It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 5:50 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC
When I was asked to run the Democratic Party after the Russians hacked our emails, I stumbled onto a shocking truth about the Clinton campaign.

By DONNA BRAZILE November 02, 2017

Before I called Bernie Sanders, I lit a candle in my living room and put on some gospel music. I wanted to center myself for what I knew would be an emotional phone call.

I had promised Bernie when I took the helm of the Democratic National Committee after the convention that I would get to the bottom of whether Hillary Clinton’s team had rigged the nomination process, as a cache of emails stolen by Russian hackers and posted online had suggested. I’d had my suspicions from the moment I walked in the door of the DNC a month or so earlier, based on the leaked emails. But who knew if some of them might have been forged? I needed to have solid proof, and so did Bernie.

So I followed the money. My predecessor, Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, had not been the most active chair in fundraising at a time when President Barack Obama’s neglect had left the party in significant debt. As Hillary’s campaign gained momentum, she resolved the party’s debt and put it on a starvation diet. It had become dependent on her campaign for survival, for which she expected to wield control of its operations.

Debbie was not a good manager. She hadn’t been very interested in controlling the party—she let Clinton’s headquarters in Brooklyn do as it desired so she didn’t have to inform the party officers how bad the situation was. How much control Brooklyn had and for how long was still something I had been trying to uncover for the last few weeks.

By September 7, the day I called Bernie, I had found my proof and it broke my heart.

***

The Saturday morning after the convention in July, I called Gary Gensler, the chief financial officer of Hillary’s campaign. He wasted no words. He told me the Democratic Party was broke and $2 million in debt.

“What?” I screamed. “I am an officer of the party and they’ve been telling us everything is fine and they were raising money with no problems.”

That wasn’t true, he said. Officials from Hillary’s campaign had taken a look at the DNC’s books. Obama left the party $24 million in debt—$15 million in bank debt and more than $8 million owed to vendors after the 2012 campaign and had been paying that off very slowly. Obama’s campaign was not scheduled to pay it off until 2016. Hillary for America (the campaign) and the Hillary Victory Fund (its joint fundraising vehicle with the DNC) had taken care of 80 percent of the remaining debt in 2016, about $10 million, and had placed the party on an allowance.

If I didn’t know about this, I assumed that none of the other officers knew about it, either. That was just Debbie’s way. In my experience she didn’t come to the officers of the DNC for advice and counsel. She seemed to make decisions on her own and let us know at the last minute what she had decided, as she had done when she told us about the hacking only minutes before the Washington Post broke the news.

The Friday Cover
Sign up for POLITICO Magazine’s email of the week’s best, delivered to your inbox every Friday morning.
Email
Your email…
Sign Up
By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.
On the phone Gary told me the DNC had needed a $2 million loan, which the campaign had arranged.

“No! That can’t be true!” I said. “The party cannot take out a loan without the unanimous agreement of all of the officers.”

“Gary, how did they do this without me knowing?” I asked. “I don’t know how Debbie relates to the officers,” Gary said. He described the party as fully under the control of Hillary’s campaign, which seemed to confirm the suspicions of the Bernie camp. The campaign had the DNC on life support, giving it money every month to meet its basic expenses, while the campaign was using the party as a fund-raising clearing house. Under FEC law, an individual can contribute a maximum of $2,700 directly to a presidential campaign. But the limits are much higher for contributions to state parties and a party’s national committee.

Individuals who had maxed out their $2,700 contribution limit to the campaign could write an additional check for $353,400 to the Hillary Victory Fund—that figure represented $10,000 to each of the thirty-two states’ parties who were part of the Victory Fund agreement—$320,000—and $33,400 to the DNC. The money would be deposited in the states first, and transferred to the DNC shortly after that. Money in the battleground states usually stayed in that state, but all the other states funneled that money directly to the DNC, which quickly transferred the money to Brooklyn.

“Wait,” I said. “That victory fund was supposed to be for whoever was the nominee, and the state party races. You’re telling me that Hillary has been controlling it since before she got the nomination?”

Gary said the campaign had to do it or the party would collapse.

“That was the deal that Robby struck with Debbie,” he explained, referring to campaign manager Robby Mook. “It was to sustain the DNC. We sent the party nearly $20 million from September until the convention, and more to prepare for the election.”

Pelosi-Lede-ByPiotrLesniak.jpg
THE POLITICO MAG PROFILE
Nancy Pelosi Has Trump Right Where She Wants Him
By EDWARD-ISAAC DOVERE
“What’s the burn rate, Gary?” I asked. “How much money do we need every month to fund the party?”

