It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 6:30 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82995
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
You don't need 21st century glasses to see that Robert E. Lee took up arms against his own country.

Fuck General Lee and any of his supporters, but this is a god awful reason to dislike the man. John Brown took up arms against his own country and he's one of the best Americans who ever lived.

a-fucking-men. This country needs more John Browns.


Yep. Religious guys who hear voices calling them are in short supply.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
good dolphin wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
You don't need 21st century glasses to see that Robert E. Lee took up arms against his own country.

Fuck General Lee and any of his supporters, but this is a god awful reason to dislike the man. John Brown took up arms against his own country and he's one of the best Americans who ever lived.

a-fucking-men. This country needs more John Browns.


Yep. Religious guys who hear voices calling them are in short supply.

I'll take a wacko fighting a just cause over a perfectly sane man allowing evil to prevail.

He was a failure at everything in life, but I cannot condemn the man. In fact, he truly was the greatest American ever. In fact, the only American living today who can compare to John Brown's courageous acts would be Edward Snowden. Funny thing how both are considered to be "traitors" by the cocksuckers in government.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 38038
Location: ...
years ago on this board i said john brown did more to end slavery than lincoln did. i think irish boy told me "in today's world, john brown would be labeled a terrorist".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
I hate Libertarians again.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
W_Z wrote:
years ago on this board i said john brown did more to end slavery than lincoln did. i think irish boy told me "in today's world, john brown would be labeled a terrorist".


He would, by Rick

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
W_Z wrote:
years ago on this board i said john brown did more to end slavery than lincoln did. i think irish boy told me "in today's world, john brown would be labeled a terrorist".

Both statements are factually correct.

Without John Brown, there is no Civil War (or if there is it is decades later)

He would also certainly be labeled a terrorist and traitor.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
W_Z wrote:
years ago on this board i said john brown did more to end slavery than lincoln did. i think irish boy told me "in today's world, john brown would be labeled a terrorist".


He would, by Rick
Possibly, but ultimately terrorists and traitors need to be judged by the rightfullness of their cause and the actions they took and if they were justified.

Snowden would be a hero if he hadn't run to Russia to aid them. Instead, his legacy is that he did a good thing and then went to a much worse country for rights and has aided them for years.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
W_Z wrote:
years ago on this board i said john brown did more to end slavery than lincoln did. i think irish boy told me "in today's world, john brown would be labeled a terrorist".


He would, by Rick
Possibly, but ultimately terrorists and traitors need to be judged by the rightfullness of their cause and the actions they took and if they were justified.

Snowden would be a hero if he hadn't run to Russia to aid them. Instead, his legacy is that he did a good thing and then went to a much worse country for rights and has aided them for years.

Russia was not his first choice. He ran to HK and intended to go elsewhere, but the US pretty much blocked his entry to most countries. Any friendly government made it clear they would turn him over. The US forced him to flee to Russia.

Also, while in Russia he has been very critical of Putin. He's no fucking stooge like Assange. He has said things about Putin that would get a Russian locked in prison until he disappeared. I guess because of his status, he is safe (for now)

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:22 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80514
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
So if the federal government in D.C. was supporting a position that you saw as taking away a woman's rights, you would support that government? You're a patriot, Rick! But I'm also guessing you wouldn't think that the brigade led by Kamala Harris that was fighting to keep their rights to their bodies was "treasonous".
You keep on asking and my position is the same. I don't feel the issue is important enough one way or another to take up arms against my country over it. We have processes that don't involve civil war to figure these things out. Use those.

But, if I was willing to fight our own government over it, then I would understand that 150 years later people may judge me poorly for doing it and consider me a traitor if my reasons for doing so were to fight for what is now the "wrong side of history".



I understand that you are a pacifist. But there is a war going on. You may not take up arms, but you have to pick a side.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Russia was not his first choice. He ran to HK and intended to go elsewhere, but the US pretty much blocked his entry to most countries. Any friendly government made it clear they would turn him over. The US forced him to flee to Russia.
Turning himself in would have been preferable if he truly had the altruistic goals he claimed. That would have been the trial of the decade. I'm guessing he would have been pardoned eventually even if he lost.

Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Also, while in Russia he has been very critical of Putin. He's no fucking stooge like Assange. He has said things about Putin that would get a Russian locked in prison until he disappeared. I guess because of his status, he is safe (for now)
There is little doubt that he has shared everything he knows with them, and has used his technical knowledge to aid Russia.

He was a whistleblower. We tend to give whistleblowers a lot of leeway.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I understand that you are a pacifist. But there is a war going on. You may not take up arms, but you have to pick a side.
At least in terms of a civil war over abortion, I have made it clear what side I would take regardless of what side my home state would be on.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80514
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I understand that you are a pacifist. But there is a war going on. You may not take up arms, but you have to pick a side.
At least in terms of a civil war over abortion, I have made it clear what side I would take regardless of what side my home state would be on.


