It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 2:18 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1012 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 34  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 7:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Baby McNown wrote:
Brandon Fucking Weeden took live snaps today. You can stop pretending this is because Kaep isn't good enough now.


I would hope everyone has by now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 7:28 pm 
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Brandon Fucking Weeden took live snaps today. You can stop pretending this is because Kaep isn't good enough now.


I would hope everyone has by now.

Suuuuuuure they have.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 9:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:19 pm
Posts: 980
The Y factor is his most recent numbers. Total crapshoot as to what you'd get even before the X factor, which is his baggage. Add both together and you simply get something not worth the trouble.

It's always been the sum. It's not some great commentary on where we are as a society.

_________________
"Mattress technology has come a long way"

- Dan Bernstein, 2016


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Baby McNown wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Brandon Fucking Weeden took live snaps today. You can stop pretending this is because Kaep isn't good enough now.


I would hope everyone has by now.

Suuuuuuure they have.

I havent seen many people arguing Kap isnt good enough. More like "freedom of speech has consequences"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
So do you think this wasn't a 100% PR stunt?


Of course it was a PR stunt. A PR stunt is not "systemic oppression". "Systemic oppression" looks nothing like someone walking out of a stadium. To address it as such is fucking lunacy.

The systemic oppression is the shootings. The Vice President making a big scene to denigrate and discredit the protest absolutely feeds into it.


But, who cares what Eric Reid said, anyway? Why would that bother you to the point of eye rolls?

Eye rolls (emoji or otherwise) are usually a bad look.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Brandon Fucking Weeden took live snaps today. You can stop pretending this is because Kaep isn't good enough now.


I would hope everyone has by now.

Suuuuuuure they have.

I havent seen many people arguing Kap isnt good enough. More like "freedom of speech has consequences"
The most plausible theory is that he didn't want to be a backup, and didn't want to be paid like a backup. Weeden is making $775k this year and was just signed as the third string quarterback because the clear starter was injured. So, Kaepernick is a better quarterback than Weeden, but it also doesn't mean that Weeden was signed over Kaepernick. Weeden was out of the league before he was brought in to basically be a guy who could hand the ball off if the two quarterbacks on the team can't go.

Oh, and I'll trust that Baby McCown is right that Weeden took a snap, but he didn't even throw a pass if he did get in the game so I don't really think it's a strong point.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
So do you think this wasn't a 100% PR stunt?


Of course it was a PR stunt. A PR stunt is not "systemic oppression". "Systemic oppression" looks nothing like someone walking out of a stadium. To address it as such is fucking lunacy.

The systemic oppression is the shootings. The Vice President making a big scene to denigrate and discredit the protest absolutely feeds into it.


That's not what Reid said. He said Pence leaving (Again, after viewing the protests in full and making no effort to stop them) was "systemic oppression", which it most certainly is not. The First doesn't guarantee you an immediate audience whenever you please with the nation's second highest executive office.

And regardless of what Reid was clumsily referring to, we can now add "oppression" to the list of words that have special, new meanings that broaden their definition to suit whatever is being discussed, thereby lessening the impact and gravity of the term as a whole. When someone leaving a football game (AFTER WATCHING THE PROTEST IN ITS ENTIRETY) is in any good god damn way oppressive, then everything, and simultaneously nothing, is oppressive.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
So do you think this wasn't a 100% PR stunt?


Of course it was a PR stunt. A PR stunt is not "systemic oppression". "Systemic oppression" looks nothing like someone walking out of a stadium. To address it as such is fucking lunacy.

The systemic oppression is the shootings. The Vice President making a big scene to denigrate and discredit the protest absolutely feeds into it.


That's not what Reid said. He said Pence leaving (Again, after viewing the protests in full and making no effort to stop them) was "systemic oppression", which it most certainly is not. The First doesn't guarantee you an immediate audience whenever you please with the nation's second highest executive office.

