Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's not a straw man argument. Don't pretend that your implication isn't that those guys on List 2 got lucky with "run support". If that's the case how did Rogers make over 200 more starts and actually increase his winning percentage to .484? He must be luckier than Ryan Reynolds!
You seem to misunderstand, and I worded it poorly: The "cut-off" of 2000 was working
backward from 2016. So that is Kenny Rogers from 2000-onward. Admittedly it was a different run environment around that time, but he was still decidedly average at best when accounting for league and park effects.
Oh, that's his last 257 starts? Okay. Again, you're not making your argument by trying to compare guys like Carrasco who pitched in some historically low scoring seasons vs. guys who threw in the heart of the steroid era. Chris Archer dreams about having as good a career as Kenny Rogers.
That's why I included ERA+, and would have included FIP- if Baseball Reference kept it as a stat (I guess I still could, but I'm lazy).
ERA+ is designed to be comparable across multiple and disparate run environments. Kenny Rogers was about average in the juiced era, and "won" 57% of his games. Carlos Carrasco has been much better than average in the more modern run environment, but has a losing record. I'll take the guy outperforming the league in peripheral stats, given the undeniable relationship between run support and W/L%.
I don't think that's true. It may attempt that but it does a piss poor job. All ERA+ is really good for is comparing a guy to the average pitcher in his league over the time he pitched.
Regardless, I understand that current conventional wisdom is that a pitcher is simply a victim of his W/L record. I simply don't believe that to be the case. All those peripherals simply show the
capabilities of a guy like Carlos Carrasco, his toolbox if you will. I don't dispute the talent of guys like Quintana or Carrasco. Javier Vazquez was obviously a more talented pitcher than Mark Buehrle. But Buehrle knew how to deploy the talent he had to maximize it.
There's more to pitching a baseball game than just throwing your nasty slider and overpowering fastball. Guys with nasty sliders and overpowering fastballs are likely to have positive peripherals. They're starting with a huge advantage over the Buehrles and Moyers of the world. But a pitcher has to be able to throw the ball where he wants to in a tight spot. Everybody misses sometimes. Even Lamar Hoyt and Greg Maddux.