It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:26 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 395 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Jbi11s wrote:
JoRR is about to tap out. You guys have him on the ropes!!! Don't let him get back up.


No worries about that. Juice and BR are at the top of their games. Impressive work by both.

Any person could perform an abortion a mere second before delivery. And that person would be committing murder. I think the law is as clear as day, and I doubt any legit doctor would ever risk jail time to just perform an abortion at 30 weeks at the mere desire of the woman. In fact, don't we often accuse doctors of performing defensive medicine and ordering too many tests to simply avoid legal liability questioning their judgment? Why would it be any different with this procedure?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43569
denisdman wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
JoRR is about to tap out. You guys have him on the ropes!!! Don't let him get back up.


No worries about that. Juice and BR are at the top of their games. Impressive work by both.

Any person could perform an abortion a mere second before delivery. And that person would be committing murder. I think the law is as clear as day, and I doubt any legit doctor would ever risk jail time to just perform an abortion at 30 weeks at the mere desire of the woman. In fact, don't we often accuse doctors of performing defensive medicine and ordering too many tests to simply avoid legal liability questioning their judgment? Why would it be any different with this procedure?

Because Obama

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Because Trump. I can't even believe the shit we're arguing about now. But I recognized it for what it was right away.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
This may be slightly off the current discussion but what about the docs that previously were the performers of partial birth abortion? I mean there must be some docs that fought very hard to retain that right to perform those. Now that they are banned does it not stand to reason some on the fringes would still do very late abortions in that manner?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
PM, they just make sure the expectant mother is properly anchored to the 8th floor balcony. That way, she can drop the fetus/baby straight down and let gravity do all the work. You take a class on tying good knots, and you're all set.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
denisdman wrote:
PM, they just make sure the expectant mother is properly anchored to the 8th floor balcony. That way, she can drop the fetus/baby straight down and let gravity do all the work. You take a class on tying good knots, and you're all set.


:lol: Good points. As I said it was tangential but I figured there had to be a handful of zealots in the entire nation to do illegal procedures.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
pittmike wrote:
denisdman wrote:
PM, they just make sure the expectant mother is properly anchored to the 8th floor balcony. That way, she can drop the fetus/baby straight down and let gravity do all the work. You take a class on tying good knots, and you're all set.


:lol: Good points. As I said it was tangential but I figured there had to be a handful of zealots in the entire nation to do illegal procedures.


I'm sure there are.

The point I was focusing on was that it is not legal to do so.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
This may be slightly off the current discussion but what about the docs that previously were the performers of partial birth abortion? I mean there must be some docs that fought very hard to retain that right to perform those. Now that they are banned does it not stand to reason some on the fringes would still do very late abortions in that manner?
No. Why would they risk losing their license or jail? They had plenty of skills that would still be legal.

As I said, OBs are getting questioned or even in trouble for doing too many C-sections. If there was a doctor with a huge amount of late term abortions he would be under constant investigation.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38348
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I also have bad news for you, if you are going down this route, then even if you banned abortions completely, these rare cases would still exist as it would be malpractice to let the mother and child die while waiting for a time in which actual birth could take place.


Yeah, but if those mothers are doing it right, they're leaving it in the hands of God and their chiropractor. Nothing can go wrong in that case.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gianna_Beretta_Molla

Not a chiropractor though.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Seacrest wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I also have bad news for you, if you are going down this route, then even if you banned abortions completely, these rare cases would still exist as it would be malpractice to let the mother and child die while waiting for a time in which actual birth could take place.


Yeah, but if those mothers are doing it right, they're leaving it in the hands of God and their chiropractor. Nothing can go wrong in that case.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gianna_Beretta_Molla

Not a chiropractor though.
:lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
This may be slightly off the current discussion but what about the docs that previously were the performers of partial birth abortion? I mean there must be some docs that fought very hard to retain that right to perform those. Now that they are banned does it not stand to reason some on the fringes would still do very late abortions in that manner?
No. Why would they risk losing their license or jail? They had plenty of skills that would still be legal.

As I said, OBs are getting questioned or even in trouble for doing too many C-sections. If there was a doctor with a huge amount of late term abortions he would be under constant investigation.


