It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 6:05 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 488 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 17  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 4:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Curious Hair wrote:
MAYBE EVEN CHUY???
:lol: :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16732
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
As for taxes in general, all of them are designed to effect behavior.


Unless you are referring exclusively to sin taxes, I have to disagree with that. By taxing my income at progressively higher rates, are they trying to discourage me from working more? Do high sales taxes encourage me to buy more?

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 4:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Jaw Breaker wrote:
By taxing my income at progressively higher rates, are they trying to discourage me from working more?
That's the reason the taxes aren't even higher. They want to find a level that will still make it worth your while to work hard for which presumably they have.

Jaw Breaker wrote:
Do high sales taxes encourage me to buy more?
Lower sales taxes do as Ogie has pointed out about his amazing state.

There is no "correct" level for any tax. It's a combination of getting enough money to be able to function along with keeping it low enough to encourage behaviors such as "hard work" and spending. As many people are saying, the lower taxes of other places are "encouraging" them to move. If everyone paid the same taxes all around the country then things would be a lot different.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:28 pm
Posts: 3902
Location: Tinley Park
pizza_Place: zzzzzz
People need to stop complaining.

Sugar tax- simple, don't drink pop and other sugary crap. With childhood obesity and diabetes rates, I feel no sympathy for higher soda prices. I drink about a 12-pack or so of Coke or so a year.

Water bottle tax- get a water filter and a reusable water bottle. You save money in the long run and it tastes just as good. Besides, something like 80% of all water bottles end up in landfills and you're not using oil to make the PET bottles or trucks to transport it.

Done and done.

_________________
Lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 7:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 11512
pizza_Place: *
DAC wrote:
People need to stop complaining.

Sugar tax- simple, don't drink pop and other sugary crap. With childhood obesity and diabetes rates, I feel no sympathy for higher soda prices. I drink about a 12-pack or so of Coke or so a year.

Image

_________________
You never miss your wealth, till your well went dry
Seem like only yesterday, you were here smiling
Now you gone away, but I know you in a better place
No traces of you, what can I do?
Alone and confused


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:28 pm
Posts: 3902
Location: Tinley Park
pizza_Place: zzzzzz
Free Ajent wrote:
DAC wrote:
People need to stop complaining.

Sugar tax- simple, don't drink pop and other sugary crap. With childhood obesity and diabetes rates, I feel no sympathy for higher soda prices. I drink about a 12-pack or so of Coke or so a year.

Image


That sure is a clever reply!

_________________
Lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 11512
pizza_Place: *
DAC wrote:
Free Ajent wrote:
DAC wrote:
People need to stop complaining.

Sugar tax- simple, don't drink pop and other sugary crap. With childhood obesity and diabetes rates, I feel no sympathy for higher soda prices. I drink about a 12-pack or so of Coke or so a year.

Image


That sure is a clever reply!

Unfortunately not as clever as you saying "don't drink pop and other sugary crap"

Do you think the answer to everything is having the government get involved in mismanaging more of my money?

_________________
You never miss your wealth, till your well went dry
Seem like only yesterday, you were here smiling
Now you gone away, but I know you in a better place
No traces of you, what can I do?
Alone and confused


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12570
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I just hope Cook County is prepared for the combination of falling sales tax revenues (as people buy over county lines) and also the lost wages when their supermarkets lay off workers.

I think this is going to be what gets people voted out of office -- now any sort of restaurant shutdown or grocery store layoffs can be attributed (rightly or wrongly) to this tax, and you can start putting faces on your TV ads. You can't do that for someone not getting heart disease... maybe you can show a weight loss thing, but public opinion on this is not likely to switch to pro-tax any time soon. All of this grandstanding that it is for the health of people is ridiculous -- the people most at risk for health issues are likely ones that are on SNAP and for some reason they are exempt from this?

I saw another Tribune article that said they were hoping to make $80 million in taxes this year, but the July shutdown cost them $20 million. These dollar amounts don't make any sense either... that isn't helping the cause.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12570
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The smoking ban was supposed to hurt bars all over the city. Last time I was there I saw a ton of bars still around. That was an actual ban too.

That was enacted as a statewide law. If this had been a statewide law, it makes more sense, as most people don't live close enough to the border of the state to make up for it. You're probably not going to be driving 100 miles to the border to go to a bar you can smoke in.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 11512
pizza_Place: *
This:
newper wrote:
All of this grandstanding that it is for the health of people is ridiculous


Where does it stop next? Drive thru tax? Anything over "X" amount of calorie tax? ABV >6% tax?

