SteveSarley wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
SteveSarley wrote:
Frankie, I always assumed that you were a simple minded little twit that had nothing better to do with his life than post over 57,000 times on a message board.
Hell, I guess if that is all you have going for you in your life, I suppose you have a right to think that it is a big deal.
Now I truly realize that you are a demented little twit that in addition to 14 posts a day, you have nothing better to do than to look up my old posts and quote them.
That seems a little twisted to me.
I'm thinking that in addition to being an aggravating, self-aggrandizing little twit, you may be a tad dangerous.
Please, go get yourself some help. There are some great doctors dispensing some great medications these days.
You seem like the perfect candidate for some of them.
Have your guardian Rick take you to one of these doctors.
This kind of stuff might explain why your podcast is having trouble retaining listeners.
Actually, I said, "We seem to have plenty of listeners but would like more."
I never said we had a problem retaining the listeners we had.
Thanks for your input, misguided, though it was.
Retaining listeners = more listeners.
Of however many listens you get an episode, probably 50-60% are Regular Listeners. The remainder are divided into two groups: Intermittent Listeners, and New Listeners. IL's are those that are subscribed to your feed, but only check into an episode once in awhile—if the title grabs them, if they're hoping to hear about some news from you, or saw a post of yours on social media, etc. NL's are people that just happened upon your podcast, and are perusing your goods, so to speak, trying to decide whether they'll subscribe to your feed, much less return regularly.
If you're interested only in the aggregate number of listens an episode, instead of turning IL's and NL's into RL's with great content, teases, increasing quality, whatever, you're missing the boat.
But yeah, my input is misguided.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
