It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 5:51 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 264 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
This is like ranting and raving against single mothers raking in $10,000/year in welfare benefits they're eligible for while not saying anything about corporate fraud that cripples local and state economies.


It's nothing like that at all.

Why are you so keen on an investigation into supposed Russian interference but not one into how many ineligible voters may be affecting U.S. elections?


Because of the scale. I happen to favor IDs being mandatory at the polls. And I'm not investigating Trump - our elected officials are.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I'm pretty sure there is potential for fraud in my local school district elections, where some races have come down to a handful of votes, and hundreds of millions of dollars in taxing/spending can hang in the balance.


I was referring to the presidential election. Still waiting on your response to my earlier post.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:49 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
There have been about 20 convictions in the past 20+ years so clearly that is more than 0 and it's clearly less than the 5 million the president said voted illegally.


I have no idea how many it is. Neither does Trump. And neither do you. But I think it defies logic to believe that there have only been twenty ineligible voters who cast ballots in the last 20+ years if that's what you're suggesting.

Nas wrote:
I would like what I do inside the voting booth to remain private. I don't want my voting record and other private information to become public and potentially be targeted for decisions that were supposed to be private. Why are you so willing to give this information up? Why aren't you bothered by this request? Is there any request from this president that would bother you?


Are you making an argument for states' rights? Some level of government obviously already has those records.

I'm bothered by it because I think it's pointless. I'm not sure what the answer is, but ineligible people vote all the time and it can have consequences. There's a possibility that Al Franken got elected by ineligible votes.


Government officials don't know who you voted for. If they did the data would be getting abused. The president wants it so he can abuse it. In the end all this will do is suppress the vote even more which obviously benefits the president and elected Trumpets.

There have been billions of votes cast in the past 20 years. If only 20 were convicted of voter fraud I don't need to guess how many weren't caught. Just based on that number I know it isn't a problem. The belief that folks only vote illegally for democrats is laughable and a very Trumpian way of viewing things.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16732
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
veganfan21 wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I'm pretty sure there is potential for fraud in my local school district elections, where some races have come down to a handful of votes, and hundreds of millions of dollars in taxing/spending can hang in the balance.


I was referring to the presidential election. Still waiting on your response to my earlier post.


I'm not defending the meddling. I'm more dismayed by the portrayal that this was on the same level as tampering with voting machines, which didn't happen. I don't think what actually happened really changed too many votes. If Russia had been the one to leak the Trump "pussy grab" tapes, I don't think people would be crying foul.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I'm pretty sure there is potential for fraud in my local school district elections, where some races have come down to a handful of votes, and hundreds of millions of dollars in taxing/spending can hang in the balance.


I was referring to the presidential election. Still waiting on your response to my earlier post.


I'm not defending the meddling. I'm more dismayed by the portrayal that this was on the same level as tampering with voting machines, which didn't happen. I don't think what actually happened really changed too many votes. If Russia had been the one to leak the Trump "pussy grab" tapes, I don't think people would be crying foul.


For me the effectiveness of the meddling is irrelevant. From everything we know it seems that this was more of a disinformation campaign than the more Hollywood-type vote machine tampering thing. Anyway, for me it's irrelevant and what I find more dismaying than the portrayal of it in the national media is the seeming indifference. Not talking to you, but we're getting played and no one gives a shit.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Just so we can put this tired only 20 cases meme to rest here is The NY Times. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/u ... trump.html

In this assumed quality source I skimmed and saw at least 86 convictions in nearly 200 cases. I'm going back to cutting grass so you guys can keep arguing but stop the 20 bullshit.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
pittmike wrote:
Just so we can put this tired only 20 cases meme to rest here is The NY Times. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/u ... trump.html

In this assumed quality source I skimmed and saw at least 86 convictions in nearly 200 cases. I'm going back to cutting grass so you guys can keep arguing but stop the 20 bullshit.


This backs up what I was saying. It doesn't uphold the "illegals voting turned the election toward the dems" narrative. If anything, it undermines it, even as it makes a case for a higher amount of voter fraud.

Quote:
Mistakes and lapses in enforcing voting and registration rules routinely occur in elections, allowing thousands of ineligible voters to go to the polls. But the federal cases provide little evidence of widespread, organized fraud, prosecutors and election law experts said.

“There was nothing that we uncovered that suggested some sort of concerted effort to tilt the election,” Richard G. Frohling, an assistant United States attorney in Milwaukee, said.

Richard L. Hasen, an expert in election law at the Loyola Law School, agreed, saying: “If they found a single case of a conspiracy to affect the outcome of a Congressional election or a statewide election, that would be significant. But what we see is isolated, small-scale activities that often have not shown any kind of criminal intent.”


