It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 5:31 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 395 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Again, I wasn't stating a point of view. It's a fact that our current government already regulates our bodies. That's why it is disingenuous to use that as a pro-abortion argument. That's all.
Would you say the same thing about our drug laws then?

But, let's go with it. The government says some types of abortion are ok. Why aren't you cool with that? Even the government has decided that a woman should have control over her own body for a portion of pregnancy.

And the government made a poor decision in that regard.

Being pregnant isn't really analogous to anything else like drug laws. Once you become pregnant you have a responsibility, imo, to do your best to keep that baby healthy until it is born. It's the same reason parents have more legal responsibilities than single people.
You're getting more reasonable. I understand completely that you think all abortion should be illegal outside of the extreme edge cases. The problem is you aren't even willing to acknowledge that a case can be made that early on in pregnancy a woman should still have a right to decide what to do with her body.

More reasonable? My stance hasn't changed even one bit.

Your last sentence is wrong. I acknowledge the case and think it's a poor one.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
More reasonable? My stance hasn't changed even one bit.

Your last sentence is wrong. I acknowledge the case and think it's a poor one.
So this was simply disagreement?
FavreFan wrote:
I think folks are picking the wrong battles here. Abortion at any stage should be 100% illegal unless absolutely needed to save the mother's life or in cases of rape. Bickering about viability, stress, and how many weeks pregnant is missing the point, imo.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
More reasonable? My stance hasn't changed even one bit.

Your last sentence is wrong. I acknowledge the case and think it's a poor one.
So this was simply disagreement?
FavreFan wrote:
I think folks are picking the wrong battles here. Abortion at any stage should be 100% illegal unless absolutely needed to save the mother's life or in cases of rape. Bickering about viability, stress, and how many weeks pregnant is missing the point, imo.

Obviously?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:27 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Once you have another life in your body it's no longer just your body. People are charged with murder for killing fetuses. Abortions and near the top of the list of issues destroying minority communities.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Once you have another life in your body it's no longer just your body.

It's crazy that this is somehow a controversial stance in 2017.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Once you have another life in your body it's no longer just your body.

It's crazy that this is somehow a controversial stance in 2017.


It is.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
More reasonable? My stance hasn't changed even one bit.

Your last sentence is wrong. I acknowledge the case and think it's a poor one.
So this was simply disagreement?
FavreFan wrote:
I think folks are picking the wrong battles here. Abortion at any stage should be 100% illegal unless absolutely needed to save the mother's life or in cases of rape. Bickering about viability, stress, and how many weeks pregnant is missing the point, imo.

Obviously?
I may have misunderstood you then. I took it as you said it shouldn't even be mentioned about viability when that is incredibly important to pretty much any pro-choice stance.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22586
pizza_Place: Giordano's
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Once you have another life in your body it's no longer just your body.

It's crazy that this is somehow a controversial stance in 2017.


Doesn't that stance hinge on a definition of "life"? Because, technically, a tumor comprised of living cells can meet certain criteria of "life".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
More reasonable? My stance hasn't changed even one bit.

Your last sentence is wrong. I acknowledge the case and think it's a poor one.
So this was simply disagreement?
FavreFan wrote:
I think folks are picking the wrong battles here. Abortion at any stage should be 100% illegal unless absolutely needed to save the mother's life or in cases of rape. Bickering about viability, stress, and how many weeks pregnant is missing the point, imo.

Obviously?
I may have misunderstood you then. I took it as you said it shouldn't even be mentioned about viability when that is incredibly important to pretty much any pro-choice stance.

It may be incredibly important to a pro-abortion stance but my post was directed towards those against abortion. I think it's the wrong battle to argue about viability and the "when" part of abortion.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
More reasonable? My stance hasn't changed even one bit.

Your last sentence is wrong. I acknowledge the case and think it's a poor one.
So this was simply disagreement?
FavreFan wrote:
I think folks are picking the wrong battles here. Abortion at any stage should be 100% illegal unless absolutely needed to save the mother's life or in cases of rape. Bickering about viability, stress, and how many weeks pregnant is missing the point, imo.

Obviously?
I may have misunderstood you then. I took it as you said it shouldn't even be mentioned about viability when that is incredibly important to pretty much any pro-choice stance.

It may be incredibly important to a pro-abortion stance but my post was directed towards those against abortion. I think it's the wrong battle to argue about viability and the "when" part of abortion.
Fair enough. That makes sense.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Nas wrote:
Abortions and near the top of the list of issues destroying minority communities.

That's the first time I've heard that. Care to explain?

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Once you have another life in your body it's no longer just your body.

It's crazy that this is somehow a controversial stance in 2017.


Doesn't that stance hinge on a definition of "life"? Because, technically, a tumor comprised of living cells can meet certain criteria of "life".

