It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:39 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 135 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
The White Sox and Hahn are making all the right moves in this rebuild and are setting the White Sox up to be really good for a 5-10 year period, and JORR wants to trade all of that for a shot at one 85-win team that might or might not have won the division?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:26 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Where were you at the end of last season then?
Kindergarten, probably.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
IMU wrote:
The White Sox and Hahn are making all the right moves in this rebuild and are setting the White Sox up to be really good for a 5-10 year period, and JORR wants to trade all of that for a shot at one 85-win team that might or might not have won the division?


It's a "wanna be" Cubs rebuild but it's far more reckless. The Cubs didn't trade away a "Chris Sale". They didn't trade away a "Jose Quintana". They traded past prime soon to be FA's like Garza and Dempster. The only thing close to value was Shark and they tried their best on an extension before moving him. They were playing with house money.

For the Sox, all these prospects have to "hit" to justify the means. The risk is enormous.


Last edited by Caller Bob on Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
.077 isn't great but he's hitting. 156 if ya count his at bats with Boston too.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92043
Location: To the left of my post
Caller Bob wrote:
IMU wrote:
The White Sox and Hahn are making all the right moves in this rebuild and are setting the White Sox up to be really good for a 5-10 year period, and JORR wants to trade all of that for a shot at one 85-win team that might or might not have won the division?


It's a "wanna be" Cubs rebuild but it's far more reckless. The Cubs didn't trade away a "Chris Sale". They didn't trade away a "Jose Quintana". They traded past prime soon to be FA's like Garza and Dempster. The only thing close to value was Shark and they tried their best on an extension before moving him. They were playing with house money.

For the Sox, all these prospects have to "hit" to justify the means. The risk is enormous.
That's the thing though. The Sox don't have to intentionally tank for 3 straight years for their plan. Theo would have done the exact same thing at the end of last season.

Once again, unless you are arguing that there was a decent chance the 2018 or 1019 White Sox would be World Series champs then the rebuild makes sense based on the way baseball is setup. Even if it ends up being a complete disaster it still doesn't mean it was the wrong attempt.

The ironic thing is that the White Sox were the classic "Go for it every year team" and they were mocked for it on here relentlessly by Cubs fans. Only IMU seems to be logically consistent.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
312player wrote:
.077 isn't great but he's hitting. 156 if ya count his at bats with Boston too.


I mean eventually, being "Cuban" is going to be a red flag right? They might not be right in the head, or lazy. Cespedes has been up and down his entire career.

Puig, we thought he was going to be an Hall of Famer his rookie year, now, he's just an average player.

Soler will be out of baseball in two years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Caller Bob wrote:
IMU wrote:
The White Sox and Hahn are making all the right moves in this rebuild and are setting the White Sox up to be really good for a 5-10 year period, and JORR wants to trade all of that for a shot at one 85-win team that might or might not have won the division?


It's a "wanna be" Cubs rebuild but it's far more reckless. The Cubs didn't trade away a "Chris Sale". They didn't trade away a "Jose Quintana". They traded past prime soon to be FA's like Garza and Dempster. The only thing close to value was Shark and they tried their best on an extension before moving him. They were playing with house money.

For the Sox, all these prospects have to "hit" to justify the means. The risk is enormous.

Hahn turned those players into more and better prospects than I thought he could get. Sale was the only one where it seemed like equal "value" (as far as trades are concerned) exchanged hands. The Sox got more for Quintana, Eaton, Robertson/Frazier than I thought they would, and signing Robert was big.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
IMU wrote:
The White Sox and Hahn are making all the right moves in this rebuild and are setting the White Sox up to be really good for a 5-10 year period, and JORR wants to trade all of that for a shot at one 85-win team that might or might not have won the division?


It's a "wanna be" Cubs rebuild but it's far more reckless. The Cubs didn't trade away a "Chris Sale". They didn't trade away a "Jose Quintana". They traded past prime soon to be FA's like Garza and Dempster. The only thing close to value was Shark and they tried their best on an extension before moving him. They were playing with house money.

