Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
To be honest my position never wavered. You lied and misrepresented it. I stated that it can exist somewhere else and I stated that it could exist in Germany. Its funny that everyone shot Germany down. Can't have it in those European countries even though it was in Europe where most of the historic Anti Semitic activity has taken place. Interesting that it is the Europeans that have no problems carving up other parts of the world i.e. Africa, Middle East, Asia but when it comes to their own there is such reluctance and hesitancy.
Your position did waver. You said that Israel shouldn't exist anywhere in the Middle East multiple times. You also wouldn't say where it should currently be moved to. You only mentioned the founding. Now, you do think Israel should exist in the Middle East, though obviously, and fairly, you think there should be a Palestine also.
long time guy wrote:
I've always stated that it should not have been in Palestine and if there is Middle Eastern land that is unoccupied then it can be there. I'm not familiar with Middle Eastern geography and thus i wouldn't know of unoccupied land which exist there. It shouldn't have been placed in land where the Palestinians lay.
Unoccupied? Most of Palestine was unoccupied.
long time guy wrote:
If you believe it should then explain why? These constant attacks on what i did or didn't say or getting old. Either state what you believe or leave it alone.
I believe Israel should exist in the general area that it does, though I would also like to see a two state solution.
Your information regarding Palestine being unoccupied is false.
I still don't believe that Israel should have been founded where it was founded. You keep playing the "exist" game as a means of suggesting that I believe it should be wiped out. Hence the whole Anti Semitic garbage. I've never said that it should be wiped out and I'm going to ask you to refrain from that sort of logic for the last time.
There is nothing at this point that can be done about Israel existing. My issue is with the way it was created. The best solution would be 2 state at this point.
This is a prime example of telling someone what it is that they think by the way.
If you can provide evidence where I say that Israel has no right to exist then provide it. I'm sure that I won't have a problem providing evidence as to where I believe it should exist.
_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.