It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:15 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
First of all, that's not a thing. Prices are what the market dictates. Price gouging is only possible with government controls.

Second, why do you want to hurt people already suffering a catastrophe by making it even harder for them to obtain what they need?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:17 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tell that to the gas stations.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Some libtards believe businesses have an obligation not to charge what the market dictates.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:24 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
First of all, that's not a thing. Prices are what the market dictates. Price gouging is only possible with government controls.

Second, why do you want to hurt people already suffering a catastrophe by making it even harder for them to obtain what they need?



Isn't "price gouging" simply demanding as much as the market will allow?

And your second paragraph doesn't seem to be very libertarian. Market capitalism isn't a humanitarian pursuit. Why would I charge less than the market value just because you're suffering?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
First of all, that's not a thing. Prices are what the market dictates. Price gouging is only possible with government controls.

Second, why do you want to hurt people already suffering a catastrophe by making it even harder for them to obtain what they need?



Isn't "price gouging" simply demanding as much as the market will allow?

And your second paragraph doesn't seem to be very libertarian. Market capitalism isn't a humanitarian pursuit. Why would I charge less than the market value just because you're suffering?

Price controls hurt relief efforts much more than price gouging does. The libertarian approach here is also the most humanitarian.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:31 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
First of all, that's not a thing. Prices are what the market dictates. Price gouging is only possible with government controls.

Second, why do you want to hurt people already suffering a catastrophe by making it even harder for them to obtain what they need?



Isn't "price gouging" simply demanding as much as the market will allow?

And your second paragraph doesn't seem to be very libertarian. Market capitalism isn't a humanitarian pursuit. Why would I charge less than the market value just because you're suffering?

Price controls hurt relief efforts much more than price gouging does. The libertarian approach here is also the most humanitarian.


That's also a very traditional Conservative Republican philosophy. I'm not disagreeing with you, but it is the kind of thing that gets you labelled as "mean spirited" by Hillary voters.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
First of all, that's not a thing. Prices are what the market dictates. Price gouging is only possible with government controls.

Second, why do you want to hurt people already suffering a catastrophe by making it even harder for them to obtain what they need?



Isn't "price gouging" simply demanding as much as the market will allow?

And your second paragraph doesn't seem to be very libertarian. Market capitalism isn't a humanitarian pursuit. Why would I charge less than the market value just because you're suffering?

Price controls hurt relief efforts much more than price gouging does. The libertarian approach here is also the most humanitarian.


That's also a very traditional Conservative Republican philosophy. I'm not disagreeing with you, but it is the kind of thing that gets you labelled as "mean spirited" by Hillary voters.

I guess you could label it as conservative, but it isn't. It's just plainly true. Even most liberals will acknowledge this is true, they just wish it weren't.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
It is an economic fact that controlling how much someone can charge for a product will decrease the supply.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
Even most liberals will acknowledge this is true, they just wish it weren't.


This sentence is a pretty good summary of the current state of American "liberalism" which is why a lot of heretofore liberals no longer want to identify as such.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
First of all, that's not a thing. Prices are what the market dictates. Price gouging is only possible with government controls.

Second, why do you want to hurt people already suffering a catastrophe by making it even harder for them to obtain what they need?



Isn't "price gouging" simply demanding as much as the market will allow?

And your second paragraph doesn't seem to be very libertarian. Market capitalism isn't a humanitarian pursuit. Why would I charge less than the market value just because you're suffering?

Price controls hurt relief efforts much more than price gouging does. The libertarian approach here is also the most humanitarian.


That's also a very traditional Conservative Republican philosophy. I'm not disagreeing with you, but it is the kind of thing that gets you labelled as "mean spirited" by Hillary voters.

I guess you could label it as conservative, but it isn't. It's just plainly true. Even most liberals will acknowledge this is true, they just wish it weren't.


:lol:

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:49 pm
Posts: 9340
Location: UM?
pizza_Place: Aurelios
One way to fix this.

Move

_________________
Hank Scorpio wrote:
What the hell, I would. Post op is OK right? Right?!?!?!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FF's statement is true. Some of these people live in a world that doesn't exist. I'd love it too if we could artificially suppress prices in times like these, but it's simply impossible without repercussions. Sometimes they think just because something seems humane that it MUST be possible.

