It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:50 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 95057
Location: To the left of my post
I think JORR needs to move to the suburbs. Lots of safe places to ride your bike there and there are even trees! You won't miss seeing a Walgreens every 5 minutes, stoplights, and condos!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7942
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
The thing that worries me most about bikers is me inadvertently crushing them under my car just because they think a huffy and a SUV belong in the same space. I ain't gonna hear your little bell, bitch. Just invest in an indoor bike cardio machine or find a park with a bike trail. When you want to get on an actual road and you're not able to go at least 50/mph then you're doing it wrong.
That's the thing too. Bike trails are all over the place now. Go ride there. Go ride roads that have dedicated bike lanes or parallel bike trails. I understand if you need a bike to get to a grocery store or work because you can't afford a car but a large majority of these people are not doing anything like that. The idea of bikes and cars co-existing is a remnant from the early days of cars when they went roughly the same speed anyways.

JORR lives in Chicago. Go ride on the lakeshore.



This is how I feel about SUVs. Why do you need a giant truck? Don't tell me it's for work.


Giant truck is for work. SUV was because I needed something big enough to get three car seats across back. Although now the SUV isn't so giant but that third kid, while a blessing, brought many an unforeseen travel complication.

I live in the sticks. Bikes rank somewhere behind slow moving combines and somewhere ahead of random livestock on road in my annoyance factor.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Grown men shouldn't ride a bicycle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:43 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 82145
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This is how I feel about SUVs. Why do you need a giant truck? Don't tell me it's for work.
It's not for joyriding. It's good for my bike rack though when I drive it to a place that bikes are designed to be though.


It's something you don't need. Families used to have 6-10 kids and got by without a fucking Hummer. They make driving difficult for everyone else.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:45 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 82145
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Hockey Gay wrote:
Grown men shouldn't ride a bicycle



If more of them did there would be less heart attacks. Maybe mandatory bikes should be part of the healthcare bill.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:46 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102753
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's something you don't need. Families used to have 6-10 kids and got by without a fucking Hummer. They make driving difficult for everyone else.
You also don't "need" to be riding a bike in the middle of the road with a double yellow line.

You say you want your three fucking feet, but then there are other laws and courteous acts that cyclists flat out ignore. If the guy in the video was riding his bike closer to the shoulder of the road, he likely would not have gotten hit.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:46 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 82145
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You think he didn't see him? I think he hit him on purpose. People like BRick get emotional when a bike is in front of them and do immoral acts.
I'm pretty sure you have more emotional outbursts in a year than I do in ten.


I don't think so. You're expressing road rage and you're not even driving.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17465
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I saw the video and yes the driver should not have left the scene, but that asshole cyclist was out in the middle to left side of the lane (instead of the side of the road) and doing so on a curve where the driver had no chance of seeing him.

Cyclist is a future Darwin Award winner
Just watched it too. Sounds like not riding single file is going to help the driver. However, him leaving the scene is unforgivable.

Yes, whether it is the driver's fault or not, the driver left the scene and that's probably a felony.

Had he stayed, the video probably helps him avoid a ticket/fault as the cyclist was not riding in a safe manner.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:48 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 82145
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's something you don't need. Families used to have 6-10 kids and got by without a fucking Hummer. They make driving difficult for everyone else.
You also don't "need" to be riding a bike in the middle of the road with a double yellow line.

You say you want your three fucking feet, but then there are other laws and courteous acts that cyclists flat out ignore. If the guy in the video was riding his bike closer to the shoulder of the road, he likely would not have gotten hit.



The average motorist is far from courteous.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7942
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This is how I feel about SUVs. Why do you need a giant truck? Don't tell me it's for work.
It's not for joyriding. It's good for my bike rack though when I drive it to a place that bikes are designed to be though.


It's something you don't need. Families used to have 6-10 kids and got by without a fucking Hummer. They make driving difficult for everyone else.


Out of curiosity. What is your definition of s huge SUV. I'd say unless you go into Suburban or Expedition sized vehicles not much made these days are as big as the Oldsmobile wagon my folks had in early 80's. Hell, you could fit 4 kids across the bench in the middle seat on those and you surely can't do that in my old x5.

Oh, and I'm all for sharing the road with bikes and even have a road bike.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 95057
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This is how I feel about SUVs. Why do you need a giant truck? Don't tell me it's for work.
It's not for joyriding. It's good for my bike rack though when I drive it to a place that bikes are designed to be though.


It's something you don't need. Families used to have 6-10 kids and got by without a fucking Hummer. They make driving difficult for everyone else.
That's a pretty big stretch. For those times you are talking about kids weren't even in car seats.

