Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Historical context matters more than the fact that is a racial or ethnic slur. That's the difference. I once referred to an elderly black guy as that while arguing over a card game years ago. I'm black and didn't understand the images that it conjured up for him. If he were still alive he'd be 95 right now. I was really young probably mid 20''s at the time and he was probably mid upper 70's. A rage set in on him. He was from a rural town in Missouri and that word had a different cultural and historical context for him.
I'm sure Reader is probably familiar with the lounge on 75th where it occurred. Known joint. I realized that I'd have to watch how I used that word. It offended him and just because I don't take as much offense didn't mean that he shouldn't. My experiences with the word were different than his.
As a kid when my generation and yours replaced the "er" with an "a" and tried to make it a term of endearment I didn't understand why older folks were upset by the use of the word. I saw it as removing the power from those who used it to hate. I now see how foolish that thinking was.
I don't think the younger Nas was necessarily foolish. Words only have the power that we give them.
This goes beyond any single word or slur, but there is a growing belief in some quarters- particularly colleges campuses- that words can be violence. Shouldn't that be highly offensive to those who have experienced actual violence?
Don Tiny mentioned that words only have the power we give them as well. While technically correct, it's also overly simplistic. If you, Nas, and I were sitting in a bar and someone walked up and called him the n-word, would we really expect him not to experience a physical reaction that includes a fight-or-flight response? Would you think lesser of him for not choosing to not give the word power? I agree that this has been a good thread with a lot of honest dialogue, but I also think there has been a lot of oversimplification and trying to look at things through lenses that aren't related.
I think you mentioned earlier the Julie DiCaro thread. I think that's a perfect example that actually refutes your argument regarding not knowing someone else's pain. In that thread, pretty much all of us, including you, dismiss her psychotic whining about every little slight. However, by your logic, we have no right to do that. We should treat it the same as if someone walked up and called ltg a coon. Intellectually, some of your take has merit, but practically speaking, there absolutely is a hierarchy of slurs that we have agreed upon as a society (generally), and historical context matters with those slurs.
_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby