It is currently Sun Nov 17, 2024 1:45 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1010 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 34  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 7:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40618
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
312player wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
A lot of these ridiculous trade ideas are just Phil Rogers trade guessing idiocy being picked up as legit discussion.


Actually, these ideas are just a little bit of the pre-2016 Cub fan mindset sneaking back in. I told anyone that would listen this Heyward thing would be bad long term and fans would want to get him out of here. Now just like the old days there SOME fans dreaming up pie in the sky scenarios where magical great trades are going to happen for him because Cubs.




Don't confuse a handful of morons with most cub fans, overwhelmingly majority of cub fans know Heyward isn't going anywhere, he's never opting out and he's not getting traded in the next 4 years.


I know. That is why I emphasized SOME. That was especially for RPB's benefit. He sometimes think I mean all of youse guys.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57206
:lol: yeah mike you were flying solo on that heyward thought. No one else thought the heyward deal was bad

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38675
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
:lol: yeah mike you were flying solo on that heyward thought. No one else thought the heyward deal was bad

I’m pretty sure just about everyone knew it was and that they overpaid for him.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:10 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79471
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
badrogue17 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: yeah mike you were flying solo on that heyward thought. No one else thought the heyward deal was bad

I’m pretty sure just about everyone knew it was and that they overpaid for him.



Apparently everyone except the smartest GM in baseball history.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40618
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: yeah mike you were flying solo on that heyward thought. No one else thought the heyward deal was bad

I’m pretty sure just about everyone knew it was and that they overpaid for him.



Apparently everyone except the smartest GM in baseball history.


:lol: At the time I compared it to the pre 2016 typical Cub fan mania like the Soriano signing. WE MUST HAVE THE BIG FLAVOR OF THE OFF SEASON FREE AGENT SIGNING. IT WILL BE AWESOME AND WE WON'T EVEN HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT MONEY LATER. It WILL NOT affect future spending in any way.

Well yeah it kind of will and the larger point I was making is again pre 2016 thinking that all teams are lining up to give the Cubs gold to take him off your hands.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
A lot of these ridiculous trade ideas are just Phil Rogers trade guessing idiocy being picked up as legit discussion.


Actually, these ideas are just a little bit of the pre-2016 Cub fan mindset sneaking back in. I told anyone that would listen this Heyward thing would be bad long term and fans would want to get him out of here. Now just like the old days there SOME fans dreaming up pie in the sky scenarios where magical great trades are going to happen for him because Cubs.

No, it's actually exactly what I said and not at all what you said.

Phil Rogers put that out.

Why do you just say things with absolutely no basis or evidence?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: yeah mike you were flying solo on that heyward thought. No one else thought the heyward deal was bad

I’m pretty sure just about everyone knew it was and that they overpaid for him.



Apparently everyone except the smartest GM in baseball history.

The guy with 3 World Series title won on two teams that hadnt won in 86 and 108 years respectively.

I feel like that guy might be decent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40618
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
A lot of these ridiculous trade ideas are just Phil Rogers trade guessing idiocy being picked up as legit discussion.


Actually, these ideas are just a little bit of the pre-2016 Cub fan mindset sneaking back in. I told anyone that would listen this Heyward thing would be bad long term and fans would want to get him out of here. Now just like the old days there SOME fans dreaming up pie in the sky scenarios where magical great trades are going to happen for him because Cubs.

No, it's actually exactly what I said and not at all what you said.

Phil Rogers put that out.

Why do you just say things with absolutely no basis or evidence?


I did not refer to you because of your post today at all. I mentioned you because you generally like to remind me not all Cub fans think like something I posted or you never read that here.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
A lot of these ridiculous trade ideas are just Phil Rogers trade guessing idiocy being picked up as legit discussion.


Actually, these ideas are just a little bit of the pre-2016 Cub fan mindset sneaking back in. I told anyone that would listen this Heyward thing would be bad long term and fans would want to get him out of here. Now just like the old days there SOME fans dreaming up pie in the sky scenarios where magical great trades are going to happen for him because Cubs.

No, it's actually exactly what I said and not at all what you said.

Phil Rogers put that out.

Why do you just say things with absolutely no basis or evidence?


I did not refer to you because of your post today at all. I mentioned you because you generally like to remind me not all Cub fans think like something I posted or you never read that here.

What?

Here is what happened

Phil Rogers put a rumor out. It got picked up and discussed. When the Giants denied it, I pointed out it was just dumb Phil Rogers guessing.


Then you came in with some tired theory about LOLOLOL CUB FANS that has no basis in reality and has nothing to do with what we are discussing.

Also, your attempt at mocking falls completely flat, since after signing him they IMMEDIATELY WON the World Series.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57206
:lol:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40618
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Bryan, I am looking below and can't find where I said you were wrong. I built off of your post not argued with it.


pittmike wrote:
312player wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
A lot of these ridiculous trade ideas are just Phil Rogers trade guessing idiocy being picked up as legit discussion.


