It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 10:27 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 568 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 19  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I saw a lot of "Let's do something" posts. I think peeps, IMU, and Darkside are the only ones who actually suggested something though.

I like Peeps but think his suggestion is terrible. Mandatory minimums are awful, violent crime or not. I'm surprised at the number of self described liberals who liked that idea though.


Gotta get serious.

Plus we can create a huge new boon in construction and running of new jails.

Win win.

You guys got serious for 12 pages. Time to bring us back to reality :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
I don't know.

Honestly, it's just hard for me to care about or respect the importance of the 2nd amendment. Especially to the degree of not putting any restrictions on it.

...but there are restrictions on it. Several.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Killer V wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Killer V wrote:
It should not be a states' issue. Why are the laws different once you cross a state border? Let's have the same laws in every state. No confusion. No buying guns in lax states and returning to "stricter" states.

Why bother having states then?


Well the fed mandated a national minimum drinking age and our fragile state system didn't collapse. Maybe something as important as gun laws would slide through too. Then, could gun offenses be made a federal case?

They didn't actually mandate it. They tied ridiculous amounts of state grant money to it, so it became impossible for a state to go it alone. They did the same thing with the 55 mph speed limit on the Interstate.


Tying extensive federal funds to their "suggestion" sure seems like a mandate to me.

I still see no reason why we shouldn't have the same gun laws in every city & state.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I saw a lot of "Let's do something" posts. I think peeps, IMU, and Darkside are the only ones who actually suggested something though.

I like Peeps but think his suggestion is terrible. Mandatory minimums are awful, violent crime or not. I'm surprised at the number of self described liberals who liked that idea though.


Gotta get serious.

Plus we can create a huge new boon in construction and running of new jails.

Win win.

You guys got serious for 12 pages. Time to bring us back to reality :lol:


Why do you not want to punish people for breaking existing gun laws?

SAD!

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
I saw a lot of "Let's do something" posts. I think peeps, IMU, and Darkside are the only ones who actually suggested something though.

I like Peeps but think his suggestion is terrible. Mandatory minimums are awful, violent crime or not. I'm surprised at the number of self described liberals who liked that idea though.

Who describes themselves as a liberal?


What's awful about punishing gun crimes harshly?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I don't know.

Honestly, it's just hard for me to care about or respect the importance of the 2nd amendment. Especially to the degree of not putting any restrictions on it.

...but there are restrictions on it. Several.

Ok. Soooo were ok with some restrictions as long as the core right is maintained?

I never suggested abolishing it.

My statement might be more specific in saying some people value "no more restrictions" on that amendment over human lives.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I saw a lot of "Let's do something" posts. I think peeps, IMU, and Darkside are the only ones who actually suggested something though.

I like Peeps but think his suggestion is terrible. Mandatory minimums are awful, violent crime or not. I'm surprised at the number of self described liberals who liked that idea though.

Who describes themselves as a liberal?


What's awful about punishing gun crimes harshly?

The same thing that's awful about punishing any crime too harshly. You're ruining people's lives over one mistake. Our justice system is supposed to be based on rehabilitation, not punishment. 20 year mandatory sentences for crimes where nobody is murdered are very clearly about punishment and not rehabilitation.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
RPB gets it.

Got to make the punishment for gun crimes an actual deterrent.

Harsh punishment is needed.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23548
pizza_Place: Giordano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
I don't know.

Honestly, it's just hard for me to care about or respect the importance of the 2nd amendment. Especially to the degree of not putting any restrictions on it.


Who has argued that there are should be no restrictions or exemptions on the 2nd? Ogie may have alluded to it, but I haven't seen anyone else come near such a thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I don't know.

Honestly, it's just hard for me to care about or respect the importance of the 2nd amendment. Especially to the degree of not putting any restrictions on it.

...but there are restrictions on it. Several.

Ok. Soooo were ok with some restrictions as long as the core right is maintained?

I never suggested abolishing it.

My statement might be more specific in saying some people value "no more restrictions" on that amendment over human lives.

But this is why you can't just say "let's do something". Most people are taking that and suggesting things(like restrictions) that are already in place.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
RPB gets it.

Got to make the punishment for gun crimes an actual deterrent.

Harsh punishment is needed.

1990s version of this:

Got to make punishment for felonies an actual deterrent.

Three Strikes Law is needed.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
RPB gets it.

Got to make the punishment for gun crimes an actual deterrent.

Harsh punishment is needed.

1990s version of this:

Got to make punishment for felonies an actual deterrent.

Three Strikes Law is needed.


I remember it.

Don't commit crimes with guns. Don't have an illegal gun. Don't sell an illegal gun.

If you do, you pay the price.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
RPB gets it.

Got to make the punishment for gun crimes an actual deterrent.

Harsh punishment is needed.

1990s version of this:

Got to make punishment for felonies an actual deterrent.

Three Strikes Law is needed.


I remember it.

Don't commit crimes with guns. Don't have an illegal gun. Don't sell an illegal gun.

If you do, you pay the price.

I hear you. Don't commit a felony. If you do, you pay the price.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
RPB gets it.

Got to make the punishment for gun crimes an actual deterrent.

Harsh punishment is needed.

1990s version of this:

Got to make punishment for felonies an actual deterrent.

Three Strikes Law is needed.


I remember it.

Don't commit crimes with guns. Don't have an illegal gun. Don't sell an illegal gun.

If you do, you pay the price.

I hear you. Don't commit a felony. If you do, you pay the price.


Yep.

