It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:05 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 300 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Nas wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
The common answer I hear is "Well, we have to do something!" But that's not a rational argument. We in fact don't have to do something, but even if we do, what is it exactly that you'd like to do?


What's irrational about it?


Absolutely nothing. So I wish people would just be honest and say "Dead kids are an unfortunate cost of my right to own an assault rifle" rather than beat around the bush.


It's absolutely irrational. You are basically saying we have to do something even if it accomplishes nothing.


What has doing nothing accomplished?


Sometimes doing nothing is better, even with the occasional terrible outcome. Let's ask Mandalay Bay if they would like to install metal detectors for all incoming guests, to prevent something like Sunday night. I'm pretty sure the answer would be no.

Do we care what Mandalay Bay wants?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:30 am
Posts: 1497
pizza_Place: Bianchis
Do people expect this to turn into a Utopian society like The Giver where all gun crimes will disappear if we do something? Passing more laws or throwing more money at a problem rarely works. The war on drugs, education and the war on terrorism are prime examples of that fallacy. We pass laws making it illegal to drive and text. Has that caused a decrease in car accidents?

Obviously spree killings won't disappear completely. So what number is acceptable to the anti-gun crowd? One a year? One every 10 years? Every 50? We hadn't had a major hurricane hit land for over 10 years, and then we had two and people seem to forget the years in between. The point is, tragedy will always be tragic no matter when the last one occurred. And regardless of when the last one occurred, it will be a prime time for people to get on their soapbox to demand changes be made.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Ah, Lemonparty, the 8th sacrament.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
Don Tiny wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
He was spot on last night. Great show.


He was right. If a Muslim did this our country would have sprang into action and came up with hundreds of solutions to try to prevent/make it harder for this to happen again. Nothing we can do now and no real outrage.

A Muslim did do it in Orlando last year.

But didn't he shoot up a fruity bar? I would suspect that the NRA types might not be entirely vexed about that.

(incidentally, I thought vexed had two X's ... we use a strange language)


It was actually a tossed salad bar.

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:34 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38362
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
leashyourkids wrote:
I understand the emotion involved by those who find these things detestable (and in some ways I sort of agree), but take a step back and look at what your prescriptions are. You're just using vague statements about gun control. Most of this stuff is already illegal. America's gun problem is more related to a culture of guns than it is any laws or lack of laws. I don't think there's any way to legislate out of this.


GRAND SLAM!!!

Insert almost any current social problem in our country in the place of guns and the answer is the same.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:35 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
SuperMario wrote:
Do people expect this to turn into a Utopian society like The Giver where all gun crimes will disappear if we do something? Passing more laws or throwing more money at a problem rarely works. The war on drugs, education and the war on terrorism are prime examples of that fallacy. We pass laws making it illegal to drive and text. Has that caused a decrease in car accidents?

Obviously spree killings won't disappear completely. So what number is acceptable to the anti-gun crowd? One a year? One every 10 years? Every 50? We hadn't had a major hurricane hit land for over 10 years, and then we had two and people seem to forget the years in between. The point is, tragedy will always be tragic no matter when the last one occurred. And regardless of when the last one occurred, it will be a prime time for people to get on their soapbox to demand changes be made.


Then why did mass killings drop like a stone in Australia?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
SuperMario wrote:
Do people expect this to turn into a Utopian society like The Giver where all gun crimes will disappear if we do something?

Thanks for the spoiler, jerk.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:38 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79586
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Sometimes doing nothing is better, even with the occasional terrible outcome. Let's ask Mandalay Bay if they would like to install metal detectors for all incoming guests, to prevent something like Sunday night. I'm pretty sure the answer would be no.

Do we care what Mandalay Bay wants?


No, but they better not install metal detectors at Bellagio.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16490
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
rogers park bryan wrote:
Do we care what Mandalay Bay wants?


Mandalay Bay will do what they believe their customers (i.e., citizens) want, so yes, by proxy I do not think "we" would want metal detectors. Too much inconvenience for too little/rare benefit.

That being said, maybe a casino will view installing them as an opportunity to attract safety-minded customers who value that more than their time.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Last edited by Jaw Breaker on Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
so now we have the govt mandating the installation of metal detectors at evey public venue?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:44 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Hatchetman wrote:
so now we have the govt mandating the installation of metal detectors at evey public venue?


And magically everything will be OK, because clearly the absence of detection is a much bigger issue than prevention.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:44 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79586
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hatchetman wrote:
so now we have the govt mandating the installation of metal detectors at evey public venue?



And mandatory white helmets for everyone!