I'm not a lawyer like you and have no interest in parsing my words that much in a random internet discussion. Everyone knows what Nas and I meant there.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19488
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
walkrman5 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
walkrman5 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
How harsh should punishment really be though when it would be perfectly legal to have a "doctor" kill the baby an hour earlier?


?? an hour earlier? Perfectly legal?



Yes. Perfectly legal.


Can you expound? Seriously. What am I missing? This happened in Chicago / United States right? I see you put "doctor" in quotes, but I am not catching the gist of your statement.



It's legal in IL to kill a baby up until they are born.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... te/448098/



It's surprising that many people don't know that.


Plus,good old Pres Obama voted for it,when he was a state rep

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38636
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Seacrest wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I also have bad news for you, if you are going down this route, then even if you banned abortions completely, these rare cases would still exist as it would be malpractice to let the mother and child die while waiting for a time in which actual birth could take place.


Yeah, but if those mothers are doing it right, they're leaving it in the hands of God and their chiropractor. Nothing can go wrong in that case.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gianna_Beretta_Molla

Not a chiropractor though.


I bet she'd make a good one.


No, she wouldn't.

She is dead. She chose to give up her life so that her baby could live.



Well, she would have been a good one if she didn't die.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:42 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Abortions and near the top of the list of issues destroying minority communities.

That's the first time I've heard that. Care to explain?


Murder
Prison
Abortions

Blacks and Hispanics represent double or triple their population in some cases. Life isn't valued.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Abortions and near the top of the list of issues destroying minority communities.

That's the first time I've heard that. Care to explain?


Murder
Prison
Abortions

Blacks and Hispanics represent double or triple their population in some cases. Life isn't valued.

Yes, I am familiar with the ramifications of the first two, but I still don't see how abortion is an issue affecting minority communities. What specifically is abortion doing to adversely affect these communities?

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:49 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Abortions and near the top of the list of issues destroying minority communities.

That's the first time I've heard that. Care to explain?


Murder
Prison
Abortions

Blacks and Hispanics represent double or triple their population in some cases. Life isn't valued.

Yes, I am familiar with the ramifications of the first two, but I still don't see how abortion is an issue affecting minority communities. What specifically is abortion doing to adversely affect these communities?


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... unity.html

If that doesn't fit your definition of affecting a community, please let us know what does.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
All that article tells me is that a bunch of motherfuckers lack the ability to pull out, and too many women have never heard of birth control. Just a lot of unprotected fucking going on.

I still don't get how this is adversely affecting those communities.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:13 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Abortions and near the top of the list of issues destroying minority communities.

That's the first time I've heard that. Care to explain?


Murder
Prison
Abortions

Blacks and Hispanics represent double or triple their population in some cases. Life isn't valued.

Yes, I am familiar with the ramifications of the first two, but I still don't see how abortion is an issue affecting minority communities. What specifically is abortion doing to adversely affect these communities?



It's genocide. Especially in the black community. The black community accounts for nearly 40% of abortions annually. That's about 500k deaths a year and 16 million since 1973. It's one of MANY reasons why our percentage of the population has been stagnant. Blacks represent 40% of the prison population, 50%+ of murder victims and 40% of abortion, but only 12.8% of the population.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:14 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Jbi11s wrote:
All that article tells me is that a bunch of motherfuckers lack the ability to pull out, and too many women have never heard of birth control. Just a lot of unprotected fucking going on.

I still don't get how this is adversely affecting those communities.


So the destruction of unborn life in the African American community has no effect on them?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22586
pizza_Place: Giordano's
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Once you have another life in your body it's no longer just your body.

It's crazy that this is somehow a controversial stance in 2017.


Doesn't that stance hinge on a definition of "life"? Because, technically, a tumor comprised of living cells can meet certain criteria of "life".

I'm not a lawyer like you and have no interest in parsing my words that much in a random internet discussion. Everyone knows what Nas and I meant there.


Well, for awhile, a clump of cells that will become a tumor and one that will become human life are indistinguishable, yet you are arguing one's body ceases to be their own in the presence of one, but not the other.

And I know you're going to say "potential for life", and I understand the difference, I just want to know how you balance that worldview with all the masturbating you do. Or are you married, and if so do you allow your wife to get her period? Why?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Once you have another life in your body it's no longer just your body.

It's crazy that this is somehow a controversial stance in 2017.


Doesn't that stance hinge on a definition of "life"? Because, technically, a tumor comprised of living cells can meet certain criteria of "life".

I'm not a lawyer like you and have no interest in parsing my words that much in a random internet discussion. Everyone knows what Nas and I meant there.


Well, for awhile, a clump of cells that will become a tumor and one that will become human life are indistinguishable, yet you are arguing one's body ceases to be their own in the presence of one, but not the other.

