It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 6:14 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 568 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 19  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7084
badrogue17 wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Mike wants to know if you read an article from the other side this weekend so that you were prepared today.


Nope I figure let's wing it.

1. Every gun must be registered. I get the reasons against this, but you have to register your car. Register your guns too.

2. Any person caught with a gun not registered within 30 days or purchase gets 5 years in jail for first offense. 20 for second.

3. After sale modification kits are illegal. Anyone caught with one or attempting to buy or sell one gets 10 years in jail for first offense. 30 for second.

4. Any person caught with an illegal firearm gets 15 years in jail for the first offense. 40 for the second.

5. Anyone using a firearm in the commitment of a crime gets 20 years in jail for the first offense. Life for the second.

If we're serious, let's get serious.

Let's go.

And what happens when some activist decides that these laws ( if enacted) result in incarcerating a disproportionate number of young black men for 20/ 40 years minimum ?


Then the same people that elected these politicians that passed these laws, would rally at the local Starbucks and post on Facebook that they are sorry for being white, make a donation to BLM and sit during the national anthem, while watching the NFL on their 90" LCD in their million dollar house, while their wife is shopping on Amazon for the matching flower decoration to her living room décor.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
As far as gun owners seeking these safeties that makes no sense. If the majority of gun owners are fine with their present safety measures why would they work hard for the manufacturers to change that?
Which is why there needs to be some sort of government mandate for it in order to get the technology to the place it needs to be. You were acting like this was a product that barely existed because you only knew of one example of it.

pittmike wrote:
Lastly, the hacking I worry about is not an owner hacking their own gun. It would be a thief etc. Your sentence reads to me like the owner is still liable after a reported theft.
They would have to report it stolen immediately, and it would be more effective in stopping people from buying other people guns and for people hacking it themselves and then letting another person take it. If it was truly stolen then they would be required to report it immediately in order to protect themselves.

It's not a complete solution but it would make things safer.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Regardless of black or white I feel that people (even those adamantly anti gun) will not feel good about wrecking lives for that many years over what may be a one time offense. Most feel people can be rehabilitated outside of rapists and murderers.

I disagree.

Everyone seems fine with DUI laws that can ruin lives for many years.


Getting a single DUI is not life changing for everyone. Getting caught with a dirty gun once would take away your life, literally.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
I have a biometric fingerprint safe. I'm just thankful that it has a backup combonation lock as some days it seams as if the finger print doesn't want to work. I'm sure it is probably a function of having oil on my hands from working that isn't a 100% cleaned even after washing up.


This is probably an argument against with not opening reliably. I was talking about (and I assume Rick was) fingerprint check actually right on the gun. Functionality and reliability were issues I read about there.



It was one of the complaints years ago when they were talking about it. Technology changes and things get better. I'm not sure what level of reliability would be needed but it has to be pretty much fool proof. One of the other idea was a bracelet worn that would have to pair someone with gun. I don't follow this stuff much anymore.
Reliability is up to the gun manufacturers. If they can't make a gun that you can trust to shoot when you need it then find another one. I can promise you that they would get the reliability so near 100% that it wouldn't be a question.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
There are like 300MM guns already out there. What is going to happen to those?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Regardless of black or white I feel that people (even those adamantly anti gun) will not feel good about wrecking lives for that many years over what may be a one time offense. Most feel people can be rehabilitated outside of rapists and murderers.

I disagree.

Everyone seems fine with DUI laws that can ruin lives for many years.


Getting a single DUI is not life changing for everyone. Getting caught with a dirty gun once would take away your life, literally.

I would say not being able to drive a car for any significant amount of time is life changing for most adults.

But is this the litmus test we want for laws? Could really screw someone over so maybe not?

In this scenario, I think it would be very easy to avoid prosecution.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Hatchetman wrote:
There are like 300MM guns already out there. What is going to happen to those?

Yea, the argument is always on future sales but there are way too many guns in existence right now. We'd need to have an aggressive buy back program.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Regardless of black or white I feel that people (even those adamantly anti gun) will not feel good about wrecking lives for that many years over what may be a one time offense. Most feel people can be rehabilitated outside of rapists and murderers.

I disagree.

Everyone seems fine with DUI laws that can ruin lives for many years.


Getting a single DUI is not life changing for everyone. Getting caught with a dirty gun once would take away your life, literally.

It's incredibly easy to avoid getting caught with a dirty gun. You have your choice of hundreds of reputable places to buy a gun.

Personal responsibility matters until it doesn't, eh?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7939
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
I have a biometric fingerprint safe. I'm just thankful that it has a backup combonation lock as some days it seams as if the finger print doesn't want to work. I'm sure it is probably a function of having oil on my hands from working that isn't a 100% cleaned even after washing up.


This is probably an argument against with not opening reliably. I was talking about (and I assume Rick was) fingerprint check actually right on the gun. Functionality and reliability were issues I read about there.



