It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 10:44 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38943
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
pittmike wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Pretty sure Oscar Robertson didn't pardon anyone, but averaging a triple-double should have allowed him to.


You are just being a cocksucker. He pardons an 88 year old voted out sheriff.

Really? Really? That's your point to move on. :x

Going to bed... night. Glad I avoided ABC news


You'll love me tomorrow, you cocksucker!

Image

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:33 am 
pittmike wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Oh, come on, Mike.

To be held in contempt of court means he was aggressively assholish. Picture a real-life Baby McNown.

I never said he wasn't. I said the POTUS had the right. They just usually do it on the way out. I would have to research but I'd guess the big Jesus O pardoned a jerk.

Probably after they went through the process


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Panther pislA wrote:
Our President is a fucking badass who marches to the beat of his own fucking drum. I love this dude.


We know, Seacrest.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 8:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
I for one believe anyone annoyed about this is simply still bitter about Hillary losing the election. Also there wasn't this kind of scrutiny applied to any of Obama's pardons, so Trump is once again clearly being denied procedural fairness by the media.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 8:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
I didn't realize how much of a piece of shit this guy is. The conditions of his jails should be illegal.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 8:31 am 
ZephMarshack wrote:
I for one believe anyone annoyed about this is simply still bitter about Hillary losing the election. Also there wasn't this kind of scrutiny applied to any of Obama's pardons, so Trump is once again clearly being denied procedural fairness by the media.

No problem. Show me where Sheriff Joe showed any remorse for his crimes, served any time for his crimes, 5 years passing since his conviction, and a DOJ recommendation for the pardon. I mean, you are so concerned about the process. Let's follow it.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23549
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Baby McNown wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I for one believe anyone annoyed about this is simply still bitter about Hillary losing the election. Also there wasn't this kind of scrutiny applied to any of Obama's pardons, so Trump is once again clearly being denied procedural fairness by the media.

No problem. Show me where Sheriff Joe showed any remorse for his crimes, served any time for his crimes, 5 years passing since his conviction, and a DOJ recommendation for the pardon. I mean, you are so concerned about the process. Let's follow it.


What process? Pardons and clemency are privileges of the country's chief executive.

The procedure discussed is how the media treats the executive wielding that power. Obama freed an unrepentant bomb-making terrorist, and anyone that disagreed with or wanted to question the decision was a racist.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 9:54 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80527
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I for one believe anyone annoyed about this is simply still bitter about Hillary losing the election. Also there wasn't this kind of scrutiny applied to any of Obama's pardons, so Trump is once again clearly being denied procedural fairness by the media.

No problem. Show me where Sheriff Joe showed any remorse for his crimes, served any time for his crimes, 5 years passing since his conviction, and a DOJ recommendation for the pardon. I mean, you are so concerned about the process. Let's follow it.


What process? Pardons and clemency are privileges of the country's chief executive.

The procedure discussed is how the media treats the executive wielding that power. Obama freed an unrepentant bomb-making terrorist, and anyone that disagreed with or wanted to question the decision was a racist.


True. That Lopez deal and Clinton with Marc Rich were egregious too. But there is some diffrrence in that those were done on the way out according to tradition and also those guys had served some time. This scumbag Joe walks scot-free.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:14 am 
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I for one believe anyone annoyed about this is simply still bitter about Hillary losing the election. Also there wasn't this kind of scrutiny applied to any of Obama's pardons, so Trump is once again clearly being denied procedural fairness by the media.

No problem. Show me where Sheriff Joe showed any remorse for his crimes, served any time for his crimes, 5 years passing since his conviction, and a DOJ recommendation for the pardon. I mean, you are so concerned about the process. Let's follow it.


What process? Pardons and clemency are privileges of the country's chief executive.

The procedure discussed is how the media treats the executive wielding that power. Obama freed an unrepentant bomb-making terrorist, and anyone that disagreed with or wanted to question the decision was a racist.

Hmmmm pretty sure Rivera had been in jail for a good long time right? As was Bradley Manning? Until DJT signed that piece of paperwork he was a convicted felon, yet was in a suit and tie on CNN telling me I was racist for saying what he did was racist.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Rednecks we're pissed when Obama let black people out of jail saying he was abusing his power.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19346
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Seems like a cool dude.

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/a-p ... on-6629798

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23549
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I for one believe anyone annoyed about this is simply still bitter about Hillary losing the election. Also there wasn't this kind of scrutiny applied to any of Obama's pardons, so Trump is once again clearly being denied procedural fairness by the media.

No problem. Show me where Sheriff Joe showed any remorse for his crimes, served any time for his crimes, 5 years passing since his conviction, and a DOJ recommendation for the pardon. I mean, you are so concerned about the process. Let's follow it.


What process? Pardons and clemency are privileges of the country's chief executive.

The procedure discussed is how the media treats the executive wielding that power. Obama freed an unrepentant bomb-making terrorist, and anyone that disagreed with or wanted to question the decision was a racist.