I have no problem with the government paying for these things at market value and giving them to those in need, but they can't simply tell suppliers what they can and cannot charge.

The argument becomes a bit different when talking about patent laws and things like that. That little weasel who charges a billion dollars for AIDS medication should be taken to a firing squad.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
I'd say the only thing that really needs limits is gas. Make the rule that you can only charge a dollar over what the maximum price you charged for gasoline in the past two years. A scenario where all gas in Florida costs $45 a gallon today would make things much worse.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'd say the only thing that really needs limits is gas. Make the rule that you can only charge a dollar over what the maximum price you charged for gasoline in the past two years. A scenario where all gas in Florida costs $45 a gallon today would make things much worse.


But if their cost is 40/gallon you can't cap what they charge or they just won't provide any.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'd say the only thing that really needs limits is gas. Make the rule that you can only charge a dollar over what the maximum price you charged for gasoline in the past two years. A scenario where all gas in Florida costs $45 a gallon today would make things much worse.


But if their cost is 40/gallon you can't cap what they charge or they just won't provide any.


I get your point. That said, you cannot justify the shop selling cases for water for $45 earlier in the week when the stock they had was bought for $2. Gas, forget that I will never understand gas pricing.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
The free market worshipers must get really horny at a time like this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
pittmike wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'd say the only thing that really needs limits is gas. Make the rule that you can only charge a dollar over what the maximum price you charged for gasoline in the past two years. A scenario where all gas in Florida costs $45 a gallon today would make things much worse.


But if their cost is 40/gallon you can't cap what they charge or they just won't provide any.


I get your point. That said, you cannot justify the shop selling cases for water for $45 earlier in the week when the stock they had was bought for $2. Gas, forget that I will never understand gas pricing.


You could theoretically cap the mark-up but I think it would be impossible to enforce.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 12:35 pm
Posts: 62
pizza_Place: The Invisible Slice
leashyourkids wrote:
That little weasel who charges a billion dollars for AIDS medication should be taken to a firing squad.


Exactly. Because he could have charged much more. Cannot coach with them. Cannot scale with them.

_________________
I have neither the time, or the inclination, to explain myself to a man who rises and sleep under the blanket of the very economic growth that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'd say the only thing that really needs limits is gas. Make the rule that you can only charge a dollar over what the maximum price you charged for gasoline in the past two years. A scenario where all gas in Florida costs $45 a gallon today would make things much worse.


But if their cost is 40/gallon you can't cap what they charge or they just won't provide any.
That is why I said you let them charge one dollar over the maximum they charged over the past two years. After the storm, if they somehow had their costs raise to $40 a gallon then that is a different story. That's highly unlikely though given how the market is set globally.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
leashyourkids wrote:
That little weasel who charges a billion dollars for AIDS medication should be taken to a firing squad.

More for the Wu Tang album thing than anything else.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
That little weasel who charges a billion dollars for AIDS medication should be taken to a firing squad.

More for the Wu Tang album thing than anything else.

That prick was the one that bought it?

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Don Tiny wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
That little weasel who charges a billion dollars for AIDS medication should be taken to a firing squad.

More for the Wu Tang album thing than anything else.

That prick was the one that bought it?

Yep, and then he feuded with Ghostface Killah.

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RPB, get a CFMB fund going to buy that shit back. Word on the street is it's on eBay now. I'm in for $1.50

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:02 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
leashyourkids wrote:
FF's statement is true. Some of these people live in a world that doesn't exist. I'd love it too if we could artificially suppress prices in times like these, but it's simply impossible without repercussions. Sometimes they think just because something seems humane that it MUST be possible.

I have no problem with the government paying for these things at market value and giving them to those in need, but they can't simply tell suppliers what they can and cannot charge.

The argument becomes a bit different when talking about patent laws and things like that. That little weasel who charges a billion dollars for AIDS medication should be taken to a firing squad.


Why draw the line for medication? Their research and development is the reason the drug exists. Why shouldn't they be able to set the market?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
RPB, get a CFMB fund going to buy that shit back. Word on the street is it's on eBay now. I'm in for $1.50

Yea, top bid is $100,100 and hopefully whoever it is will just release it.