Ironically though, when you go to a car museum and look at how big some of those cars were, they were as big as the biggest SUV's being sold today. They just were shorter.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:51 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 82145
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I saw the video and yes the driver should not have left the scene, but that asshole cyclist was out in the middle to left side of the lane (instead of the side of the road) and doing so on a curve where the driver had no chance of seeing him.

Cyclist is a future Darwin Award winner
Just watched it too. Sounds like not riding single file is going to help the driver. However, him leaving the scene is unforgivable.

Yes, whether it is the driver's fault or not, the driver left the scene and that's probably a felony.

Had he stayed, the video probably helps him avoid a ticket/fault as the cyclist was not riding in a safe manner.


No. A lot of you don't seem to know the rules of the road. I'm really shocked that Law and Order Rick so blithely dismisses them because he feels they inconvience him. I'll remember to bring that up the next time the board druggies feel inconvienced by the puritanism of Rick and the U.S. Congress.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 95057
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You think he didn't see him? I think he hit him on purpose. People like BRick get emotional when a bike is in front of them and do immoral acts.
I'm pretty sure you have more emotional outbursts in a year than I do in ten.


I don't think so. You're expressing road rage and you're not even driving.
If I'm expressing road rage then you have a victim complex. What have I said that conveys anger?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 95057
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I saw the video and yes the driver should not have left the scene, but that asshole cyclist was out in the middle to left side of the lane (instead of the side of the road) and doing so on a curve where the driver had no chance of seeing him.

Cyclist is a future Darwin Award winner
Just watched it too. Sounds like not riding single file is going to help the driver. However, him leaving the scene is unforgivable.

Yes, whether it is the driver's fault or not, the driver left the scene and that's probably a felony.

Had he stayed, the video probably helps him avoid a ticket/fault as the cyclist was not riding in a safe manner.


No. A lot of you don't seem to know the rules of the road. I'm really shocked that Law and Order Rick so blithely dismisses them because he feels they inconvience him. I'll remember to bring that up the next time the board druggies feel inconvienced by the puritanism of Rick and the U.S. Congress.

See bold text.
Quote:
"In Mississippi and Tennessee, bicyclists are allowed to use the full lane of traffic to ride in when necessary. Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file, and riders are encouraged to move to the right to allow for vehicles to pass," Farmer said. "It is also highly recommended riders wear high-visibility clothing and flashing front and rear lights. Vehicle drivers must provide a safe distance when overtaking and passing a bicyclist."

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
How long until JORR is tweeting about Lying Rick and FAKE NEWS?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:54 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102753
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's something you don't need. Families used to have 6-10 kids and got by without a fucking Hummer. They make driving difficult for everyone else.
You also don't "need" to be riding a bike in the middle of the road with a double yellow line.

You say you want your three fucking feet, but then there are other laws and courteous acts that cyclists flat out ignore. If the guy in the video was riding his bike closer to the shoulder of the road, he likely would not have gotten hit.


The average motorist is far from courteous.
I am not talking about the average motorist, so stop bringing that up. I am talking about cyclists who either ignore or think they don't have to follow the rules of the road.

Earlier in this thread you said that a bike is a legal road vehicle. I have seen MANY cyclists blow right thru stop signs, red lights, and break other basic traffic laws. In the video Tad posted, cyclists are breaking the law.

But, share the road, right?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 95057
Location: To the left of my post
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I saw the video and yes the driver should not have left the scene, but that asshole cyclist was out in the middle to left side of the lane (instead of the side of the road) and doing so on a curve where the driver had no chance of seeing him.

Cyclist is a future Darwin Award winner
Just watched it too. Sounds like not riding single file is going to help the driver. However, him leaving the scene is unforgivable.

Yes, whether it is the driver's fault or not, the driver left the scene and that's probably a felony.

Had he stayed, the video probably helps him avoid a ticket/fault as the cyclist was not riding in a safe manner.


No. A lot of you don't seem to know the rules of the road. I'm really shocked that Law and Order Rick so blithely dismisses them because he feels they inconvience him. I'll remember to bring that up the next time the board druggies feel inconvienced by the puritanism of Rick and the U.S. Congress.

See bold text.
Quote:
"In Mississippi and Tennessee, bicyclists are allowed to use the full lane of traffic to ride in when necessary. Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file, and riders are encouraged to move to the right to allow for vehicles to pass," Farmer said. "It is also highly recommended riders wear high-visibility clothing and flashing front and rear lights. Vehicle drivers must provide a safe distance when overtaking and passing a bicyclist."

