It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 2:24 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 174 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
"OMG I can't understand why MANY black people get upset when white people say n-word. This is so unfair! " This level of complete fucking stupidity is frightening.


Isn't Ice Cube essentially saying what I said weeks ago: it's the intent of the speaker that makes the use offensive?


No. He's saying that only black people should say it regardless of intent.


It's a ridiculous double standard that gives all sorts of ammunition to the alt-right.

Also, who gets to define "black"? Someone who is half-black? What about someone who is a quarter black, but "identifies" as black. Beyond that should white people even listen to people saying the word or is that "appropriating" something that does not belong to them?

As soon as we start creating special rules for language bases on race we are entering a divisive and dangerous territory. Bill Maher's joke was stupid, but he clearly wasn't trying to hurt people.


WFR, I'm not trying to be an asshole, but the dangerous territory you speak of has always existed around this word.

I don't think most educated people give a shit what the alt-right thinks.

What exactly are you advocating?

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82242
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
"OMG I can't understand why MANY black people get upset when white people say n-word. This is so unfair! " This level of complete fucking stupidity is frightening.


Isn't Ice Cube essentially saying what I said weeks ago: it's the intent of the speaker that makes the use offensive?


No. He's saying that only black people should say it regardless of intent.


It's a ridiculous double standard that gives all sorts of ammunition to the alt-right.

Also, who gets to define "black"? Someone who is half-black? What about someone who is a quarter black, but "identifies" as black. Beyond that should white people even listen to people saying the word or is that "appropriating" something that does not belong to them?

As soon as we start creating special rules for language bases on race we are entering a divisive and dangerous territory. Bill Maher's joke was stupid, but he clearly wasn't trying to hurt people.


but he was

He wasn't using it as some kind of greeting or term of endearment, which is the occasion when some people find the use acceptable

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:34 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
"OMG I can't understand why MANY black people get upset when white people say n-word. This is so unfair! " This level of complete fucking stupidity is frightening.


Isn't Ice Cube essentially saying what I said weeks ago: it's the intent of the speaker that makes the use offensive?


No. He's saying that only black people should say it regardless of intent.


It's a ridiculous double standard that gives all sorts of ammunition to the alt-right.

Also, who gets to define "black"? Someone who is half-black? What about someone who is a quarter black, but "identifies" as black. Beyond that should white people even listen to people saying the word or is that "appropriating" something that does not belong to them?

As soon as we start creating special rules for language bases on race we are entering a divisive and dangerous territory. Bill Maher's joke was stupid, but he clearly wasn't trying to hurt people.



If you just have to use a racial slur no one is going to stop you. Go ahead and shout it out at the top of your lungs.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82242
Hatchetman wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
[
Isn't Ice Cube essentially saying what I said weeks ago: it's the intent of the speaker that makes the use offensive?


you said that but backtracked so it doesn't count.


Wha?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:38 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
"OMG I can't understand why MANY black people get upset when white people say n-word. This is so unfair! " This level of complete fucking stupidity is frightening.


Isn't Ice Cube essentially saying what I said weeks ago: it's the intent of the speaker that makes the use offensive?


No. He's saying that only black people should say it regardless of intent.


No. He is just assuming intent when used by a white person. I don't think he is for black people using it with malicious intent.


Fair enough

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92088
Location: To the left of my post
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
As soon as we start creating special rules for language bases on race we are entering a divisive and dangerous territory. Bill Maher's joke was stupid, but he clearly wasn't trying to hurt people.

Why is this so difficult? When you are a member of a group you are allowed to say some things about that group that others outside the group are not. It is a word that is designed to demean and dehumanize a certain group of people. Now, we could argue whether ANYONE should be using it but the intent is clearly different inside the group.

The scared white male society should just deal with it. They, and that includes myself, have no idea what it feels like to be called that name and if a group that has been treated poorly in the past simply requests you not use that one specific word then just deal with it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
As soon as we start creating special rules for language bases on race we are entering a divisive and dangerous territory. Bill Maher's joke was stupid, but he clearly wasn't trying to hurt people.

Why is this so difficult? When you are a member of a group you are allowed to say some things about that group that others outside the group are not. It is a word that is designed to demean and dehumanize a certain group of people. Now, we could argue whether ANYONE should be using it but the intent is clearly different inside the group.