And I know you're going to say "potential for life", and I understand the difference, I just want to know how you balance that worldview with all the masturbating you do. Or are you married, and if so do you allow your wife to get her period? Why?

It's very simple. We are talking about pregnancy.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22586
pizza_Place: Giordano's
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Once you have another life in your body it's no longer just your body.

It's crazy that this is somehow a controversial stance in 2017.


Doesn't that stance hinge on a definition of "life"? Because, technically, a tumor comprised of living cells can meet certain criteria of "life".

I'm not a lawyer like you and have no interest in parsing my words that much in a random internet discussion. Everyone knows what Nas and I meant there.


Well, for awhile, a clump of cells that will become a tumor and one that will become human life are indistinguishable, yet you are arguing one's body ceases to be their own in the presence of one, but not the other.

And I know you're going to say "potential for life", and I understand the difference, I just want to know how you balance that worldview with all the masturbating you do. Or are you married, and if so do you allow your wife to get her period? Why?

It's very simple. We are talking about pregnancy.


So you define "life" as conception?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
I simply do not agree with either of your stances here Nas/Seacrest. Prison, murder, job opportunities, and education would be ahead of abortion on my to do list for these communities if I was the POTUS.

Yes NYC had a crazy amount of abortions in whatever year that article was referencing. With the way I feel about abortion that article tells me there is not birth control readily available.

I can usually see my way into someone's point, and find something I agree with in a debate. Just not happening with this one.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Jbi11s wrote:
With the way I feel about abortion that article tells me there is not birth control readily available.
Take a guess as to what poster in this thread has fought hard to limit the availability of birth control?

Oh, and to add to it, I'm pretty sure that he also wouldn't want a gay couple to be able to adopt one of the kids that were born to parents that couldn't take care of them since he is against gay marriage!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Once you have another life in your body it's no longer just your body.

It's crazy that this is somehow a controversial stance in 2017.


Doesn't that stance hinge on a definition of "life"? Because, technically, a tumor comprised of living cells can meet certain criteria of "life".

I'm not a lawyer like you and have no interest in parsing my words that much in a random internet discussion. Everyone knows what Nas and I meant there.


Well, for awhile, a clump of cells that will become a tumor and one that will become human life are indistinguishable, yet you are arguing one's body ceases to be their own in the presence of one, but not the other.

And I know you're going to say "potential for life", and I understand the difference, I just want to know how you balance that worldview with all the masturbating you do. Or are you married, and if so do you allow your wife to get her period? Why?

It's very simple. We are talking about pregnancy.


Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
So you define "life" as conception?


Yes, just like science does.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
With the way I feel about abortion that article tells me there is not birth control readily available.
Take a guess as to what poster in this thread has fought hard to limit the availability of birth control?

Oh, and to add to it, I'm pretty sure that he also wouldn't want a gay couple to be able to adopt one of the kids that were born to parents that couldn't take care of them since he is against gay marriage!

So you're telling me I'm debating a Catholic conservative brick wall?

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Jbi11s wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
With the way I feel about abortion that article tells me there is not birth control readily available.
Take a guess as to what poster in this thread has fought hard to limit the availability of birth control?

Oh, and to add to it, I'm pretty sure that he also wouldn't want a gay couple to be able to adopt one of the kids that were born to parents that couldn't take care of them since he is against gay marriage!

So you're telling me I'm debating a Catholic conservative brick wall?

I don't think it's a conservative/catholic thing. Seacrest, jorr, Nas, and I all have very different political beliefs from what I can tell.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
FavreFan wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
With the way I feel about abortion that article tells me there is not birth control readily available.
Take a guess as to what poster in this thread has fought hard to limit the availability of birth control?

Oh, and to add to it, I'm pretty sure that he also wouldn't want a gay couple to be able to adopt one of the kids that were born to parents that couldn't take care of them since he is against gay marriage!

So you're telling me I'm debating a Catholic conservative brick wall?

I don't think it's a conservative/catholic thing. Seacrest, jorr, Nas, and I all have very different political beliefs from what I can tell.

I was just talking about Seacrest. The rest of you guys are cool.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Jbi11s wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
With the way I feel about abortion that article tells me there is not birth control readily available.
Take a guess as to what poster in this thread has fought hard to limit the availability of birth control?

Oh, and to add to it, I'm pretty sure that he also wouldn't want a gay couple to be able to adopt one of the kids that were born to parents that couldn't take care of them since he is against gay marriage!

So you're telling me I'm debating a Catholic conservative brick wall?



It's science until you and Brick disagree with it. :lol: :lol:

You aren't debating anyone. You are flailing for blame now that science has contradicted you.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 395 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group