And regardless of what Reid was clumsily referring to, we can now add "oppression" to the list of words that have special, new meanings that broaden their definition to suit whatever is being discussed, thereby lessening the impact and gravity of the term as a whole. When someone leaving a football game (AFTER WATCHING THE PROTEST IN ITS ENTIRETY) is in any good god damn way oppressive, then everything, and simultaneously nothing, is oppressive.
Pence is clearly part of the "system" and I think it's fair to say that his dumb publicity stunt was an attempt to fight back against them message that the players are trying to say.

The Executive Office just needs to learn when they should shut up.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
So do you think this wasn't a 100% PR stunt?


Of course it was a PR stunt. A PR stunt is not "systemic oppression". "Systemic oppression" looks nothing like someone walking out of a stadium. To address it as such is fucking lunacy.

The systemic oppression is the shootings. The Vice President making a big scene to denigrate and discredit the protest absolutely feeds into it.


That's not what Reid said. He said Pence leaving (Again, after viewing the protests in full and making no effort to stop them) was "systemic oppression", which it most certainly is not. The First doesn't guarantee you an immediate audience whenever you please with the nation's second highest executive office.

And regardless of what Reid was clumsily referring to, we can now add "oppression" to the list of words that have special, new meanings that broaden their definition to suit whatever is being discussed, thereby lessening the impact and gravity of the term as a whole. When someone leaving a football game (AFTER WATCHING THE PROTEST IN ITS ENTIRETY) is in any good god damn way oppressive, then everything, and simultaneously nothing, is oppressive.

Alright.

Seems like a weird thing to get so annoyed by, but whatever.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
So do you think this wasn't a 100% PR stunt?


Of course it was a PR stunt. A PR stunt is not "systemic oppression". "Systemic oppression" looks nothing like someone walking out of a stadium. To address it as such is fucking lunacy.

The systemic oppression is the shootings. The Vice President making a big scene to denigrate and discredit the protest absolutely feeds into it.


That's not what Reid said. He said Pence leaving (Again, after viewing the protests in full and making no effort to stop them) was "systemic oppression", which it most certainly is not. The First doesn't guarantee you an immediate audience whenever you please with the nation's second highest executive office.

And regardless of what Reid was clumsily referring to, we can now add "oppression" to the list of words that have special, new meanings that broaden their definition to suit whatever is being discussed, thereby lessening the impact and gravity of the term as a whole. When someone leaving a football game (AFTER WATCHING THE PROTEST IN ITS ENTIRETY) is in any good god damn way oppressive, then everything, and simultaneously nothing, is oppressive.
Pence is clearly part of the "system" and I think it's fair to say that his dumb publicity stunt was an attempt to fight back against them message that the players are trying to say.

The Executive Office just needs to learn when they should shut up.


Yes, absolutely. This was a dumb PR campaign that was am abhorrent waste of taxpayer dollars. It was not, however, in any way oppressive of Reid, not anyone else protesting. It just simply wasn't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Yes, absolutely. This was a dumb PR campaign that was am abhorrent waste of taxpayer dollars. It was not, however, in any way oppressive of Reid, not anyone else protesting. It just simply wasn't.

The move represents the systemic oppression that exists. "How dare you protest your oppression?!"

You know this...you just cannot ever admit to oppression and discrimination existing.

Please don't have kids.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Yes, absolutely. This was a dumb PR campaign that was am abhorrent waste of taxpayer dollars. It was not, however, in any way oppressive of Reid, not anyone else protesting. It just simply wasn't.

The move represents the systemic oppression that exists. "How dare you protest your oppression?!"


Reid was not speaking metaphorically. Ardent defenders and ass-lickers might cling to such a view now, but he was speaking about the oppression of Mike Pence leaving a football game.

Quote:
You know this...you just cannot ever admit to oppression and discrimination existing.


I will admit to, and rail against, things that are actually oppressive, like felony drug possession crimes and life imprisonment for non-violent drug possession offenses. But I cannot in good conscience agree with someone labeling as oppressive the act of Mike Pence leaving a football game after viewing the full protests exhibited by Reid and his teammates.