It also would be hard to argue it was necessary to be that close to the middle of the road especially on a curve like that. The road was in good condition and his riding partner was safely using that part of the road without issue.

Can someone at the next board outing provide JORR with the rules of the road? He seems to have a poor understanding of his duties as a cyclist.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Frank Coztansa wrote:
But, share the road, right?

Cyclists annoy me when I'm driving, too. But calling out cyclists for not "sharing the road" is bogus. Cyclists and motorists are forced into this hateful relationship by motorists. Motorists insist on having 2 lanes each way with street parking on both sides, right turn lanes, etc etc etc. However, when the road is "shared" by designating a bike lane the motorists begin screaming bloody murder. How dare a bureaucrat take a precious lane of asphalt away from car use?!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 38376
Location: ...
i blame sidewalk laws that prevent cyclists from using it. i've had more problems with suburban cyclists than city cyclists. seems like they're in more danger, anyway. suburban cyclists are just, on average, complete tools. motorists are the worst though, but you can't always see who they are.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:10 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 82145
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This is how I feel about SUVs. Why do you need a giant truck? Don't tell me it's for work.
It's not for joyriding. It's good for my bike rack though when I drive it to a place that bikes are designed to be though.


It's something you don't need. Families used to have 6-10 kids and got by without a fucking Hummer. They make driving difficult for everyone else.


Out of curiosity. What is your definition of s huge SUV. I'd say unless you go into Suburban or Expedition sized vehicles not much made these days are as big as the Oldsmobile wagon my folks had in early 80's. Hell, you could fit 4 kids across the bench in the middle seat on those and you surely can't do that in my old x5.

Oh, and I'm all for sharing the road with bikes and even have a road bike.


The proliferation of SUVs is based on fashion rather than on any practical necessity.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 95057
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This is how I feel about SUVs. Why do you need a giant truck? Don't tell me it's for work.
It's not for joyriding. It's good for my bike rack though when I drive it to a place that bikes are designed to be though.


It's something you don't need. Families used to have 6-10 kids and got by without a fucking Hummer. They make driving difficult for everyone else.


Out of curiosity. What is your definition of s huge SUV. I'd say unless you go into Suburban or Expedition sized vehicles not much made these days are as big as the Oldsmobile wagon my folks had in early 80's. Hell, you could fit 4 kids across the bench in the middle seat on those and you surely can't do that in my old x5.

Oh, and I'm all for sharing the road with bikes and even have a road bike.


The proliferation of SUVs is based on fashion rather than on any practical necessity.
Once again, most SUV's are equal to or smaller than most cars that existed in previous decades. They are somewhat taller though. They also look bigger because in previous decades there weren't the small little go kart type cars all over the road.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:13 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 82145
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I saw the video and yes the driver should not have left the scene, but that asshole cyclist was out in the middle to left side of the lane (instead of the side of the road) and doing so on a curve where the driver had no chance of seeing him.

Cyclist is a future Darwin Award winner
Just watched it too. Sounds like not riding single file is going to help the driver. However, him leaving the scene is unforgivable.

Yes, whether it is the driver's fault or not, the driver left the scene and that's probably a felony.

Had he stayed, the video probably helps him avoid a ticket/fault as the cyclist was not riding in a safe manner.


No. A lot of you don't seem to know the rules of the road. I'm really shocked that Law and Order Rick so blithely dismisses them because he feels they inconvience him. I'll remember to bring that up the next time the board druggies feel inconvienced by the puritanism of Rick and the U.S. Congress.

See bold text.
Quote:
"In Mississippi and Tennessee, bicyclists are allowed to use the full lane of traffic to ride in when necessary. Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file, and riders are encouraged to move to the right to allow for vehicles to pass," Farmer said. "It is also highly recommended riders wear high-visibility clothing and flashing front and rear lights. Vehicle drivers must provide a safe distance when overtaking and passing a bicyclist."

It also would be hard to argue it was necessary to be that close to the middle of the road especially on a curve like that. The road was in good condition and his riding partner was safely using that part of the road without issue.

Can someone at the next board outing provide JORR with the rules of the road? He seems to have a poor understanding of his duties as a cyclist.


I think you bolded the wrong sentence. Bikes are allowed- even encouraged- on the Natchez Trace. Ogie seems to be suggesting that a motorist can drive full speed around a blind corner and has a right to slam into whatever happens to be on the other side.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:14 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 82145
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This is how I feel about SUVs. Why do you need a giant truck? Don't tell me it's for work.
It's not for joyriding. It's good for my bike rack though when I drive it to a place that bikes are designed to be though.


It's something you don't need. Families used to have 6-10 kids and got by without a fucking Hummer. They make driving difficult for everyone else.


