It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:53 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
You think Drew Gooden is crap? I've always liked the guy. A few years ago I was hoping the Bulls would be able to pull off a trade for him. He isn't making a lot either. I see him being a 15 and 10 guy. I like Hughes but I think Gooden is the best part of this trade.


So he wasn't a 15 and 10 guy with Cleveland and Lebron James but he'll do it for the Bulls?

He may be a slight upgrade over Joe Smith but he's not a 15/10 guy. He's had one season in his career close to that.

Drew Gooden isn't crap. He can be productive and obviously there is a chance he improves his play but he's not going to have a major impact on wins and losses.

I like Drew Gooden too, but will it honestly make a difference this year or next year with him on the team?

The best part of this trade was that Ben Wallace's lockerrom antics are gone. The rest of it is a trade that doesn't help. If the Bulls get better, it's because Wallace is gone and the current players start playing better.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Drew Gooden will definitely help the Bulls this year and next season. Playing next to Big Z won't really help your numbers. I expect for his numbers to increase and I think he will play a key role in the Bulls making the playoffs this season. I think Drew Gooden is by far the best player in this deal. The Bulls haven't had a guy that could score in the post and rebound since Grant left for Orlando.


You may be right. The Bulls may make the playoffs with Drew Gooden providing a marginal low post scoring presence. I would say that the bigger reason for this will be improved play from Hinrich, Deng, and Gordon if he accepts his role.

I just can't consider it a trade that made the Bulls better because they go from the 9th worst team to the 8th worst team and a first round exit.

I hope I'm wrong, but the whole thing is a mess and they struck out on anyone that could have helped them greatly the past two years. We are now looking at a trade that makes the Bulls slightly better.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
The good news is they are only 4 games out of the 6th seed. The bad news is they have lost as many games as they did last season even though they have almost 29 games left. My first prediction of the year is the Bulls will make it to the second round of the playoffs if they don't face Boston.


Let's hope that we get Good Larry Hughes and not Bad Larry Hughes.

I will say one thing. This trade works out great if causes the underachieving current players we have to regain focus and play like pro's. I wouldn't care if Ben Wallace had been traded for the rights to Bill Wennington if it does that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Just my 2 cents...

I think Nas is completely over-rating Hughes and Gooden. Gooden is well known to be a lazy, albeit talented, player who doesnt like to hit the boards hard or play defense. Didnt we have a guy like that we all hated and sent packing to NY? Gooden is an ok player but his lack of effort made Lebron hate him, Bron has been pushing a trade to get him out of town for 2 years now.

Hughes might benfit from a change of scenery, but I dont see him averaging much more than 12-3-3 with 40% shooting. 37% from the field is awful, and like Baku said he is a cutter and slasher which magnifies the shittyness of the stat. Much like Rick, I expect to hate Hughes till the day he leaves, his one lasting contribution being he helped rid us of Wallace.


Overall I like the trade, I really dont see any downside from it. Joe Smith was a very good player for us, but he belongs on a team like Cleveland or San Antonio, not us. Like Pax said, we are right back where we were a couple years ago, with young talent that we need to evaluate. We got rid of Ben Wallace's contract, so that alone makes this a good trade. Theres a slight chance Hughes regains his old form a bit and we actually win big in the trade, but I wouldnt be expecting a big resurgence on the backs of Hughes and Gooden, they simply arent that good, IMO.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
I'm agreeing with FavreFan a little too much lately. Either he got dumber or I got smarter.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
FavreFan wrote:
but I wouldnt be expecting a big resurgence on the backs of Hughes and Gooden, they simply arent that good, IMO.


Right. You need to remind yourself that Cleveland is trying to win a championship. The fact that they would essentially swap Gooden for Wallace and Hughes for Szczerbiak says a lot...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:03 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:09 pm
Posts: 3944
FavreFan wrote:
Gooden is well known to be a lazy, albeit talented, player who doesnt like to hit the boards hard or play defense.


I haven't read he's lazy. Can you provide more info, FF?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
NSJ wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Gooden is well known to be a lazy, albeit talented, player who doesnt like to hit the boards hard or play defense.


I haven't read he's lazy. Can you provide more info, FF?