Quote:
In swing states, including Ohio and Wisconsin, party leaders conducted inquiries to find people who may have voted improperly and prodded officials to act on their findings.

But the party officials and lawmakers were often disappointed. The accusations led to relatively few cases, and a significant number resulted in acquittals.


Quote:
So could fraud decide a national election?

Almost certainly not
, chiefly because the enforcement of voter ID laws would guard solely against in-person fraud, which has been strikingly rare. Experts also say that the risk of widespread, decisive misconduct in a national election is extremely slim, in part because of the number of regulators from both parties and the constitutional structure of presidential balloting.

But there is bipartisan agreement that, under exceptional circumstances, fraud could taint contests involving far fewer votes, like some local races.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:51 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
pittmike wrote:
Just so we can put this tired only 20 cases meme to rest here is The NY Times. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/u ... trump.html

In this assumed quality source I skimmed and saw at least 86 convictions in nearly 200 cases. I'm going back to cutting grass so you guys can keep arguing but stop the 20 bullshit.


If you changed it to 5000 out of billions of votes cast it still would be a really insignificant number. You're a scientist so you out of all people should understand that.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Should illegals have the right to vote? Is citizenship a concept that has outlived its usefulness?


That's an unnecessary stretch, but I will play your game. MANY only see corporate citizenship as mattering. Or at least first among (non)equals



It's not a game. I'm trying to get at the right answer. I don't see an issue with resident aliens being allowed to vote in certain local elections. But I do find it disingenuous to be constantly beating a drum regarding the integrity of federal elections with regard to "Russian interference" when said integrity is much more like to be under attack by ineligible voters who are actively sought by one of the major political parties. I'm pretty sure that Jerry Brown signed a bill that automatically registers Californians to vote when they receive their driver's licenses. There are undoubtedly many ineligible voters casting ballots regardless of whether or not a loon like Trump overstates the case.

Anyway, I'm open to the idea of a completely open border and anyone who resides within what used to be the United States having the right to cast a ballot. I'm not sure how that would work out though.


Why does your logic only work one way?

You constantly criticize the Russia investigation (and I agree on many counts), but you're all in favor of a hunt for illegal voters simply because our schizophrenic president has a hunch? Isn't that hypocritical?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:55 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Should illegals have the right to vote? Is citizenship a concept that has outlived its usefulness?


That's an unnecessary stretch, but I will play your game. MANY only see corporate citizenship as mattering. Or at least first among (non)equals



It's not a game. I'm trying to get at the right answer. I don't see an issue with resident aliens being allowed to vote in certain local elections. But I do find it disingenuous to be constantly beating a drum regarding the integrity of federal elections with regard to "Russian interference" when said integrity is much more like to be under attack by ineligible voters who are actively sought by one of the major political parties. I'm pretty sure that Jerry Brown signed a bill that automatically registers Californians to vote when they receive their driver's licenses. There are undoubtedly many ineligible voters casting ballots regardless of whether or not a loon like Trump overstates the case.

Anyway, I'm open to the idea of a completely open border and anyone who resides within what used to be the United States having the right to cast a ballot. I'm not sure how that would work out though.


Why does your logic only work one way?

You constantly criticize the Russia investigation (and I agree on many counts), but you're all in favor of a hunt for illegal voters simply because our schizophrenic president has a hunch? Isn't that hypocritical?


Why do you want people to vote who aren't eligible to vote?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Just so we can put this tired only 20 cases meme to rest here is The NY Times. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/u ... trump.html

In this assumed quality source I skimmed and saw at least 86 convictions in nearly 200 cases. I'm going back to cutting grass so you guys can keep arguing but stop the 20 bullshit.


If you changed it to 5000 out of billions of votes cast it still would be a really insignificant number. You're a scientist so you out of all people should understand that.


It doesn't make it ok to base an argument on 20. One is too many for me. If the principle of the law is not enforced then just make it Jorr's let anyone vote that feels like it. It isn't that hard to agree to laws that are fair to all and enforce them. Just get pols from both sides to stop lying about what it is they want instead of that.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
pittmike wrote:
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Just so we can put this tired only 20 cases meme to rest here is The NY Times. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/u ... trump.html

In this assumed quality source I skimmed and saw at least 86 convictions in nearly 200 cases. I'm going back to cutting grass so you guys can keep arguing but stop the 20 bullshit.


If you changed it to 5000 out of billions of votes cast it still would be a really insignificant number. You're a scientist so you out of all people should understand that.