Yes, whichever side the feds in D.C. supported. A most principled stand indeed!

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Russia was not his first choice. He ran to HK and intended to go elsewhere, but the US pretty much blocked his entry to most countries. Any friendly government made it clear they would turn him over. The US forced him to flee to Russia.
Turning himself in would have been preferable if he truly had the altruistic goals he claimed. That would have been the trial of the decade. I'm guessing he would have been pardoned eventually even if he lost.

Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Also, while in Russia he has been very critical of Putin. He's no fucking stooge like Assange. He has said things about Putin that would get a Russian locked in prison until he disappeared. I guess because of his status, he is safe (for now)
There is little doubt that he has shared everything he knows with them, and has used his technical knowledge to aid Russia.

He was a whistleblower. We tend to give whistleblowers a lot of leeway.

I honestly don't blame him one bit for doing what he did. If this country truly had avenues for whistleblowers to out blatant violations of constitutional rights, he wouldn't have had to run to Glenn Greenwald and do what he did.

Once again, he tried to flee to a neutral country, but the US exerted diplomatic pressure to stop that. We in effect drove him into Russia's arms and if he had to give information to save his life, then I can't blame him. We drove him there and we deserve the repercussions of that. The NSA and CIA deserve whatever damage was done to them as a result of this. I say that wholeheartedly.

Also, given the nature of the details he exposed, I highly doubt he would receive a publicly open trial. Edward Snowden is the greatest hero of our time. If this generation doesn't see it, then perhaps future ones will.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I understand that you are a pacifist. But there is a war going on. You may not take up arms, but you have to pick a side.
At least in terms of a civil war over abortion, I have made it clear what side I would take regardless of what side my home state would be on.


Yes, whichever side the feds in D.C. supported. A most principled stand indeed!
It is more than you give me credit for. We are a country with a process that doesn't involve violence to come up with these things. Even if I disagree with the current law it needs to be a very high bar to take up arms against your country over it.

I don't believe it is right for anti-abortion protesters to bomb abortion clinics either. I fully support their rights to try and work politically to change the law. I view this as a more extreme version of that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I understand that you are a pacifist. But there is a war going on. You may not take up arms, but you have to pick a side.
At least in terms of a civil war over abortion, I have made it clear what side I would take regardless of what side my home state would be on.


Yes, whichever side the feds in D.C. supported. A most principled stand indeed!
It is more than you give me credit for. We are a country with a process that doesn't involve violence to come up with these things. Even if I disagree with the current law it needs to be a very high bar to take up arms against your country over it.

I don't believe it is right for anti-abortion protesters to bomb abortion clinics either. I fully support their rights to try and work politically to change the law. I view this as a more extreme version of that.

Isn't that more or less what Shelby Foote was saying in the Civil War documentary? (and this was also what Gen Kelly was parroting. He basically repeated what Foote said word for word in the Ken Burns doc)

For the record, Burns probably gave Foote a bit too much of a voice in that documentary.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Last edited by Ogie Oglethorpe on Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I honestly don't blame him one bit for doing what he did. If this country truly had avenues for whistleblowers to out blatant violations of constitutional rights, he wouldn't have had to run to Glenn Greenwald and do what he did.

Once again, he tried to flee to a neutral country, but the US exerted diplomatic pressure to stop that. We in effect drove him into Russia's arms and if he had to give information to save his life, then I can't blame him. We drove him there and we deserve the repercussions of that. The NSA and CIA deserve whatever damage was done to them as a result of this. I say that wholeheartedly.
Save his life? He should have walked into a reporters office in Manhattan the moment it was released.

I believe that much of his rationale for doing this was more than just wanting to expose government issues. I actually agree his initial actions were important but he also has turned himself into an enemy combatant by cozying up with a country that is UNDENIABLY worse than we are at this kind of stuff.

Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Also, given the nature of the details he exposed, I highly doubt he would receive a publicly open trial. Edward Snowden is the greatest hero of our time. If this generation doesn't see it, then perhaps future ones will.
Of course he would. It's ludicrous to think that the United States could have killed him or locked him away and everyone would just forget.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:38 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80514
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I understand that you are a pacifist. But there is a war going on. You may not take up arms, but you have to pick a side.
At least in terms of a civil war over abortion, I have made it clear what side I would take regardless of what side my home state would be on.


Yes, whichever side the feds in D.C. supported. A most principled stand indeed!
It is more than you give me credit for. We are a country with a process that doesn't involve violence to come up with these things. Even if I disagree with the current law it needs to be a very high bar to take up arms against your country over it.

I don't believe it is right for anti-abortion protesters to bomb abortion clinics either. I fully support their rights to try and work politically to change the law. I view this as a more extreme version of that.



