long time guy wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I told you already. If you don't understand tough. How do you feel about Bin Laden's claims. Funny but not surprising you didn't answer.
Who is doing spin now?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2347e/2347ebc0b7577f6bf259c9d833e0475bb719a9c1" alt="Laughing :lol:"
If there is no empty land to be inhabited then it doesn't. It's that simple. If you aren't going to address Bin Laden or Israel for that matter then again have a good one.
If you think that Israel has moral justification to do what it did then be prepared for for future turmoil in the region. For those that it effects I hope for the best.
Israel had the moral justification to be declared a nation as it did so without taking land from any nation as there was at no point in history any independent nation named Palestine. They simply set up a state on land that had been granted to them and the inhabitants (Jew or Arab) would be granted citizenship and really nothing would change other than they would no longer be subjects to the crown. That the Arabs rejected partition is a tragedy and Israel really cannot be blamed for what followed as it was the rejection of partition that led to the present situation.
From the fact you are dodging just about everything I've written in this thread, I can only deduce that you are completely ignorant on this subject and unwilling to engage with facts.
The reason that I avoided it is because I simply didn't wish to go down this road again. First off yes there wasn't a state called Palestine. However Palestinians were overwhelmingly the majority group in the region. If anyone was to be granted a state it should have been them.
2ndly as you say that Palestine never existed neither has the concept behind Zionism. Zionism is a rather contrived belief created by some guy during the late 1800's. Even if it did have historical relevance that doesn't mean that it had to be actualized on land inhabited by another group.
3rdly The terms under which Israel was created were dubious to say the least.
The problem is that your facts here are wrong. The Palestinians were not the overwhelming majority of people in the region. They were the overwhelming majority of the people in the lands granted to them via partition, but not the region. The Jews were in fact the overwhelming majority in the lands that were partitioned for the Jewish state.
It was clear that only partition could work as 1 state was not workable. Starting in the 1920s when Arab nationalism started to take hold, attacks aginst Jews in the land became regular. There were massacres in Hebron, Jerusalem, etc. Pogroms like those of the Czars became commonplace in Jewish neighborhoods. It was clear that 2 states would have to be granted to 2 people as making the Jews a minority within an Arab state would be setting them in danger not even 3 years after the Holocaust ended.
Furthermore, when the land was granted to Israel, it was done knowing there were still over a million Jewish refugees stuck in DP camps post Holocaust who had nowhere else to go. It was also done with the knowledge that 900,000 Jews were living as 2nd class citizens in Arab lands and likely to come set-up home.
No Palestinian had to give up his land for partition and those who accepted it still live in Israel as Arab Israelis with more rights than any other Arab in the Middle East. All that partition did is have them no longer be subjects of the British crown and instead be living in a majority Jewish nation, but granting them rights they never had being ruled from London or Istanbul. Once again, no land was "taken" as there was no country to take it from. The people who accepted partition got to stay as they had before and their children are thriving.
As for Zionism, yes the idea of a Jewish state being formed started in the 19th century, but you're ignoring the fact there was a constant Jewish presence in the region. Jews have lived in that land uninterrupted for over 3,000 years. In fact, even before Zionism became a political movement, the Jewish people were the majority population in Jerusalem as early as 1860, over 3 decades before Herzl.
As for how Israel was created, it's hardly dubious. Partition was often the solution when a colonial power left and there were 2 different groups of people who could not be expected to share a country. Pakistan was never an independent country until the British carved it out of India.
Once again, if partition is accepted none of this is being discussed today.