It doesn't make it ok to base an argument on 20. One is too many for me. If the principle of the law is not enforced then just make it Jorr's let anyone vote that feels like it. It isn't that hard to agree to laws that are fair to all and enforce them. Just get pols from both sides to stop lying about what it is they want instead of that.


Have you read the article you posted? It cites many cases outside of illegals voting, including felons voting because they simply didn't know they were ineligible to vote.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:15 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
pittmike wrote:
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Just so we can put this tired only 20 cases meme to rest here is The NY Times. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/u ... trump.html

In this assumed quality source I skimmed and saw at least 86 convictions in nearly 200 cases. I'm going back to cutting grass so you guys can keep arguing but stop the 20 bullshit.


If you changed it to 5000 out of billions of votes cast it still would be a really insignificant number. You're a scientist so you out of all people should understand that.


It doesn't make it ok to base an argument on 20. One is too many for me. If the principle of the law is not enforced then just make it Jorr's let anyone vote that feels like it. It isn't that hard to agree to laws that are fair to all and enforce them. Just get pols from both sides to stop lying about what it is they want instead of that.


Well that's because you're a Trumpet/Jorrpet. No one with a brain (especially a scientist) would be alarmed by something happening 20 or 86 times out of billions. No one with a brain would believe that a commission was needed. Just based on those numbers this is a law that is probably broken the least in America.

The point of saying 20 times was I knew it was a really insignificant amount. The link below says 31.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washin ... lots-cast/

https://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/ ... fraud-myth

Given this tiny incident rate for voter impersonation fraud, it is more likely, the report noted, that an American “will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls.”

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Just so we can put this tired only 20 cases meme to rest here is The NY Times. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/u ... trump.html

In this assumed quality source I skimmed and saw at least 86 convictions in nearly 200 cases. I'm going back to cutting grass so you guys can keep arguing but stop the 20 bullshit.


If you changed it to 5000 out of billions of votes cast it still would be a really insignificant number. You're a scientist so you out of all people should understand that.


It doesn't make it ok to base an argument on 20. One is too many for me. If the principle of the law is not enforced then just make it Jorr's let anyone vote that feels like it. It isn't that hard to agree to laws that are fair to all and enforce them. Just get pols from both sides to stop lying about what it is they want instead of that.


Have you read the article you posted? It cites many cases outside of illegals voting, including felons voting because they simply didn't know they were ineligible to vote.


He didn't read it and he won't read the links I posted. He just waits for JORR to tell him what to think. It's really embarrassing to see a man do that to himself.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
pittmike wrote:
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Just so we can put this tired only 20 cases meme to rest here is The NY Times. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/u ... trump.html

In this assumed quality source I skimmed and saw at least 86 convictions in nearly 200 cases. I'm going back to cutting grass so you guys can keep arguing but stop the 20 bullshit.


If you changed it to 5000 out of billions of votes cast it still would be a really insignificant number. You're a scientist so you out of all people should understand that.


It doesn't make it ok to base an argument on 20. One is too many for me. If the principle of the law is not enforced then just make it Jorr's let anyone vote that feels like it. It isn't that hard to agree to laws that are fair to all and enforce them. Just get pols from both sides to stop lying about what it is they want instead of that.


In a country of 350 million people, 1 instance of voter fraud would be outstanding. #science

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
leashyourkids wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Just so we can put this tired only 20 cases meme to rest here is The NY Times. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/u ... trump.html

In this assumed quality source I skimmed and saw at least 86 convictions in nearly 200 cases. I'm going back to cutting grass so you guys can keep arguing but stop the 20 bullshit.


If you changed it to 5000 out of billions of votes cast it still would be a really insignificant number. You're a scientist so you out of all people should understand that.


It doesn't make it ok to base an argument on 20. One is too many for me. If the principle of the law is not enforced then just make it Jorr's let anyone vote that feels like it. It isn't that hard to agree to laws that are fair to all and enforce them. Just get pols from both sides to stop lying about what it is they want instead of that.


In a country of 350 million people, 1 instance of voter fraud would be outstanding. #science


It's 1 too many. We need a "distinguished" commission to collect all voting records so we can prevent it from happening.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
If you're not illegally voting, you have nothing to hide.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Nas wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Just so we can put this tired only 20 cases meme to rest here is The NY Times. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/u ... trump.html

In this assumed quality source I skimmed and saw at least 86 convictions in nearly 200 cases. I'm going back to cutting grass so you guys can keep arguing but stop the 20 bullshit.


If you changed it to 5000 out of billions of votes cast it still would be a really insignificant number. You're a scientist so you out of all people should understand that.


It doesn't make it ok to base an argument on 20. One is too many for me. If the principle of the law is not enforced then just make it Jorr's let anyone vote that feels like it. It isn't that hard to agree to laws that are fair to all and enforce them. Just get pols from both sides to stop lying about what it is they want instead of that.