Quote:
Please don't have kids.


Well it's either that or I have a child with a developmental disability which you can make fun of like the class act of a human you are.


Last edited by Juice's Lecture Notes on Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Reid was not speaking metaphorically. Ardent defenders and ass-lickers might cling to such a view now, but he was speaking about the oppression of Mike Pence leaving a football game.

Are you fucking serious? You are so full of yourself that you are going to pass judgement on exactly what someone else meant? You...the only person on this earth that even has that viewpoint? You are a loon.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Yes, absolutely. This was a dumb PR campaign that was am abhorrent waste of taxpayer dollars. It was not, however, in any way oppressive of Reid, not anyone else protesting. It just simply wasn't.

The move represents the systemic oppression that exists. "How dare you protest your oppression?!"


Reid was not speaking metaphorically. Ardent defenders and ass-lickers might cling to such a view now, but he was speaking about the oppression of Mike Pence leaving a football game.

Im not a Reid fan. Not even sure what team he is on. Guessing he's a player.

The first I saw of this tweet was this morning and I took it as metaphorical. The VP leaving at the behest of the President is part of the larger issue.

It seems like you're just on a mission to find "players who dont even know what they are protesting" and this one is a stretch.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Reid was not speaking metaphorically. Ardent defenders and ass-lickers might cling to such a view now, but he was speaking about the oppression of Mike Pence leaving a football game.

Are you fucking serious? You are so full of yourself that you are going to pass judgement on exactly what someone else meant? You...the only person on this earth that even has that viewpoint? You are a loon.


Eric Reid wrote:
"And so, this is what systemic oppression looks like. A man with power comes to the game, tweets a couple things out and leaves the game, with an attempt to thwart our efforts."


That is not metaphorical speaking. He used "this" to describe how Pence "leaves the game with an attempt to thwart our efforts", and pointed it directly at "systemic oppression". He's not talking about the metaphorical implications of a man with such power in the United States turning his back on people with a message. He's very clearly saying that Pence leaving oppressed him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Yes, absolutely. This was a dumb PR campaign that was am abhorrent waste of taxpayer dollars. It was not, however, in any way oppressive of Reid, not anyone else protesting. It just simply wasn't.

The move represents the systemic oppression that exists. "How dare you protest your oppression?!"


Reid was not speaking metaphorically. Ardent defenders and ass-lickers might cling to such a view now, but he was speaking about the oppression of Mike Pence leaving a football game.

Im not a Reid fan. Not even sure what team he is on. Guessing he's a player.

The first I saw of this tweet was this morning and I took it as metaphorical. The VP leaving at the behest of the President is part of the larger issue.

It seems like you're just on a mission to find "players who dont even know what they are protesting" and this one is a stretch.


Eric Reid wrote:
"And so, this is what systemic oppression looks like. A man with power comes to the game, tweets a couple things out and leaves the game, with an attempt to thwart our efforts."


That is not metaphorical.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Reid was not speaking metaphorically. Ardent defenders and ass-lickers might cling to such a view now, but he was speaking about the oppression of Mike Pence leaving a football game.

Are you fucking serious? You are so full of yourself that you are going to pass judgement on exactly what someone else meant? You...the only person on this earth that even has that viewpoint? You are a loon.


Eric Reid wrote:
"And so, this is what systemic oppression looks like. A man with power comes to the game, tweets a couple things out and leaves the game, with an attempt to thwart our efforts."


That is not metaphorical speaking. He used "this" to describe how Pence "leaves the game with an attempt to thwart our efforts", and pointed it directly at "systemic oppression". He's not talking about the metaphorical implications of a man with such power in the United States turning his back on people with a message. He's very clearly saying that Pence leaving oppressed him.

Yes, it is. He is saying that Pence, the Vice President of the entire United States, thinks so little of discrimination and oppression that he walks out because he believes protesting discrimination and oppression is disrespectful to America. The Vice President represents the system...and the system is on board with oppression. Systemic oppression.

