It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 1:35 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 295 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:10 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79470
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
IMU wrote:
It is flawed. It judges one player when he only contributes 33% to that result. Additionally, a pitcher pitches to hitters. Not one single portion of W/L shows how a pitcher fared in that.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Are you arguing that Samardzija is unluckier this season or that he is getting hit harder? It's hard to tell.

It is easy to tell. It is all in the numbers.


Are the locations of batted balls random or not? Do you understand the whole concept of DIPS? Because it doesn't seem as if you do.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
IMU wrote:
It is flawed. It judges one player when he only contributes 33% to that result. Additionally, a pitcher pitches to hitters. Not one single portion of W/L shows how a pitcher fared in that.
In one specific game, sure this might be the case.

Over the course of 100, 200, 300 career starts, its flawed to ignore the W-L record.

No, a pitcher pitches to hitters in all games.

This isn't flipping a coin. 500 GS instead of 1 GS isn't going to solve the issue of W/L not analyzing how a pitcher deals with getting hitters out. A pitcher has no ability to get himself a win.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Last edited by IMU on Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
Cub with two very good trades
They were always going to win the division. Now they have the pitching they need for the playoffs. Tiger got fleeced in that deal sending two solid controllable pieces. Just calling a spade a spade Gents.

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Frank Coztansa wrote:
IMU wrote:
It is flawed. It judges one player when he only contributes 33% to that result. Additionally, a pitcher pitches to hitters. Not one single portion of W/L shows how a pitcher fared in that.
In one specific game, sure this might be the case.

Over the course of 100, 200, 300 career starts, its flawed to ignore the W-L record.


Image

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
IMU wrote:
It is flawed.

No, it isn't. It's objective is to determine how a starting pitcher fared against another starting pitcher. It accomplishes its objective. Like any other stat, a small sample size will lead to error in analysis.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:12 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79470
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
IMU wrote:
No, a pitcher pitches to hitters in all games.


No shit. Pitchers pitch to hitters and hitters hit pitchers. One man's "run support" is another man's earned runs.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
It's flawed, as in all stats are flawed if you look that one stat in a vacuum.

And most people devolve to one stat or another via confirmation bias shows what they are looking to find; which is also problem in the scientific community.

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
No, a pitcher pitches to hitters in all games.


No shit. Pitchers pitch to hitters and hitters hit pitchers. One man's "run support" is another man's earned runs.

No statistic that rewards a pitcher for giving up 6 ER in 5 innings will ever be a good indicator of performance. Ever.

I know that pitcher pitched poorly. You don't.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Sonny Gray to Yanks for some underwhealming prospects. Rat turds, I wish we got in on that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
Apologist wrote:
Cub with two very good trades
They were always going to win the division. Now they have the pitching they need for the playoffs. Tiger got fleeced in that deal sending two solid controllable pieces. Just calling a spade a spade Gents.


I'm backing off this slightly upon further developments.
Avila is not controlled and the reports have cash going to the Tigers. If they picked up a couple million in cash that would be substantial.

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Apologist wrote:
Apologist wrote:
Cub with two very good trades
They were always going to win the division. Now they have the pitching they need for the playoffs. Tiger got fleeced in that deal sending two solid controllable pieces. Just calling a spade a spade Gents.


I'm backing off this slightly upon further developments.
Avila is not controlled and the reports have cash going to the Tigers. If they picked up a couple million in cash that would be substantial.


It's the fucking Cubs. Who cares about a couple million.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:18 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79470
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
No, a pitcher pitches to hitters in all games.


No shit. Pitchers pitch to hitters and hitters hit pitchers. One man's "run support" is another man's earned runs.

No statistic that rewards a pitcher for giving up 6 ER in 5 innings will ever be a good indicator of performance. Ever.

I know that pitcher pitched poorly. You don't.


I don't see the starting pitcher's win as a "reward". It shows exactly what it's supposed to show. That he was the best pitcher in a particular game. I'm pretty sure you can't find too many guys with 10.80 ERAs and winning records, so your example is a little silly.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
IMU wrote:
No statistic that rewards a pitcher for giving up 6 ER in 5 innings will ever be a good indicator of performance. Ever.

I know that pitcher pitched poorly. You don't.

JLN posted all these graphs and charts and Venn diagrams and Tsquares and formulas and all this crap that showed Quintana didn't win because he lacked run support.

I have seen MANY Quintana games for the Sox where he gets a lead, and then gives runs right back. He has had some so called "tough luck" no decisions, and he had some no decisions where he gave up 4 and 5 runs, even though his "run support" was as much as what he gave up.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
IMU wrote:
No statistic that rewards a pitcher for giving up 6 ER in 5 innings will ever be a good indicator of performance. Ever.

I know that pitcher pitched poorly. You don't.