In a country of 350 million people, 1 instance of voter fraud would be outstanding. #science


It's 1 too many. We need a "distinguished" commission to collect all voting records so we can prevent it from happening.


Voting machines cause pregnancy.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
It's possible.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80533
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
veganfan21 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
This is like ranting and raving against single mothers raking in $10,000/year in welfare benefits they're eligible for while not saying anything about corporate fraud that cripples local and state economies.


It's nothing like that at all.

Why are you so keen on an investigation into supposed Russian interference but not one into how many ineligible voters may be affecting U.S. elections?


Because of the scale. I happen to favor IDs being mandatory at the polls. And I'm not investigating Trump - our elected officials are.


I think the likelihood of an election turning on the votes of ineligible voters is far greater than than of a foreign power seizing control of our voting booths.

If Nas thinks only 20 or even only 5000 ineligible people voted, I'm not going to argue. Neither of us knows. But I think common sense suggests it's more than either of those numbers. Whether it's ever been enough to make a difference, who knows?

As far as whether ineligible voters would be more likely to go Democrat, it seems likely that they would, but that's immaterial. They simply shouldn't be voting. There's little concern for whether or not they do though. That's because the concern about the "integrity of our voting system" isn't really about that at all. For most people it's simply about "Get Trump".

And hey, if someone says that and feels it's a moral imperative, I'm open to hearing their argument. Thus far I've only heard hyperbolic hysteria from guys like Jonathan Chait and Nas. Most of the complaints come down to "he's doing stuff I don't like". And you and I may not like it. That's fine. But many people who voted for him do like it and he was fairly elected, so barring any high crimes and misdemeanors (something no American should be rooting for) we just have to grit our teeth for four years.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80533
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Should illegals have the right to vote? Is citizenship a concept that has outlived its usefulness?


That's an unnecessary stretch, but I will play your game. MANY only see corporate citizenship as mattering. Or at least first among (non)equals



It's not a game. I'm trying to get at the right answer. I don't see an issue with resident aliens being allowed to vote in certain local elections. But I do find it disingenuous to be constantly beating a drum regarding the integrity of federal elections with regard to "Russian interference" when said integrity is much more like to be under attack by ineligible voters who are actively sought by one of the major political parties. I'm pretty sure that Jerry Brown signed a bill that automatically registers Californians to vote when they receive their driver's licenses. There are undoubtedly many ineligible voters casting ballots regardless of whether or not a loon like Trump overstates the case.

Anyway, I'm open to the idea of a completely open border and anyone who resides within what used to be the United States having the right to cast a ballot. I'm not sure how that would work out though.


Why does your logic only work one way?

You constantly criticize the Russia investigation (and I agree on many counts), but you're all in favor of a hunt for illegal voters simply because our schizophrenic president has a hunch? Isn't that hypocritical?



I think I've said more than once that I'm not in favor of Trump's method. But we should do the best we can to make sure ineligible people aren't voting and I don't believe we are doing that. There are problems with a national ID too. I don't have the answer. I'm just not silly enough to think only 20 ineligible voters cast ballots.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Terry's Peeps wrote:
If you're not illegally voting, you have nothing to hide.


:lol: Well sort of. As I neither started nor endorsed any commission I feel ok about my opinion. Either enforce the laws you have or change them to the way that a majority of the people find fair and lawful. This is true of many issues. Ignoring or not enforcing laws you have in order to manipulate factors doesn't really help in the long run does it?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Just so we can put this tired only 20 cases meme to rest here is The NY Times. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/u ... trump.html

In this assumed quality source I skimmed and saw at least 86 convictions in nearly 200 cases. I'm going back to cutting grass so you guys can keep arguing but stop the 20 bullshit.


If you changed it to 5000 out of billions of votes cast it still would be a really insignificant number. You're a scientist so you out of all people should understand that.


That's roughly the same ratio of global warming deniers in the scientific community, and Mike rolls with it.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:14 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
pittmike wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
If you're not illegally voting, you have nothing to hide.


:lol: Well sort of. As I neither started nor endorsed any commission I feel ok about my opinion. Either enforce the laws you have or change them to the way that a majority of the people find fair and lawful. This is true of many issues. Ignoring or not enforcing laws you have in order to manipulate factors doesn't really help in the long run does it?


Who says they're not being enforced? Clearly they are unless of course you believe 5 million illegal aliens voted for Hillary in 2016.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
pittmike wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
If you're not illegally voting, you have nothing to hide.