It was one of the complaints years ago when they were talking about it. Technology changes and things get better. I'm not sure what level of reliability would be needed but it has to be pretty much fool proof. One of the other idea was a bracelet worn that would have to pair someone with gun. I don't follow this stuff much anymore.
Reliability is up to the gun manufacturers. If they can't make a gun that you can trust to shoot when you need it then find another one. I can promise you that they would get the reliability so near 100% that it wouldn't be a question.



Absolutely.And I bet a few companies would work on it more if not for pressure from industry lobby to not compromise on things like that. See Smith and Wesson's lovely NRA experience from 10 years back.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Regardless of black or white I feel that people (even those adamantly anti gun) will not feel good about wrecking lives for that many years over what may be a one time offense. Most feel people can be rehabilitated outside of rapists and murderers.

I disagree.

Everyone seems fine with DUI laws that can ruin lives for many years.


Getting a single DUI is not life changing for everyone. Getting caught with a dirty gun once would take away your life, literally.

I would say not being able to drive a car for any significant amount of time is life changing for most adults.

But is this the litmus test we want for laws? Could really screw someone over so maybe not?

In this scenario, I think it would be very easy to avoid prosecution.



You brought up DUI not me. All I am saying is if with a magic wand Peeps proposals were enacted tomorrow down the road I can see there being some concerns.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
There are like 300MM guns already out there. What is going to happen to those?

Yea, the argument is always on future sales but there are way too many guns in existence right now. We'd need to have an aggressive buy back program.



This is where you piss off at least half of legal gun owners. Many are holding onto guns that are generational family heirlooms.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Regardless of black or white I feel that people (even those adamantly anti gun) will not feel good about wrecking lives for that many years over what may be a one time offense. Most feel people can be rehabilitated outside of rapists and murderers.

I disagree.

Everyone seems fine with DUI laws that can ruin lives for many years.


Getting a single DUI is not life changing for everyone. Getting caught with a dirty gun once would take away your life, literally.

I would say not being able to drive a car for any significant amount of time is life changing for most adults.

But is this the litmus test we want for laws? Could really screw someone over so maybe not?

In this scenario, I think it would be very easy to avoid prosecution.



You brought up DUI not me. All I am saying is if with a magic wand Peeps proposals were enacted tomorrow down the road I can see there being some concerns.

I dont think that's a valid concern for most.

I believe an overwhelming majority would support stricter laws. As Kirkwood pointed out, it's incredibly easy to get a gun legally.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Kirkwood wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Regardless of black or white I feel that people (even those adamantly anti gun) will not feel good about wrecking lives for that many years over what may be a one time offense. Most feel people can be rehabilitated outside of rapists and murderers.

I disagree.

Everyone seems fine with DUI laws that can ruin lives for many years.


Getting a single DUI is not life changing for everyone. Getting caught with a dirty gun once would take away your life, literally.

It's incredibly easy to avoid getting caught with a dirty gun. You have your choice of hundreds of reputable places to buy a gun.

Personal responsibility matters until it doesn't, eh?


I am not particularly against Peeps' proposals. Especially so as I am a very stringent law follower when it come to guns. I am simply wondering aloud about potential discussions 10 years down the road when many people of all backgrounds are locked up.

Maybe society will say too bad you fucked up? Maybe they won't?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
There are like 300MM guns already out there. What is going to happen to those?

Yea, the argument is always on future sales but there are way too many guns in existence right now. We'd need to have an aggressive buy back program.



This is where you piss off at least half of legal gun owners. Many are holding onto guns that are generational family heirlooms.


Register and declare them. If you sell them, file proper paperwork. If you don't and one ends up used in a crime, go to jail.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
There are like 300MM guns already out there. What is going to happen to those?

Yea, the argument is always on future sales but there are way too many guns in existence right now. We'd need to have an aggressive buy back program.



This is where you piss off at least half of legal gun owners. Many are holding onto guns that are generational family heirlooms.

Frankly, I dont really care. They might be pissed. Sucks for them.

There are many family members of mass shooting victims that are probably more pissed off than the heirloom gun guy would be.

If the trade off is losing some generational family heirlooms but having less mass shootings, Ill make that trade.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Terry's Peeps wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
There are like 300MM guns already out there. What is going to happen to those?

Yea, the argument is always on future sales but there are way too many guns in existence right now. We'd need to have an aggressive buy back program.



This is where you piss off at least half of legal gun owners. Many are holding onto guns that are generational family heirlooms.


Register and declare them. If you sell them, file proper paperwork. If you don't and one ends up used in a crime, go to jail.


No problem. We were discussing just the technological safeguards for a moment though.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
It seems like some people believe that the cries about non violent drug offenders in prison are bullshit cover and really those cries are just saying let black people out of prison, they've had it rough.


I've literally never heard one person in my life complain about any one of any color being locked up for a violent crime.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
There are like 300MM guns already out there. What is going to happen to those?

Yea, the argument is always on future sales but there are way too many guns in existence right now. We'd need to have an aggressive buy back program.



This is where you piss off at least half of legal gun owners. Many are holding onto guns that are generational family heirlooms.

Frankly, I dont really care. They might be pissed. Sucks for them.

There are many family members of mass shooting victims that are probably more pissed off than the heirloom gun guy would be.