So we're back to the joke leash made. Slavery was the law. Abolitionists were extremists who should have been working politically to change the law.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I honestly don't blame him one bit for doing what he did. If this country truly had avenues for whistleblowers to out blatant violations of constitutional rights, he wouldn't have had to run to Glenn Greenwald and do what he did.

Once again, he tried to flee to a neutral country, but the US exerted diplomatic pressure to stop that. We in effect drove him into Russia's arms and if he had to give information to save his life, then I can't blame him. We drove him there and we deserve the repercussions of that. The NSA and CIA deserve whatever damage was done to them as a result of this. I say that wholeheartedly.
Save his life? He should have walked into a reporters office in Manhattan the moment it was released.

I believe that much of his rationale for doing this was more than just wanting to expose government issues. I actually agree his initial actions were important but he also has turned himself into an enemy combatant by cozying up with a country that is UNDENIABLY worse than we are at this kind of stuff.

Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Also, given the nature of the details he exposed, I highly doubt he would receive a publicly open trial. Edward Snowden is the greatest hero of our time. If this generation doesn't see it, then perhaps future ones will.
Of course he would. It's ludicrous to think that the United States could have killed him or locked him away and everyone would just forget.

The reporter he was giving the info to was in Brazil (American journalist, but he has opted to live as an expat)

Once again, him fleeing to Russia does not happen if we don't block his entry to a neutral country. We drove him into their arms and once again we deserve whatever repercussions come from that.

As for Snowden, I doubt he would receive a trial from the Holder justice department, which is the same one which drew up a legal defense to justify the use of drones to kill an American on US soil. Snowden did what he had to and he will one day be regarded as a hero.

Once again, if we don't exert pressure on every nation that is semi-friendly to us, he doesn't go to Russia. That was probably his last choice to go.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
So we're back to the joke leash made. Slavery was the law. Abolitionists were extremists who should have been working politically to change the law.
Today, I would certainly feel that military action to stop slavery would be justified. I'm going to say that as a Northerner I would have felt the same way in the Civil War era but as you have pointed out I have no way of knowing that for certain.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The reporter he was giving the info to was in Brazil (American journalist, but he has opted to live as an expat)

Once again, him fleeing to Russia does not happen if we don't block his entry to a neutral country. We drove him into their arms and once again we deserve whatever repercussions come from that.

As for Snowden, I doubt he would receive a trial from the Holder justice department, which is the same one which drew up a legal defense to justify the use of drones to kill an American on US soil. Snowden did what he had to and he will one day be regarded as a hero.

Once again, if we don't exert pressure on every nation that is semi-friendly to us, he doesn't go to Russia. That was probably his last choice to go.
What is the government going to do? Would they have done a drone strike on the New York Times or CNN headquarters?

Chelsea Manning got a fair trial and then got pardoned. He had that option. It's not always easy to be a hero and a patriot. It's not heroic or a patriot to show the American public something important to know and then go to a place that is even worse for it and aid them. If the goal was to make the world a better place then you don't aid Russia.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:38 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80514
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
So we're back to the joke leash made. Slavery was the law. Abolitionists were extremists who should have been working politically to change the law.
Today, I would certainly feel that military action to stop slavery would be justified. I'm going to say that as a Northerner I would have felt the same way in the Civil War era but as you have pointed out I have no way of knowing that for certain.


Right, but that's informed by your personal values and those values are informed by the time in which you live. A future Boilermaker Rick might say, "I would certainly feel that military action to stop abortion would be justified." And a past Boilermaker Rick may have said, "Well, I think slavery is bad but I visited Uncle Beauregard's plantation when I was a teenager and he treated his slaves well. I don't want to go to war about it. I'm too busy writing letters to spanky and Juice's Lecture Notes telling them how stupid they are."

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:45 pm
Posts: 70
pizza_Place: Taylor St
hnd wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There is only one argument against Lee and that is that he fought to perpetuate slavery.


i believe Robert E. Lee himself said both before and after the war that he found slavery abhorrent, but like many others of the time felt it a necessary institution. I have read quotes from him where he stated prior to the war that he felt liberation of the slaves was a worthwhile objective but felt the call to arms to stand with Virginia of the ultimate importance.


he thought that on the other side, african americans would be a stronger better people because of it. and he did what he could after it through schools and all sorts of other avenues to try and make that a reality.


He rounded up free slaves in the north and sold them into slavery in the south during the war. After the war he didn't think black people were smart enough to vote which was just a way of saying he didn't want them voting for republicans.

Lee used to get off on seeing his slaves tortured by overseers. You're a nitwit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
So we're back to the joke leash made. Slavery was the law. Abolitionists were extremists who should have been working politically to change the law.
Today, I would certainly feel that military action to stop slavery would be justified. I'm going to say that as a Northerner I would have felt the same way in the Civil War era but as you have pointed out I have no way of knowing that for certain.