JLN posted all these graphs and charts and Venn diagrams and Tsquares and formulas and all this crap that showed Quintana didn't win because he lacked run support.

I have seen MANY Quintana games for the Sox where he gets a lead, and then gives runs right back. He has had some so called "tough luck" no decisions, and he had some no decisions where he gave up 4 and 5 runs, even though his "run support" was as much as what he gave up.


This basically reads: I'm too stupid to analyze an intellectual analysis so here is my "from the hip" analysis, now excuse me while I put some farts in jars.hehehe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Thank you for your input.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Caller Bob wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
IMU wrote:
No statistic that rewards a pitcher for giving up 6 ER in 5 innings will ever be a good indicator of performance. Ever.

I know that pitcher pitched poorly. You don't.

JLN posted all these graphs and charts and Venn diagrams and Tsquares and formulas and all this crap that showed Quintana didn't win because he lacked run support.

I have seen MANY Quintana games for the Sox where he gets a lead, and then gives runs right back. He has had some so called "tough luck" no decisions, and he had some no decisions where he gave up 4 and 5 runs, even though his "run support" was as much as what he gave up.


This basically reads: I'm too stupid to analyze an intellectual analysis so here is my "from the hip" analysis, now excuse me while I put some farts in jars.hehehe

I don't think a lot of people come here for a math debate.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79470
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Apologist wrote:
Apologist wrote:
Cub with two very good trades
They were always going to win the division. Now they have the pitching they need for the playoffs. Tiger got fleeced in that deal sending two solid controllable pieces. Just calling a spade a spade Gents.


I'm backing off this slightly upon further developments.
Avila is not controlled and the reports have cash going to the Tigers. If they picked up a couple million in cash that would be substantial.



They don't need Avila under control. In fact, after hearing Hoyer the other day, I'm certain they feel Caratini is better than any catcher they were going to trade for. The point is, at this point in his development they want Caratini getting consistent at-bats and Contreras is going to be doing the lion's share of the catching.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Shawn Estes, in almost 300 starts, had a winning record with a career 90 ERA+. Was he better than Pat Dobson?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:30 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79470
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
IMU wrote:
Shawn Estes, in almost 300 starts, had a winning record with a career 90 ERA+. Was he better than Pat Dobson?



Was Murry Dickson better than Catfish Hunter?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
Apologist wrote:
Cub with two very good trades
They were always going to win the division. Now they have the pitching they need for the playoffs. Tiger got fleeced in that deal sending two solid controllable pieces. Just calling a spade a spade Gents.


Avila isn't controlled. He signed a one year contract this year and is well beyond his arbitration years. I'm not sure you would want him for a whole year anyway as he played in 124 games combined the previous two years, hit about .200, is going to be 31 and is heavily concussed.

The Cubbies received two players but it was hardly a fleecing. Candalerio is a top 100 prospect and Paredes was the apple of Theo's eye just a week ago when he reassured everyone how stocked his minor league system still is. Those are two guys who project to be MLB players on the left side of the infield for a reliever and a backup catcher. It is the kind of trade a team with an open window makes but makes with a little regret as to its long term future, just like the Chapman trade.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Candalerio is not a top 100 prospect. if he's still in any, he will be flushed out next ranking. He's a AAAA player.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:34 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79470
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Caller Bob wrote:
Candalerio is not a top 100 prospect.



At least now that he's no longer a Cub he's not.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Caller Bob wrote:
Candalerio is not a top 100 prospect.

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2017?list=prospects

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Candalerio is not a top 100 prospect.

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2017?list=prospects

if he's still in any, he will be flushed out next ranking.

Keep reading, top to bottom, left to right.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Candalerio is not a top 100 prospect.

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2017?list=prospects

I'm too stupid to analyze an intellectual analysis so here is my "from the hip" analysis, now excuse me while I put some farts in jars

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Candelario is going to be a decent MLB player.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Candalerio is not a top 100 prospect.

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2017?list=prospects

if he's still in any, he will be flushed out next ranking.

Keep reading, top to bottom, left to right.

You sure get flustered when proven factually wrong

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Candalerio is not a top 100 prospect.

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2017?list=prospects

if he's still in any, he will be flushed out next ranking.

Keep reading, top to bottom, left to right.


and, when do you think the last ranking came out...I'll give you a hint, this isn't going to go well for Caller Bob

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
He was last ranked 92nd. He's about to be very old for AAA, where he's putting up OK numbers. There is your analysis. Of course you are the dumb asses that get excited because AAA Fulmer is still a "Top 100 prospect"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:40 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79470
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Candalerio is not a top 100 prospect.

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2017?list=prospects

I'm too stupid to analyze an intellectual analysis so here is my "from the hip" analysis, now excuse me while I put some farts in jars


Image

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 295 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group