It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 2:09 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 568 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 19  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.

This is the very reason voter ID laws are bullshit...

If we are ideologically consistent, we should see gun registries and voter ID laws as infringements upon our rights.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
It would be outright denial of history to say that this government did not carry out atrocities.
I did not say this.

I never said you did, I was building off of your point, not countering. It may not have come off as intended.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Last edited by Ogie Oglethorpe on Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.

Odd. MANY people against registering guns are strongly for more stringent voter registration.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Kirkwood wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.

Odd. MANY people against registering guns are strongly for more stringent voter registration.

what about those of us who are against both voter ID laws and gun registrations?

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.

Odd. MANY people against registering guns are strongly for more stringent voter registration.

what about those of us who are against both voter ID laws and gun registrations?

fringe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.

Odd. MANY people against registering guns are strongly for more stringent voter registration.

what about those of us who are against both voter ID laws and gun registrations?

fringe

or ideologically consistent.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.

This is the very reason voter ID laws are bullshit...

If we are ideologically consistent, we should see gun registries and voter ID laws as infringements upon our rights.


Make both free and I'm sold on both.

Register your guns.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
You have to pay for a FOID card as it is right now. You have to pay further for a Conceal Carry license, plus take a course to satisfy further requirements. Said course costs money too.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.

Odd. MANY people against registering guns are strongly for more stringent voter registration.

what about those of us who are against both voter ID laws and gun registrations?

Keepin it real


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4137
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.

Odd. MANY people against registering guns are strongly for more stringent voter registration.

what about those of us who are against both voter ID laws and gun registrations?


Do you feel there should be no restrictions of freedom of speech?

As an example, if I parked my car in front of your house at 4 AM and honked my horn for 70 minutes non-stop, would you be against the police giving me a citation for disorderly conduct in violation of my freedom of speech/expression rights guaranteed by the first amendment?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.
The problem is that you act like Constitutional rights are somehow immune from any sort of regulation when that is false. You can be "dissuaded" from your right without it violating your overall right. Free speech alone has many examples.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4137
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.
The problem is that you act like Constitutional rights are somehow immune from any sort of regulation when that is false. You can be "dissuaded" from your right without it violating your overall right. Free speech alone has many examples.


Rick, you're missing the point. Sure all of those other constitutional rights have reasonable and rational exceptions and restrictions on them, but if you make any sort of reasonable restriction on the 2nd amendment the only logical inference/conclusion is that the Federal government will first confiscate every gun in the USA, then melt them down, and then impose a communist style dictatorial regime upon the citizens.

I mean this isn't hard to understand, it's Civics 101 stuff...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7084
Darkside wrote:
To rpbs point about valuing the 2nd amendment over the lives of others...
I do indeed value the 2nd amendment over the lives of others. And pretty much the whole constitution. I value it over my own life, as should anyone in this country protected by this document. Miilions have died protecting these rights. Hundreds of thousands died obtaining these rights. They are worth more than individual lives for without them individual lives have no liberty, no safety, no protection against the inevitable atrocities committed by a country with no limitations.
This document and the rights contained within are the reason we don't live in a place that's similar to north Korea or Syria or any other litany of god awful places with a merciless government run amok. It's why we don't have coups every 5 years. It's why we're here talking about this today. It is indeed the very identity of this country, and I believe in my heart that the United States is valued over any number of its citizens.


What Darkside said:
Image

What they hear:
Image

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38943
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
You have to pay for a FOID card as it is right now. You have to pay further for a Conceal Carry license, plus take a course to satisfy further requirements. Said course costs money too.

Only people with FOID cards should be allowed to vote

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.
The problem is that you act like Constitutional rights are somehow immune from any sort of regulation when that is false.


No, I don't act like that. I comprehend the nuance of reasonable restrictions (time, place, manner, etc.) in the trade-off between protecting explicitly granted freedoms and maintaining a functioning society.

