It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 3:09 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 488 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 17  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Didn't they ban any food deemed to be unsafe in Demolition Man?

Is that what you want, Rick?

Assholes walking around in mu mus all the time telling you to fucking Be Well?


Rick uses the "shells" for sex


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Didn't they ban any food deemed to be unsafe in Demolition Man?

Is that what you want, Rick?

Assholes walking around in mu mus all the time telling you to fucking Be Well?

exposure to the sun is dangerous and causes cancer. Therefore we all need to wear either burqas or the outfits in handmaid's tale.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Snopes also debunked the "splenda is unsafe" myth.

http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/splenda.asp
You said "proven to be safe". There is a lot of information starting to come out that ALL artificial sweeteners meant to mimic sugar are bad for you. It doesn't mean you are going to raise your cancer risk or that you are going to have your stomach explode but it would be hard to call it "safe" if we don't consider sugar "safe".

as with most food products, sugar itself is safe. It comes down to being responsible and having reasonable amounts/portions of it.

Fat, cholesterol, sugar, etc. are all necessary components in your food. You cannot eliminate them entirely, but simply must be an adult and be responsible for what you intake.

We are adults and we alone should be responsible for what we eat. it is not up to the state to dictate what we can and can't do with our own bodies. Does the phrase "my body my choice" mean anything here?
Sugar is not a "necessary component" of food. Sugar was not added to most peoples foods for thousands of years.

This tax isn't stopping anyone from making bad choices. As you said, this isn't even stopping anyone from buying sugary drinks! :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33243
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Didn't they ban any food deemed to be unsafe in Demolition Man?

Is that what you want, Rick?

Assholes walking around in mu mus all the time telling you to fucking Be Well?

exposure to the sun is dangerous and causes cancer. Therefore we all need to wear either burqas or the outfits in handmaid's tale.


Yes, I want more nanny state. Protect us from the dangers of the real world. Nothing is my fault. I take no responsibility for my actions.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Snopes also debunked the "splenda is unsafe" myth.

http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/splenda.asp
You said "proven to be safe". There is a lot of information starting to come out that ALL artificial sweeteners meant to mimic sugar are bad for you. It doesn't mean you are going to raise your cancer risk or that you are going to have your stomach explode but it would be hard to call it "safe" if we don't consider sugar "safe".

as with most food products, sugar itself is safe. It comes down to being responsible and having reasonable amounts/portions of it.

Fat, cholesterol, sugar, etc. are all necessary components in your food. You cannot eliminate them entirely, but simply must be an adult and be responsible for what you intake.

We are adults and we alone should be responsible for what we eat. it is not up to the state to dictate what we can and can't do with our own bodies. Does the phrase "my body my choice" mean anything here?
Sugar is not a "necessary component" of food. Sugar was not added to most peoples foods for thousands of years.

This tax isn't stopping anyone from making bad choices. As you said, this isn't even stopping anyone from buying sugary drinks! :lol:

People have the right to put into their bodies whatever they deem fit (and I also say that for drugs)

I just hope Cook County is prepared for the combination of falling sales tax revenues (as people buy over county lines) and also the lost wages when their supermarkets lay off workers.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Didn't they ban any food deemed to be unsafe in Demolition Man?

Is that what you want, Rick?

Assholes walking around in mu mus all the time telling you to fucking Be Well?
Sugar and sugar substitutes should not be banned. If healthier choices are moderately cheaper then that is ok by me.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
The snopes article was last updated a year before the article I posted, but the European study was posted a year after.

:compress:

and my article referencing the new European study on Splenda was from 2-3 months ago.


That's what I said Ogie!!!

I think we are referring to 2 separate studies, this is the one I was referring to:

http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2017/05/ ... 494340228/

1. The snopes article
2. The article I posted
3. The European study

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32164
pizza_Place: Milano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Sugar is not a "necessary component" of food.


http://www.brandeating.com/2017/08/ihop ... onuts.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
denisdman wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Didn't they ban any food deemed to be unsafe in Demolition Man?

Is that what you want, Rick?

Assholes walking around in mu mus all the time telling you to fucking Be Well?

exposure to the sun is dangerous and causes cancer. Therefore we all need to wear either burqas or the outfits in handmaid's tale.


Yes, I want more nanny state. Protect us from the dangers of the real world. Nothing is my fault. I take no responsibility for my actions.

it would be funny if this wasn't true of those who elect Illinois politicians and wonder why their state is so fucked.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
People have the right to put into their bodies whatever they deem fit (and I also say that for drugs)

I just hope Cook County is prepared for the combination of falling sales tax revenues (as people buy over county lines) and also the lost wages when their supermarkets lay off workers.
You are approaching strawman territory. You can put as much sugar into your body as you want. There may just be cheaper alternatives that don't involve sugar.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Sugar is not a "necessary component" of food.


http://www.brandeating.com/2017/08/ihop ... onuts.html
:lol: I would try it but IHOP kind of blows.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Didn't they ban any food deemed to be unsafe in Demolition Man?

