It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 10:30 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 137 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56745
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't see true single payer ever happening. That's a good thing. A hybrid system may happen with the government providing basic care and supplemental coverage from insurance companies. That is actually what most of the highest rated systems are. We will never be a top ten system. Too many outside factors here to do well in the rankings.

That would probably be mostly fine. That's more or less what France does and the French seem happy with what they have. But we can do better than what we have now and that necessitates eliminating these vampires of private for-profit health insurance.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93627
Location: To the left of my post
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I am not nearly as well versed in this stuff as many of you guys. Let me ask a few questions in regard to this discussion.

With a single payer system do monthly premiums go away, or will they still exist? Deductibles?

Is everything covered completely?

What happens to all of these high power insurance companies if the Gov't takes over this stuff?

There would seem to have to be a tax increase to be able to fund this? Would we be paying more in the extra taxes than the former premiums?

Single payer means the government pays 100%. There may be a small copay for some things but that stretches the definition a little.

Most things would be covered though the government gets to decide. Expensive end of life care would be one of the first things that would have to be sorted out.

People like us would probably pay somewhat more in the form of taxes. It would be hard to add so many more people in and not have that happen to those who make above a certain level.

The insurance companies are banned from providing healthcare in single payer. You can't opt out.


Thanks for the answers.

So what is the forecast for this actually happening at some point? Is it inevitable? Is it still a long shot?

It sounds pretty good, but my fear would be that the tax increases that would be associated with it would screw us more than the monthly health insurance premiums

The answer is in "who is us"?. Healthy people would be required to pay more to cover unhealthy people. That's really the big issue. For-profit insurance companies want nothing to do with those clients. That's why pre-existing conditions is a buzzword. Most Americans want them covered but insurance companies and hardline conservatives don't.
But even the Republicans weren't going after preexisting condition clauses.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56745
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
The answer is in "who is us"?. Healthy people would be required to pay more to cover unhealthy people. That's really the big issue. For-profit insurance companies want nothing to do with those clients. That's why pre-existing conditions is a buzzword. Most Americans want them covered but insurance companies and hardline conservatives don't.


Did you see that retard on Fox & Friends say something like "congratulations, millennials, now the healthy have to pay for the sick"? THAT IS THE WHOLE PREMISE OF HEALTH INSURANCE. I'm convinced Republicans want healthcare to be like buying a TV: you look at sticker prices, shop around, bring in a coupon from a competitor and tell them to match it or you'll speak with their manager, and then pay that. It's insane.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57669
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Healthy people would be required to pay more to cover unhealthy people.

Isnt that happening with the current system tho? If I am a healthy person that is paying high premiums but never use very much health care?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:32 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I am not nearly as well versed in this stuff as many of you guys. Let me ask a few questions in regard to this discussion.

With a single payer system do monthly premiums go away, or will they still exist? Deductibles?

Is everything covered completely?

What happens to all of these high power insurance companies if the Gov't takes over this stuff?

There would seem to have to be a tax increase to be able to fund this? Would we be paying more in the extra taxes than the former premiums?

Single payer means the government pays 100%. There may be a small copay for some things but that stretches the definition a little.

Most things would be covered though the government gets to decide. Expensive end of life care would be one of the first things that would have to be sorted out.

People like us would probably pay somewhat more in the form of taxes. It would be hard to add so many more people in and not have that happen to those who make above a certain level.

The insurance companies are banned from providing healthcare in single payer. You can't opt out.


Thanks for the answers.

So what is the forecast for this actually happening at some point? Is it inevitable? Is it still a long shot?

It sounds pretty good, but my fear would be that the tax increases that would be associated with it would screw us more than the monthly health insurance premiums

I don't see true single payer ever happening. That's a good thing. A hybrid system may happen with the government providing basic care and supplemental coverage from insurance companies. That is actually what most of the highest rated systems are. We will never be a top ten system. Too many outside factors here to do well in the rankings.

It will be interesting to see how things change. Many worldwide healthcare systems are strained. Ironically, single payer UK healthcare wants to become more like ours.


I imagine it would be similar to the current payroll taxes. Instead of 1.45% for Medicare you would pay 7% and maybe a deductible for some services and your employer would pay an additional 7% (like they do now for Medicare).

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56745
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
RFDC wrote:
If I am a healthy person that is paying high premiums but never use very much health care?

Yeah, it is pretty stupid when you lay it out like that, especially considering "well you pay now so you can be covered later" still has you paying a lot.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13464
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
The funny thing is that Medicare is a government run health system that is both popular and generally successful. Obamacare expanded it and conservatives cried foul as it represented an expansion of government. That is certainly true but the spin has carefully avoided the Medicare link and focused more on the government is inefficient and bad propaganda. That is in large part due to insurance industry lobbyists who most certainly don't have our best interests at heart.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56745
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
The funny thing is that Medicare is a government run health system that is both popular and generally successful.

