It is currently Wed Nov 13, 2024 11:43 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:31 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79402
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Curious Hair wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Then ignore all the bad stuff (and the cutoff is '95, not '92). I've not once listened to No Line on the Horizon because I figured it must suck.
I'm not sure you can say ignore 20 years of their music so easily.

If they were so great why create two decades of garbage?


I dunno, happens in rock music. And fortunately, twenty years only ends up being five kinda-not-great albums (and I don't even think some of those are bad, just not great) against nine in fifteen years that are pretty great. I don't think the mere existence of Songs of Innocence diminishes The Joshua Tree in any way.


It's hard to really judge though when a high bar has been set. if some of those later career albums by bands like the Stones or U2 had been released by a group of 18 year olds no one had previously heard of perhaps they would have been praised critically.

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91883
Location: To the left of my post
Curious Hair wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Then ignore all the bad stuff (and the cutoff is '95, not '92). I've not once listened to No Line on the Horizon because I figured it must suck.
I'm not sure you can say ignore 20 years of their music so easily.

If they were so great why create two decades of garbage?


I dunno, happens in rock music. And fortunately, twenty years only ends up being five kinda-not-great albums (and I don't even think some of those are bad, just not great) against nine in fifteen years that are pretty great. I don't think the mere existence of Songs of Innocence diminishes The Joshua Tree in any way.
Fair point. It's kind of like when Nelly went country.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55827
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
I remember when I used to listen to the Loop in high school and their slogan was the beautifully tautological "Classic Rock...That Rocks," they still played "Beautiful Day" and "Elevation" a lot even though they were only about a year and a half old. That's an endorsement, one would have to think. Maybe U2 from the 2000s should have just released singles and EPs instead of filler-heavy albums. They could still nail the anthems but couldn't put together LPs anymore.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Curious Hair wrote:
I remember when I used to listen to the Loop in high school and their slogan was the beautifully tautological "Classic Rock...That Rocks," they still played "Beautiful Day" and "Elevation" a lot even though they were only about a year and a half old. That's an endorsement, one would have to think. Maybe U2 from the 2000s should have just released singles and EPs instead of filler-heavy albums. They could still nail the anthems but couldn't put together LPs anymore.


Are you implying that someone likes Beautiful Day?

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
I remember when I used to listen to the Loop in high school and their slogan was the beautifully tautological "Classic Rock...That Rocks," they still played "Beautiful Day" and "Elevation" a lot even though they were only about a year and a half old. That's an endorsement, one would have to think. Maybe U2 from the 2000s should have just released singles and EPs instead of filler-heavy albums. They could still nail the anthems but couldn't put together LPs anymore.


Are you implying that someone likes Beautiful Day?

Everyone but you, Grandpa Crotchety


*Scurries off Hank's lawn*


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
rogers park bryan wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
I remember when I used to listen to the Loop in high school and their slogan was the beautifully tautological "Classic Rock...That Rocks," they still played "Beautiful Day" and "Elevation" a lot even though they were only about a year and a half old. That's an endorsement, one would have to think. Maybe U2 from the 2000s should have just released singles and EPs instead of filler-heavy albums. They could still nail the anthems but couldn't put together LPs anymore.


Are you implying that someone likes Beautiful Day?

Everyone but you, Grandpa Crotchety


*Scurries off Hank's lawn*


Did you say that with oversized glasses on and with your arms held out wide? Everrrryyyone but YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Then ignore all the bad stuff (and the cutoff is '95, not '92). I've not once listened to No Line on the Horizon because I figured it must suck.
I'm not sure you can say ignore 20 years of their music so easily.

If they were so great why create two decades of garbage?


I dunno, happens in rock music. And fortunately, twenty years only ends up being five kinda-not-great albums (and I don't even think some of those are bad, just not great) against nine in fifteen years that are pretty great. I don't think the mere existence of Songs of Innocence diminishes The Joshua Tree in any way.


It's hard to really judge though when a high bar has been set. if some of those later career albums by bands like the Stones or U2 had been released by a group of 18 year olds no one had previously heard of perhaps they would have been praised critically.

But that's the rub...a lot of the albums in question were, in fact, praised critically. Hell, "...Atomic Bomb" won the Grammy for Best Album. Not sure what more you could ask for in the avenue of critical praise.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
lipidquadcab wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Then ignore all the bad stuff (and the cutoff is '95, not '92). I've not once listened to No Line on the Horizon because I figured it must suck.
I'm not sure you can say ignore 20 years of their music so easily.

If they were so great why create two decades of garbage?


I dunno, happens in rock music. And fortunately, twenty years only ends up being five kinda-not-great albums (and I don't even think some of those are bad, just not great) against nine in fifteen years that are pretty great. I don't think the mere existence of Songs of Innocence diminishes The Joshua Tree in any way.


It's hard to really judge though when a high bar has been set. if some of those later career albums by bands like the Stones or U2 had been released by a group of 18 year olds no one had previously heard of perhaps they would have been praised critically.

But that's the rub...a lot of the albums in question were, in fact, praised critically. Hell, "...Atomic Bomb" won the Grammy for Best Album. Not sure what more you could ask for in the avenue of critical praise.

It became cool to hate on U2 around 1995.

Its all good. I like a group that includes you, me, CH, Shirtless Driver and SomeGuy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Btw, I DO hear it. I can believe they stole or were inspired that distorted begginning riff.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7929
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
Because of this post I've scrounged up my old U2 cd's..I'm sorry, but I am enjoying them.. I still won't listen to soungs of innocence though. Even though those jerks gave it it to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 8:46 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I disagree a little bit with your timeline, 'Arps. I think it became cool to hate on U2 at the time of the PopMart tour thru 2001-2. Some of that they absolutely brought on themselves with PopMart (which was a GREAT tour btw). ATYCLB is a pretty good album, but Bono acting like an angel during the Super Bowl and him trying to get the crowd singing along with "New York" in any city he was in is definitely cheesy.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group