I think that there is some question to the fact that he always seems to be injured.

Edit: I was wrong. I was mistaken. I throw my mercy on the board.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Last edited by Brick on Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13259
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Nas wrote:
I think Drew Gooden is by far the best player in this deal. The Bulls haven't had a guy that could score in the post and rebound since Grant left for Orlando.

I don't claim to be an expert on Drew Gooden, but everything I've read about him says he's a jump shooter - not a post player.

For what it's worth, my co-workers out of Cleveland love the deal, but acknowledge that Gooden was well regarded.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
NSJ wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Gooden is well known to be a lazy, albeit talented, player who doesnt like to hit the boards hard or play defense.


I haven't read he's lazy. Can you provide more info, FF?


I could, but it would mostly be anecdotal. There's been instances Bill Simmons has covered in his columns where Lebron would routinely stare down and embarrass Gooden for his lack of effort rotating on defense, his poor hands when getting a pass near the hoop, or his general lack of hustle. He seems to be the anti-Noah, basically. I mean, hes not as bas as Curry, but he will never be an All Star, he will have some 20-10 games, but I wouldnt say he is better than Joe Smith. If Im trying to win a 7 game series in June, i want Joe Smith on the court instead of Gooden.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Not to steal the thread, but does anyone remember when Carlos Boozer screwed over Cleveland who was trying to do him a favor by releasing him and then signing him to a better contract?

Drew Gooden was the person they signed to replace Carlos Boozer.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
I think Drew Gooden is by far the best player in this deal. The Bulls haven't had a guy that could score in the post and rebound since Grant left for Orlando.

I don't claim to be an expert on Drew Gooden, but everything I've read about him says he's a jump shooter - not a post player.

For what it's worth, my co-workers out of Cleveland love the deal, but acknowledge that Gooden was well regarded.


Horace Grant was infinitely more tougher than Gooden. Gooden likes to play 10-12 feet from the basket, much like Z does. Getting Big Ben will help shore up there defense inside. I wouldnt refer to Gooden as a post player. He doesnt have good hands and isnt that tough.

By the way... Im willing to reconsider my position on the trade if Gooden brings back the patch of hair on the back of his neck that looks like it was stolen from Rasheed Wallace's head.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
NSJ wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Gooden is well known to be a lazy, albeit talented, player who doesnt like to hit the boards hard or play defense.


I haven't read he's lazy. Can you provide more info, FF?


I think that there is some question to the fact that he always seems to be injured.


He missed 8 games the past 5 seasons. I've seen nothing that says he is lazy. Kind of from the Tim Duncan mode where it doesn't always look like he is into the game. Passion doesn’t equal excellence in my book.


What was I thinking? I was thinking of Larry Hughes. My mistake.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
NSJ wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Gooden is well known to be a lazy, albeit talented, player who doesnt like to hit the boards hard or play defense.


I haven't read he's lazy. Can you provide more info, FF?


I think that there is some question to the fact that he always seems to be injured.


He missed 8 games the past 5 seasons. I've seen nothing that says he is lazy. Kind of from the Tim Duncan mode where it doesn't always look like he is into the game. Passion doesn’t equal excellence in my book.


Wow, did you just imply excellence as a term that should be used regarding Drew Gooden? Tim Duncan shows alot more passion and leadership than Gooden will ever show. He's actually become quite the leader not only through his play, but with his body language and vocally over the past couple seasons.

Ill give you Gooden isnt injury prone at all, I think Rick was referring to Hughes. It's easy to get your overrated, overpayed players confused in this trade.

Nas, I hope you are right. Im a Bulls fan and would love nothing more than for Hughes to regain his all star form and Gooden to average a double double for the first time in his career, I just dont see it happening. Also, for as horrible as Ben Wallace was, he was a good post defender. All Star guards have eaten us up in the past, and unless Noah is a much better on the ball defender than I have given him credit for(and I've been one of his biggest supporters) than our post defense just got a lot worse. Drew Gooden is horrible on defense, mostly due to lack of effort I imagine. So yeah, thats a problem now too.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
NSJ wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Gooden is well known to be a lazy, albeit talented, player who doesnt like to hit the boards hard or play defense.