Haha, yeah. "Keep the government's hands off my Medicare!" People like Medicare because not only is it generally successful, it makes ordinary people's lives so much easier. When the government does something to make life just a little less miserable, whether that's Social Security or Medicare or even streamlining the DMV, people really really like it! When the government does something that makes your life harder, whether that's fucking with your kid's math curriculum or making you shop online for insurance plans and explain at great length why you shouldn't have to pay full price, people really really hate it. "The government" is not universally good or universally evil, but it can get things right from time to time.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13464
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
RFDC wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Healthy people would be required to pay more to cover unhealthy people.

Isnt that happening with the current system tho? If I am a healthy person that is paying high premiums but never use very much health care?

To some extent yes but you are viewing it through a very personal window. If you have a pre-existing condition and lose your job you are screwed. What you view as high premiums doesn't reflect those costs. Fortunately for most of us insurance companies can't easily dump fellow employees because of health issues...but they would if they could.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33242
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I am ready for it. The government runs everything else so well, let's do it.

I know you believe anything run by the government is inherently bad but "for profit" health care is not your friend. As a pro-capitalism poster I'm sure you understand how they make money and what they are willing to do to achieve their goals. There is a reason every other industrialized nation went away from that model. If you have money and a good job of course you like the status quo. Screw the rest.

On a side note: does anyone think the insurance companies do a good job? Seriously, guys like denis and many others bash "the government" in typically generic fashion but dealing with insurance companies is a nightmare. They don't even remotely fit into the capitalist concept of "competition keep them in line."


Drop the illusion that are healthcare insurers are providing insurance. In every other line of insurance, auto, home, life workers comp, GL, for profit companies work just fine. There are ways to address risky people with take all comer or insurers of last resort models.

Our health insurance market is a dollar trading scheme. Most private employers are self insured with the insurer simply providing claim administration and network access. In fully insured plans, you are just paying high premiums to match low deductible claims. Real insurance would be catastrophic cover where individuals are responsible for most of the day to day losses. I agree with CH early quoted post about people without coverage not going to doctors. It's a huge problem. So is our obsesity crisis, drug use, smoking, and generally sedentary lifestyles.

Where the logic of government taking the profit out logic fails is that the government will be full of waste and fraud. They have no clue how to run an efficient cost conscience operation. And wait until public hospitals look like CPS schools or our public infrastructure. It will be robbed of investment.

How will the government save money? Well cost controls, meaning under paying providers as it does now. That sounds great until you realize doctors will stop spending ten years in school and hundreds of thousands on tuition for a government paid job. The cost of drugs will go down, but so will research needed to find break-through medicines.

Look at the VA system. Is that what you want? What part of our government gives you confidence that they can run 1/6 of our economy.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93627
Location: To the left of my post
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
The funny thing is that Medicare is a government run health system that is both popular and generally successful. Obamacare expanded it and conservatives cried foul as it represented an expansion of government. That is certainly true but the spin has carefully avoided the Medicare link and focused more on the government is inefficient and bad propaganda. That is in large part due to insurance industry lobbyists who most certainly don't have our best interests at heart.

It's a niche program though. It's the insurance equivalent of social security. It's not applicable to healthcare at large which is why Medicaid is horrible.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56745
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
denisdman wrote:
How will the government save money? Well cost controls, meaning under paying providers as it does now. That sounds great until you realize doctors will stop spending ten years in school and hundreds of thousands on tuition for a government paid job. The cost of drugs will go down, but so will research needed to find break-through medicines.


http://tinyletter.com/error/letters/som ... ngle-payer
Quote:
What about doctor salaries?

I believe that the reduction in per-service costs (and the adoption of smarter standards of payment, like "pay for treatment" instead of "pay for specific service") will be more than matched by an increase in people seeking affordable preventative care, so most physicians will find their compensation to be fair.

But that might not be a perfect argument. Ultimately, some physicians will find their total compensation reduced—mostly specialists, who have been unfairly privileged in price increases over time. (PCPs and rural medicine doctors, on the other hand, are due for a compensation increase relative to median American physician salaries — which are, it should be noted much much much higher than salaries in other countries...)

One of the reasons physicians need high salaries is because they graduate ten years of education with $300,000 in student debt and 7% of compounding interest. That's two decades of paying off debt. How cruel!

So I think there is room in the Universal Single-Payer Healthcare for tuition relief and/or free medical training for doctors, nurses, and other essential health providers. Relieve their pressure to be locked into a career path and insurmountable education debt in exchange for fairer salaries. This should be a net better result for everyone.


France pays its doctors well, not as well as ours, but they also don't let them fall victim to backbreaking medical debt.

I suspect a lot of medical research is already government-related, and even so, the idea that the whole industry will go Galt and stop inventing new and better boner pills if we don't keep bankrupting ourselves for care has always felt far-fetched to me.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13464
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
denisdman wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I am ready for it. The government runs everything else so well, let's do it.

I know you believe anything run by the government is inherently bad but "for profit" health care is not your friend. As a pro-capitalism poster I'm sure you understand how they make money and what they are willing to do to achieve their goals. There is a reason every other industrialized nation went away from that model. If you have money and a good job of course you like the status quo. Screw the rest.

On a side note: does anyone think the insurance companies do a good job? Seriously, guys like denis and many others bash "the government" in typically generic fashion but dealing with insurance companies is a nightmare. They don't even remotely fit into the capitalist concept of "competition keep them in line."