If the trade off is losing some generational family heirlooms but having less mass shootings, Ill make that trade.



That is fine. You see though where the counter argument would come. It also adds to the they are coming to take my guns mindset.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
It seems like some people believe that the cries about non violent drug offenders in prison are bullshit cover and really those cries are just saying let black people out of prison, they've had it rough.


I've literally never heard one person in my life complain about any one of any color being locked up for a violent crime.


Well the most recent discussions around the subject do revolve around non violent drug offenders. Even that though has many nuances as to what is or isn't a non violent drug offender etc. When reading Peeps' list I can very easily see people get thrown in jail for something that is not in and of itself violent in any way for a very long time.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
There are like 300MM guns already out there. What is going to happen to those?

Yea, the argument is always on future sales but there are way too many guns in existence right now. We'd need to have an aggressive buy back program.



This is where you piss off at least half of legal gun owners. Many are holding onto guns that are generational family heirlooms.

Frankly, I dont really care. They might be pissed. Sucks for them.

There are many family members of mass shooting victims that are probably more pissed off than the heirloom gun guy would be.

If the trade off is losing some generational family heirlooms but having less mass shootings, Ill make that trade.



That is fine. You see though where the counter argument would come. It also adds to the they are coming to take my guns mindset.

But we are so far from that it's ridiculous to even consider.

We can barely pass legislation that mentally ill people shouldn't have guns.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
How many people are killed with antique heirlooms?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
It seems like some people believe that the cries about non violent drug offenders in prison are bullshit cover and really those cries are just saying let black people out of prison, they've had it rough.


I've literally never heard one person in my life complain about any one of any color being locked up for a violent crime.


Well the most recent discussions around the subject do revolve around non violent drug offenders. Even that though has many nuances as to what is or isn't a non violent drug offender etc. When reading Peeps' list I can very easily see people get thrown in jail for something that is not in and of itself violent in any way for a very long time.

In my world, any sort of gun crime is violent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
One other thing that is interesting. I have not been a member of the NRA for probably 10-12 years. I do recall though that a very big main plank of their efforts was to follow existing laws very strictly and punish offenders big time. Seems many people are coming around to that given the shootings the last several years.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
There are like 300MM guns already out there. What is going to happen to those?

Yea, the argument is always on future sales but there are way too many guns in existence right now. We'd need to have an aggressive buy back program.



This is where you piss off at least half of legal gun owners. Many are holding onto guns that are generational family heirlooms.

Frankly, I dont really care. They might be pissed. Sucks for them.

There are many family members of mass shooting victims that are probably more pissed off than the heirloom gun guy would be.

If the trade off is losing some generational family heirlooms but having less mass shootings, Ill make that trade.



That is fine. You see though where the counter argument would come. It also adds to the they are coming to take my guns mindset.

But we are so far from that it's ridiculous to even consider.

We can barely pass legislation that mentally ill people shouldn't have guns.



I am pretty sure that is already a law in most states. Verifying it and enforcing might be your larger concern.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Hatchetman wrote:
How many people are killed with antique heirlooms?


I have a WWII 45 semi auto from my grandfather. I could do damage with that.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32164
pizza_Place: Milano's
pittmike wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
How many people are killed with antique heirlooms?


I have a WWII 45 semi auto from my grandfather. I could do damage with that.


it could break the skin !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19615
rogers park bryan wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Mike wants to know if you read an article from the other side this weekend so that you were prepared today.


Nope I figure let's wing it.

1. Every gun must be registered. I get the reasons against this, but you have to register your car. Register your guns too.

2. Any person caught with a gun not registered within 30 days or purchase gets 5 years in jail for first offense. 20 for second.

3. After sale modification kits are illegal. Anyone caught with one or attempting to buy or sell one gets 10 years in jail for first offense. 30 for second.

4. Any person caught with an illegal firearm gets 15 years in jail for the first offense. 40 for the second.

5. Anyone using a firearm in the commitment of a crime gets 20 years in jail for the first offense. Life for the second.

If we're serious, let's get serious.

Let's go.

And what happens when some activist decides that these laws ( if enacted) result in incarcerating a disproportionate number of young black men for 20/ 40 years minimum ?

Is there any history of that sort of complaint on violent crimes?

I hear that about non violent drug offenders.


Gun crimes involving illegal gun possession in cook county are not treated seriously by the court system.

https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/gun-s ... up-debate/

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
One other thing that is interesting. I have not been a member of the NRA for probably 10-12 years. I do recall though that a very big main plank of their efforts was to follow existing laws very strictly and punish offenders big time. Seems many people are coming around to that given the shootings the last several years.

Who was ever against punishing gun crimes?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
rogers park bryan wrote:
[
Who was ever against punishing gun crimes?


MANY people do not believe in strict sentencing guidelines.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
But we are so far from that it's ridiculous to even consider.

We can barely pass legislation that mentally ill people shouldn't have guns.



I am pretty sure that is already a law in most states. Verifying it and enforcing might be your larger concern.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/28/politics/ ... index.html


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 568 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 19  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group