As I said it is extremely rare I am sure but zealots are zealots.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38348
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I also have bad news for you, if you are going down this route, then even if you banned abortions completely, these rare cases would still exist as it would be malpractice to let the mother and child die while waiting for a time in which actual birth could take place.


Yeah, but if those mothers are doing it right, they're leaving it in the hands of God and their chiropractor. Nothing can go wrong in that case.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gianna_Beretta_Molla

Not a chiropractor though.
:lol:


:lol: :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:17 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
pittmike wrote:
This may be slightly off the current discussion but what about the docs that previously were the performers of partial birth abortion? I mean there must be some docs that fought very hard to retain that right to perform those. Now that they are banned does it not stand to reason some on the fringes would still do very late abortions in that manner?



I'm pretty sure that the partial birth abortion bans are unenforceable. I'll wait for Juice to give us his interpretations of the Carhart decisions.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
pittmike wrote:
This may be slightly off the current discussion but what about the docs that previously were the performers of partial birth abortion? I mean there must be some docs that fought very hard to retain that right to perform those. Now that they are banned does it not stand to reason some on the fringes would still do very late abortions in that manner?



I'm pretty sure that the partial birth abortion bans are unenforceable. I'll wait for Juice to give us his interpretations of the Carhart decisions.
Why aren't they enforceable?

Unless you want doctors to watch the mother and child die rather than intervene then you'll see them as needed in very rare circumstances even if you banned abortion completely.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:42 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
pittmike wrote:
This may be slightly off the current discussion but what about the docs that previously were the performers of partial birth abortion? I mean there must be some docs that fought very hard to retain that right to perform those. Now that they are banned does it not stand to reason some on the fringes would still do very late abortions in that manner?



I'm pretty sure that the partial birth abortion bans are unenforceable. I'll wait for Juice to give us his interpretations of the Carhart decisions.
Why aren't they enforceable?

Unless you want doctors to watch the mother and child die rather than intervene then you'll see them as needed in very rare circumstances even if you banned abortion completely.



They've been struck down in many states.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
For a very good reason as I mentioned.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I think folks are picking the wrong battles here. Abortion at any stage should be 100% illegal unless absolutely needed to save the mother's life or in cases of rape. Bickering about viability, stress, and how many weeks pregnant is missing the point, imo.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
I think folks are picking the wrong battles here. Abortion at any stage should be 100% illegal unless absolutely needed to save the mother's life or in cases of rape. Bickering about viability, stress, and how many weeks pregnant is missing the point, imo.

Viability is a major point.

Why is there no case that the mother also has the right to control her own body especially very early on?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I think folks are picking the wrong battles here. Abortion at any stage should be 100% illegal unless absolutely needed to save the mother's life or in cases of rape. Bickering about viability, stress, and how many weeks pregnant is missing the point, imo.

Viability is a major point.

Why is there no case that the mother also has the right to control her own body especially very early on?

That's a bad talking point. None of us have complete control of our own bodies. Many things are regulated regarding what we can and cannot do with it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
FavreFan wrote:
I think folks are picking the wrong battles here. Abortion at any stage should be 100% illegal unless absolutely needed to save the mother's life or in cases of rape. Bickering about viability, stress, and how many weeks pregnant is missing the point, imo.

50 pages

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
That's a bad talking point. None of us have complete control of our own bodies. Many things are regulated regarding what we can and cannot do with it.
That's not a very Libertarian point of view.

I'll remember that the next time you complain about our drug laws though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Seacrest wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I also have bad news for you, if you are going down this route, then even if you banned abortions completely, these rare cases would still exist as it would be malpractice to let the mother and child die while waiting for a time in which actual birth could take place.


Yeah, but if those mothers are doing it right, they're leaving it in the hands of God and their chiropractor. Nothing can go wrong in that case.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gianna_Beretta_Molla

Not a chiropractor though.


I bet she'd make a good one.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That's a bad talking point. None of us have complete control of our own bodies. Many things are regulated regarding what we can and cannot do with it.
That's not a very Libertarian point of view.

I'll remember that the next time you complain about our drug laws though.

Huh? Im stating a fact, not a point of view, in that post.

But you would be wrong if you think being against abortion is antithetical to libertarianism. It's very much in line with it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That's a bad talking point. None of us have complete control of our own bodies. Many things are regulated regarding what we can and cannot do with it.
That's not a very Libertarian point of view.