_________________
You never miss your wealth, till your well went dry
Seem like only yesterday, you were here smiling
Now you gone away, but I know you in a better place
No traces of you, what can I do?
Alone and confused


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 11512
pizza_Place: *
newper wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The smoking ban was supposed to hurt bars all over the city. Last time I was there I saw a ton of bars still around. That was an actual ban too.

That was enacted as a statewide law. If this had been a statewide law, it makes more sense, as most people don't live close enough to the border of the state to make up for it. You're probably not going to be driving 100 miles to the border to go to a bar you can smoke in.

I know plenty of bars in Illinois that will still let you smoke in.

_________________
You never miss your wealth, till your well went dry
Seem like only yesterday, you were here smiling
Now you gone away, but I know you in a better place
No traces of you, what can I do?
Alone and confused


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23562
pizza_Place: Giordano's
If the goal is to meet the budget, why not reduce the budget?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Free Ajent wrote:
This:
newper wrote:
All of this grandstanding that it is for the health of people is ridiculous


Where does it stop next? Drive thru tax? Anything over "X" amount of calorie tax? ABV >6% tax?

Instagram-checking tax (since checking Instagram is supposedly correlated with anxiety)

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
There are a great many bars in Chicago that openly ignore the smoking ban. I dont think the city/county is going to be as forgiving towards convenience stores trying to skate this tax.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12570
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
If the goal is to meet the budget, why not reduce the budget?

Sane thoughts are not welcome in the county government, sir.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
This beverage tax makes it more difficult for small business owners of restaurants and taverns. They have to pass the cost on and it will hurt their overall revenue. The government really just needs to get the fuck out of the way on issues like this and let people make money. Socialist Rick doesn't get that. #Sad.

The smoking ban was supposed to hurt bars all over the city. Last time I was there I saw a ton of bars still around. That was an actual ban too.

The difference between this and smoking is two-fold

1: smoking impacts more than just the smoker via second hand smoke
2: the smoke filled air at a bar probably kept more non-smokers away. I know that I avoided bars where smoking was allowed as the smoke irritates my eyes.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Curious Hair wrote:
Either people pay the tax and still get sick or they don't pay the tax and the state doesn't make budget. This isn't like taxing tobacco where it comes along with draconian regulations on when, where, and how the product is marketed; Coca-Cola is still practically the air we breathe. Also, tobacco is objectively worse than soda, as bad as soda may be.

Anyone who runs against Fat Toni on a repeal-the-soda-tax platform will win running away. MAYBE EVEN CHUY???

I think this tax will be short lived. A new county government will be elected on a platform of repealing this tax.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
This beverage tax makes it more difficult for small business owners of restaurants and taverns. They have to pass the cost on and it will hurt their overall revenue. The government really just needs to get the fuck out of the way on issues like this and let people make money. Socialist Rick doesn't get that. #Sad.

The smoking ban was supposed to hurt bars all over the city. Last time I was there I saw a ton of bars still around. That was an actual ban too.

The difference between this and smoking is two-fold

1: smoking impacts more than just the smoker via second hand smoke
2: the smoke filled air at a bar probably kept more non-smokers away. I know that I avoided bars where smoking was allowed as the smoke irritates my eyes.

Also, drinking pop doesn't make you look cool


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
This beverage tax makes it more difficult for small business owners of restaurants and taverns. They have to pass the cost on and it will hurt their overall revenue. The government really just needs to get the fuck out of the way on issues like this and let people make money. Socialist Rick doesn't get that. #Sad.

The smoking ban was supposed to hurt bars all over the city. Last time I was there I saw a ton of bars still around. That was an actual ban too.

The difference between this and smoking is two-fold

1: smoking impacts more than just the smoker via second hand smoke
2: the smoke filled air at a bar probably kept more non-smokers away. I know that I avoided bars where smoking was allowed as the smoke irritates my eyes.
The point is that people said the same thing about the smoking ban and bars are still thriving. Are we to believe that bars are going to struggle because a rum and coke gets an 8 cent tax on it?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
This beverage tax makes it more difficult for small business owners of restaurants and taverns. They have to pass the cost on and it will hurt their overall revenue. The government really just needs to get the fuck out of the way on issues like this and let people make money. Socialist Rick doesn't get that. #Sad.

The smoking ban was supposed to hurt bars all over the city. Last time I was there I saw a ton of bars still around. That was an actual ban too.