I haven't read he's lazy. Can you provide more info, FF?


I could, but it would mostly be anecdotal. There's been instances Bill Simmons has covered in his columns where Lebron would routinely stare down and embarrass Gooden for his lack of effort rotating on defense, his poor hands when getting a pass near the hoop, or his general lack of hustle. He seems to be the anti-Noah, basically. I mean, hes not as bas as Curry, but he will never be an All Star, he will have some 20-10 games, but I wouldnt say he is better than Joe Smith. If Im trying to win a 7 game series in June, i want Joe Smith on the court instead of Gooden.


This sounds a lot like the Chandler vs Wallace stuff from a few years back. Gooden is 6 years younger and right now is a better player than Wallace or Smith and should peak over the next 4 seasons. Getting rid of 2 players in the twilight of their careers and bringing in a younger player that is already better is a plus.


Not once in his tenure in Chicago did I ever consider Chandler a lazy player. If that sounded like the stuff you heard a few years ago I dont know who you were talking to. And Drew Gooden is not a better player right now than Joe Smith.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:25 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:09 pm
Posts: 3944
Had to look it up. Here's what Simmons wrote. I think it's less about Gooden being lazy than it is about LeBron having a hard time with mortals . . .

During the third quarter, LeBron drove toward the foul line and made a beautiful dish to Gooden, who didn't gather himself for the pass in time. As the ball bounced out of bounds, a frustrated LeBron jogged back up the court staring at the coaches with one of those, "Did you see that? You saw that, right?" looks on his face. And that would have been fine if it ended right there. After all, we get it -- he's great, the rest of his team sucks, and occasionally, it's going to be a little exasperating.

Well, LeBron wasn't done. He glanced back disdainfully at Gooden again, then back to the bench for an extended pseudo-glare. Reading between the lines, I interpreted the glare to mean either, "Take him out of the game before I punch him in the face" or "If that happens again, I'm running straight into the locker room, getting my stuff and chartering my own jet home." At this point, Gooden was running back upcourt and watching the whole thing -- he was officially getting shown up in front of 15,000 people. LeBron shook his head and glanced at Gooden one more time, then back at the bench for a third time, just in case they missed the message the other two times. What a bizarre sequence to watch from 20 feet away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Only Nas and I could get into a 10 page argument over a trade we both think was good for the Bulls.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
NSJ wrote:
Had to look it up. Here's what Simmons wrote. I think it's less about Gooden being lazy than it is about LeBron having a hard time with mortals . . .

During the third quarter, LeBron drove toward the foul line and made a beautiful dish to Gooden, who didn't gather himself for the pass in time. As the ball bounced out of bounds, a frustrated LeBron jogged back up the court staring at the coaches with one of those, "Did you see that? You saw that, right?" looks on his face. And that would have been fine if it ended right there. After all, we get it -- he's great, the rest of his team sucks, and occasionally, it's going to be a little exasperating.

Well, LeBron wasn't done. He glanced back disdainfully at Gooden again, then back to the bench for an extended pseudo-glare. Reading between the lines, I interpreted the glare to mean either, "Take him out of the game before I punch him in the face" or "If that happens again, I'm running straight into the locker room, getting my stuff and chartering my own jet home." At this point, Gooden was running back upcourt and watching the whole thing -- he was officially getting shown up in front of 15,000 people. LeBron shook his head and glanced at Gooden one more time, then back at the bench for a third time, just in case they missed the message the other two times. What a bizarre sequence to watch from 20 feet away.


Thanks for looking it up. Yeah I see your point, but I've also seen Marc Stein who is a much objective writer than Bill Simmons criticize Gooden in the similar ways. I also watch alot of NBA basketball(Button 48, and Nas I know you do too) and he has never really impressed me. He's always been pretty much "a guy". He is below average on defense, has a decent little jump shot, doesnt like to bang inside, and will give you 12-8 averaged out over a season, with little to no steals or blocks.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Ben Wallace will be a different player for Cleveland. He's not as bad as he was playing here. Just wait. He's going to return back to his form that he had in Detroit. This should make Bulls fans dislike him even more.