Drop the illusion that are healthcare insurers are providing insurance. In every other line of insurance, auto, home, life workers comp, GL, for profit companies work just fine. There are ways to address risky people with take all comer or insurers of last resort models.

Our health insurance market is a dollar trading scheme. Most private employers are self insured with the insurer simply providing claim administration and network access. In fully insured plans, you are just paying high premiums to match low deductible claims. Real insurance would be catastrophic cover where individuals are responsible for most of the day to day losses. I agree with CH early quoted post about people without coverage not going to doctors. It's a huge problem. So is our obsesity crisis, drug use, smoking, and generally sedentary lifestyles.

Where the logic of government taking the profit out logic fails is that the government will be full of waste and fraud. They have no clue how to run an efficient cost conscience operation. And wait until public hospitals look like CPS schools or our public infrastructure. It will be robbed of investment.

How will the government save money? Well cost controls, meaning under paying providers as it does now. That sounds great until you realize doctors will stop spending ten years in school and hundreds of thousands on tuition for a government paid job. The cost of drugs will go down, but so will research needed to find break-through medicines.

Look at the VA system. Is that what you want? What part of our government gives you confidence that they can run 1/6 of our economy.

As usual, you over-simplify and compare apples to oranges. For profit insurance means for profit. They are not pro you. Health insurance is not a commodity like you seem to believe. I admit there is also not an easy answer. But you seem to believe that inefficiency is inherent only to government which is patently false. Further, that inefficiency does not necessarily mean higher cost when compared with the oh so efficient (only to those who haven't dealt with them) for profit insurers.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16732
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's not applicable to healthcare at large which is why Medicaid is horrible.


And it's a big reason the "Medicare for all" is problematic...Medicare reimbursements do not cover doctor/hospital costs and must be supplemented by patients with private insurance. Doctors and hospitals would either demand higher payments, disappear, or cut back on services (which would likely affect mortality).

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 5:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93627
Location: To the left of my post
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's not applicable to healthcare at large which is why Medicaid is horrible.


And it's a big reason the "Medicare for all" is problematic...Medicare reimbursements do not cover doctor/hospital costs and must be supplemented by patients with private insurance. Doctors and hospitals would either demand higher payments, disappear, or cut back on services (which would likely affect mortality).

Very true.

Lots of complaining about for profit insurance here when much of the markup is because of how the government underfunds their part.

Let's trust them to run it all though! We can even get health justice!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's not applicable to healthcare at large which is why Medicaid is horrible.


And it's a big reason the "Medicare for all" is problematic...Medicare reimbursements do not cover doctor/hospital costs and must be supplemented by patients with private insurance. Doctors and hospitals would either demand higher payments, disappear, or cut back on services (which would likely affect mortality).

Very true.

Lots of complaining about for profit insurance here when much of the markup is because of how the government underfunds their part.

Let's trust them to run it all though! We can even get health justice!


Yes insurance is getting a bad rap. Particularly by Zipperhead who seemingly has had the worst possible insurance experience of all time. Bottom line is most think they are happy with their insurance as it is. The question has always been the uninsured and the preexisting patients. There are better ways to handle those than is already being done.

I have said very clearly there is the pre ACA system and single payer type solution. The in between stuff will never make everyone happy.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Health insurance
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10885
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's not applicable to healthcare at large which is why Medicaid is horrible.


And it's a big reason the "Medicare for all" is problematic...Medicare reimbursements do not cover doctor/hospital costs and must be supplemented by patients with private insurance. Doctors and hospitals would either demand higher payments, disappear, or cut back on services (which would likely affect mortality).

Very true.

Lots of complaining about for profit insurance here when much of the markup is because of how the government underfunds their part.

Let's trust them to run it all though! We can even get health justice!


Yes insurance is getting a bad rap. Particularly by Zipperhead who seemingly has had the worst possible insurance experience of all time. Bottom line is most think they are happy with their insurance as it is. The question has always been the uninsured and the preexisting patients. There are better ways to handle those than is already being done.

I have said very clearly there is the pre ACA system and single payer type solution. The in between stuff will never make everyone happy.


I'm not happy with my insurance as it is. I cover myself and my 2 children. My kids go to the doctor way more than I do. My son broke his arm....it cost me over $2000 out of pocket. It was pre-tax out of pocket, but still....that's a lot of out of pocket money considering I pay monthly insurance premiums (with contributions from my employer as well). That's ridiculous.

The biggest problem are with how much the same coverage has increased year by year. I know insurance has a cost....fine with that....but it's clear the costs our out of control and that's not right. The system as it stands has inheritantly high costs. Part of that is profit for Insurance companies, but most of that is on malpractice as well. So not only are we insuring ourselves but we insuring the doctors from themselves. It's crazy.

Single payer is a great theory, but it's not very practical in reality. Agree that medicare is not a good comparison. I think we'd see single payer resemble social security...not good. If we are truly going to do something, seems to me the only way we could see premiums / costs controlled is to open up the markets and get them as competitive as possible....but not holding my breath.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 137 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group