The difference between this and smoking is two-fold

1: smoking impacts more than just the smoker via second hand smoke
2: the smoke filled air at a bar probably kept more non-smokers away. I know that I avoided bars where smoking was allowed as the smoke irritates my eyes.
The point is that people said the same thing about the smoking ban and bars are still thriving. Are we to believe that bars are going to struggle because a rum and coke gets an 8 cent tax on it?

I'm not talking about bars here. I'm talking about grocers and C-Stores, and yes the data from Philadelphia (the only other large city adopter of such a tax) says this is exactly what happens.

The grocers and C-Stores had to lay off workers and the tax revenues fell millions short of expectations as buyers crossed into jurisdictions with no tax. As I also mentioned, on such trips a buyer is likely to do a full shopping trip so a $200 grocery trip in Cook County ends up being spend entirely in Lake County or DuPage County.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
This beverage tax makes it more difficult for small business owners of restaurants and taverns. They have to pass the cost on and it will hurt their overall revenue. The government really just needs to get the fuck out of the way on issues like this and let people make money. Socialist Rick doesn't get that. #Sad.

The smoking ban was supposed to hurt bars all over the city. Last time I was there I saw a ton of bars still around. That was an actual ban too.

The difference between this and smoking is two-fold

1: smoking impacts more than just the smoker via second hand smoke
2: the smoke filled air at a bar probably kept more non-smokers away. I know that I avoided bars where smoking was allowed as the smoke irritates my eyes.
The point is that people said the same thing about the smoking ban and bars are still thriving. Are we to believe that bars are going to struggle because a rum and coke gets an 8 cent tax on it?

I'm not talking about bars here. I'm talking about grocers and C-Stores, and yes the data from Philadelphia (the only other large city adopter of such a tax) says this is exactly what happens.

The grocers and C-Stores had to lay off workers and the tax revenues fell millions short of expectations as buyers crossed into jurisdictions with no tax. As I also mentioned, on such trips a buyer is likely to do a full shopping trip so a $200 grocery trip in Cook County ends up being spend entirely in Lake County or DuPage County.

I'm not trying to be combative, but you responded to something I said in response to "restaurants and taverns".

The smoking ban didn't hurt grocery and convenience stores either.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
This beverage tax makes it more difficult for small business owners of restaurants and taverns. They have to pass the cost on and it will hurt their overall revenue. The government really just needs to get the fuck out of the way on issues like this and let people make money. Socialist Rick doesn't get that. #Sad.

The smoking ban was supposed to hurt bars all over the city. Last time I was there I saw a ton of bars still around. That was an actual ban too.

The difference between this and smoking is two-fold

1: smoking impacts more than just the smoker via second hand smoke
2: the smoke filled air at a bar probably kept more non-smokers away. I know that I avoided bars where smoking was allowed as the smoke irritates my eyes.
The point is that people said the same thing about the smoking ban and bars are still thriving. Are we to believe that bars are going to struggle because a rum and coke gets an 8 cent tax on it?

I'm not talking about bars here. I'm talking about grocers and C-Stores, and yes the data from Philadelphia (the only other large city adopter of such a tax) says this is exactly what happens.

The grocers and C-Stores had to lay off workers and the tax revenues fell millions short of expectations as buyers crossed into jurisdictions with no tax. As I also mentioned, on such trips a buyer is likely to do a full shopping trip so a $200 grocery trip in Cook County ends up being spend entirely in Lake County or DuPage County.

I'm not trying to be combative, but you responded to something I said in response to "restaurants and taverns".

The smoking ban didn't hurt grocery and convenience stores either.

I would agree that the restaurants and bars will not be adversely effected as it adds pennies to the sales there.

That isn't the case when we're talking about the retail side of this.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I would agree that the restaurants and bars will not be adversely effected as it adds pennies to the sales there.

That isn't the case when we're talking about the retail side of this.
It might. The thing is that was already true. Cook County already had a higher sales tax. If you are that price conscious but also a huge soda drinker you already should have been leaving the county to shop.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Just like the bottled water tax and the red light camera tickets, this will fall woefully short of the "expected" revenue generation. Nothing will be solved because of it.

More of the same.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 9:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
DAC wrote:
People need to stop complaining.

Sugar tax- simple, don't drink pop and other sugary crap. With childhood obesity and diabetes rates, I feel no sympathy for higher soda prices. I drink about a 12-pack or so of Coke or so a year.

Water bottle tax- get a water filter and a reusable water bottle. You save money in the long run and it tastes just as good. Besides, something like 80% of all water bottles end up in landfills and you're not using oil to make the PET bottles or trucks to transport it.

