Coast2Coast wrote:
Go ahead and nail Duhon to whatever they wish. He deserves it. While you're doing that though, how about addressing what is REALLY wrong with the Bulls? And it's not just their work ethic. The answer is more complicated than blaming the irresponsible kids not giving effort. It sounds like the announcers fell right into it too last night. I didn't hear it, but that would figure. Blame the kids' effort. Blame the kids not showing up. Blame the kids' poor work ethic. All of that is surely true, but those are not the main reasons this team sucks. Paxson makes that claim because the guy clearly does not want to address what is REALLY wrong with the Bulls. That would mean Pax would have to admit he has been the big failure.
Even with great work ethic, this team would still suck. That's all I'm saying. Talking about this stuff takes attention away from the failures that Pax has had in building this team. How about the Bulls announcers and the local media discussing the fact that Pax has not built a quality lineup through the draft or trades, has a minor leaguer as coach, has nobody on this roster who can consistently guard people, does not have a bona fide NBA center, and has nobody taller than 6-7 who can score consistently? You think they could talk about THAT once in a while instead of simply blaming the kids?
This team sucks because they got exposed last year in the playoffs and did nothing to address it. They came into this season and despite the incredulity of the opposing scouts, did nothing to change how they play. A new coach only has given them a new wrinkle but its the same talent and their physical deficiences (no real height, no low post presence, jump shot dependence) have shown that a new coach can only make so much chicken salad out of chicken shit. It took this town 6 years to admit that Krause didn't have a plan post-Jordan, Paxson could only improve upon his predecessor (how do you go from 72 wins in 1 season to needing three seasons to win the next 72? after Jordan retires. . .but I digress). "Character guys" are a convenient way of explaining second tier players and over-paid guys who would start for other teams but not for long.
Fans don't give dick about character when it comes to winning, winning trumps character every time. Since winning doesn't come often to Chicago, this whole character thing is regularly resurrected and thus overrated. Today's "character" guy is reverred tomorrow for being a dick or an ass and a winner for someone else, and yesterday's winner that now wears a Chicago uniform is best touted as today's character guy.
Don't think so? Who were the character guys on Chicago's winners? And how replaceable were they?
back to letting NCM have her space