True. That Lopez deal and Clinton with Marc Rich were egregious too. But there is some diffrrence in that those were done on the way out according to tradition and also those guys had served some time. This scumbag Joe walks scot-free.


Yeah, but he's an 86-year old convicted of contempt...what's the maximum on that, six months, a year?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:48 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80527
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I for one believe anyone annoyed about this is simply still bitter about Hillary losing the election. Also there wasn't this kind of scrutiny applied to any of Obama's pardons, so Trump is once again clearly being denied procedural fairness by the media.

No problem. Show me where Sheriff Joe showed any remorse for his crimes, served any time for his crimes, 5 years passing since his conviction, and a DOJ recommendation for the pardon. I mean, you are so concerned about the process. Let's follow it.


What process? Pardons and clemency are privileges of the country's chief executive.

The procedure discussed is how the media treats the executive wielding that power. Obama freed an unrepentant bomb-making terrorist, and anyone that disagreed with or wanted to question the decision was a racist.


True. That Lopez deal and Clinton with Marc Rich were egregious too. But there is some diffrrence in that those were done on the way out according to tradition and also those guys had served some time. This scumbag Joe walks scot-free.


Yeah, but he's an 86-year old convicted of contempt...what's the maximum on that, six months, a year?


Right, but it's more the symbolism of it. It comes across as a "fuck you" to Mexicans. And besides that, both of these guys are hypocrites droning on about "law and order" except when they want to scoff at the law.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
leashyourkids wrote:
pittmike wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Trump supporters love the Constitution until they don't, and then they never did.


Pardons are unconstitutional? Ok. Now you have my interest. A sheriff breaks the law to enforce the constitution/immigration and gets pardoned is bad. Ok.

It's a wonder anything can get done anymore in this country. There are a zillion separate interests.


No.

Racial profiling is unconstitutional.


Not to be a dick but where is that enumerated in the Constitution?

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Baby McNown wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I for one believe anyone annoyed about this is simply still bitter about Hillary losing the election. Also there wasn't this kind of scrutiny applied to any of Obama's pardons, so Trump is once again clearly being denied procedural fairness by the media.

No problem. Show me where Sheriff Joe showed any remorse for his crimes, served any time for his crimes, 5 years passing since his conviction, and a DOJ recommendation for the pardon. I mean, you are so concerned about the process. Let's follow it.


Didn't one of the guys Obama pardoned get picked and put right back in like 3 months later?

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:57 am 
chaspoppcap wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I for one believe anyone annoyed about this is simply still bitter about Hillary losing the election. Also there wasn't this kind of scrutiny applied to any of Obama's pardons, so Trump is once again clearly being denied procedural fairness by the media.

No problem. Show me where Sheriff Joe showed any remorse for his crimes, served any time for his crimes, 5 years passing since his conviction, and a DOJ recommendation for the pardon. I mean, you are so concerned about the process. Let's follow it.


Didn't one of the guys Obama pardoned get picked and put right back in like 3 months later?

Is that why you hate him so much? He didn't give you a pardon?


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2016 10:39 am
Posts: 1493
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
The people on the left want to get Sheriff Joe, but they forget that Obama and his administration were basically ignoring immigration law and allowing DACA when it could not pass the Congress.

_________________
God is the uncaused cause of the universe. He had no beginning and has no end. He is not bound by the laws of the universe he created.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23549
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Drake LaRrieta wrote:
The people on the left want to get Sheriff Joe, but they forget that Obama and his administration were basically ignoring immigration law and allowing DACA when it could not pass the Congress.


Except ignoring the law is not quite the same as ignoring a court order.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
chaspoppcap wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
pittmike wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Trump supporters love the Constitution until they don't, and then they never did.


Pardons are unconstitutional? Ok. Now you have my interest. A sheriff breaks the law to enforce the constitution/immigration and gets pardoned is bad. Ok.

It's a wonder anything can get done anymore in this country. There are a zillion separate interests.


No.

Racial profiling is unconstitutional.


Not to be a dick but where is that enumerated in the Constitution?


The Fourth Amendment guards against illegal search and seizure, which is what he was doing without cause other than ethnicity.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
leashyourkids wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
pittmike wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Trump supporters love the Constitution until they don't, and then they never did.


Pardons are unconstitutional? Ok. Now you have my interest. A sheriff breaks the law to enforce the constitution/immigration and gets pardoned is bad. Ok.

It's a wonder anything can get done anymore in this country. There are a zillion separate interests.


No.

Racial profiling is unconstitutional.


Not to be a dick but where is that enumerated in the Constitution?


The Fourth Amendment guards against illegal search and seizure, which is what he was doing without cause other than ethnicity.

Um I just read the synopses on the cornell law school page,nothing on there about that kinda stuff so please give me some sources that I can use to verify.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
chaspoppcap wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
pittmike wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Trump supporters love the Constitution until they don't, and then they never did.