What I do act like is someone who thinks that with all the other restrictions placed on gun ownership and possession (not always the same thing, mind you), the burdens placed on the individual when seeking to purchase a firearm (which itself is recorded by the government), much less carry it in public, etc., any forced registration of a firearm tips the scale of burden towards "unconstitutional".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.
The problem is that you act like Constitutional rights are somehow immune from any sort of regulation when that is false. You can be "dissuaded" from your right without it violating your overall right. Free speech alone has many examples.


Rick, you're missing the point. Sure all of those other constitutional rights have reasonable and rational exceptions and restrictions on them, but if you make any sort of reasonable restriction on the 2nd amendment the only logical inference/conclusion is that the Federal government will first confiscate every gun in the USA, then melt them down, and then impose a communist style dictatorial regime upon the citizens.

I mean this isn't hard to understand, it's Civics 101 stuff...


Except a national gun registry isn't the first "reasonable and rational exception" to the 2nd. You and your ilk disingenuously paint it as such, but we are not starting from a point of "no restrictions", here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.
The problem is that you act like Constitutional rights are somehow immune from any sort of regulation when that is false. You can be "dissuaded" from your right without it violating your overall right. Free speech alone has many examples.


Rick, you're missing the point. Sure all of those other constitutional rights have reasonable and rational exceptions and restrictions on them, but if you make any sort of reasonable restriction on the 2nd amendment the only logical inference/conclusion is that the Federal government will first confiscate every gun in the USA, then melt them down, and then impose a communist style dictatorial regime upon the citizens.

I mean this isn't hard to understand, it's Civics 101 stuff...



I think the point is that if the government was successful in eliminating one constitutional right, it might lead to others getting eliminated, too. Being allowed to own a gun is seen by many as more important when protecting the Bill of Rights than their actual household or well-being. And considering governments show no shame in taking away whatever else they want from its citizens, that Bill of Rights becomes that much more important.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
No, I don't act like that. I comprehend the nuance of reasonable restrictions (time, place, manner, etc.) in the trade-off between protecting explicitly granted freedoms and maintaining a functioning society.
You are though. Your issue with a registry was clear.

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
What I do act like is someone who thinks that with all the other restrictions placed on gun ownership and possession (not always the same thing, mind you), the burdens placed on the individual when seeking to purchase a firearm (which itself is recorded by the government), much less carry it in public, etc., any forced registration of a firearm tips the scale of burden towards "unconstitutional".
That sounds like a made up line. If we already have these restrictions then why can't we literally have a list of gun owners?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
Kirkwood wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think it's obvious that the "SOMETHING MUST BE DONE!" people want to take guns away from someone. So the next question is, are there special people who should retain their full Second Amendment rights?

Nope. I'm good without people having guns.

But it'll never happen. So it's just hope I'm not anywhere where a loon is shooting people.


Cuck a doodle doo

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
One Post wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Registering a gun is not infringing on your right to own a gun. No issue there.


It has a chilling effect, which itself can be unconstitutional. Registration dissuades people (whether by cost of compliance, burden, fear, etc.) from exercising their right, which is an infringement on the right itself.
The problem is that you act like Constitutional rights are somehow immune from any sort of regulation when that is false. You can be "dissuaded" from your right without it violating your overall right. Free speech alone has many examples.


Rick, you're missing the point. Sure all of those other constitutional rights have reasonable and rational exceptions and restrictions on them, but if you make any sort of reasonable restriction on the 2nd amendment the only logical inference/conclusion is that the Federal government will first confiscate every gun in the USA, then melt them down, and then impose a communist style dictatorial regime upon the citizens.

I mean this isn't hard to understand, it's Civics 101 stuff...


:lol:

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
No, I don't act like that. I comprehend the nuance of reasonable restrictions (time, place, manner, etc.) in the trade-off between protecting explicitly granted freedoms and maintaining a functioning society.
You are though. Your issue with a registry was clear.

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
What I do act like is someone who thinks that with all the other restrictions placed on gun ownership and possession (not always the same thing, mind you), the burdens placed on the individual when seeking to purchase a firearm (which itself is recorded by the government), much less carry it in public, etc., any forced registration of a firearm tips the scale of burden towards "unconstitutional".
That sounds like a made up line. If we already have these restrictions then why can't we literally have a list of gun owners?