The scared white male society should just deal with it. They, and that includes myself, have no idea what it feels like to be called that name and if a group that has been treated poorly in the past simply requests you not use that one specific word then just deal with it.

100% agree. Why do white people want to use that word? What's the endgame?

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92088
Location: To the left of my post
Also, the thing you have to keep in mind is that in general when a target of a slur uses that slur themselves it is an attempt to lessen the damaging nature of the slur. That is another thing that makes it different. There would be no ill effect towards me if that word was used against me so as a white guy I can't do the same thing.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82242
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Also, the thing you have to keep in mind is that in general when a target of a slur uses that slur themselves it is an attempt to lessen the damaging nature of the slur. That is another thing that makes it different. There would be no ill effect towards me if that word was used against me so as a white guy I can't do the same thing.


You had me then you lost me. The sting is the same depending on the known intent of the speaker, maybe worse if the receiver knows the speaker is aware of the extent it damages

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55959
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
He could have made the same dumb joke if he'd said "I'm a house slave." Still would have pissed people off but he wouldn't have hit the red button like he did.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43576
good dolphin wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Also, the thing you have to keep in mind is that in general when a target of a slur uses that slur themselves it is an attempt to lessen the damaging nature of the slur. That is another thing that makes it different. There would be no ill effect towards me if that word was used against me so as a white guy I can't do the same thing.


You had me then you lost me. The sting is the same depending on the known intent of the speaker, maybe worse if the receiver knows the speaker is aware of the extent it damages

Zip it, pollock.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92088
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Also, the thing you have to keep in mind is that in general when a target of a slur uses that slur themselves it is an attempt to lessen the damaging nature of the slur. That is another thing that makes it different. There would be no ill effect towards me if that word was used against me so as a white guy I can't do the same thing.


You had me then you lost me. The sting is the same depending on the known intent of the speaker, maybe worse if the receiver knows the speaker is aware of the extent it damages
No, the idea is to repurpose the word. We can debate the effectiveness of such a matter but it clearly is different.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:03 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
For me the context and the speaker (regardless of race) matters. I just don't understand the argument that some people are making. If you want to argue that no one should use certain words, I would not have an issue with that. However, arguing that everyone should have the right to say n-word (without being criticized) because some black people use it is ridiculous.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The scared white male society should just deal with it. They, and that includes myself, have no idea what it feels like to be called that name and if a group that has been treated poorly in the past simply requests you not use that one specific word then just deal with it.

this is shakier ground, though. they may never be able to understand what it feels like to be called that, but many of them can relate to it from being called other words. and some might say that there's not a history of violence and disfranchisement behind those other words, but i'd disagree. i think academics, for example, have correctly pointed to certain words as abhorrent and demeaning and have overlooked the actual processes of demeaning (or denied that other words can also significantly negatively affect others). look, you don't want to make everyone a victim, and you don't want to tell people to just get over it. there's so much power in having people relate to one another.

there are many people, regardless of race, who have been called names and been treated poorly as a result of their appearance or identity. these can have significant economic and psychological consequences.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Douchebag wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Also, the thing you have to keep in mind is that in general when a target of a slur uses that slur themselves it is an attempt to lessen the damaging nature of the slur. That is another thing that makes it different. There would be no ill effect towards me if that word was used against me so as a white guy I can't do the same thing.


You had me then you lost me. The sting is the same depending on the known intent of the speaker, maybe worse if the receiver knows the speaker is aware of the extent it damages

Zip it, pollock.

if you're referring to jackson pollock, that is hurtful

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82242
Douchebag wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Also, the thing you have to keep in mind is that in general when a target of a slur uses that slur themselves it is an attempt to lessen the damaging nature of the slur. That is another thing that makes it different. There would be no ill effect towards me if that word was used against me so as a white guy I can't do the same thing.


