It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 6:16 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 568 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:29 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Imagine telling George Washington that he has to perform a background check on the friend he wants to give a gun to, and can go to jail for not doing it.
Imagine telling George Washington that he can walk onto a machine that will take him from Washington to Boston in a matter of minutes, and that somebody in a 50+ story building killed dozens of people in a matter of seconds by using a gun.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
leashyourkids wrote:
The big city Liberal can’t possibly bring himself to believe that some people value rights over some imaginary “protection” by the government, and for some reason, the hillbilly with guns can’t bring himself to admit that he does. The hillbilly has been shamed into inventing reasons why he wants guns rather than stating how he really feels.

Not getting the imaginary protection by the government thing. What do you mean by that?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
That's a fine quote. On the other hand, when you have these mass shootings as frequently as we have had them in recent years, I cant really come down too hard on the "we should try and stop these mass shootings from happening" people.


Far more people die in car crashes. Why isn't there political pressure to stop those?



Seatbelt, carseat laws..no texting or handsfree devices, Anti collision controls will be mandatory on new cars by 2020 ish.. Steps were taken, laws were passed.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Imagine telling George Washington that he has to perform a background check on the friend he wants to give a gun to, and can go to jail for not doing it.
Imagine telling George Washington that he can walk onto a machine that will take him from Washington to Boston in a matter of minutes, and that somebody in a 50+ story building killed dozens of people in a matter of seconds by using a gun.

George Washington: Wait, wait, back up. Do the slaves have firearms?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:32 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
That's a fine quote. On the other hand, when you have these mass shootings as frequently as we have had them in recent years, I cant really come down too hard on the "we should try and stop these mass shootings from happening" people.


Far more people die in car crashes. Why isn't there political pressure to stop those?
MANY people claimed that it was their right to not wear a seatbelt. Cars and licences are regulated far more than guns are.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
The big city Liberal can’t possibly bring himself to believe that some people value rights over some imaginary “protection” by the government, and for some reason, the hillbilly with guns can’t bring himself to admit that he does. The hillbilly has been shamed into inventing reasons why he wants guns rather than stating how he really feels.

Not getting the imaginary protection by the government thing. What do you mean by that?


JORR hit on it a bit. The entire mindset of the American public has changed. Think about it for a second (Beardown vibe, I know)... it can definitely sound folksy and corny to say, but America was founded on protection from government. But you and I and probably everyone here were raised in a culture that looks to government to solve our problems. If you went back 200 years and there was rampant violence, those people would not look to government to solve their problems. It may not even occur to them. They would try to solve it on their own. And in this case, they might just consider it to be one of the necessary evils of life. That’s not an insensitive thing to say. It’s the reality that life is risky and messy - a reality that some people seem not to believe anymore. The government can’t solve all of life’s problems or risks.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Imagine telling George Washington that he has to perform a background check on the friend he wants to give a gun to, and can go to jail for not doing it.
Imagine telling him that if he sold his house that he would have to pay taxes to the government for it.

So, just to be clear, you think anyone should be able to give anyone else a gun legally? So, if you own a gun right now, you should be able to give it to a guy that just got out of prison for armed robbery.


Imagine telling George Washington that a lunatic exercised his 2nd Amendment right, and killed 58 people and wounded hundreds more.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
leashyourkids wrote:
The government can’t solve all of life’s problems or risks.

But the people running the computer simulation we are almost certainly living in, CAN.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Chus wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Imagine telling George Washington that he has to perform a background check on the friend he wants to give a gun to, and can go to jail for not doing it.
Imagine telling him that if he sold his house that he would have to pay taxes to the government for it.

So, just to be clear, you think anyone should be able to give anyone else a gun legally? So, if you own a gun right now, you should be able to give it to a guy that just got out of prison for armed robbery.


Imagine telling George Washington that a lunatic exercised his 2nd Amendment right, and killed 58 people and wounded hundreds more.


I wonder what they used to do to lunatics in revolutionary times? I don't know? Witches I guess.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
That's a fine quote. On the other hand, when you have these mass shootings as frequently as we have had them in recent years, I cant really come down too hard on the "we should try and stop these mass shootings from happening" people.