Pardons are unconstitutional? Ok. Now you have my interest. A sheriff breaks the law to enforce the constitution/immigration and gets pardoned is bad. Ok.

It's a wonder anything can get done anymore in this country. There are a zillion separate interests.


No.

Racial profiling is unconstitutional.


Not to be a dick but where is that enumerated in the Constitution?


The Fourth Amendment guards against illegal search and seizure, which is what he was doing without cause other than ethnicity.

Um I just read the synopses on the cornell law school page,nothing on there about that kinda stuff so please give me some sources that I can use to verify.


What?

What do you think his contempt conviction was for? It was for illegally searching and detaining people without any reason other than suspecting they were illegal.

I'm not sure how this is confusing.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2016 10:39 am
Posts: 1493
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
For every Sheriff Joe there's hundreds of mayors and governors that are openly bragging about how they have and will continue to ignore federal immigration law. There are people who have died because the American citizens were killed by the policies of those liberal politicians.

_________________
God is the uncaused cause of the universe. He had no beginning and has no end. He is not bound by the laws of the universe he created.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 5:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4137
chaspoppcap wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
pittmike wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Trump supporters love the Constitution until they don't, and then they never did.


Pardons are unconstitutional? Ok. Now you have my interest. A sheriff breaks the law to enforce the constitution/immigration and gets pardoned is bad. Ok.

It's a wonder anything can get done anymore in this country. There are a zillion separate interests.


No.

Racial profiling is unconstitutional.


Not to be a dick but where is that enumerated in the Constitution?


Start reading the Amendments to the US constitution. You'll find it enumerated there. If you read beyond the 14th Amendment, you went too far.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Quote:
What?

What do you think his contempt conviction was for? It was for illegally searching and detaining people without any reason other than suspecting they were illegal.

I'm not sure how this is confusing.


When an officer observes unusual conduct which leads him reasonably to conclude that criminal activity may be afoot, the officer may briefly stop the suspicious person and make reasonable inquiries aimed at confirming or dispelling the officer's suspicions.
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)
Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 (1993)

An officer at an international border may conduct routine stops and searches.
United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531 (1985).

Where there is probable cause to believe that a vehicle contains evidence of a criminal activity, an officer may lawfully search any area of the vehicle in which the evidence might be found.
Arizona v. Gant, 129 S. Ct. 1710 (2009),

An officer may conduct a traffic stop if he has reasonable suspicion that a traffic violation has occurred or that criminal activity is afoot.
Berekmer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984),
United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2002).

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
You win, chas. I can't argue with your superior logic.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7939
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
Well... I looked at Facebook. Big fans of the move are my friends from out west. Asking why not Bundys and affiliates. Ugh.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 27, 2017 10:17 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
Well... I looked at Facebook. Big fans of the move are my friends from out west. Asking why not Bundys and affiliates. Ugh.


Sounds like your friends are very fine people.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 27, 2017 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7939
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
Eh... people I met while out west or on an industry message board. Most are comments of their friends but there are A few older guys that really have problems with the federal government. It's not an non typical worldview out there to have issues with government ownership of land and many have to deal with BLM and USFS which doesn't exactly sound like fun and games. Oddly the Canadians are bigger fans still. I can probably narrow it down to three families. Maybe 4 that are the epicenter to these posts.

Quit a bit of this is comments on a Range magazine editorial. I used to like that magazine 20 years ago as I found it informative and pertinent to what I was studying. Found it filled a bit of void in my midwestern upbringing. It's swung a little to the right (read that as a lot) over the past few years. At times I am tempted to block or ignore the posts of these people but I guess I'm unwilling to completely isolate myself from the people I knew in that time in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 27, 2017 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
I can't say that I'm a fan of immigration, legal or otherwise (it's a moot point, in many ways, since we seem to live in an age of migration), but what they were doing to people was clearly wrong, not to mention explicitly illegal. What he did to prisoners in Arizona was worse.

When I was a kid, part of me used to want to like this guy, but he's shown himself to be a politician in the worst senses of the word: he panders and fabricates to get elected and then hides behind some kind of "I tell it like it is" facade. Guy's just full of shit.

Honestly, though, I think the situation he is in probably pushed him to be more authoritarian than he would have been. I could see it undermining his sense of agency.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:43 pm
Posts: 2220
pizza_Place: ....
Nas wrote:
Panther pislA wrote:
Our President is a fucking badass who marches to the beat of his own fucking drum. I love this dude.


He was losing a little bit of his base so he's spent the past 2 weeks locking them up.

Roger Stone's thoughts
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/2 ... ent-242010

HATERZ 'GUNN HAYT!

_________________
I like thinking big. . . If you're going to be thinking anything, you might as well think big.
-Donald J. Trump, BPE
FavreFan wrote:
I apologize to The Hawk


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group