You had me then you lost me. The sting is the same depending on the known intent of the speaker, maybe worse if the receiver knows the speaker is aware of the extent it damages

Zip it, pollock.


polock, dipshit

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92088
Location: To the left of my post
formerlyknownas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The scared white male society should just deal with it. They, and that includes myself, have no idea what it feels like to be called that name and if a group that has been treated poorly in the past simply requests you not use that one specific word then just deal with it.

this is shakier ground, though. they may never be able to understand what it feels like to be called that, but many of them can relate to it from being called other words. and some might say that there's not a history of violence and disfranchisement behind those other words, but i'd disagree. i think academics, for example, have correctly pointed to certain words as abhorrent and demeaning and have overlooked the actual processes of demeaning (or denied that other words can also significantly negatively affect others). look, you don't want to make everyone a victim, and you don't want to tell people to just get over it. there's so much power in having people relate to one another.

there are many people, regardless of race, who have been called names and been treated poorly as a result of their appearance or identity. these can have significant economic and psychological consequences.
This is just the classic "slippery slope" argument that you can make for almost anything. It doesn't matter if other groups have had similar situations at times in history. Black people have this situation now in America. I mean, there are still a huge amount of people alive today that literally lived under segregation and then the slow and unfinished reversal of the societal ramifications of that. If there was a similar group with the resume of injustice against them, and they requested that they weren't called a specific word, then just accept it and move on. Who knows, maybe one day white males can be so mistreated they'll get to do it!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nas wrote:
For me the context and the speaker (regardless of race) matters. I just don't understand the argument that some people are making. If you want to argue that no one should use certain words, I would not have an issue with that. However, arguing that everyone should have the right to say n-word (without being criticized) because some black people use it is ridiculous.


It should either not be said by anyone, or it's now an inoffensive part of the vernacular that has been reclaimed and is no longer offensive unless used with hateful intent. If Ice Cube is so offended by the word, then why he would not feel offended playing to mostly white audiences raping along to his music?

This talking down to people is not helpful in the least. This is a "teachable moment Bill". You sound like a redneck. You would be a slave-master.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Last edited by WaitingforRuffcorn on Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
formerlyknownas wrote:
There are a couple lines I wouldn't cross...the N-word being one...I can't think of a comp.


good dolphin wrote:
The p word.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
For me the context and the speaker (regardless of race) matters. I just don't understand the argument that some people are making. If you want to argue that no one should use certain words, I would not have an issue with that. However, arguing that everyone should have the right to say n-word (without being criticized) because some black people use it is ridiculous.


It should either not be said by anyone, or it's now now an inoffensive part or the vernacular that has been reclaimed and is no longer offensive unless used with hateful intent. If Ice Cube is so offended by the word, then why he would not feel offended playing to mostly white audiences raping along to his music?

This talking down to people is not helpful in the least. This is a "teachable moment Bill". You sound like a redneck. You would be a slave-master.


So stop trying to talk down to people in this matter yourself

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92088
Location: To the left of my post
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
For me the context and the speaker (regardless of race) matters. I just don't understand the argument that some people are making. If you want to argue that no one should use certain words, I would not have an issue with that. However, arguing that everyone should have the right to say n-word (without being criticized) because some black people use it is ridiculous.


It should either not be said by anyone, or it's now now an inoffensive part or the vernacular that has been reclaimed and is no longer offensive unless used with hateful intent. If Ice Cube is so offended by the word, then why he would not feel offended playing to mostly white audiences raping along to his music?

This talking down to people is not helpful in the least. This is a "teachable moment Bill". You sound like a redneck. You would be a slave-master.

This is the flaw in your logic. In an ideal world, the word would never be said by anyone. That doesn't mean it is the same when said by a member of the target group and by someone who is not a member of the target group.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The scared white male society should just deal with it. They, and that includes myself, have no idea what it feels like to be called that name and if a group that has been treated poorly in the past simply requests you not use that one specific word then just deal with it.

this is shakier ground, though. they may never be able to understand what it feels like to be called that, but many of them can relate to it from being called other words. and some might say that there's not a history of violence and disfranchisement behind those other words, but i'd disagree. i think academics, for example, have correctly pointed to certain words as abhorrent and demeaning and have overlooked the actual processes of demeaning (or denied that other words can also significantly negatively affect others). look, you don't want to make everyone a victim, and you don't want to tell people to just get over it. there's so much power in having people relate to one another.

there are many people, regardless of race, who have been called names and been treated poorly as a result of their appearance or identity. these can have significant economic and psychological consequences.
This is just the classic "slippery slope" argument that you can make for almost anything. It doesn't matter if other groups have had similar situations at times in history. Black people have this situation now in America. I mean, there are still a huge amount of people alive today that literally lived under segregation and then the slow and unfinished reversal of the societal ramifications of that. If there was a similar group with the resume of injustice against them, and they requested that they weren't called a specific word, then just accept it and move on. Who knows, maybe one day white males can be so mistreated they'll get to do it!