For the Sox, all these prospects have to "hit" to justify the means. The risk is enormous.
That's the thing though. The Sox don't have to intentionally tank for 3 straight years for their plan. Theo would have done the exact same thing at the end of last season.

Once again, unless you are arguing that there was a decent chance the 2018 or 1019 White Sox would be World Series champs then the rebuild makes sense based on the way baseball is setup. Even if it ends up being a complete disaster it still doesn't mean it was the wrong attempt.

The ironic thing is that the White Sox were the classic "Go for it every year team" and they were mocked for it on here relentlessly by Cubs fans. Only IMU seems to be logically consistent.


If a player is under 30 and is under team friendly control for multiple seasons, they can be part of your "rebuild" plan. You don't have to trade them. It's not a black and white template.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
IMU wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
IMU wrote:
The White Sox and Hahn are making all the right moves in this rebuild and are setting the White Sox up to be really good for a 5-10 year period, and JORR wants to trade all of that for a shot at one 85-win team that might or might not have won the division?


It's a "wanna be" Cubs rebuild but it's far more reckless. The Cubs didn't trade away a "Chris Sale". They didn't trade away a "Jose Quintana". They traded past prime soon to be FA's like Garza and Dempster. The only thing close to value was Shark and they tried their best on an extension before moving him. They were playing with house money.

For the Sox, all these prospects have to "hit" to justify the means. The risk is enormous.

Hahn turned those players into more and better prospects than I thought he could get. Sale was the only one where it seemed like equal "value" (as far as trades are concerned) exchanged hands. The Sox got more for Quintana, Eaton, Robertson/Frazier than I thought they would, and signing Robert was big.


The Q trade will probably be good for them. God damn Eloy is good. The Sale trade, I'm afraid will go down in infamy as a lopsided deal in favor of the Red Sox.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92043
Location: To the left of my post
Caller Bob wrote:
If a player is under 30 and is under team friendly control for multiple seasons, they can be part of your "rebuild" plan. You don't have to trade them. It's not a black and white template.
Ok, go back to the first day of the offseason last year. You are Rick Hahn. What are your next 3 big moves? One seemed to be Eaton. What are the other two? The goal is to make the White Sox into a legitimate World Series contender by the 2019 season.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
IMU wrote:
The White Sox and Hahn are making all the right moves in this rebuild and are setting the White Sox up to be really good for a 5-10 year period, and JORR wants to trade all of that for a shot at one 85-win team that might or might not have won the division?


You're a fan of a team that rebuilt countless times over 108 years without ever winning. It's pretty silly to think that a guy is "making all the right moves" and even if he is, you might not win anyway.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Victor Diaz has an ERA of like 40,000 and Basabe hasn't shown any promise until very recently. Should not have settled for those two instead of Devers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
If a player is under 30 and is under team friendly control for multiple seasons, they can be part of your "rebuild" plan. You don't have to trade them. It's not a black and white template.
Ok, go back to the first day of the offseason last year. You are Rick Hahn. What are your next 3 big moves? One seemed to be Eaton. What are the other two? The goal is to make the White Sox into a legitimate World Series contender by the 2019 season.


What is your definition of a legitimate World Series contender?

Mine is a team capable of winning 90-95 games and the division. This isn't the NBA.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
If a player is under 30 and is under team friendly control for multiple seasons, they can be part of your "rebuild" plan. You don't have to trade them. It's not a black and white template.
Ok, go back to the first day of the offseason last year. You are Rick Hahn. What are your next 3 big moves? One seemed to be Eaton. What are the other two? The goal is to make the White Sox into a legitimate World Series contender by the 2019 season.




I trade Robertson, Frasier,Melky, Eaton, and sign Jason Hammell.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92043
Location: To the left of my post
Caller Bob wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
If a player is under 30 and is under team friendly control for multiple seasons, they can be part of your "rebuild" plan. You don't have to trade them. It's not a black and white template.
Ok, go back to the first day of the offseason last year. You are Rick Hahn. What are your next 3 big moves? One seemed to be Eaton. What are the other two? The goal is to make the White Sox into a legitimate World Series contender by the 2019 season.


What is your definition of a legitimate World Series contender?

