It is currently Sun Nov 17, 2024 10:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1759 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 59  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16459
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
rogers park bryan wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
If you have the Dodgers bullpen, you can pull starters early.

The Cubs do not possess the Dodgers bullpen.

Any bullpen that has Lackey throwing two games in a row, is by definition bad.


Yeah, this is illustrated by Maeda vs. Lackey. Maeda is a stud in the pen, as you would expect from one of your regular season starters (who should be better than all of your relievers except the closer). In fact, Maeda is even better in relief, as he doesn't need to conserve energy for 100 pitches.

The Dodgers and Astros made good moves that are paying off. The Cubs got Justin Wilson and Alex Avila, who may not play at all in the postseason.

Agree with everything but what's in parentheses.

At this point, smart teams are looking at the bullpen like we used to the rotation. You need 4 good relievers at least. You have to fill each spot.

Relief Ace
High leverage
High leverage
LOOGY


And the talent is not all in the rotation anymore.


I would agree to a point, but that it is more of a playoff phenomenon vs regular season. Is there any reason to give starting pitchers $25m per year if they can't go 5 innings in a playoff game? There seems to be this movement to pull starters before the third time through the lineup (which could also skew the stats to make relievers look better than they really are).

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Jaw Breaker wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
If you have the Dodgers bullpen, you can pull starters early.

The Cubs do not possess the Dodgers bullpen.

Any bullpen that has Lackey throwing two games in a row, is by definition bad.


Yeah, this is illustrated by Maeda vs. Lackey. Maeda is a stud in the pen, as you would expect from one of your regular season starters (who should be better than all of your relievers except the closer). In fact, Maeda is even better in relief, as he doesn't need to conserve energy for 100 pitches.

The Dodgers and Astros made good moves that are paying off. The Cubs got Justin Wilson and Alex Avila, who may not play at all in the postseason.

Agree with everything but what's in parentheses.

At this point, smart teams are looking at the bullpen like we used to the rotation. You need 4 good relievers at least. You have to fill each spot.

Relief Ace
High leverage
High leverage
LOOGY


And the talent is not all in the rotation anymore.


I would agree to a point, but that it is more of a playoff phenomenon vs regular season. Is there any reason to give starting pitchers $25m per year if they can't go 5 innings in a playoff game?

The paradigm is shifting.

There will always be guys who can go deep, but they will be even more rare and exotic. But the days of bullpens just being failed/old starters and retreads are over.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16459
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
rogers park bryan wrote:
The paradigm is shifting.

There will always be guys who can go deep, but they will be even more rare and exotic. But the days of bullpens just being failed/old starters and retreads are over.


Yeah, I can see the fundamental structure of staffs changing based on number of times through the lineup. Will be interesting to see how that plays out with agents and players if staffs no longer have $25-30m starters, but instead a bunch of $5-10m pitchers who rotate in for a few innings.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
rogers park bryan wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
If you have the Dodgers bullpen, you can pull starters early.

The Cubs do not possess the Dodgers bullpen.

Any bullpen that has Lackey throwing two games in a row, is by definition bad.


Yeah, this is illustrated by Maeda vs. Lackey. Maeda is a stud in the pen, as you would expect from one of your regular season starters (who should be better than all of your relievers except the closer). In fact, Maeda is even better in relief, as he doesn't need to conserve energy for 100 pitches.

The Dodgers and Astros made good moves that are paying off. The Cubs got Justin Wilson and Alex Avila, who may not play at all in the postseason.

Agree with everything but what's in parentheses.

At this point, smart teams are looking at the bullpen like we used to the rotation. You need 4 good relievers at least. You have to fill each spot.

Relief Ace
High leverage
High leverage
LOOGY


And the talent is not all in the rotation anymore.


I would agree to a point, but that it is more of a playoff phenomenon vs regular season. Is there any reason to give starting pitchers $25m per year if they can't go 5 innings in a playoff game?

The paradigm is shifting.