The burn rate was $3.5 million to $4 million a month, he said.

I gasped. I had a pretty good sense of the DNC’s operations after having served as interim chair five years earlier. Back then the monthly expenses were half that. What had happened? The party chair usually shrinks the staff between presidential election campaigns, but Debbie had chosen not to do that. She had stuck lots of consultants on the DNC payroll, and Obama’s consultants were being financed by the DNC, too.

When we hung up, I was livid. Not at Gary, but at this mess I had inherited. I knew that Debbie had outsourced a lot of the management of the party and had not been the greatest at fundraising. I would not be that kind of chair, even if I was only an interim chair. Did they think I would just be a surrogate for them, get on the road and rouse up the crowds? I was going to manage this party the best I could and try to make it better, even if Brooklyn did not like this. It would be weeks before I would fully understand the financial shenanigans that were keeping the party on life support.

***

Hacks.jpg New Window
Hachette Book Group
Right around the time of the convention, the leaked emails revealed Hillary’s campaign was grabbing money from the state parties for its own purposes, leaving the states with very little to support down-ballot races. A Politico story published on May 2, 2016, described the big fund-raising vehicle she had launched through the states the summer before, quoting a vow she had made to rebuild “the party from the ground up … when our state parties are strong, we win. That’s what will happen.”

Yet the states kept less than half of 1 percent of the $82 million they had amassed from the extravagant fund-raisers Hillary’s campaign was holding, just as Gary had described to me when he and I talked in August. When the Politico story described this arrangement as “essentially … money laundering” for the Clinton campaign, Hillary’s people were outraged at being accused of doing something shady. Bernie’s people were angry for their own reasons, saying this was part of a calculated strategy to throw the nomination to Hillary.

I wanted to believe Hillary, who made campaign finance reform part of her platform, but I had made this pledge to Bernie and did not want to disappoint him. I kept asking the party lawyers and the DNC staff to show me the agreements that the party had made for sharing the money they raised, but there was a lot of shuffling of feet and looking the other way.

When I got back from a vacation in Martha’s Vineyard, I at last found the document that described it all: the Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund, and Hillary for America.

The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.

I had been wondering why it was that I couldn’t write a press release without passing it by Brooklyn. Well, here was the answer.

BetsyDeVos-Lede-ByJesseDittmar.jpg
THE POLITICO MAG PROFILE
The Education of Betsy DeVos
By TIM ALBERTA
When the party chooses the nominee, the custom is that the candidate’s team starts to exercise more control over the party. If the party has an incumbent candidate, as was the case with Clinton in 1996 or Obama in 2012, this kind of arrangement is seamless because the party already is under the control of the president. When you have an open contest without an incumbent and competitive primaries, the party comes under the candidate’s control only after the nominee is certain. When I was manager of Gore’s campaign in 2000, we started inserting our people into the DNC in June. This victory fund agreement, however, had been signed in August 2015, just four months after Hillary announced her candidacy and nearly a year before she officially had the nomination.

I had tried to search out any other evidence of internal corruption that would show that the DNC was rigging the system to throw the primary to Hillary, but I could not find any in party affairs or among the staff. I had gone department by department, investigating individual conduct for evidence of skewed decisions, and I was happy to see that I had found none. Then I found this agreement.

The funding arrangement with HFA and the victory fund agreement was not illegal, but it sure looked unethical. If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity.

***

I had to keep my promise to Bernie. I was in agony as I dialed him. Keeping this secret was against everything that I stood for, all that I valued as a woman and as a public servant.

“Hello, senator. I’ve completed my review of the DNC and I did find the cancer,” I said. “But I will not kill the patient.”

I discussed the fundraising agreement that each of the candidates had signed. Bernie was familiar with it, but he and his staff ignored it. They had their own way of raising money through small donations. I described how Hillary’s campaign had taken it another step.

171031offmessagepreet.jpg
OFF MESSAGE
Preet Bharara Reads Bob Mueller’s Tea Leaves
By EDWARD-ISAAC DOVERE
I told Bernie I had found Hillary’s Joint Fundraising Agreement. I explained that the cancer was that she had exerted this control of the party long before she became its nominee. Had I known this, I never would have accepted the interim chair position, but here we were with only weeks before the election.

Bernie took this stoically. He did not yell or express outrage. Instead he asked me what I thought Hillary’s chances were. The polls were unanimous in her winning but what, he wanted to know, was my own assessment?