Mine is a team capable of winning 90-95 games and the division. This isn't the NBA.
Ok, what are the 3 moves you make to get them to 90-95 wins and winning the division at the end of last season?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Caller Bob wrote:
312player wrote:
.077 isn't great but he's hitting. 156 if ya count his at bats with Boston too.


I mean eventually, being "Cuban" is going to be a red flag right? They might not be right in the head, or lazy. Cespedes has been up and down his entire career.

Puig, we thought he was going to be an Hall of Famer his rookie year, now, he's just an average player.

Soler will be out of baseball in two years.




The Japanese and Cubans are always over hyped.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:48 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
312player wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
If a player is under 30 and is under team friendly control for multiple seasons, they can be part of your "rebuild" plan. You don't have to trade them. It's not a black and white template.
Ok, go back to the first day of the offseason last year. You are Rick Hahn. What are your next 3 big moves? One seemed to be Eaton. What are the other two? The goal is to make the White Sox into a legitimate World Series contender by the 2019 season.




I trade Robertson, Frasier,Melky, Eaton, and sign Jason Hammell.



That's not as easy as just saying it though. Melky is better than MANY outfielders on contending teams and nobody wants to make the jump even though not improving may cost them a World Series. It would have been even harder to trade him in the off-season.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
If a player is under 30 and is under team friendly control for multiple seasons, they can be part of your "rebuild" plan. You don't have to trade them. It's not a black and white template.
Ok, go back to the first day of the offseason last year. You are Rick Hahn. What are your next 3 big moves? One seemed to be Eaton. What are the other two? The goal is to make the White Sox into a legitimate World Series contender by the 2019 season.


What is your definition of a legitimate World Series contender?

Mine is a team capable of winning 90-95 games and the division. This isn't the NBA.
Ok, what are the 3 moves you make to get them to 90-95 wins and winning the division at the end of last season?


Like I said, I still do the Eaton trade. That was perfect, even if Guillto has lost a bit of luster. Always beware of guys like Eaton that have an incredibly inflated fWAR based on defense.

The other moves are open season on any player not named Sale/Quintana for prospects. The only way Sale is leaving is for young major league talent along with prospects.

I bet as a Sox fan you feel a helluva lot better today with those two in the rotation and a still "very good" farm system, which you could have had. 88-90 wins would not have been out of the question in 2018.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92043
Location: To the left of my post
They had to trade three guys to get one good prospect. Who else gets anything?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 503
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
juschill wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
Many thought he was the goods. Looks more like Jorge Orta on a bad day.

Unlike Cubs fans, we wait more than 5 games before declaring ours guys HOF'ers


Ironically, moncada was likely traded for a hall of famer.


I think Moncada is going to flame out but Chris Sale Hall of Famer? Can you let him win a single award and be certain his arm doesn't fall off before you put him in the Hall of Fame?

Hall of Fame used to have standards. Then they started putting guys like Ozzie Smith and Barry Larkin in there and everyone who's played a couple good games think they should be in there.



I agree that Sale has a way to go before he can be seriously discussed as a Hall of Famer, but the standards for starting pitchers are going to need to be relaxed or there won't be another one who ever gets in. Halladay should go in. But I can't think of another guy who is a no-brainer. Kershaw, I guess, but he's still way short of traditional benchmarks. I think he has about 140 wins. If he retired tomorrow he's pretty similar to John Santana who I would say is short of the Hall of Fame.


I agree.

Certainly winning a couple Cy Young awards should be a minimum.

You should be among the best at your position without much debate for 10-15 years. Otherwise you can end up in the Good Player but not Hall of Fame category.

Two many people in the Hall of Fame. Ivan Rodriguez? Ugh. Tim Raines? For what?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Sale is pretty much a lock for the HOF. Two more seasons like 2017 and he's in. Especially considering this new 'juiced ball" era.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:16 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
So two more season's like the career best year he is currently having. So he doesn't have his work cut out for him then.

MANY bad thoughts in this thread. MANY Cubs fans in this thread. I do not believe that is a coincidence.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:26 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
juschill wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
juschill wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
Many thought he was the goods. Looks more like Jorge Orta on a bad day.

