unreasonable.

need assault rifles to protect myself and family.

No.

Stupid waste of time.

_________________

What are the 2,200 exemptions for "assault style recreational weapons?"

Anyway, this is reasonable. They took my magazine limit advice.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.

The first three points of the "other provisions" section are galling intrusions on personal property rights.

Hey dude, there are things that are illegal to own in the US. I don't want to break any news to you or anything...

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.

That's great and all, except none of what I referenced has to do with the lawfulness of owning or possessing something.

Nobody is more open-minded than me, believe me.

_________________

What?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.

All three of the provisions in the section I referenced are restrictions on what can be done with something that is already owned. It is not prohibiting the ownership or possession of anything.

They govern, in order: the ability to trade or gift lawfully owned property, the storing of lawfully owned property, and the "transfer" of lawfully owned property.

I am allowed to own a car. But it must be a car manufactured for the USDM, or it can be imported as long as it is 25 years old or older. I also cannot make certain modifications to said car, even if said car parts are also legal in the country and state I live in. I am also not allowed to tamper with numerous aspects of the car, such as safety mechanisms.

I don't think this is groundbreaking stuff, man. You want to make a mountain out of a molehill and will stop at nothing to make gun control seem like the biggest atrocity ever committed by one man against another.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.

Just to try to save you guys some time none of Feinstein’s stuff will become law. Just saying.

_________________
Elections have consequences.

Those are awful analogies. On top of being wrong about the particulars (you can make any modifications you want, or tamper with any safety device you please, those acts in and of themselves are not unlawful), they don't even come close to what is being proposed vis a vis guns.

1. You do not have an explicit constitutional right to a car.

2. You can trade or gift your car at your sole discretion.

3. You are not mandated by the government to store your vehicle in your garage with the windows rolled up and the doors locked.

4. Hard to think of a car-centric proxy for magazines, but you can cut out your gas tank and give it to whomever you please.

These proposed restrictions introduce the government into your personal bundle of rights concerning your property, thereby encroaching on the entire notion of personal property.



This is just nonsense. Stop acting like we have no amount of gun control in this country, and that people who oppose unconstitutional measures of gun control are arguing for the Wild West (which surprisingly wasn't even free of gun control measures).

Come again?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.

Right. Because of certain people.

#NotAllRepublicans

#ButMANY

_________________

Those are all road worthy restrictions. If I'm rebuilding a car I can take out the airbags and converter in a workshop or my garage without the feds indicting me. In fact, the part you bolded even mentions "operating". The acts themselves are not inherently unlawful. Now get to work on apt analogies.

By the end of my lifetime, we will have a state-run media, freedom of speech only to the extent that it doesn’t offend anyone, and several crimes that are exempted from due process.

_________________

And these suggested gun control laws are public-worthy restrictions.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.

In several states a domestic violence charge is a mandatory bench trial, only after which may you "appeal" and get a trial by jury.

You mean except for the ones that govern how private property is handled and transferred in private, right? The public has no interest in whom I give my gun, nor where or how I keep and store it.

And even if the public did have such a compelling interest, restrictions would have to be narrowly tailored and the least restrictive means by which the public, via the government, could achieve their ends. The proposals I am discussing are none of that.

There are many crimes for which you cannot waste the time getting a jury trial.

_________________
Elections have consequences.

If we had to empanel a jury every time some bitch mouthed off too much and got what was coming to her the economy would grind to a halt.

_________________

Instead of trial-and-error venue-shopping, maybe research out and pick a state that isn't too tough on wife-beaters and stay there.

Once we get rid of the 19th amendment this will no longer be an issue.

It's outdated anyways. At the time women were honest home makers. If the legislators saw today's thottery they would have not passed it.

_________________

One mans wife beater is another man's observant Muslim

_________________

Cue LTG.

_________________
Elections have consequences.

_________________

You're gonna die today?

Yes we do. And we are a country of laws. I will appreciate you following the new ones once passed.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.

You're gonna need an amendment for some of what you want.
I get a feeling we won't see an amendment in any of our lifetimes.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014

No, you don't.