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
SuperMario wrote:
Do people expect this to turn into a Utopian society like The Giver where all gun crimes will disappear if we do something? Passing more laws or throwing more money at a problem rarely works. The war on drugs, education and the war on terrorism are prime examples of that fallacy. We pass laws making it illegal to drive and text. Has that caused a decrease in car accidents?

Obviously spree killings won't disappear completely. So what number is acceptable to the anti-gun crowd? One a year? One every 10 years? Every 50? We hadn't had a major hurricane hit land for over 10 years, and then we had two and people seem to forget the years in between. The point is, tragedy will always be tragic no matter when the last one occurred. And regardless of when the last one occurred, it will be a prime time for people to get on their soapbox to demand changes be made.


Then why did mass killings drop like a stone in Australia?

All of the animals over there are looking to kill you, so maybe a disproportionate number of nutjobs just so happened to be eaten by Koalas or whatever.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
so now we have the govt mandating the installation of metal detectors at evey public venue?



And mandatory white helmets for everyone!

Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:30 am
Posts: 1497
pizza_Place: Bianchis
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
SuperMario wrote:
Do people expect this to turn into a Utopian society like The Giver where all gun crimes will disappear if we do something? Passing more laws or throwing more money at a problem rarely works. The war on drugs, education and the war on terrorism are prime examples of that fallacy. We pass laws making it illegal to drive and text. Has that caused a decrease in car accidents?

Obviously spree killings won't disappear completely. So what number is acceptable to the anti-gun crowd? One a year? One every 10 years? Every 50? We hadn't had a major hurricane hit land for over 10 years, and then we had two and people seem to forget the years in between. The point is, tragedy will always be tragic no matter when the last one occurred. And regardless of when the last one occurred, it will be a prime time for people to get on their soapbox to demand changes be made.


Then why did mass killings drop like a stone in Australia?


But not murders in general. In Ireland, Australia and England, the gun bans either had a static effect or actually caused murder rates to increase. It goes back to the point that bad people will do bad things with whatever is available to them. And I don't think Australia is going to start banning boomerangs and machetes and dune buggies and Crocodile Dundee.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Ah, Lemonparty, the 8th sacrament.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
SuperMario wrote:
Do people expect this to turn into a Utopian society like The Giver where all gun crimes will disappear if we do something? Passing more laws or throwing more money at a problem rarely works. The war on drugs, education and the war on terrorism are prime examples of that fallacy. We pass laws making it illegal to drive and text. Has that caused a decrease in car accidents?

Obviously spree killings won't disappear completely. So what number is acceptable to the anti-gun crowd? One a year? One every 10 years? Every 50? We hadn't had a major hurricane hit land for over 10 years, and then we had two and people seem to forget the years in between. The point is, tragedy will always be tragic no matter when the last one occurred. And regardless of when the last one occurred, it will be a prime time for people to get on their soapbox to demand changes be made.


Then why did mass killings drop like a stone in Australia?


It's an island in the middle of an ocean!!!!!!

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Because Australians aren't a bunch of pussies


Australia's murder rate falls to record low of one person per 100,000
Report shows knives are most common murder weapon followed by guns, with alcohol and beatings a big factor


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:56 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Seacrest wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I understand the emotion involved by those who find these things detestable (and in some ways I sort of agree), but take a step back and look at what your prescriptions are. You're just using vague statements about gun control. Most of this stuff is already illegal. America's gun problem is more related to a culture of guns than it is any laws or lack of laws. I don't think there's any way to legislate out of this.


GRAND SLAM!!!

Insert almost any current social problem in our country in the place of guns and the answer is the same.


Interesting.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:02 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
SuperMario wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
SuperMario wrote:
Do people expect this to turn into a Utopian society like The Giver where all gun crimes will disappear if we do something? Passing more laws or throwing more money at a problem rarely works. The war on drugs, education and the war on terrorism are prime examples of that fallacy. We pass laws making it illegal to drive and text. Has that caused a decrease in car accidents?

Obviously spree killings won't disappear completely. So what number is acceptable to the anti-gun crowd? One a year? One every 10 years? Every 50? We hadn't had a major hurricane hit land for over 10 years, and then we had two and people seem to forget the years in between. The point is, tragedy will always be tragic no matter when the last one occurred. And regardless of when the last one occurred, it will be a prime time for people to get on their soapbox to demand changes be made.


Then why did mass killings drop like a stone in Australia?