Is that what you want, Rick?

Assholes walking around in mu mus all the time telling you to fucking Be Well?

You are fined one credit for a violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
People have the right to put into their bodies whatever they deem fit (and I also say that for drugs)

I just hope Cook County is prepared for the combination of falling sales tax revenues (as people buy over county lines) and also the lost wages when their supermarkets lay off workers.
You are approaching strawman territory. You can put as much sugar into your body as you want. There may just be cheaper alternatives that don't involve sugar.

and that is not for the state to decide. That is for individuals to decide. That's my point. The state can try to dictate it, but they will ultimately fail.

If they really cared about this, they would exclude such items from SNAP. This is 100% about revenue. If you believe it's about health, then you're easily lied to. The health angle just allows it to be sold to those willing to be lied to.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Don Tiny wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Didn't they ban any food deemed to be unsafe in Demolition Man?

Is that what you want, Rick?

Assholes walking around in mu mus all the time telling you to fucking Be Well?

You are fined one credit for a violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.


Demolition Man is really an underrated move.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
and that is not for the state to decide. That is for individuals to decide. That's my point. The state can try to dictate it, but they will ultimately fail.
Taxes are for the state to decide. Whether the tax is worth paying is up to the individuals.

Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If they really cared about this, they would exclude such items from SNAP. This is 100% about revenue. If you believe it's about health, then you're easily lied to. The health angle just allows it to be sold to those willing to be lied to.
But you told me this will lose money! Why do you keep contradicting yourself?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
and that is not for the state to decide. That is for individuals to decide. That's my point. The state can try to dictate it, but they will ultimately fail.
Taxes are for the state to decide. Whether the tax is worth paying is up to the individuals.

Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If they really cared about this, they would exclude such items from SNAP. This is 100% about revenue. If you believe it's about health, then you're easily lied to. The health angle just allows it to be sold to those willing to be lied to.
But you told me this will lose money! Why do you keep contradicting yourself?

It's not a contradiction. The county thinks they will gain revenue from this program, but in practice they will not as their projections ignore the externalities of surrounding counties. They ignore that not only will soda be purchased there, but also other items on such trips which would have otherwise been purchased within county.

As mentioned, Philadelphia is learning this lesson the hard way as both the tax projections have fallen, but also other sales tax revenues have fallen. This has been coupled with lay-offs at C-stores and grocers within the city. If anything this highlights how inept Cook County's leadership is. They believe they will find revenue via this tax, but the reality is they will see revenue fall short. This is not a contradiction. This is reality.

In regards to the taxes, yes they can pass them, but philosophically it is wrong for the state to tax behaviors for the purpose of being a nanny state.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Sugar is not a "necessary component" of food.


http://www.brandeating.com/2017/08/ihop ... onuts.html
:lol: I would try it but IHOP kind of blows.

Sarley! wrote:
Careful, Rick!
You are going to draw the ire of of Frankie Flapjacks with comments like this!
The Oversized Omelette Oaf will attack you until the end of days!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
and that is not for the state to decide. That is for individuals to decide. That's my point. The state can try to dictate it, but they will ultimately fail.
Taxes are for the state to decide. Whether the tax is worth paying is up to the individuals.

Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If they really cared about this, they would exclude such items from SNAP. This is 100% about revenue. If you believe it's about health, then you're easily lied to. The health angle just allows it to be sold to those willing to be lied to.
But you told me this will lose money! Why do you keep contradicting yourself?

It's not a contradiction. The county thinks they will gain revenue from this program, but in practice they will not as their projections ignore the externalities of surrounding counties. They ignore that not only will soda be purchased there, but also other items on such trips which would have otherwise been purchased within county.

As mentioned, Philadelphia is learning this lesson the hard way as both the tax projections have fallen, but also other sales tax revenues have fallen. This has been coupled with lay-offs at C-stores and grocers within the city. If anything this highlights how inept Cook County's leadership is. They believe they will find revenue via this tax, but the reality is they will see revenue fall short. This is not a contradiction. This is reality.

In regards to the taxes, yes they can pass them, but philosophically it is wrong for the state to tax behaviors for the purpose of being a nanny state.
The tax should go away quickly then if it's only about money.

As for taxes in general, all of them are designed to effect behavior. This one is just more obvious. You moved to your inferior state because of lower taxes!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
and that is not for the state to decide. That is for individuals to decide. That's my point. The state can try to dictate it, but they will ultimately fail.
Taxes are for the state to decide. Whether the tax is worth paying is up to the individuals.

Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If they really cared about this, they would exclude such items from SNAP. This is 100% about revenue. If you believe it's about health, then you're easily lied to. The health angle just allows it to be sold to those willing to be lied to.
But you told me this will lose money! Why do you keep contradicting yourself?

