Sending a few PM's to people I trust, or at least thought I could trust, is the same thing as posting it, under a mult, for everybody to see? That's quite a leap.



I didn't lie about anything. I told a few other people who didn't receive those PM's, including good dolphin and Dr. Ken, that it was me who found it.



Speaking of shit starters. I am responsible for the behavior of "known shit starters"? And I have no idea who used a mult to post it on the board. Again, another huge leap.



I just passed along some information that took three minutes to find. Your ire should be directed at whoever posted it publicly, under a different name. But, it's probably one of your pals, so you are swallowing the whistle.

If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.

You will call me a liar, but I'm pretty sure you were increasing the amount of people you told until someone eventually made a thread on it.

It has that feel to it, based on who was provided the info and in what order.

While my shit starting days are largely behind me, you knew the people to tell in order to make sure it was posted publicly.

I would have done it without creating a mult, but it is what it is. I already told the poster that I thought he (or they??) should have posted it under their actual board names and not a mult.

I listened to the audio. You sound like you're above it all and you "hope nothing like that would happen to you". You're the doxxer man. Someone else posted the link but you did all the work. Telling a dozen people isn't keeping a secret, you tell that many people so that someone else can do your dirty work.

Sending a few PM's to people I trust, or at least thought I could trust, is the same thing as posting it, under a mult, for everybody to see? That's quite a leap.



I didn't lie about anything. I told a few other people who didn't receive those PM's, including good dolphin and Dr. Ken, that it was me who found it.



Speaking of shit starters. I am responsible for the behavior of "known shit starters"? And I have no idea who used a mult to post it on the board. Again, another huge leap.



I just passed along some information that took three minutes to find. Your ire should be directed at whoever posted it publicly, under a different name. But, it's probably one of your pals, so you are swallowing the whistle.

If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.

Whoever is SJWplayer needs to admit it though as well.

Chus, you're better off arguing that yeah, you publicized it, but did so because of this person's history and it is, in your estimation, serious enough for the board to know.

It's just disingenuous to go on a podcast and talk around an issue when you literally started the issue. Whoever is SJWplayer needs to admit it though as well.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

Which multi posted the info?
Was it sjw or soda?

Well, I did make those points exactly in the thread that disappeared. I would be lying if I said I thought there was a 0% chance that it would get posted. I really thought the outcome would be some good laughs via PM. I guess I trusted the wrong people.

I think SJW but it could have been both. Chus take on SJW is wrong. Never commit a crime with Chus. He will take everyone down if caught.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

That's....somehow even worse. Whatever, I guess. At least stop pretending you didn't publicize it.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

What? He did not do that. Blame the multi for posting it if you feel blame must be given but I'm having a hard time thinking it's a bad thing that everyone knows.

He pretty much listed everyone he told and suggested that a mult out themselves.

Which multi posted the info?
Was it sjw or soda?

I think SJW but it could have been both. Chus take on SJW is wrong.

Never commit a crime with Chus. He will take everyone down if caught.

Even if you have the list of everyone he told, who is to say they didn't spread it to others who then created the mult?

I don't know if Chus did something that awful here. Perhaps one of the so-called trusted people told someone else without thinking much of it.

That's....somehow even worse. Whatever, I guess. At least stop pretending you didn't publicize it.

Why don't you blame Florida for publicizing his name? It's their list and they made it public.

How am I pretending that I didn't send the PMs?

There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.

Chus sold the gun that was used to commit the offense.

Chus is no better than Big Tobacco.

Or the Barbary Pirates.

1. I think my stance on registries like that are on record here.

2. It is public information, yes. There is a difference, however, between something being publicly available and publicizing it to people otherwise unaware of its existence.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

You're trying reeeealllly hard to pretend that "posting it publicly" isn't in the immediate vicinity of "sharing it with a few people". At their core, they are the exact same act.

Sending PMs is not the same thing as posting for all to see. It's not.

If they are the exact same thing, then why is the mult hiding?

There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.