Building 7 was never hit, yet it fell, just like a professional, controlled implosion. There hasn't been a good explanation for that.

First Bigfoot and now this.

I will smash your face into a car windshield, and then take your mother, Dorothy Leash, out for a nice, seafood dinner, and NEVER call her again!

I'm not saying that a plane didn't crash. I'm more concerned with how an engine from a 737 was found when we were told two 767s crashed into the buildings. That is what has me wearing the tin foil hat right now.

:

Definitely didn't expect to click on this thread and find Chas being the voice of reason

The towers were brought down by fires weakening the steel of a building that was severely compromised by the impact of the jetliners.

The structure of the WTC towers was unique in that the exterior wall (and a central core) provided the bulk of the structural support. The walls that were destroyed by the impact were more or less an exoskeleton for the building. That is why the 2nd tower that was hit fell first. The plane hit it at an angle where it punched through two perpendicular sides of the building and put a significant amount of stress on that surviving corner between them. The steel columns that remained were asked to take on a higher load than they were designed to and could've done so had they not had fire reduce their strength to 50%.

Those buildings could have survived the fires or they could have survived the plane impacts. They could not survive both in conjunction with each other.

I'm not saying that a plane didn't crash. I'm more concerned with how an engine from a 737 was found when we were told two 767s crashed into the buildings. That is what has me wearing the tin foil hat right now.

:

There is no conspiracy.

Thanks for your time.