:lol: Well sort of. As I neither started nor endorsed any commission I feel ok about my opinion. Either enforce the laws you have or change them to the way that a majority of the people find fair and lawful. This is true of many issues. Ignoring or not enforcing laws you have in order to manipulate factors doesn't really help in the long run does it?


Mike I'd just like to know if you have any comment on the article you posted that refutes the beliefs you hold about illegals and voter fraud.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:27 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

If Nas thinks only 20 or even only 5000 ineligible people voted, I'm not going to argue. Neither of us knows. But I think common sense suggests it's more than either of those numbers. Whether it's ever been enough to make a difference, who knows?



We don't have to argue because MANY have already investigated and the numbers are insignificant. This has been a voter suppression tactic by republicans before your lord and savior became president.

We can't get people who are eligible to vote to show up but democrats have managed to get millions of illegal aliens to vote in elections they always lose? They've also managed to pull this off year after year and failure after failure without being exposed? How does this make sense in your head? Because President Trump is for it now? Sad!

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Chus wrote:
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Just so we can put this tired only 20 cases meme to rest here is The NY Times. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/u ... trump.html

In this assumed quality source I skimmed and saw at least 86 convictions in nearly 200 cases. I'm going back to cutting grass so you guys can keep arguing but stop the 20 bullshit.


If you changed it to 5000 out of billions of votes cast it still would be a really insignificant number. You're a scientist so you out of all people should understand that.


That's roughly the same ratio of global warming deniers in the scientific community, and Mike rolls with it.


The lack of consistency in thought by the Trumpets is frightening and embarrassing.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
This is like ranting and raving against single mothers raking in $10,000/year in welfare benefits they're eligible for while not saying anything about corporate fraud that cripples local and state economies.


It's nothing like that at all.

Why are you so keen on an investigation into supposed Russian interference but not one into how many ineligible voters may be affecting U.S. elections?


Because of the scale. I happen to favor IDs being mandatory at the polls. And I'm not investigating Trump - our elected officials are.


I think the likelihood of an election turning on the votes of ineligible voters is far greater than than of a foreign power seizing control of our voting booths.

If Nas thinks only 20 or even only 5000 ineligible people voted, I'm not going to argue. Neither of us knows. But I think common sense suggests it's more than either of those numbers. Whether it's ever been enough to make a difference, who knows?

As far as whether ineligible voters would be more likely to go Democrat, it seems likely that they would, but that's immaterial. They simply shouldn't be voting. There's little concern for whether or not they do though. That's because the concern about the "integrity of our voting system" isn't really about that at all. For most people it's simply about "Get Trump".

And hey, if someone says that and feels it's a moral imperative, I'm open to hearing their argument. Thus far I've only heard hyperbolic hysteria from guys like Jonathan Chait and Nas. Most of the complaints come down to "he's doing stuff I don't like". And you and I may not like it. That's fine. But many people who voted for him do like it and he was fairly elected, so barring any high crimes and misdemeanors (something no American should be rooting for) we just have to grit our teeth for four years.


The numbers aren't in your favor here, and no one (at least here) says the voting machines were compromised. Look, this isn't Uganda. We have superior controls over the vote tabulation and recording process. There's no way the level of fraud you're implying can occur can actually happen at the national level. No way. Even the article that Mike might have inadvertently posted says as much. When it comes to fraud we've got a bunch of isolated incidents that end up not being all fraudulent in the first place, and it's not just undocumented immigrants voting when they shouldn't. Either way, it's not enough to swing an entire race. You know very well that the commission is a vanity project for Trump since he's butthurt over losing the popular vote.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:42 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80533
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
We don't have to argue because MANY have already investigated and the numbers are insignificant.


That's just not true.

https://www.odu.edu/news/2016/12/fake_news#.WV15FlGQyM8

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
veganfan21 wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
If you're not illegally voting, you have nothing to hide.


:lol: Well sort of. As I neither started nor endorsed any commission I feel ok about my opinion. Either enforce the laws you have or change them to the way that a majority of the people find fair and lawful. This is true of many issues. Ignoring or not enforcing laws you have in order to manipulate factors doesn't really help in the long run does it?


Mike I'd just like to know if you have any comment on the article you posted that refutes the beliefs you hold about illegals and voter fraud.


I didn't feel I needed to as that wasn't the point I was trying to make. Regardless, I agree that it likely does not change a national election. I do think it can have local and maybe state effects as was mentioned here as well.

I think as we move forward I do not like the way pols manipulate or selectively enforce the law to suit their needs. So in that line of thought I see no problem cleaning up the laws and enforcing them. Others can argue what those laws should be but pick a lane and enforce. I feel similarly about immigration law.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 264 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group