Credit to Rza, it was a novel idea but it backfired.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Nas wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FF's statement is true. Some of these people live in a world that doesn't exist. I'd love it too if we could artificially suppress prices in times like these, but it's simply impossible without repercussions. Sometimes they think just because something seems humane that it MUST be possible.

I have no problem with the government paying for these things at market value and giving them to those in need, but they can't simply tell suppliers what they can and cannot charge.

The argument becomes a bit different when talking about patent laws and things like that. That little weasel who charges a billion dollars for AIDS medication should be taken to a firing squad.


Why draw the line for medication? Their research and development is the reason the drug exists. Why shouldn't they be able to set the market?



That normally is true. In the case of the weasel or other old medicine/patent raiders not true.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:10 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
pittmike wrote:
Nas wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FF's statement is true. Some of these people live in a world that doesn't exist. I'd love it too if we could artificially suppress prices in times like these, but it's simply impossible without repercussions. Sometimes they think just because something seems humane that it MUST be possible.

I have no problem with the government paying for these things at market value and giving them to those in need, but they can't simply tell suppliers what they can and cannot charge.

The argument becomes a bit different when talking about patent laws and things like that. That little weasel who charges a billion dollars for AIDS medication should be taken to a firing squad.


Why draw the line for medication? Their research and development is the reason the drug exists. Why shouldn't they be able to set the market?



That normally is true. In the case of the weasel or other old medicine/patent raiders not true.


Why penalize them because the government didn't make the investment?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Nas wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FF's statement is true. Some of these people live in a world that doesn't exist. I'd love it too if we could artificially suppress prices in times like these, but it's simply impossible without repercussions. Sometimes they think just because something seems humane that it MUST be possible.

I have no problem with the government paying for these things at market value and giving them to those in need, but they can't simply tell suppliers what they can and cannot charge.

The argument becomes a bit different when talking about patent laws and things like that. That little weasel who charges a billion dollars for AIDS medication should be taken to a firing squad.


Why draw the line for medication? Their research and development is the reason the drug exists. Why shouldn't they be able to set the market?



That normally is true. In the case of the weasel or other old medicine/patent raiders not true.


Why penalize them because the government didn't make the investment?


Not following.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:18 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
leashyourkids wrote:
FF's statement is true. Some of these people live in a world that doesn't exist. I'd love it too if we could artificially suppress prices in times like these, but it's simply impossible without repercussions. Sometimes they think just because something seems humane that it MUST be possible.

I have no problem with the government paying for these things at market value and giving them to those in need, but they can't simply tell suppliers what they can and cannot charge.

The argument becomes a bit different when talking about patent laws and things like that. That little weasel who charges a billion dollars for AIDS medication should be taken to a firing squad.


There's a larger discussion here about what kind of society we really want to have. The reason market capitalism works is because man is greedy by nature. And that's the same reason communism has never worked and ultimately always has led down a path to dictatorship and murder. Of course, market capitalists love to point that out while ignoring the atrocities wrought by their own system, the most obvious being slavery.

The problem with centrist Democrats is that things are too good for them to really want change. Can we base a society on generosity rather than greed? It's going to be very difficult when accumulation is one of our primary values. I would suggest the first step toward a better way would be to outlaw advertising.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FF's statement is true. Some of these people live in a world that doesn't exist. I'd love it too if we could artificially suppress prices in times like these, but it's simply impossible without repercussions. Sometimes they think just because something seems humane that it MUST be possible.

I have no problem with the government paying for these things at market value and giving them to those in need, but they can't simply tell suppliers what they can and cannot charge.

The argument becomes a bit different when talking about patent laws and things like that. That little weasel who charges a billion dollars for AIDS medication should be taken to a firing squad.


There's a larger discussion here about what kind of society we really want to have. The reason market capitalism works is because man is greedy by nature. And that's the same reason communism has never worked and ultimately always has led down a path to dictatorship and murder. Of course, market capitalists love to point that out while ignoring the atrocities wrought by their own system, the most obvious being slavery.

The problem with centrist Democrats is that things are too good for them to really want change. Can we base a society on generosity rather than greed? It's going to be very difficult when accumulation is one of our primary values. I would suggest the first step toward a better way would be to outlaw advertising.

Still salty that Rick stops in cleaner restrooms than you while traveling.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group