But not murders in general. In Ireland, Australia and England, the gun bans either had a static effect or actually caused murder rates to increase. It goes back to the point that bad people will do bad things with whatever is available to them. And I don't think Australia is going to start banning boomerangs and machetes and dune buggies and Crocodile Dundee.


I'll take my chances against boomerangs and machetes any day of the week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41378
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
The next step at a hotel...a terrorist(foreign or domestic) will rent a room for a few days and build a bomb in the room, big enough to take the entire building down...think a popular hotel near Times Square, perhaps on New Years Eve? You won't seen TSA like screenings at hotels, but you will seem some basic searches...just like at Theme Parks/Stadiums now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
I'll take my chances against boomerangs and machetes any day of the week.
You do realize just how low the odds are of ever being near a mass shooting is?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:08 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
I'll take my chances against boomerangs and machetes any day of the week.
You do realize just how low the odds are of ever being near a mass shooting is?


I'd say roughly 32 miles from where I'm sitting, so pretty good.

http://www.heyjackass.com


Last edited by Ugueth Will Shiv You on Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:09 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
I'll take my chances against boomerangs and machetes any day of the week.
You do realize just how low the odds are of ever being near a mass shooting is?


Higher than an American plane being hijacked?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41378
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Plane hijackings have essentially been eliminated via regulations(yes, that can be inconvenient at times).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
I'll take my chances against boomerangs and machetes any day of the week.
You do realize just how low the odds are of ever being near a mass shooting is?


I'd say roughly 32 miles from where I'm sitting, so pretty good.

http://www.heyjackass.com
I said mass shootings.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:15 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
I'll take my chances against boomerangs and machetes any day of the week.
You do realize just how low the odds are of ever being near a mass shooting is?


I'd say roughly 32 miles from where I'm sitting, so pretty good.

http://www.heyjackass.com
I said mass shootings.


An incident involving multiple victims of firearm violence?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:30 am
Posts: 1497
pizza_Place: Bianchis
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
SuperMario wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
SuperMario wrote:
Do people expect this to turn into a Utopian society like The Giver where all gun crimes will disappear if we do something? Passing more laws or throwing more money at a problem rarely works. The war on drugs, education and the war on terrorism are prime examples of that fallacy. We pass laws making it illegal to drive and text. Has that caused a decrease in car accidents?

Obviously spree killings won't disappear completely. So what number is acceptable to the anti-gun crowd? One a year? One every 10 years? Every 50? We hadn't had a major hurricane hit land for over 10 years, and then we had two and people seem to forget the years in between. The point is, tragedy will always be tragic no matter when the last one occurred. And regardless of when the last one occurred, it will be a prime time for people to get on their soapbox to demand changes be made.


Then why did mass killings drop like a stone in Australia?


But not murders in general. In Ireland, Australia and England, the gun bans either had a static effect or actually caused murder rates to increase. It goes back to the point that bad people will do bad things with whatever is available to them. And I don't think Australia is going to start banning boomerangs and machetes and dune buggies and Crocodile Dundee.


I'll take my chances against boomerangs and machetes any day of the week.


Me too. As long as I have my pistol on me.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Ah, Lemonparty, the 8th sacrament.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16490
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Caller Bob wrote:
Plane hijackings have essentially been eliminated via regulations(yes, that can be inconvenient at times).


Inconvenient is an understatement.

We could eliminate automobile fatalities if we reduced the speed limit to 15 mph. Would people accept that tradeoff?

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:30 am
Posts: 1497
pizza_Place: Bianchis
Caller Bob wrote:
Plane hijackings have essentially been eliminated via regulations(yes, that can be inconvenient at times).


A little easier to control what and who gets on and off a plane with 400 people max then it is a 2700 mile country bordering two other countries and hundreds of ports on two ocean fronts with over 300 million people. And we have no-fly lists, but sadly pretty much anyone can come into our country.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Ah, Lemonparty, the 8th sacrament.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Jaw Breaker wrote:
We could eliminate automobile fatalities if we reduced the speed limit to 15 mph. Would people accept that tradeoff?



I'LL TAKE IT
!

Image

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41378
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
SuperMario wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Plane hijackings have essentially been eliminated via regulations(yes, that can be inconvenient at times).


A little easier to control what and who gets on and off a plane with 400 people max then it is a 2700 mile country bordering two other countries and hundreds of ports on two ocean fronts with over 300 million people. And we have no-fly lists, but sadly pretty much anyone can come into our country.


I was speaking to hotel security moving forward...which would be a mild inconvenience at best. Most major office buildings in big cities have similar security..you would just implement it for hotel guest. Or watch a building go 'boom'...eventually.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 300 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group