Actually, these ideas are just a little bit of the pre-2016 Cub fan mindset sneaking back in. I told anyone that would listen this Heyward thing would be bad long term and fans would want to get him out of here. Now just like the old days there SOME fans dreaming up pie in the sky scenarios where magical great trades are going to happen for him because Cubs.




Don't confuse a handful of morons with most cub fans, overwhelmingly majority of cub fans know Heyward isn't going anywhere, he's never opting out and he's not getting traded in the next 4 years.


I know. That is why I emphasized SOME. That was especially for RPB's benefit. He sometimes think I mean all of youse guys.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40618
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
A lot of these ridiculous trade ideas are just Phil Rogers trade guessing idiocy being picked up as legit discussion.


Actually, these ideas are just a little bit of the pre-2016 Cub fan mindset sneaking back in. I told anyone that would listen this Heyward thing would be bad long term and fans would want to get him out of here. Now just like the old days there SOME fans dreaming up pie in the sky scenarios where magical great trades are going to happen for him because Cubs.

No, it's actually exactly what I said and not at all what you said.

Phil Rogers put that out.

Why do you just say things with absolutely no basis or evidence?


I did not refer to you because of your post today at all. I mentioned you because you generally like to remind me not all Cub fans think like something I posted or you never read that here.

What?

Here is what happened

Phil Rogers put a rumor out. It got picked up and discussed. When the Giants denied it, I pointed out it was just dumb Phil Rogers guessing.


Then you came in with some tired theory about LOLOLOL CUB FANS that has no basis in reality and has nothing to do with what we are discussing.

Also, your attempt at mocking falls completely flat, since after signing him they IMMEDIATELY WON the World Series.


They also immediately won after some other non descript signing of a middle reliever. So what?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:

They also immediately won after some other non descript signing of a middle reliever. So what?

#1 Any moves made right before a WS win are pretty much protected under the SCOREBOARD rule
#2 Heyward helped them win the World Series


I'm sorry that you're OMG CUB FANS ARE SO DUMB narrative doesn't work anymore. You should stop trying to force it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Heyward didn't contribute dick to that WS, it was a real bad signing.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
312player wrote:
Heyward didn't contribute dick to that WS, it was a real bad signing.

First statement is wrong, second one is right.


He won a gold glove and the team defense was a big part of why they were the best team in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40618
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
312player wrote:
Heyward didn't contribute dick to that WS, it was a real bad signing.


You are right. Lately, RPB is just trying to be impossible just to be impossible. I would just as soon be trapped in a cabin in the woods forced to listen to LTG and Ogie debate the middle east.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
The best defensive outfielder in all of baseball had no positive effect. Who knew?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
312player wrote:
Heyward didn't contribute dick to that WS, it was a real bad signing.


You are right. Lately, RPB is just trying to be impossible just to be impossible. I would just as soon be trapped in a cabin in the woods forced to listen to LTG and Ogie debate the middle east.

No, Im just calling you on your baseless uninformed bullshit.


I'll stop now though. I want this to be a safe space for you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40618
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
312player wrote:
Heyward didn't contribute dick to that WS, it was a real bad signing.


You are right. Lately, RPB is just trying to be impossible just to be impossible. I would just as soon be trapped in a cabin in the woods forced to listen to LTG and Ogie debate the middle east.

No, Im just calling you on your baseless uninformed bullshit.


I'll stop now though. I want this to be a safe space for you.


Ok so not one Cub fan desired to have the flavor of the off season prize Heyward regardless of the cost. Not one Cub fan said don't worry about the money the Cubs will have streams of revenue and will not consider this contract in future spending. Lastly, not one Cub fan is thinking some other team will trade them great things for this bad player/contract.

Yeah you are right. Why can't you accept any negative view of anything Cub? You won the WS relax.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
312player wrote:
Heyward didn't contribute dick to that WS, it was a real bad signing.


You are right. Lately, RPB is just trying to be impossible just to be impossible. I would just as soon be trapped in a cabin in the woods forced to listen to LTG and Ogie debate the middle east.

No, Im just calling you on your baseless uninformed bullshit.


I'll stop now though. I want this to be a safe space for you.


Ok so not one Cub fan desired to have the flavor of the off season prize Heyward regardless of the cost. Not one Cub fan said don't worry about the money the Cubs will have streams of revenue and will not consider this contract in future spending. Lastly, not one Cub fan is thinking some other team will trade them great things for this bad player/contract.

Yeah you are right. Why can't you accept any negative view of anything Cub? You won the WS relax.

You say things without evidence quite often. This is just the latest example.

I accept many negative views of the Cubs (108 years without a title...too long imo) and their fans (too optimistic in general), just not the tired old ones that dont fit and never really did.

I am relaxed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:07 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79471
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: yeah mike you were flying solo on that heyward thought. No one else thought the heyward deal was bad

I’m pretty sure just about everyone knew it was and that they overpaid for him.