You are not a smart man. Let us do the critical thinking for you.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Reid was not speaking metaphorically. Ardent defenders and ass-lickers might cling to such a view now, but he was speaking about the oppression of Mike Pence leaving a football game.

Are you fucking serious? You are so full of yourself that you are going to pass judgement on exactly what someone else meant? You...the only person on this earth that even has that viewpoint? You are a loon.


Eric Reid wrote:
"And so, this is what systemic oppression looks like. A man with power comes to the game, tweets a couple things out and leaves the game, with an attempt to thwart our efforts."


That is not metaphorical speaking. He used "this" to describe how Pence "leaves the game with an attempt to thwart our efforts", and pointed it directly at "systemic oppression". He's not talking about the metaphorical implications of a man with such power in the United States turning his back on people with a message. He's very clearly saying that Pence leaving oppressed him.

Yes, it is. He is saying that Pence, the Vice President of the entire United States, thinks so little of discrimination and oppression that he walks out because he believes protesting discrimination and oppression is disrespectful to America. The Vice President represents the system...and the system is on board with oppression. Systemic oppression.

You are not a smart man. Let us do the critical thinking for you.


I think you calling JLN a dumb Nazi over and over is definitely going to change his mind. Keep up the great work.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Julie Dicaro retweeted this powerful image


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:34 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80527
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
IMU wrote:
He is saying that Pence, the Vice President of the entire United States, thinks so little of discrimination and oppression that he walks out because he believes protesting discrimination and oppression is disrespectful to America.


I don't know what Pence's motivations are and I don't care. This is the same goof who wants to "reeducate" homosexuals.

But I will say that there are millions of Americans who have no problem with someone protesting discrimination and oppression and who might even join such protest but who also have an issue with the specific form this particular protest has taken.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
leashyourkids wrote:
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Reid was not speaking metaphorically. Ardent defenders and ass-lickers might cling to such a view now, but he was speaking about the oppression of Mike Pence leaving a football game.

Are you fucking serious? You are so full of yourself that you are going to pass judgement on exactly what someone else meant? You...the only person on this earth that even has that viewpoint? You are a loon.


Eric Reid wrote:
"And so, this is what systemic oppression looks like. A man with power comes to the game, tweets a couple things out and leaves the game, with an attempt to thwart our efforts."


That is not metaphorical speaking. He used "this" to describe how Pence "leaves the game with an attempt to thwart our efforts", and pointed it directly at "systemic oppression". He's not talking about the metaphorical implications of a man with such power in the United States turning his back on people with a message. He's very clearly saying that Pence leaving oppressed him.

Yes, it is. He is saying that Pence, the Vice President of the entire United States, thinks so little of discrimination and oppression that he walks out because he believes protesting discrimination and oppression is disrespectful to America. The Vice President represents the system...and the system is on board with oppression. Systemic oppression.

You are not a smart man. Let us do the critical thinking for you.


I think you calling JLN a dumb Nazi over and over is definitely going to change his mind. Keep up the great work.

Are there smart Nazis?

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
He is saying that Pence, the Vice President of the entire United States, thinks so little of discrimination and oppression that he walks out because he believes protesting discrimination and oppression is disrespectful to America.


I don't know what Pence's motivations are and I don't care. This is the same goof who wants to "reeducate" homosexuals.

But I will say that there are millions of Americans who have no problem with someone protesting discrimination and oppression and who might even join such protest but who also have an issue with the specific form this particular protest has taken.

I can't say for sure...but when I look at the people that have an issue with this specific form of protest...I have doubts. Maybe instead of millions you could say hundreds?

Every thinly closeted bigot has used this as an opportunity to come out and "save the National Anthem."

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Reid was not speaking metaphorically. Ardent defenders and ass-lickers might cling to such a view now, but he was speaking about the oppression of Mike Pence leaving a football game.