He has gas left in his tank still. Cavs vs. Celtics will be a great series.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ben Wallace will be a different player for Cleveland. He's not as bad as he was playing here. Just wait. He's going to return back to his form that he had in Detroit. This should make Bulls fans dislike him even more.

He has gas left in his tank still. Cavs vs. Celtics will be a great series.


So will Detroit/Cavs or Detroit/Celtics. I agree on the Ben Wallace point. Z can be a softy like he wants, but it wont be as noticeable because he wont have another soft player playing beside him. I think Z and Ben will be a good frontcourt tandem.

Nas... dont forget the Ben Wallace played great in the playoffs last year. He actually did help us out alot, probably more than Chandler would have. Obviously I would rather have Tyson, but Ben Wallace can still contribute something to a competing team. And I agree with Rick this will make us hate him more.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
NSJ wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Gooden is well known to be a lazy, albeit talented, player who doesnt like to hit the boards hard or play defense.


I haven't read he's lazy. Can you provide more info, FF?


I could, but it would mostly be anecdotal. There's been instances Bill Simmons has covered in his columns where Lebron would routinely stare down and embarrass Gooden for his lack of effort rotating on defense, his poor hands when getting a pass near the hoop, or his general lack of hustle. He seems to be the anti-Noah, basically. I mean, hes not as bas as Curry, but he will never be an All Star, he will have some 20-10 games, but I wouldnt say he is better than Joe Smith. If Im trying to win a 7 game series in June, i want Joe Smith on the court instead of Gooden.


This sounds a lot like the Chandler vs Wallace stuff from a few years back. Gooden is 6 years younger and right now is a better player than Wallace or Smith and should peak over the next 4 seasons. Getting rid of 2 players in the twilight of their careers and bringing in a younger player that is already better is a plus.


Not once in his tenure in Chicago did I ever consider Chandler a lazy player. If that sounded like the stuff you heard a few years ago I dont know who you were talking to. And Drew Gooden is not a better player right now than Joe Smith.


I guess you haven't looked back at any old posts. I was the only one that thought the Wallace signing was terrible from day one. I had the right kind of judgement to see Chandler was a younger and taller version of Ben Wallace and that he would become a better player than Wallace (I said 2 years but it happened in the first year). Please tell me how is 20 mins max Joe Smith better than Gooden. The number definitely don't agree with you. Have you watched any Cavs games? :wink:


Yep.. and if you have, you wouldnt be asking the question :wink:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:41 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:09 pm
Posts: 3944
Nas wrote:
I'm pumped about the remaining 29 games.


I'll say I'm looking forward to tonight's game. Are Hughes and Gooden expected to play tonight?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
NSJ wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Gooden is well known to be a lazy, albeit talented, player who doesnt like to hit the boards hard or play defense.


I haven't read he's lazy. Can you provide more info, FF?


I think that there is some question to the fact that he always seems to be injured.


He missed 8 games the past 5 seasons. I've seen nothing that says he is lazy. Kind of from the Tim Duncan mode where it doesn't always look like he is into the game. Passion doesn’t equal excellence in my book.


Wow, did you just imply excellence as a term that should be used regarding Drew Gooden? Tim Duncan shows alot more passion and leadership than Gooden will ever show. He's actually become quite the leader not only through his play, but with his body language and vocally over the past couple seasons.

Ill give you Gooden isnt injury prone at all, I think Rick was referring to Hughes. It's easy to get your overrated, overpayed players confused in this trade.

Nas, I hope you are right. Im a Bulls fan and would love nothing more than for Hughes to regain his all star form and Gooden to average a double double for the first time in his career, I just dont see it happening. Also, for as horrible as Ben Wallace was, he was a good post defender. All Star guards have eaten us up in the past, and unless Noah is a much better on the ball defender than I have given him credit for(and I've been one of his biggest supporters) than our post defense just got a lot worse. Drew Gooden is horrible on defense, mostly due to lack of effort I imagine. So yeah, thats a problem now too.


Wallace was a good post defender. That no longer is true. When guys like Eric Dampier put 25 and 10 on you that says a lot. He showed flashes every now and then but overall he was terrible. I see Noah filling his role and doing a good job. Gooden will score and rebound. I never said Gooden was "excellent". My point was just because you show a lot of emotion doesn't mean you are playing well or are a good player. At 26 I think the Bulls may have gotten their power forward for the next 6 or 7 years.