Right, but that's informed by your personal values and those values are informed by the time in which you live. A future Boilermaker Rick might say, "I would certainly feel that military action to stop abortion would be justified." And a past Boilermaker Rick may have said, "Well, I think slavery is bad but I visited Uncle Beauregard's plantation when I was a teenager and he treated his slaves well. I don't want to go to war about it. I'm too busy writing letters to spanky and Juice's Lecture Notes telling them how stupid they are."
The difference being that I'm not choosing to fight against my own country for or against it. There is a big difference between thinking slavery was ok, and thinking slavery was so acceptable you would lead an army against your own country to try and keep it going. If you lead an army against the United States of America you better be completely sure that you are on "the right side of history" or you deserve to be viewed poorly.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38943
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
So we're back to the joke leash made. Slavery was the law. Abolitionists were extremists who should have been working politically to change the law.
Today, I would certainly feel that military action to stop slavery would be justified. I'm going to say that as a Northerner I would have felt the same way in the Civil War era but as you have pointed out I have no way of knowing that for certain.


Right, but that's informed by your personal values and those values are informed by the time in which you live. A future Boilermaker Rick might say, "I would certainly feel that military action to stop abortion would be justified." And a past Boilermaker Rick may have said, "Well, I think slavery is bad but I visited Uncle Beauregard's plantation when I was a teenager and he treated his slaves well. I don't want to go to war about it. I'm too busy writing letters to spanky and Juice's Lecture Notes telling them how stupid they are."

:lol: :lol:

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 12:26 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80514
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
So we're back to the joke leash made. Slavery was the law. Abolitionists were extremists who should have been working politically to change the law.
Today, I would certainly feel that military action to stop slavery would be justified. I'm going to say that as a Northerner I would have felt the same way in the Civil War era but as you have pointed out I have no way of knowing that for certain.


Right, but that's informed by your personal values and those values are informed by the time in which you live. A future Boilermaker Rick might say, "I would certainly feel that military action to stop abortion would be justified." And a past Boilermaker Rick may have said, "Well, I think slavery is bad but I visited Uncle Beauregard's plantation when I was a teenager and he treated his slaves well. I don't want to go to war about it. I'm too busy writing letters to spanky and Juice's Lecture Notes telling them how stupid they are."
The difference being that I'm not choosing to fight against my own country for or against it. There is a big difference between thinking slavery was ok, and thinking slavery was so acceptable you would lead an army against your own country to try and keep it going. If you lead an army against the United States of America you better be completely sure that you are on "the right side of history" or you deserve to be viewed poorly.


Again, the concept of the U.S. as a country/nation in 1860 was far different than it is today. This isn't a perfect analogy, but it's like the way we see MLB today as just "baseball", a single entity. My grandfather understood MLB to be separate leagues that really had nothing to do with each other except that they played a series each year to determine a champion.

And I'm not sure what the "right side of history" means from a moral standpoint. If the South had won the war, it wouldn't make slavery less terrible.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33242
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
About half the country was traitors, geographically. So is it any surprise that the half that was will celebrate the folks that led the rebellion?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
You don't need 21st century glasses to see that Robert E. Lee took up arms against his own country.

Fuck General Lee and any of his supporters, but this is a god awful reason to dislike the man. John Brown took up arms against his own country and he's one of the best Americans who ever lived.


John Brown also had no problem conceptualizing what was moral and immoral. What is humane and inhumane transcends eras. There isn't an era which makes it understandable.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:

He was a whistleblower. We tend to give whistleblowers a lot of leeway.

What? No we don't. The Obama administration had a horrendous record when it comes to not prosecuting whistleblowers.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:

He was a whistleblower. We tend to give whistleblowers a lot of leeway.

What? No we don't. The Obama administration had a horrendous record when it comes to not prosecuting whistleblowers.
Oh, he definitely would have faced a trial. That's the whole point. Whether he was convicted, and whether he was pardoned is far more important especially when the alternative is going to Russia and aiding them in any way you can to be able to stay.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Robert E Lee
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:

He was a whistleblower. We tend to give whistleblowers a lot of leeway.

What? No we don't. The Obama administration had a horrendous record when it comes to not prosecuting whistleblowers.
Oh, he definitely would have faced a trial. That's the whole point. Whether he was convicted, and whether he was pardoned is far more important especially when the alternative is going to Russia and aiding them in any way you can to be able to stay.

The Obama administration also had a terrible record with pardoning whistleblowers. Something tells me Trump definitely wouldn't have pardoned him. And then who knows how far into the future it would be. If you want to criticize him, fine, but you seem to be ignoring the federal government is more to blame than he is for his actions. They created a situation where a Snowden was inevitable, and also didn't have proper channels in place for whistleblowers to safely come forward.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group