I had to be frank with him. I did not trust the polls, I said. I told him I had visited states around the country and I found a lack of enthusiasm for her everywhere. I was concerned about the Obama coalition and about millennials.

I urged Bernie to work as hard as he could to bring his supporters into the fold with Hillary, and to campaign with all the heart and hope he could muster. He might find some of her positions too centrist, and her coziness with the financial elites distasteful, but he knew and I knew that the alternative was a person who would put the very future of the country in peril. I knew he heard me. I knew he agreed with me, but I never in my life had felt so tiny and powerless as I did making that call.

When I hung up the call to Bernie, I started to cry, not out of guilt, but out of anger. We would go forward. We had to.


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
Well done Hillary!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
But what about Trump?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
But what about Trump?

you're a better poster than what you've been recently. quit phoning it in.

we need you


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
I wonder if she momentarily considered composing this treacherous tale in a considerably less self-indulgent manner.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
and people wonder why voter turnout is incredibly low.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33242
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
One thing that bothers me about politicians is that they are in control of the country's finances but can't manage things like this. And this is not a partisan crack- I had these concerns when the shit hit the fan about Marco Rubio and his financial issues. Ted Cruz also had questions in this regard.

I know most of you have a disdain for the way us accounting folk view the world, but this is why we are so focused on economics and cost discipline. This came up yesterday in our minimum wage discussion and comes to the forefront when we talk about school funding and balanced budgets.

The people running our country do not understand how to make tough financial decisions.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Don Tiny wrote:
I wonder if she momentarily considered composing this treacherous tale in a considerably less self-indulgent manner.

Where's the fun in that?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Don Tiny wrote:
I wonder if she momentarily considered composing this treacherous tale in a considerably less self-indulgent manner.


Probably not.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:53 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Quote:
I had tried to search out any other evidence of internal corruption that would show that the DNC was rigging the system to throw the primary to Hillary, but I could not find any in party affairs or among the staff.


Apparently she didn't have access to a mirror during her "investigation". Brazile infamously gave Clinton an unfair advantage in one of the Town Hall "debates" by sending her campaign the final list of questions prior to the event.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
But what about Trump?

you're a better poster than what you've been recently. quit phoning it in.

we need you


:?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82995
Donna Brazille is the architect of two losses in two absolutely fall down campaigns and yet she is still used as an expert and consultant.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15198
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
not only is that entire story depressing, it's written by an egotistical 2 year old.

Campaign finance reform. Please.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:26 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80514
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Like rats leaving a sinking ship. If Hillary had won, do you think Brazile would have written that? Or would she be in a cabinet position?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Donna Brazille?!

Hahahahahaha!

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Funny how she leaves out the fact she fed Hillary debate questions :lol:

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 1019
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Funny how she leaves out the fact she fed Hillary debate questions :lol:

And that Bernie is not a "Democrat".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56745
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
You're right: despite caucusing with the Democrats for his entire congressional career, he is not a real Democrat. He's definitely the kind of person who sort of looks like Democrats but doesn't really share the same beliefs as Democrats and infiltrates the society of Democrats to make money off the Democrats and then maybe drink the blood of baby Democrats. I think I'm getting this right.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Curious Hair wrote:
You're right: despite caucusing with the Democrats for his entire congressional career, he is not a real Democrat. He's definitely the kind of person who sort of looks like Democrats but doesn't really share the same beliefs as Democrats and infiltrates the society of Democrats to make money off the Democrats and then maybe drink the blood of baby Democrats. I think I'm getting this right.


Yeah; he’s an actual Liberal, not a Democrat.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 1019
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
Curious Hair wrote:
You're right: despite caucusing with the Democrats for his entire congressional career, he is not a real Democrat. He's definitely the kind of person who sort of looks like Democrats but doesn't really share the same beliefs as Democrats and infiltrates the society of Democrats to make money off the Democrats and then maybe drink the blood of baby Democrats. I think I'm getting this right.


How much money did he raise for the DNC? And people are shocked the DNC was, allegedly, tilting the playing field? I am shocked there is gambling in Casablanca.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82995
You wouldn't have to slant the article at all to title it: Hillary Saves Democratic Party

Brazille does her best Claude Raines impersonation saying "I'm shocked, shocked that fundraising drives elections." Meanwhile, Hillary is the only thing preventing the DNC from becoming insolvent in the middle of a presidential year.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
Curious Hair wrote:
You're right: despite caucusing with the Democrats for his entire congressional career, he is not a real Democrat. He's definitely the kind of person who sort of looks like Democrats but doesn't really share the same beliefs as Democrats and infiltrates the society of Democrats to make money off the Democrats and then maybe drink the blood of baby Democrats. I think I'm getting this right.