I disagree with Ben Wallace being a terrible player now, but Im very glad hes off our team, so thats why I like the trade. Drew Gooden might be our PF for the next 6 years or so, but I doubt it. If he is, he will be our 4th best, or at most our 3rd best, starter over that span of time, or we wont even be sniffing the NBA Finals during that time. I think him and Noah will be good together, they should compliment eachother well. If Hughes doesnt blossom in the new environment though, we will still need to fix our backcourt situation though, as Hughes could easily become the guard version of Ben Wallace on our team.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:48 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:09 pm
Posts: 3944
FavreFan wrote:
If Hughes doesnt blossom in the new environment though, we will still need to fix our backcourt situation though, as Hughes could easily become the guard version of Ben Wallace on our team.


I think Hughes has no choice but to blossom. If he doesn't turn it around here, he'll never get back to his "glory days" with the Wizards.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
I think Nas does have a point in that while perusing Gooden's stats, he pretty much has averaged around 9-10 FGA per game (not all that much) and his rebounding numbers are fairly solid. Obviously you have a lot of other people that are going to be taking a lot of shots, but I don't think near the level of what LeBron and Z take so his numbers may go up if he gets more touches

I don't have any problem with him being 'our PF' for the next 6 years as long as he isn't near the best player on the team


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ben Wallace will be a different player for Cleveland. He's not as bad as he was playing here. Just wait. He's going to return back to his form that he had in Detroit. This should make Bulls fans dislike him even more.

He has gas left in his tank still. Cavs vs. Celtics will be a great series.


So will Detroit/Cavs or Detroit/Celtics. I agree on the Ben Wallace point. Z can be a softy like he wants, but it wont be as noticeable because he wont have another soft player playing beside him. I think Z and Ben will be a good frontcourt tandem.

Nas... dont forget the Ben Wallace played great in the playoffs last year. He actually did help us out alot, probably more than Chandler would have. Obviously I would rather have Tyson, but Ben Wallace can still contribute something to a competing team. And I agree with Rick this will make us hate him more.


I predicted he would be great against the Heat because Shaq is also old and slow. I also knew that he would suck against the Pistons and he did. In that series he showed why the Bulls should have never overpaid for him. He spent most of his time trying to hangout with he former teammates and showing up late for games than he did producing. He was awful and a cancer and the best thing he did all season was defend an aging Shaq for 4 games.


I must have saw a different series than you did.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Baku wrote:
I don't have any problem with him being 'our PF' for the next 6 years as long as he isn't near the best player on the team


Same here.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I disagree with Ben Wallace being a terrible player now, but Im very glad hes off our team, so thats why I like the trade. Drew Gooden might be our PF for the next 6 years or so, but I doubt it. If he is, he will be our 4th best, or at most our 3rd best, starter over that span of time, or we wont even be sniffing the NBA Finals during that time. I think him and Noah will be good together, they should compliment eachother well. If Hughes doesnt blossom in the new environment though, we will still need to fix our backcourt situation though, as Hughes could easily become the guard version of Ben Wallace on our team.


What about 5 points and 8 rebounds for $60M do you like? Do you like the 37% from the field and the 42% from the line? I agree Noah (I was wrong about him) and Gooden will be good together. In a way they compliment each other like Curry and Chandler did with the exception Curry is a better scorer and Gooden doesn't have a problem jumping for a rebound. I don't see Hughes as a problem because the Bulls are deep in the backcourt. At worst he is just a streaky as Gordon but a bigger and better defender. He is the Bulls best option at SG now. I think he will continue to play the way he has since he has been healthy.


Pick a side Nas.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
37% for a big man is a lot different

Still, 37% for Hughes sucks too :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Please tell me how is 20 mins max Joe Smith better than Gooden. The number definitely don't agree with you. Have you watched any Cavs games? :wink:


I wasnt going to bring this up, because both of us dislike stats to a certain extent and know they can be deceiving, but the numbers do agree with me actually.

Gooden's PER 12.8
Joe Smith's PER 17.4

It's actually not even close.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group