I'll remember that the next time you complain about our drug laws though.

Huh? Im stating a fact, not a point of view, in that post.

But you would be wrong if you think being against abortion is antithetical to libertarianism. It's very much in line with it.
I honestly don't know the official stance on abortion of Libertarians. However, I am sure that "the government has the right to regulate what you can and can't do with your body" would make a real Libertarian quite concerned.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That's a bad talking point. None of us have complete control of our own bodies. Many things are regulated regarding what we can and cannot do with it.
That's not a very Libertarian point of view.

I'll remember that the next time you complain about our drug laws though.

Huh? Im stating a fact, not a point of view, in that post.

But you would be wrong if you think being against abortion is antithetical to libertarianism. It's very much in line with it.
I honestly don't know the official stance on abortion of Libertarians. However, I am sure that "the government has the right to regulate what you can and can't do with your body" would make a real Libertarian quite concerned.

Again, I wasn't stating a point of view. It's a fact that our current government already regulates our bodies. That's why it is disingenuous to use that as a pro-abortion argument. That's all.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Again, I wasn't stating a point of view. It's a fact that our current government already regulates our bodies. That's why it is disingenuous to use that as a pro-abortion argument. That's all.
Would you say the same thing about our drug laws then?

But, let's go with it. The government says some types of abortion are ok. Why aren't you cool with that? Even the government has decided that a woman should have control over her own body for a portion of pregnancy.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Again, I wasn't stating a point of view. It's a fact that our current government already regulates our bodies. That's why it is disingenuous to use that as a pro-abortion argument. That's all.
Would you say the same thing about our drug laws then?

But, let's go with it. The government says some types of abortion are ok. Why aren't you cool with that? Even the government has decided that a woman should have control over her own body for a portion of pregnancy.

And the government made a poor decision in that regard.

Being pregnant isn't really analogous to anything else like drug laws. Once you become pregnant you have a responsibility, imo, to do your best to keep that baby healthy until it is born. It's the same reason parents have more legal responsibilities than single people.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:17 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38348
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I also have bad news for you, if you are going down this route, then even if you banned abortions completely, these rare cases would still exist as it would be malpractice to let the mother and child die while waiting for a time in which actual birth could take place.


Yeah, but if those mothers are doing it right, they're leaving it in the hands of God and their chiropractor. Nothing can go wrong in that case.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gianna_Beretta_Molla

Not a chiropractor though.


I bet she'd make a good one.


No, she wouldn't.

She is dead. She chose to give up her life so that her baby could live.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Again, I wasn't stating a point of view. It's a fact that our current government already regulates our bodies. That's why it is disingenuous to use that as a pro-abortion argument. That's all.
Would you say the same thing about our drug laws then?

But, let's go with it. The government says some types of abortion are ok. Why aren't you cool with that? Even the government has decided that a woman should have control over her own body for a portion of pregnancy.

And the government made a poor decision in that regard.

Being pregnant isn't really analogous to anything else like drug laws. Once you become pregnant you have a responsibility, imo, to do your best to keep that baby healthy until it is born. It's the same reason parents have more legal responsibilities than single people.
You're getting more reasonable. I understand completely that you think all abortion should be illegal outside of the extreme edge cases. The problem is you aren't even willing to acknowledge that a case can be made that early on in pregnancy a woman should still have a right to decide what to do with her body.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22533
pizza_Place: Giordano's
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Again, I wasn't stating a point of view. It's a fact that our current government already regulates our bodies. That's why it is disingenuous to use that as a pro-abortion argument. That's all.
Would you say the same thing about our drug laws then?

But, let's go with it. The government says some types of abortion are ok. Why aren't you cool with that? Even the government has decided that a woman should have control over her own body for a portion of pregnancy.

And the government made a poor decision in that regard.

Being pregnant isn't really analogous to anything else like drug laws. Once you become pregnant you have a responsibility, imo, to do your best to keep that baby healthy until it is born. It's the same reason parents have more legal responsibilities than single people.


Does having sex demonstrate an intent to cause pregnancy? Can people ever have sex with pregnancy being a bona fide unintended result?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 395 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group