Without being condescending I know you are smarter than that. Pointing out someone's hypocrisy is "cool". There needs to be more equity however. Probably isn't that big a deal but that to me is what's tiresome. There is a hands off approach taken in regards to numerous people that post here. When they say dumb shit (some of them very often) it is ignored too often. Their hypocrisy is never pointed out and they definitely aren't piled upon.

If you want to know what is "tiresome" that's it. I don't use message boards to get kicks. You probably need to be psychoanalyzing those that do. There is some sort of deficit if a person's sense of security or validation comes from this bullshit.

For instance when JBills states that Rondo is nothing more than a "mediocre role player in today''s NBA" it's a stupid ass statement. It sounds even dumber in lieu of recent Rondo play yet it went completely by the boards.

Once things go bad in G.S. he is going to be a cancerous cell on that team too. You can't have him around if you arent winning.

You don't have to worry about being a losing team if he's on the team. That problem solves itself.

Hoiberg certainly silenced his doubters.

What did Hoiberg do to lose this series?

For one not start Portis over Mirotic

I agree Portis should have started over Mirotic but I don't think that would have changed the outcome. The Bulls offense was stifled without Rondo. Scoring was down about 16-17 points without him. They guarded the Bulls man to man and they didn't have anyone I(Butler included) that could beat their guy one on one. Every shot was contested.

In game 1 decided in the 4th quarter Butler had 17 points while Rondo played a buck 40 and didn't contribute anything