There will always be guys who can go deep, but they will be even more rare and exotic. But the days of bullpens just being failed/old starters and retreads are over.


That's not sustainable for 162 games.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
rogers park bryan wrote:
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.


#That'sSoCub

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Regular Reader wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.


#That'sSoCub

What?

Actually, Cubs are LATE on this party.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
rogers park bryan wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.


#That'sSoCub

What?

Actually, Cubs are LATE on this party.


How long do Cubbie ace Hendricks starts go? Or now Q, the saviour?

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Regular Reader wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.


#That'sSoCub

What?

Actually, Cubs are LATE on this party.


How long do Cubbie ace Hendricks starts go? Or now Q, the saviour?


Not real long, but quite a bit longer than Sox starters this time of year.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Regular Reader wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.


#That'sSoCub

What?

Actually, Cubs are LATE on this party.


How long do Cubbie ace Hendricks starts go? Or now Q, the saviour?

Are you still drunk from last night?

I dont even know what you're talking about. This bullpen discussion has very little to do with the Cubs other than the fact that they need to get on board.

And your glorious Dodgers are up 2-0 without their starters going beyond 5, so yes, it's a thing.


I get that your happy about the Cubs losing. Good for you. But you're making no sense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
The reason starters are going only 5 innings is because there is too much emphasis on the strikeout. They should be trying to pitch to weak contact, instead they are trying to get people to swing at balls that are just off the plate. Too much nibbling. 100-110 pitches used to get you somewhere. But now everyone needs to throw 20 pitches an inning because they are trying to strike everyone out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
rogers park bryan wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.


#That'sSoCub

What?

Actually, Cubs are LATE on this party.


How long do Cubbie ace Hendricks starts go? Or now Q, the saviour?

Are you still drunk from last night?

I dont even know what you're talking about. This bullpen discussion has very little to do with the Cubs other than the fact that they need to get on board.

And your glorious Dodgers are up 2-0 without their starters going beyond 5, so yes, it's a thing.


I get that your happy about the Cubs losing. Good for you. But you're making no sense.


Every baseball discussion we try to have here is viewed by Sox fans as some sort of Cubs-Sox thing even when it isn't.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Big Chicagoan wrote:
The reason starters are going only 5 innings is because there is too much emphasis on the strikeout. They should be trying to pitch to weak contact, instead they are trying to get people to swing at balls that are just off the plate. Too much nibbling. 100-110 pitches used to get you somewhere. But now everyone needs to throw 20 pitches an inning because they are trying to strike everyone out.

Max effort/strike em out is the most effective way to stop offenses currently though, so doesn't matter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
Schwarber's regression is remarkable. Two years ago he was the toast of the town. Last year people were lighting votive candles for his knee to heal sufficiently for the playoffs. Now, he is damaging to the lineup both offensively and defensively.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
good dolphin wrote:
Schwarber's regression is remarkable. Two years ago he was the toast of the town. Last year people were lighting votive candles for his knee to heal sufficiently for the playoffs. Now, he is damaging to the lineup both offensively and defensively.


I wish this was trolling but it's just the truth.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Hank Scorpio wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Schwarber's regression is remarkable. Two years ago he was the toast of the town. Last year people were lighting votive candles for his knee to heal sufficiently for the playoffs. Now, he is damaging to the lineup both offensively and defensively.


I wish this was trolling but it's just the truth.

Not really that crazy though. He had a killer run through the 2015 playoffs and came back from injury to help win the World Series (2016)


Of course a guy like that is going to be beloved. The Cardinals thought they had the next Scott Rolen with David Freese. He's just a guy now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.

God, that's depressing. Baseball sucks now.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Hank Scorpio wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Schwarber's regression is remarkable. Two years ago he was the toast of the town. Last year people were lighting votive candles for his knee to heal sufficiently for the playoffs. Now, he is damaging to the lineup both offensively and defensively.


I wish this was trolling but it's just the truth.

he's still going to be a good hitter. He's not Kevin Maas.

It just may not be with the Cubs.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.

God, that's depressing. Baseball sucks now.