It's not a contradiction. The county thinks they will gain revenue from this program, but in practice they will not as their projections ignore the externalities of surrounding counties. They ignore that not only will soda be purchased there, but also other items on such trips which would have otherwise been purchased within county.

As mentioned, Philadelphia is learning this lesson the hard way as both the tax projections have fallen, but also other sales tax revenues have fallen. This has been coupled with lay-offs at C-stores and grocers within the city. If anything this highlights how inept Cook County's leadership is. They believe they will find revenue via this tax, but the reality is they will see revenue fall short. This is not a contradiction. This is reality.

In regards to the taxes, yes they can pass them, but philosophically it is wrong for the state to tax behaviors for the purpose of being a nanny state.
The tax should go away quickly then if it's only about money.

As for taxes in general, all of them are designed to effect behavior. This one is just more obvious. You moved to your inferior state because of lower taxes!

Do you not see the philosophical issue with trying to tax behavior? Matters such as that should be an individual responsibility, not matters for a state.

As for my inferior state? :lol: https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/rankings

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
This beverage tax makes it more difficult for small business owners of restaurants and taverns. They have to pass the cost on and it will hurt their overall revenue. The government really just needs to get the fuck out of the way on issues like this and let people make money. Socialist Rick doesn't get that. #Sad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Do you not see the philosophical issue with trying to tax behavior? Matters such as that should be an individual responsibility, not matters for a state.
I'm saying that philosophically, all taxes are about behavior. You raise or lower or remove or add them based on how the population will react.

Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
That list is bad for at least 10 obvious reasons. Who wants to live in Iowa?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Caller Bob wrote:
This beverage tax makes it more difficult for small business owners of restaurants and taverns. They have to pass the cost on and it will hurt their overall revenue. The government really just needs to get the fuck out of the way on issues like this and let people make money. Socialist Rick doesn't get that. #Sad.
It's a penny an ounce. That $6 rum and coke probably accounts for an 8 cent difference.

The smoking ban was supposed to hurt bars all over the city. Last time I was there I saw a ton of bars still around. That was an actual ban too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19616
Why is there a bottled water tax in Chicago? Isn't water healthy?

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
conns7901 wrote:
Why is there a bottled water tax in Chicago? Isn't water healthy?

The plastic silly. Which is why if you don't already you will probably get a dime tax per plastic bag at the store. You know, the ones they got you to use when paper was bad because trees. See how this all works.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38637
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Didn't they ban any food deemed to be unsafe in Demolition Man?

Is that what you want, Rick?

Assholes walking around in mu mus all the time telling you to fucking Be Well?


All that was left was Taco Bell. That's only good for making sure your colon is clean.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38637
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Caller Bob wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Didn't they ban any food deemed to be unsafe in Demolition Man?

Is that what you want, Rick?

Assholes walking around in mu mus all the time telling you to fucking Be Well?

You are fined one credit for a violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.


Demolition Man is really an underrated move.


God damn, we do have some common ground after all...

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Why is there a bottled water tax in Chicago? Isn't water healthy?

The plastic silly. Which is why if you don't already you will probably get a dime tax per plastic bag at the store. You know, the ones they got you to use when paper was bad because trees. See how this all works.
I'll leave this to Caller Bob. He's a big believer that climate change needs to be dealt with immediately and with strong answers. He loves the war on plastic!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56748
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Either people pay the tax and still get sick or they don't pay the tax and the state doesn't make budget. This isn't like taxing tobacco where it comes along with draconian regulations on when, where, and how the product is marketed; Coca-Cola is still practically the air we breathe. Also, tobacco is objectively worse than soda, as bad as soda may be.

Anyone who runs against Fat Toni on a repeal-the-soda-tax platform will win running away. MAYBE EVEN CHUY???

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Why is there a bottled water tax in Chicago? Isn't water healthy?

The plastic silly. Which is why if you don't already you will probably get a dime tax per plastic bag at the store. You know, the ones they got you to use when paper was bad because trees. See how this all works.
I'll leave this to Caller Bob. He's a big believer that climate change needs to be dealt with immediately and with strong answers. He loves the war on plastic!


My war is against Carbon Emissions, try and keep up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Caller Bob wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Why is there a bottled water tax in Chicago? Isn't water healthy?

The plastic silly. Which is why if you don't already you will probably get a dime tax per plastic bag at the store. You know, the ones they got you to use when paper was bad because trees. See how this all works.
I'll leave this to Caller Bob. He's a big believer that climate change needs to be dealt with immediately and with strong answers. He loves the war on plastic!


My war is against Carbon Emissions, try and keep up.
You may want to look at just how much "carbon emissions" come from the plastic bottle lifecycle then.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 488 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group