Are you fucking serious? You are so full of yourself that you are going to pass judgement on exactly what someone else meant? You...the only person on this earth that even has that viewpoint? You are a loon.


Eric Reid wrote:
"And so, this is what systemic oppression looks like. A man with power comes to the game, tweets a couple things out and leaves the game, with an attempt to thwart our efforts."


That is not metaphorical speaking. He used "this" to describe how Pence "leaves the game with an attempt to thwart our efforts", and pointed it directly at "systemic oppression". He's not talking about the metaphorical implications of a man with such power in the United States turning his back on people with a message. He's very clearly saying that Pence leaving oppressed him.

Yes, it is. He is saying that Pence, the Vice President of the entire United States, thinks so little of discrimination and oppression that he walks out because he believes protesting discrimination and oppression is disrespectful to America. The Vice President represents the system...and the system is on board with oppression. Systemic oppression.

You are not a smart man. Let us do the critical thinking for you.


Again, you are desperately trying to attach metaphorical meaning to a statement that was clearly meant literally. The phrase "leaves the game with an attempt to thwart our efforts" is not metaphorical language, it is literal language describing what Pence did, and labeling what Pence did as "systemic oppression".

In your interpretation, Pence leaving is supposed to be symbolic of a system not caring, and if that is the case, then Reid would have no reason to call Pence's action an "attempt to thwart our efforts". To "thwart" something is to derail or stifle (oppress, perhaps?) something by some overt action. The statement makes more (read: actual) sense if we read it literally: Reid is saying that Pence leaving the game was an attempt to thwart his protest, and thus Mike Pence was attempting to oppress him by leaving the football game. That is not oppression.

You are demonstrably incapable of critical thinking.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Reid was not speaking metaphorically. Ardent defenders and ass-lickers might cling to such a view now, but he was speaking about the oppression of Mike Pence leaving a football game.

Are you fucking serious? You are so full of yourself that you are going to pass judgement on exactly what someone else meant? You...the only person on this earth that even has that viewpoint? You are a loon.


Eric Reid wrote:
"And so, this is what systemic oppression looks like. A man with power comes to the game, tweets a couple things out and leaves the game, with an attempt to thwart our efforts."


That is not metaphorical speaking. He used "this" to describe how Pence "leaves the game with an attempt to thwart our efforts", and pointed it directly at "systemic oppression". He's not talking about the metaphorical implications of a man with such power in the United States turning his back on people with a message. He's very clearly saying that Pence leaving oppressed him.

Yes, it is. He is saying that Pence, the Vice President of the entire United States, thinks so little of discrimination and oppression that he walks out because he believes protesting discrimination and oppression is disrespectful to America. The Vice President represents the system...and the system is on board with oppression. Systemic oppression.

You are not a smart man. Let us do the critical thinking for you.


Again, you are desperately trying to attach metaphorical meaning to a statement that was clearly meant literally. The phrase "leaves the game with an attempt to thwart our efforts" is not metaphorical language, it is literal language describing what Pence did, and labeling what Pence did as "systemic oppression".

In your interpretation, Pence leaving is supposed to be symbolic of a system not caring, and if that is the case, then Reid would have no reason to call Pence's action an "attempt to thwart our efforts". To "thwart" something is to derail or stifle (oppress, perhaps?) something by some overt action. The statement makes more (read: actual) sense if we read it literally: Reid is saying that Pence leaving the game was an attempt to thwart his protest, and thus Mike Pence was attempting to oppress him by leaving the football game. That is not oppression.

You are demonstrably incapable of critical thinking.

You're clueless. What Pence did is exactly attempting to derail or stifle the protest by 'officially' declaring it disrespectful and saying he (the system) won't give it the time of day.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:00 am 
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
So do you think this wasn't a 100% PR stunt?


Of course it was a PR stunt. A PR stunt is not "systemic oppression". "Systemic oppression" looks nothing like someone walking out of a stadium. To address it as such is fucking lunacy.

The systemic oppression is the shootings. The Vice President making a big scene to denigrate and discredit the protest absolutely feeds into it.


