Sneakers O'Toole wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Perhaps, but it's not my board [but I'm on that board]. I would say that categorizing anyone as a Nazi in any capacity could be injurious to their real life persona in the modern political climate. With that in mind, were it my board, such claims—especially those without proper merit or passed off casually—would get a closer look from me, yeah.
[1]I'm just going by what you said earlier in that you didn't ask for it to be edited or deleted. It didn't seem like you meant "not yet, but I was about to".
[2]I know it's easy for me to say since I rarely post, but this board is a better read with little to no moderation and as had been mentioned before, it seems impossible to moderate in this way without it coming off as arbitrary. This was ignored the first time I referenced it (unless I missed a response), but just today BD was accused of being pro forced sterilization of all black people. That would seem injurious to BD's real life persona, if that's the criteria we're using.
[3]And just to clear this up, and if you don't draw any distinction, that's fine, but IMU said you were pro-Nazi, correct?
1. Yeah I wasn't going to huff and puff over it, because it's not my board to moderate, and I had already used up a lot of capital on the whole doxxing fiasco, so making a stink over this as well could make me more of a problem child than I already am. I disagreed with it vehemently, and think it's a pretty shitty thing to go throwing around at people for not singing as loud as the rest of the choir (or posting to twitter enough about how great PK Subban is, etc.).
2. I would say my real life persona is now a lot closer to my board persona than MANY here, and that would be taken into consideration in the hypothetical world where I am King of the Board.
3. That's what the post said when I quoted it, though I can't speak to what it read in any earlier versions. And no, I don't see much of a distinction. "Nazi" is the operative term, here.