjust to the small headed wood rackets of the 70's with all the crazy surfaces. I wonder how the Ivan Lendl's of the world would have done on modern grass vs the old skipping grass. Doubt it would have helped him enough to deal with Beckers of the world but still it would be interesting. Some of the craziest matches back in the day were the ones with a serving specialist like goran ivanišević vs a return guy like Agassi on grass.

The impressive thing about Federer is he has stayed relatively dominant to an older age than many. At least as memory serves me some of the "greats" were basically done by 33 years old.

I hated Borg, but only because I was such a Johnny Mac fan. I do recognize Borg's greatness and how much of a better player he was.


I loved McEnroe too, and like I said, I can't honestly say he was better than Borg, but it's certainly not like Borg was greatly superior. There are arguments to be made for McEnroe. And I believe they are close to even head-to-head.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30755
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
In the 80's it was impossible to not follow tennis. It was huge with all the personalities. It would liken it to the interest in golf with Tiger but I don't think it was to that extent. Hard to know as I was just a youth. Parents were big fans and had my brother and I playing at a young age and the French and Wimbledon were must TV in the Squirrel household.

Laver is before my time and my memory of Borg is vague at best. I do wonder how the power players of today would adjust to the small headed wood rackets of the 70's with all the crazy surfaces. I wonder how the Ivan Lendl's of the world would have done on modern grass vs the old skipping grass. Doubt it would have helped him enough to deal with Beckers of the world but still it would be interesting. Some of the craziest matches back in the day were the ones with a serving specialist like goran ivanišević vs a return guy like Agassi on grass.

The impressive thing about Federer is he has stayed relatively dominant to an older age than many. At least as memory serves me some of the "greats" were basically done by 33 years old.

I hated Borg, but only because I was such a Johnny Mac fan. I do recognize Borg's greatness and how much of a better player he was.


I loved McEnroe too, and like I said, I can't honestly say he was better than Borg, but it's certainly not like Borg was greatly superior. There are arguments to be made for McEnroe. And I believe they are close to even head-to-head.

The rivalries were great then also in tennis, not so much today.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:25 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
What a racket this thread has turned in to.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
What a racket this thread has turned in to.

Mods please ban

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
In the 80's it was impossible to not follow tennis. It was huge with all the personalities. It would liken it to the interest in golf with Tiger but I don't think it was to that extent. Hard to know as I was just a youth. Parents were big fans and had my brother and I playing at a young age and the French and Wimbledon were must TV in the Squirrel household.

Laver is before my time and my memory of Borg is vague at best. I do wonder how the power players of today would adjust to the small headed wood rackets of the 70's with all the crazy surfaces. I wonder how the Ivan Lendl's of the world would have done on modern grass vs the old skipping grass. Doubt it would have helped him enough to deal with Beckers of the world but still it would be interesting. Some of the craziest matches back in the day were the ones with a serving specialist like goran ivanišević vs a return guy like Agassi on grass.

The impressive thing about Federer is he has stayed relatively dominant to an older age than many. At least as memory serves me some of the "greats" were basically done by 33 years old.

I hated Borg, but only because I was such a Johnny Mac fan. I do recognize Borg's greatness and how much of a better player he was.


I loved McEnroe too, and like I said, I can't honestly say he was better than Borg, but it's certainly not like Borg was greatly superior. There are arguments to be made for McEnroe. And I believe they are close to even head-to-head.

The thing with Borg is he left so close to the top that I think he sometimes gets inflated credit. He's only remembered for his peak because he didn't really play outside of his peak and struggle the way pretty much everyone else in the discussion did after their own respective peaks. You never saw him losing to less than great players because he didn't stick around long enough for those less than great players to catch up to him.

McEnroe not winning the French is the big mark against him relative to Borg. The meltdown in 1984 is one of the biggest collapses I've seen in any sport, especially since he was en route to one of the greatest years in the open era.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38637
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Tennis and golf are great cures for insomnia.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:39 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
You spelled "soccer" wrong.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
Hard thing with tennis, much like golf, is equipment changes. Surface changes have been significant in last 30 odd years too. The grass at Wimbledon has been changed and is now more consistent making the ball skip less and allowing a base line game that was next to impossible 25 years Go. The hard courts have been changed as well with Softness taken out. Wouldn't stun me if they've messed with clay as well, even if it's just to get it to dry faster.

They've definitely started using lighter balls at Roland Garros, which increases the amount of aces you see and also contributes to surface homogenization.

I'm someone who's always defended Sampras a lot more in these discussions since the 90s were probably the last era with a really great deal of surface variety and also legitimate surface specialists who were threats throughout a bracket at a major. At this point though I find it difficult to make any sort of case against Federer. He's been a greater beneficiary of the surface changes than is often let on, but he had enough of an all-court game to succeed in any era and his longevity is ridiculous. I can still see the case for Laver if someone wants to stretch that far back but I think it's much more difficult to make one for Sampras or Borg over him.

I feel like a woman hearing guys talk about sports when I read these two posts. Just no fucking clue what you guys are saying.


Can't understand a word.

Image

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group