I might agree with much of that, but I'm not talking about race. We marginalize people in more ways that that, and many of them are based on things they cannot change. It's just much harder to discuss in a systematic way, to be honest. (Unless you are talking about social class, but that's not what I am talking about.)

There's still a huge amount of people today living under segregation--racial residential segregation, whose effects are at least as deleterious as the classic Jim Crow policies.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
As a white guy, I understand that I shouldn't use that word, so I don't. It's really not that difficult.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Chus wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
There are a couple lines I wouldn't cross...the N-word being one...I can't think of a comp.


good dolphin wrote:
The p word.

pusillanimous?

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Can we get a list of words with the appropriate people who can say them?

Thanks.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:36 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Can we get a list of words with the appropriate people who can say them?

Thanks.

DONE! I sent the list to Spmack.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Nas wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Can we get a list of words with the appropriate people who can say them?

Thanks.

DONE! I sent the list to Spmack.

:lol:

NICE!

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This talking down to people is not helpful in the least. This is a "teachable moment Bill". You sound like a redneck. You would be a slave-master.

I guess when you discuss this issue, it may pay to be like a non-violent protestor: Give people no footholds to disagree with you. No rhetorical distractions ("you sound like a redneck"). Not so much to satisfy a perfect argument, but to satisfy human nature....since many come to arguments without an open mind.

On the other hand, sometimes people aren't trying to persuade you; they just want to show you how pissed they are. Or they say that it's not their job to educate you, etc.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The scared white male society should just deal with it. They, and that includes myself, have no idea what it feels like to be called that name and if a group that has been treated poorly in the past simply requests you not use that one specific word then just deal with it.

this is shakier ground, though. they may never be able to understand what it feels like to be called that, but many of them can relate to it from being called other words. and some might say that there's not a history of violence and disfranchisement behind those other words, but i'd disagree. i think academics, for example, have correctly pointed to certain words as abhorrent and demeaning and have overlooked the actual processes of demeaning (or denied that other words can also significantly negatively affect others). look, you don't want to make everyone a victim, and you don't want to tell people to just get over it. there's so much power in having people relate to one another.

there are many people, regardless of race, who have been called names and been treated poorly as a result of their appearance or identity. these can have significant economic and psychological consequences.
This is just the classic "slippery slope" argument that you can make for almost anything. It doesn't matter if other groups have had similar situations at times in history. Black people have this situation now in America. I mean, there are still a huge amount of people alive today that literally lived under segregation and then the slow and unfinished reversal of the societal ramifications of that. If there was a similar group with the resume of injustice against them, and they requested that they weren't called a specific word, then just accept it and move on. Who knows, maybe one day white males can be so mistreated they'll get to do it!


So the suffering Olympics is back on?

We can use the word, and you can't, is just bad policy. If you are offended by a word, it should be offensive regardless of who uses it. Race is increasingly becoming difficult to define. It's also continues to push this us vs. them mentality based along racial divides. I don't think I'm really that different from people of other races in my thoughts, wants and emotions. If we can agree that race is a social construct, then let's start to push that idea rather than continue to say we are so radically different that we cannot policy understand each other's circumstances.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Regular Reader wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
For me the context and the speaker (regardless of race) matters. I just don't understand the argument that some people are making. If you want to argue that no one should use certain words, I would not have an issue with that. However, arguing that everyone should have the right to say n-word (without being criticized) because some black people use it is ridiculous.


It should either not be said by anyone, or it's now now an inoffensive part or the vernacular that has been reclaimed and is no longer offensive unless used with hateful intent. If Ice Cube is so offended by the word, then why he would not feel offended playing to mostly white audiences raping along to his music?

This talking down to people is not helpful in the least. This is a "teachable moment Bill". You sound like a redneck. You would be a slave-master.


So stop trying to talk down to people in this matter yourself


How am I talking down to you? I have no desire to insult anyone. Just want to discuss this using facts rather than feelings.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 174 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group