Seacrest wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Chus wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Chus wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Chus just pulled a "where'd you play your ball" on me w/r/t to parenting. I have three kids.
Is one of them autistic? If not, then you have no idea what I deal with on a daily basis.
Maybe if you smoked a little less weed you would be able to deal with the world better
Maybe you if didn't try to have sex with a minor, you wouldn't be on a sex offender list.
Remember this post the next time that you cry about people picking on you.
It's also going to be funny to watch Nas and Co. pretend this isn't Chus getting pretty close to doxxing Chas openly on the board...again.
Pathetic.
To stave off the inevitable: No, I don't care what IMU said or implied about Chus' kid as it pertains to this. Don't equivocate, deal with the issue in front of you, which is an unrepentant board member dancing around doxxing someone again after you shrugged off the first incident. Chas' posting history doesn't make this shit acceptable.
Your claim of another doxxing is over the top and without any basis.
I'm saying Chus was getting close to it. I disagree with CH that the cat is out of the proverbial bag. The "doxxing" isn't revealing his history, it's the history itself, because the personally identifying information is mandated by law to be public and searchable. Pointing people to
a registry, not even
the registry, is giving them the general area where Chas information (or "dox") can be found, and that is done in every single instance where it is brought up specifically, and Chus' wording in the post I quoted was specific enough that someone could have a board member's personal information on their screen in mere moments.
Quote:
You have no idea what was done by us when chas was doxxed. AND IT WILL REMAIN THAT WAY.
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I know he wasn't publicly reprimanded by any of the powers-that-be here, and was still allowed to post in the immediate aftermath, and that's all I need to know about your inaction. Further still, two of you guys have gone well out of your own respective ways to paint what he did as "no big deal", which only serves as tacit endorsement of the "no big deal" (it IS a big deal) action itself.
Quote:
Julie Dicaro has a job in radio and you don't. Get over it.
So, in summation, it doesn't matter what was done, you just feel that you have a right to know and it should be made public because you say so.
Thanks for sharing.
_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