Done and done.




Agreed, well stated.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 9:06 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
312player wrote:
DAC wrote:
People need to stop complaining.

Sugar tax- simple, don't drink pop and other sugary crap. With childhood obesity and diabetes rates, I feel no sympathy for higher soda prices. I drink about a 12-pack or so of Coke or so a year.

Water bottle tax- get a water filter and a reusable water bottle. You save money in the long run and it tastes just as good. Besides, something like 80% of all water bottles end up in landfills and you're not using oil to make the PET bottles or trucks to transport it.

Done and done.
Agreed, well stated.
You rubes are missing the point. You don't drink soda, so the tax is fine. The point is that rather than cutting spending, revamping pensions, putting an end to corruption, the band aid on a broken leg fix is raise taxes. The Government should not be doing this. But they are, and because they are taxing the thing you don't use, that makes it ok.

As soon as they hit you on a property tax bill or something else that you "use," you are the type of people that are screaming bloody murder for impeachments, reforms, and other fixes. All the while it was happening right under your noses, and you didn't do a fucking thing about it.

If it was really about health, the tax would be 200%. If it was really about helping to balance budgets, the tax would be more manageable like a nickel on a 12pack and a dime on a 24pack so as not to scare people into buying these drinks outside of Cook County.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I would agree that the restaurants and bars will not be adversely effected as it adds pennies to the sales there.

That isn't the case when we're talking about the retail side of this.
It might. The thing is that was already true. Cook County already had a higher sales tax. If you are that price conscious but also a huge soda drinker you already should have been leaving the county to shop.

Cook County had a higher tax, but it may have been negligible depending upon the purchase.

Now when you add a penny per ounce to an item which is often purchased in bulk, it really can add to a purchase and thus this tax tips the scales for people who may not have been crossing county lines previously.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
312player wrote:
DAC wrote:
People need to stop complaining.

Sugar tax- simple, don't drink pop and other sugary crap. With childhood obesity and diabetes rates, I feel no sympathy for higher soda prices. I drink about a 12-pack or so of Coke or so a year.

Water bottle tax- get a water filter and a reusable water bottle. You save money in the long run and it tastes just as good. Besides, something like 80% of all water bottles end up in landfills and you're not using oil to make the PET bottles or trucks to transport it.

Done and done.
Agreed, well stated.
You rubes are missing the point. You don't drink soda, so the tax is fine. The point is that rather than cutting spending, revamping pensions, putting an end to corruption, the band aid on a broken leg fix is raise taxes. The Government should not be doing this. But they are, and because they are taxing the thing you don't use, that makes it ok.

As soon as they hit you on a property tax bill or something else that you "use," you are the type of people that are screaming bloody murder for impeachments, reforms, and other fixes. All the while it was happening right under your noses, and you didn't do a fucking thing about it.

You have to drink a huge amount of soda for this to matter to pretty much anyone.

Let's say you drink 16 ounces of soda a day. That's 16 cents a day or $4.80 a month.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Theme song of Cook County and the State of Illinois.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8OgkjcW0g4

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:28 pm
Posts: 3902
Location: Tinley Park
pizza_Place: zzzzzz
Frank Coztansa wrote:
312player wrote:
DAC wrote:
People need to stop complaining.

Sugar tax- simple, don't drink pop and other sugary crap. With childhood obesity and diabetes rates, I feel no sympathy for higher soda prices. I drink about a 12-pack or so of Coke or so a year.

Water bottle tax- get a water filter and a reusable water bottle. You save money in the long run and it tastes just as good. Besides, something like 80% of all water bottles end up in landfills and you're not using oil to make the PET bottles or trucks to transport it.

Done and done.
Agreed, well stated.
You rubes are missing the point. You don't drink soda, so the tax is fine. The point is that rather than cutting spending, revamping pensions, putting an end to corruption, the band aid on a broken leg fix is raise taxes. The Government should not be doing this. But they are, and because they are taxing the thing you don't use, that makes it ok.

As soon as they hit you on a property tax bill or something else that you "use," you are the type of people that are screaming bloody murder for impeachments, reforms, and other fixes. All the while it was happening right under your noses, and you didn't do a fucking thing about it.

If it was really about health, the tax would be 200%. If it was really about helping to balance budgets, the tax would be more manageable like a nickel on a 12pack and a dime on a 24pack so as not to scare people into buying these drinks outside of Cook County.


Supporting these taxes does not mean that you're against cutting spending, revamping pensions, and putting an end to corruption.

_________________
Lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 488 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group