Either we're serious or we're not.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
KFC or Popeye’s for dinner?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
KFC or Popeye’s for dinner?

Harold's. Either you're serious about good fast food chicken or you're not.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
KFC or Popeye’s for dinner?

Harold's. Either you're serious about good fast food chicken or you're not.


Not sure when this started, or why.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
KFC or Popeye’s for dinner?

Harold's. Either you're serious about good fast food chicken or you're not.


This guy gets it.

No second chances.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Yes, some people like it more than they like other people's ability to breathe. We agree.

It's the state that denies the ability of people to breathe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Eric_Garner

Im with you there.

Fact remains that some people value their 2nd amendment right over the lives of others.

Of course they do. To use a favorite word of yours lately, it's INSANE not to value our constitutional amendments over an individual's life. It's sort of the entire reason our country exists in the first place.

Anyway, I'm only like halfway through this crazy ass thread but you posted that several times and I felt I had to respond before finishing the thread.

I don't know, I feel like of enough innocent people were dying I might be willing to compromise on some things.

Guess I'm not a Patriot.


I always knew you loved your country.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Terry's Peeps wrote:
RPB gets it.

Got to make the punishment for gun crimes an actual deterrent.

Harsh punishment is needed.


Death penalty?!?!

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
pittmike wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
RPB gets it.

Got to make the punishment for gun crimes an actual deterrent.

Harsh punishment is needed.


Death penalty?!?!


3rd offense.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Yes, some people like it more than they like other people's ability to breathe. We agree.

It's the state that denies the ability of people to breathe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Eric_Garner

Im with you there.

Fact remains that some people value their 2nd amendment right over the lives of others.

Of course they do. To use a favorite word of yours lately, it's INSANE not to value our constitutional amendments over an individual's life. It's sort of the entire reason our country exists in the first place.

Anyway, I'm only like halfway through this crazy ass thread but you posted that several times and I felt I had to respond before finishing the thread.

I don't know, I feel like of enough innocent people were dying I might be willing to compromise on some things.

Guess I'm not a Patriot.


I always knew you loved your country.

Huh?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I don't know.

Honestly, it's just hard for me to care about or respect the importance of the 2nd amendment. Especially to the degree of not putting any restrictions on it.

...but there are restrictions on it. Several.

Ok. Soooo were ok with some restrictions as long as the core right is maintained?

I never suggested abolishing it.

My statement might be more specific in saying some people value "no more restrictions" on that amendment over human lives.

But this is why you can't just say "let's do something". Most people are taking that and suggesting things(like restrictions) that are already in place.

I am not a "let's do something" person.

I just think that's a more understandable thought than fearing the government will take your guns at this point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Sorry was meant for FF.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:45 am
Posts: 2940
pizza_Place: Drag's
Heard this guy on the radio today. The research was not sponsored by any interested parties. Let's count all the justifications the gun fairies will use to dismiss it.

Stanford Law School Professor John Donohue found that states that adopted right-to-carry laws have experienced a 13 to 15 percent increase in violent crime in the 10 years after enacting those laws.

https://news.stanford.edu/2017/06/21/vi ... ry-states/

_________________
Soccer 1,2,3
Spanish Honor Society 1,2,3,4
Forensics 1,2,3,4

"Smiles with Nostrils"

"...no Hmong, go find some blacks"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
Thread title reminds me of a It's Always Sunny episode- "The Gang Solves the Gun Control Issue"


That would be a good episode. I see some good Frank potential.

Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 12:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4137
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
No, I don't act like that. I comprehend the nuance of reasonable restrictions (time, place, manner, etc.) in the trade-off between protecting explicitly granted freedoms and maintaining a functioning society.
You are though. Your issue with a registry was clear.

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
What I do act like is someone who thinks that with all the other restrictions placed on gun ownership and possession (not always the same thing, mind you), the burdens placed on the individual when seeking to purchase a firearm (which itself is recorded by the government), much less carry it in public, etc., any forced registration of a firearm tips the scale of burden towards "unconstitutional".
That sounds like a made up line. If we already have these restrictions then why can't we literally have a list of gun owners?


This is what a slippery slope looks like, kids.


If you were charged with a crime tomorrow, lets say arson, on a scale of 1 - 10 how fearful would you be that you would be denied a jury trial?

1 being not fearful and 10 being the most fearful possible.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Yes, some people like it more than they like other people's ability to breathe. We agree.

It's the state that denies the ability of people to breathe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Eric_Garner

Im with you there.

Fact remains that some people value their 2nd amendment right over the lives of others.

Of course they do. To use a favorite word of yours lately, it's INSANE not to value our constitutional amendments over an individual's life. It's sort of the entire reason our country exists in the first place.

Anyway, I'm only like halfway through this crazy ass thread but you posted that several times and I felt I had to respond before finishing the thread.

I want to address this before it gets twisted. The INSANE thing. I've only used that when discussing how certain news channels spent years investigating Barack Obama being born in Kenya. That is, in fact, insane.

Its not like I dismiss ideas from the other side. I'm probably one of the most open minded people here.

thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
Don Tiny wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
Thread title reminds me of a It's Always Sunny episode- "The Gang Solves the Gun Control Issue"


That would be a good episode. I see some good Frank potential.

Image



:lol: :lol:

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
NBC Politics‏Verified account @NBCPolitics 5h5 hours ago
More
JUST IN: Sen. Feinstein and Senate Democrats introduce bill to ban assault weapons
Image


Is this restriction reasonable or nah?


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 568 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 19  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group