Unlike Cubs fans, we wait more than 5 games before declaring ours guys HOF'ers


Ironically, moncada was likely traded for a hall of famer.


I think Moncada is going to flame out but Chris Sale Hall of Famer? Can you let him win a single award and be certain his arm doesn't fall off before you put him in the Hall of Fame?

Hall of Fame used to have standards. Then they started putting guys like Ozzie Smith and Barry Larkin in there and everyone who's played a couple good games think they should be in there.



I agree that Sale has a way to go before he can be seriously discussed as a Hall of Famer, but the standards for starting pitchers are going to need to be relaxed or there won't be another one who ever gets in. Halladay should go in. But I can't think of another guy who is a no-brainer. Kershaw, I guess, but he's still way short of traditional benchmarks. I think he has about 140 wins. If he retired tomorrow he's pretty similar to John Santana who I would say is short of the Hall of Fame.


I agree.

Certainly winning a couple Cy Young awards should be a minimum.

You should be among the best at your position without much debate for 10-15 years. Otherwise you can end up in the Good Player but not Hall of Fame category.

Two many people in the Hall of Fame. Ivan Rodriguez? Ugh. Tim Raines? For what?


There are a lot of guys I'd complain about before those two.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:29 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Caller Bob wrote:
Sale is pretty much a lock for the HOF. Two more seasons like 2017 and he's in. Especially considering this new 'juiced ball" era.



That's ridiculous. What does he have? 85 wins? If you put Sale in now you better put Don Gullett and Ron Guidry in first.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Sale is pretty much a lock for the HOF. Two more seasons like 2017 and he's in. Especially considering this new 'juiced ball" era.



That's ridiculous. What does he have? 85 wins? If you put Sale in now you better put Don Gullett and Ron Guidry in first.


Nobody is going to give a shit about pitcher wins when the likes of Kershaw, Sale and Scherzer are up for their HOF votes. Forget the debate of how useless the "win" stat is, you have nuances like specialized bullpens, five men rotations, starts skipped, etc. There just are not as many opportunities for pitchers to get the "W" stat.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
Sale has to win a couple playoff games, at least. I don't think he's ever been on "the big stage" and his personality has been... volatile. Great competitor, but the HOF talk is a little silly at this point.

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
Bob you're off the rocker here. Those other guys you mentioned have a bunch of Cys

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
The White Sox and Hahn are making all the right moves in this rebuild and are setting the White Sox up to be really good for a 5-10 year period, and JORR wants to trade all of that for a shot at one 85-win team that might or might not have won the division?


You're a fan of a team that rebuilt countless times over 108 years without ever winning. It's pretty silly to think that a guy is "making all the right moves" and even if he is, you might not win anyway.

Winning isnt guaranteed. Giving your organization the best chances at winning is how you should be judged.

The Cubs had decades and decades of the wrong people making the wrong moves. I would not have been a fan of the rebuild had Hendry still been there or Zell still owned the team, for example.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Last edited by IMU on Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Apologist wrote:
Bob you're off the rocker here. Those other guys you mentioned have a bunch of Cys


Chris Sale has been every bit as good of pitcher as Scherzer the past half decade. Everyone with a functional baseball brain knows that. Kershaw is just on a level above everyone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:48 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Caller Bob wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Sale is pretty much a lock for the HOF. Two more seasons like 2017 and he's in. Especially considering this new 'juiced ball" era.



That's ridiculous. What does he have? 85 wins? If you put Sale in now you better put Don Gullett and Ron Guidry in first.


Nobody is going to give a shit about pitcher wins when the likes of Kershaw, Sale and Scherzer are up for their HOF votes. Forget the debate of how useless the "win" stat is, you have nuances like specialized bullpens, five men rotations, starts skipped, etc. There just are not as many opportunities for pitchers to get the "W" stat.



:lol: They all have giant winning percentages but I'm gonna say no starter with less than 150 wins is getting in the Hall of Fame. There are way too many good ones out there with more who aren't in.

But like I said, the standards will have to be relaxed. They're not going to be relaxed from 300 wins down to 110 though.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 135 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group