Apparently everyone except the smartest GM in baseball history.

The guy with 3 World Series title won on two teams that hadnt won in 86 and 108 years respectively.

I feel like that guy might be decent.



Fine. And I don't see you complaining about Heyward.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: yeah mike you were flying solo on that heyward thought. No one else thought the heyward deal was bad

I’m pretty sure just about everyone knew it was and that they overpaid for him.



Apparently everyone except the smartest GM in baseball history.

The guy with 3 World Series title won on two teams that hadnt won in 86 and 108 years respectively.

I feel like that guy might be decent.



Fine. And I don't see you complaining about Heyward.

Right because I'm not racist.

Batting averages are culturally biased.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57206
pittmike wrote:
312player wrote:
Heyward didn't contribute dick to that WS, it was a real bad signing.


You are right. Lately, RPB is just trying to be impossible just to be impossible. I would just as soon be trapped in a cabin in the woods forced to listen to LTG and Ogie debate the middle east.


:lol: you started this exchange.

Sorry the Cubs world series win messed up your fun

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
badrogue17 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: yeah mike you were flying solo on that heyward thought. No one else thought the heyward deal was bad

I’m pretty sure just about everyone knew it was and that they overpaid for him.


I would bet there is a thread about it from the day of the signing that would either prove or disprove your assertion

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: yeah mike you were flying solo on that heyward thought. No one else thought the heyward deal was bad

I’m pretty sure just about everyone knew it was and that they overpaid for him.



Apparently everyone except the smartest GM in baseball history.

The guy with 3 World Series title won on two teams that hadnt won in 86 and 108 years respectively.

I feel like that guy might be decent.


not at signing big money free agents

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
A lot of these ridiculous trade ideas are just Phil Rogers trade guessing idiocy being picked up as legit discussion.


Actually, these ideas are just a little bit of the pre-2016 Cub fan mindset sneaking back in. I told anyone that would listen this Heyward thing would be bad long term and fans would want to get him out of here. Now just like the old days there SOME fans dreaming up pie in the sky scenarios where magical great trades are going to happen for him because Cubs.

No, it's actually exactly what I said and not at all what you said.

Phil Rogers put that out.

Why do you just say things with absolutely no basis or evidence?


I did not refer to you because of your post today at all. I mentioned you because you generally like to remind me not all Cub fans think like something I posted or you never read that here.

What?

Here is what happened

Phil Rogers put a rumor out. It got picked up and discussed. When the Giants denied it, I pointed out it was just dumb Phil Rogers guessing.


Then you came in with some tired theory about LOLOLOL CUB FANS that has no basis in reality and has nothing to do with what we are discussing.

Also, your attempt at mocking falls completely flat, since after signing him they IMMEDIATELY WON the World Series.


Are you working from the assumption that Phil Rogers is a professional and unbiased columnist rather than a Cubbie fan?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: yeah mike you were flying solo on that heyward thought. No one else thought the heyward deal was bad

I’m pretty sure just about everyone knew it was and that they overpaid for him.



Apparently everyone except the smartest GM in baseball history.

The guy with 3 World Series title won on two teams that hadnt won in 86 and 108 years respectively.

I feel like that guy might be decent.


not at signing big money free agents

And still....the record is what the record is


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
rogers park bryan wrote:
312player wrote:
Heyward didn't contribute dick to that WS, it was a real bad signing.

First statement is wrong, second one is right.


He won a gold glove and the team defense was a big part of why they were the best team in baseball.


How could you forget The Speech

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
A lot of these ridiculous trade ideas are just Phil Rogers trade guessing idiocy being picked up as legit discussion.


Actually, these ideas are just a little bit of the pre-2016 Cub fan mindset sneaking back in. I told anyone that would listen this Heyward thing would be bad long term and fans would want to get him out of here. Now just like the old days there SOME fans dreaming up pie in the sky scenarios where magical great trades are going to happen for him because Cubs.

No, it's actually exactly what I said and not at all what you said.

Phil Rogers put that out.

Why do you just say things with absolutely no basis or evidence?


I did not refer to you because of your post today at all. I mentioned you because you generally like to remind me not all Cub fans think like something I posted or you never read that here.

What?

Here is what happened

Phil Rogers put a rumor out. It got picked up and discussed. When the Giants denied it, I pointed out it was just dumb Phil Rogers guessing.


Then you came in with some tired theory about LOLOLOL CUB FANS that has no basis in reality and has nothing to do with what we are discussing.

Also, your attempt at mocking falls completely flat, since after signing him they IMMEDIATELY WON the World Series.


Are you working from the assumption that Phil Rogers is a professional and unbiased columnist rather than a Cubbie fan?

Of course not. Although you will see him described as MLB.COM's Phil Rogers so people take it seriously.

I said idiocy in the original post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Alright.

State your position.


Gun to your head, you have to trade Russell or Baez. Who do you keep?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1010 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 34  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group