I'm fine with it.


Once they enact my "no warm ups on the mound, just come in from the pen and begin pitching" rule the time issue will be solved.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.

God, that's depressing. Baseball sucks now.

I'm fine with it.


Once they enact my "no warm ups on the mound, just come in from the pen and begin pitching" rule the time issue will be solved.


I believe they should also implement a rule that the starting pitcher must move somewhere in the field once they are removed and continue to bat until the end of the game.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:13 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
leashyourkids wrote:
I believe they should also implement a rule that the starting pitcher must move somewhere in the field once they are removed and continue to bat until the end of the game.
That might actually help the Cubs score some runs.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Frank Coztansa wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I believe they should also implement a rule that the starting pitcher must move somewhere in the field once they are removed and continue to bat until the end of the game.
That might actually help the Cubs score some runs.


Maybe with Arrieta.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.

God, that's depressing. Baseball sucks now.

I'm fine with it.


Once they enact my "no warm ups on the mound, just come in from the pen and begin pitching" rule the time issue will be solved.


I believe they should also implement a rule that the starting pitcher must move somewhere in the field once they are removed and continue to bat until the end of the game.

And also if your starter can't last four goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.

God, that's depressing. Baseball sucks now.

I'm fine with it.


Once they enact my "no warm ups on the mound, just come in from the pen and begin pitching" rule the time issue will be solved.


I believe they should also implement a rule that the starting pitcher must move somewhere in the field once they are removed and continue to bat until the end of the game.

My idea is legit though.

Its like two minutes of waiting every time a new pitcher comes in. You cut that out and you drop 10 minutes from game time.

its really stupid. At most they should get 3 pitches off the mound. But even that is unnecessary.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Are you saying mine isn't legit?

I see why Sox fans dislike you.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.

God, that's depressing. Baseball sucks now.

I'm fine with it.


Once they enact my "no warm ups on the mound, just come in from the pen and begin pitching" rule the time issue will be solved.


I believe they should also implement a rule that the starting pitcher must move somewhere in the field once they are removed and continue to bat until the end of the game.

And also if your starter can't last four goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.

1967
if your starter can't last 9 goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.

1977
if your starter can't last 8 goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.

1987
if your starter can't last 7 goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.

1997
if your starter can't last 6 goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.

2007
if your starter can't last 5 goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.

2017
if your starter can't last 4 goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.



By 2047 we'll be looking at 9 pitchers per game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
It's already happening, dolphin.

Average start goes down every year, eventually it will be around 3 2/3 to 4 innings. We're almost there now.

God, that's depressing. Baseball sucks now.

I'm fine with it.


Once they enact my "no warm ups on the mound, just come in from the pen and begin pitching" rule the time issue will be solved.


I believe they should also implement a rule that the starting pitcher must move somewhere in the field once they are removed and continue to bat until the end of the game.

And also if your starter can't last four goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.

1967
if your starter can't last 9 goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.

1977
if your starter can't last 8 goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.

1987
if your starter can't last 7 goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.

1997
if your starter can't last 6 goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.

2007
if your starter can't last 5 goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.

2017
if your starter can't last 4 goddamn innings you forfeit the game on principle alone.



By 2047 we'll be looking at 9 pitchers per game.

Big reason why your sport is dying. It's a shame you enthusiastically support it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Next year the Cubs will have time to work Maples into a role of late inning flame thrower. Shit I would have thrown him on the roster this postseason.

Adbert Alzolay and Oscar De La Cruz, two more high velocity starting pitchers they have might also find their way into the bullpen. Esp De La Cruz who can't stay healthy. Also keep an eye on Brandon Little (if starting isn't in the cards).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
My sport is not dying. Baseball is better than ever and is currently getting a shot in the arm from the people afraid to let their kids play your sport.


It wont go much beyond the 3-4 inning thing and you'll still have guys that go 6-7 innings, just not every day and every pitcher.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57206
Why is the game tomorrow starting at 8 and not 7?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1759 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 59  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group