This is what a slippery slope looks like, kids.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
This is what a slippery slope looks like, kids.
Wait a minute, I thought you aren't acting like Constitutional rights are somehow immune from any sort of regulation, and yet you are here using the slippery slope argument about any type of added gun control. Hmmmmm.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
This is what a slippery slope looks like, kids.
Wait a minute, I thought you aren't acting like Constitutional rights are somehow immune from any sort of regulation, and yet you are here using the slippery slope argument about any type of added gun control. Hmmmmm.


Let's see if you can figure out the difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think it's obvious that the "SOMETHING MUST BE DONE!" people want to take guns away from someone. So the next question is, are there special people who should retain their full Second Amendment rights?

Nope. I'm good without people having guns.

But it'll never happen. So it's just hope I'm not anywhere where a loon is shooting people.


Cuck a doodle doo

Ya, you're definitely 1 or 1a on the board of people it'd be smart to stay away from. Very worrisome posts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
Kirkwood wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think it's obvious that the "SOMETHING MUST BE DONE!" people want to take guns away from someone. So the next question is, are there special people who should retain their full Second Amendment rights?

Nope. I'm good without people having guns.

But it'll never happen. So it's just hope I'm not anywhere where a loon is shooting people.


Cuck a doodle doo

Ya, you're definitely 1 or 1a on the board of people it'd be smart to stay away from. Very worrisome posts.



You're in luck. I don't associate with fat man children.

#low energy
#SAD

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
This is what a slippery slope looks like, kids.
Wait a minute, I thought you aren't acting like Constitutional rights are somehow immune from any sort of regulation, and yet you are here using the slippery slope argument about any type of added gun control. Hmmmmm.


Let's see if you can figure out the difference.
I can't. The definition of a slippery slope argument is that if you start doing something that it will lead to a series of bad things. You chose to use the analogy that indicates that we never should have had any sort of regulation on guns because of the 2nd amendment.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think it's obvious that the "SOMETHING MUST BE DONE!" people want to take guns away from someone. So the next question is, are there special people who should retain their full Second Amendment rights?

Nope. I'm good without people having guns.

But it'll never happen. So it's just hope I'm not anywhere where a loon is shooting people.


Cuck a doodle doo

Ya, you're definitely 1 or 1a on the board of people it'd be smart to stay away from. Very worrisome posts.



You're in luck. I don't associate with fat man children.

#low energy
#SAD

totally normal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23557
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
This is what a slippery slope looks like, kids.
Wait a minute, I thought you aren't acting like Constitutional rights are somehow immune from any sort of regulation, and yet you are here using the slippery slope argument about any type of added gun control. Hmmmmm.


Let's see if you can figure out the difference.
I can't. The definition of a slippery slope argument is that if you start doing something that it will lead to a series of bad things. You chose to use the analogy that indicates that we never should have had any sort of regulation on guns because of the 2nd amendment.


No, the slippery slope here is that more regulation will only lead to more regulation, not a stable state. That's exactly what you were doing with your line, "we already have those regulations, what's the harm in a little bit more?"

You are not at all interested in balancing the preservation of a constitutional right with the needs of society, you want only to regulate to death the constitutional right, and you will do so by saying "we're already here, what's the harm in going just a bit further?" over and over and over again. Hence, slippery slope.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Kirkwood wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think it's obvious that the "SOMETHING MUST BE DONE!" people want to take guns away from someone. So the next question is, are there special people who should retain their full Second Amendment rights?

Nope. I'm good without people having guns.

But it'll never happen. So it's just hope I'm not anywhere where a loon is shooting people.


Cuck a doodle doo

Ya, you're definitely 1 or 1a on the board of people it'd be smart to stay away from. Very worrisome posts.



You're in luck. I don't associate with fat man children.

#low energy
#SAD

totally normal


I have met you. You are not fat.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
pittmike wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:

You're in luck. I don't associate with fat man children.

#low energy
#SAD

totally normal


I have met you. You are not fat.

:lol:

thanks mike


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 568 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 19  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Reared on the Score and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group