Out of curiosity. What is your definition of s huge SUV. I'd say unless you go into Suburban or Expedition sized vehicles not much made these days are as big as the Oldsmobile wagon my folks had in early 80's. Hell, you could fit 4 kids across the bench in the middle seat on those and you surely can't do that in my old x5.

Oh, and I'm all for sharing the road with bikes and even have a road bike.


The proliferation of SUVs is based on fashion rather than on any practical necessity.
Once again, most SUV's are equal to or smaller than most cars that existed in previous decades. They are somewhat taller though. They also look bigger because in previous decades there weren't the small little go kart type cars all over the road.


SUVs are wider and they make it more difficult to see. Why are you inconveniencing me with an SUV when I am trying to get to work?

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
W_Z wrote:
i blame sidewalk laws that prevent cyclists from using it. i've had more problems with suburban cyclists than city cyclists. seems like they're in more danger, anyway. suburban cyclists are just, on average, complete tools. motorists are the worst though, but you can't always see who they are.


Yeah I have suburban cyclists in mind mainly because traffic moves faster in the suburbs. Sharing the road makes no sense - it'd be like airplanes having to accommodate hot air balloon traffic if they ever manage to fly that high without suffocating the passengers. They just don't belong in the same space, much like cars and bikes.

Image

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 95057
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think you bolded the wrong sentence. Bikes are allowed- even encouraged- on the Natchez Trace. Ogie seems to be suggesting that a motorist can drive full speed around a blind corner and has a right to slam into whatever happens to be on the other side.
No one is saying they weren't allowed. It was that the bikes are required to be single file and to be over to the right unless needed.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SUVs are wider and they make it more difficult to see. Why are you inconveniencing me with an SUV when I am trying to get to work?
This is not correct though. I'll use two personal examples. We have a Chevy Equinox. It is listed as 73 inches wide. The Delta 88 my parents had as a kid is listed as 76.8 inches wide. This is incredibly common on all but the most extreme SUV's many of which are not even made now. SUV's have been a more logical replacement for the huge sedans that used to exist that actually provide more functionality with less width and length.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Last edited by Brick on Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:25 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 82145
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have seen MANY cyclists blow right thru stop signs, red lights, and break other basic traffic laws.


I could sit at the corner of Albany and Waveland or Lunt and Sacramento or name any side street intersection on the North side and watch car after car blow through the stop signs.

And if I blow a stop on my bike the chances of me killing a guy driving a Ford Atrocity or a Chevy Enormity are remote.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:28 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 82145
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
No one is saying they weren't allowed.


:lol: Then what the fuck is your point?

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
We have a Chevy Equinox. It is listed as 73 inches wide. The delta 88 my parents had as a kid is listed as 76.8 inches wide. This is incredibly common on all but the most extreme SUV's many of which are not even made now. SUV's have been a more logical replacement for the huge sedans that used to exist that actually provide more functionality with less width and length.


You can take my SUV when you can pry the steering wheel from my cold dead hands.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7942
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think you bolded the wrong sentence. Bikes are allowed- even encouraged- on the Natchez Trace. Ogie seems to be suggesting that a motorist can drive full speed around a blind corner and has a right to slam into whatever happens to be on the other side.
No one is saying they weren't allowed. It was that the bikes are required to be single file and to be over to the right unless needed.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SUVs are wider and they make it more difficult to see. Why are you inconveniencing me with an SUV when I am trying to get to work?
This is not correct though. I'll use two personal examples. We have a Chevy Equinox. It is listed as 73 inches wide. The delta 88 my parents had as a kid is listed as 76.8 inches wide. This is incredibly common on all but the most extreme SUV's many of which are not even made now. SUV's have been a more logical replacement for the huge sedans that used to exist that actually provide more functionality with less width and length.



The giant station wagons of late 70's and 80's are all of .7 inches more narrow than a suburban. And I'd argue the Buick Enclave and chevy whatever are significantly smaller and are more just an evolution of those wagons than of The truck suv's like the early bronco's and Cherokee's.

Now, it's stupid as hell to see a single person driving an Escalade as a daily driver but whatever.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

And if I blow a stop on my bike the chances of me killing a guy driving a Ford Atrocity or a Chevy Enormity are remote.


Yeah but the very real possibility of those cars taking out the at-fault biker is what we're talking about.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 95057
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
:lol: Then what the fuck is your point?
The cyclist was improperly riding. This probably would have cleared the driver had he not left especially with seemingly no injury.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You can take my SUV when you can pry the steering wheel from my cold dead hands.
No doubt. They are superior to the huge sedans of previous generations. Looks like you agree.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group