That's not what Reid said. He said Pence leaving (Again, after viewing the protests in full and making no effort to stop them) was "systemic oppression", which it most certainly is not. The First doesn't guarantee you an immediate audience whenever you please with the nation's second highest executive office.

And regardless of what Reid was clumsily referring to, we can now add "oppression" to the list of words that have special, new meanings that broaden their definition to suit whatever is being discussed, thereby lessening the impact and gravity of the term as a whole. When someone leaving a football game (AFTER WATCHING THE PROTEST IN ITS ENTIRETY) is in any good god damn way oppressive, then everything, and simultaneously nothing, is oppressive.

Alright.

Seems like a weird thing to get so annoyed by, but whatever.

The grasping at stuff to try and divert our attention from the fact that probably close to a million dollars of our tax money was spent for this stunt is really cute. Just as transparent as the stunt itself, but cute.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:03 am 
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
IMU wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Reid was not speaking metaphorically. Ardent defenders and ass-lickers might cling to such a view now, but he was speaking about the oppression of Mike Pence leaving a football game.

Are you fucking serious? You are so full of yourself that you are going to pass judgement on exactly what someone else meant? You...the only person on this earth that even has that viewpoint? You are a loon.


Eric Reid wrote:
"And so, this is what systemic oppression looks like. A man with power comes to the game, tweets a couple things out and leaves the game, with an attempt to thwart our efforts."


That is not metaphorical speaking. He used "this" to describe how Pence "leaves the game with an attempt to thwart our efforts", and pointed it directly at "systemic oppression". He's not talking about the metaphorical implications of a man with such power in the United States turning his back on people with a message. He's very clearly saying that Pence leaving oppressed him.

Paraphrasing because of course his spin guys cleaned it up. "I left because how dare they disrespect the flag (they aren't) in my presence". Yeah that's pretty cut and dry.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:04 am 
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
He is saying that Pence, the Vice President of the entire United States, thinks so little of discrimination and oppression that he walks out because he believes protesting discrimination and oppression is disrespectful to America.


I don't know what Pence's motivations are and I don't care. This is the same goof who wants to "reeducate" homosexuals.

But I will say that there are millions of Americans who have no problem with someone protesting discrimination and oppression and who might even join such protest but who also have an issue with the specific form this particular protest has taken.

Those are called "snowflakes"


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
IMU wrote:
You're clueless. What Pence did is exactly attempting to derail or stifle the protest by 'officially' declaring it disrespectful and saying he (the system) won't give it the time of day.


Ah, now the goalposts are shifting. Where in "leaves the game with an attempt to thwart our efforts" is Reid decidedly not talking about the act of Pence leaving the game? Reid clearly said that Pence leaving the game is oppression of him and his message. Your attempts to pretend that isn't what he was saying are getting ever more colorful.

And no, Pence calling the protests "disrespectful" is not oppressive. It's stupid, but it isn't oppressive.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Your 'tell' when you are losing an argument on this board is to say "the goalposts are shifting."

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19347
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
IMU wrote:
You're clueless. What Pence did is exactly attempting to derail or stifle the protest by 'officially' declaring it disrespectful and saying he (the system) won't give it the time of day.


Ah, now the goalposts are shifting. Where in "leaves the game with an attempt to thwart our efforts" is Reid decidedly not talking about the act of Pence leaving the game? Reid clearly said that Pence leaving the game is oppression of him and his message. Your attempts to pretend that isn't what he was saying are getting ever more colorful.

And no, Pence calling the protests "disrespectful" is not oppressive. It's stupid, but it isn't oppressive.


Other than proving IMU wrong (which is admittedly satisfying), what do you gain from pointing out that Pence leaving a football game isn't literally oppressive?

Football guy says wrong thing! Film at 11.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
IMU wrote:
Your 'tell' when you are losing an argument on this board is to say "the goalposts are shifting."


And yours is actually shifting the goalposts. Like you did above.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1012 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 34  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group