Name the number of elections he ran for as a Democrat.

The most hilarious thing is his wikipedia page, which I'm assuming was done by his people has this:

Code:
Political party   Independent (1979–2015; 2016–present)
Other political
affiliations   Liberty Union (1971–1977)
Democratic (2015–2016)


Yeah, he was a Democrat! :lol: He was so much of a Democrat that as soon as the election was over he removed Democrat from his party affiliation!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56745
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
You wouldn't have to slant the article at all to title it: Hillary Saves Democratic Party

Brazille does her best Claude Raines impersonation saying "I'm shocked, shocked that fundraising drives elections." Meanwhile, Hillary is the only thing preventing the DNC from becoming insolvent in the middle of a presidential year.

Surprised to see you prostrating yourself before a Protestant from the suburbs like this.

I think the upshot here is that Hillary Clinton has lost so much influence in the Democratic Party that even a foot soldier like Donna Brazile will sell her out for a tell-all book.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56745
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Image
Imagine reaching the same conclusion as board-certified dipshit Candice Aiston

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Curious Hair wrote:
Image
Imagine reaching the same conclusion as board-certified dipshit Candice Aiston


A valid conclusion indeed!

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56745
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
So if I'm following it, basically what happened here is that Obama was too cool to raise money for the DNC, then Debbie Wasserman Schultz wasted all their money on think tanks and Hamilton tickets, leaving the party broke. Hillary, who had phat staxx from Goldman Sachs and Harvey Weinstein, loans the DNC money in exchange for turning the DNC into essentially a captured shop of the Hillary campaign. Then Bernie Sanders does better than expected to begin the primary and the campaign has to use the bought-and-paid-for DNC to influence the primary against Bernie. Then after all that, she still loses to an idiot because everyone fucking hates her so much. Cool cool.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
I'd read that she was bankrolling the party. If she truly had to bail them out because of the missteps of Obama then the focus should be on Obama. It won't however.

Begs the question of whether she should have had the right to control the DNC. I personally don't believe that she should have control but there is definitely an argument to be made. In the immortal words of the not so late Chet Coppock "your dime your dance floor".

The 2nd part of this relates to Sanders. The DNC and the Dems do not owe Bernie Sanders a damn thing. He isn't a Democrat and uses every opportunity (save for when he chooses to run for for Pres) to let the party know about it. He is an opportunist that sought to use the party to advance his fledging Presidential campaign. They didn't allow him to do it so now he and his supporters are all pissy about it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56745
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Well, I'm just glad that at the end of the day, the Democratic Party, which I root for like a sports team, was saved. Everything is okay now.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82995
Curious Hair wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
You wouldn't have to slant the article at all to title it: Hillary Saves Democratic Party

Brazille does her best Claude Raines impersonation saying "I'm shocked, shocked that fundraising drives elections." Meanwhile, Hillary is the only thing preventing the DNC from becoming insolvent in the middle of a presidential year.

Surprised to see you prostrating yourself before a Protestant from the suburbs like this.

I think the upshot here is that Hillary Clinton has lost so much influence in the Democratic Party that even a foot soldier like Donna Brazile will sell her out for a tell-all book.



There is no prostration. The DNC would not have been able to run a campaign, save for Clinton's fundraising. That doesn't seem to be in question. If Bernie was the candidate, even if they won the presidency, they would have needed a Hillary type white knight (and really, is there anyone else out there like that besides Bill) to get them out of tens of millions in debt.

I wouldn't say they had to make a deal with the devil in Clinton because they have essentially been the face of the DNC for 25 years.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Curious Hair wrote:
So if I'm following it, basically what happened here is that Obama was too cool to raise money for the DNC, then Debbie Wasserman Schultz wasted all their money on think tanks and Hamilton tickets, leaving the party broke. Hillary, who had phat staxx from Goldman Sachs and Harvey Weinstein, loans the DNC money in exchange for turning the DNC into essentially a captured shop of the Hillary campaign. Then Bernie Sanders does better than expected to begin the primary and the campaign has to use the bought-and-paid-for DNC to influence the primary against Bernie. Then after all that, she still loses to an idiot because everyone fucking hates her so much. Cool cool.


Thanks for the summary.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group