Far more people die in car crashes. Why isn't there political pressure to stop those?


Simple answer is the car's main purpose isn't to kill/injure others.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:43 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80514
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
That's a fine quote. On the other hand, when you have these mass shootings as frequently as we have had them in recent years, I cant really come down too hard on the "we should try and stop these mass shootings from happening" people.


Far more people die in car crashes. Why isn't there political pressure to stop those?



Seatbelt, carseat laws..no texting or handsfree devices, Anti collision controls will be mandatory on new cars by 2020 ish.. Steps were taken, laws were passed.



Sounds kind of like the restrictions of firearms. IT'S NOT WORKING! DO SOMETHING!

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:44 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80514
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Chus wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
That's a fine quote. On the other hand, when you have these mass shootings as frequently as we have had them in recent years, I cant really come down too hard on the "we should try and stop these mass shootings from happening" people.


Far more people die in car crashes. Why isn't there political pressure to stop those?


Simple answer is the car's main purpose isn't to kill/injure others.



That raises the question of whether there is ever a reason to kill/injure someone.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Chus wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
That's a fine quote. On the other hand, when you have these mass shootings as frequently as we have had them in recent years, I cant really come down too hard on the "we should try and stop these mass shootings from happening" people.


Far more people die in car crashes. Why isn't there political pressure to stop those?


Simple answer is the car's main purpose isn't to kill/injure others.



That raises the question of whether there is ever a reason to kill/injure someone.


30 more pages.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
That's a fine quote. On the other hand, when you have these mass shootings as frequently as we have had them in recent years, I cant really come down too hard on the "we should try and stop these mass shootings from happening" people.


Far more people die in car crashes. Why isn't there political pressure to stop those?



Seatbelt, carseat laws..no texting or handsfree devices, Anti collision controls will be mandatory on new cars by 2020 ish.. Steps were taken, laws were passed.



Sounds kind of like the restrictions of firearms. IT'S NOT WORKING! DO SOMETHING!

Seems to me like those driving restrictions appear to be working? From mandated safety features to licensing, etc.

Image


Last edited by Kirkwood on Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:47 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 25, 2017 9:30 pm
Posts: 135
pizza_Place: Score cafe
leashyourkids wrote:
Think about it for a second (Beardown vibe, I know)


It's "just think about it," not think about it for a second. If your going to do a parody then do it right. But like drinky you failed. But he fails at most things in life. Cuz he's a dumbass.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
The big city Liberal can’t possibly bring himself to believe that some people value rights over some imaginary “protection” by the government, and for some reason, the hillbilly with guns can’t bring himself to admit that he does. The hillbilly has been shamed into inventing reasons why he wants guns rather than stating how he really feels.

Not getting the imaginary protection by the government thing. What do you mean by that?


JORR hit on it a bit. The entire mindset of the American public has changed. Think about it for a second (Beardown vibe, I know)... it can definitely sound folksy and corny to say, but America was founded on protection from government. But you and I and probably everyone here were raised in a culture that looks to government to solve our problems. If you went back 200 years and there was rampant violence, those people would not look to government to solve their problems. It may not even occur to them. They would try to solve it on their own. And in this case, they might just consider it to be one of the necessary evils of life. That’s not an insensitive thing to say. It’s the reality that life is risky and messy - a reality that some people seem not to believe anymore. The government can’t solve all of life’s problems or risks.



Should gun owners be allowed to own an M4?

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Then there is the fact that most people see cars as a necessity in today's America. Many people dont view guns that way yet.


Right. Because most people assume that there will be someone else there (some "special" person with a gun) to protect them. It's for the same reason that we have to have warning labels that coffee is hot. The idea of self-reliance that the country was founded upon has almost disappeared.

It kind of reminds me of the way my wife drives. She's not a bad driver but she always assumes that every other driver is going to do the right thing, i.e follow the traffic laws. I never assume anything. When my light turns green, I still look both ways because once in awhile some asshole is flaying through on the red. Ultimately, everyone is responsible for himself.
I mostly agree with you. The problem with guns is that things can be done to make them safer and all of those things are fought against by the "I need it for protection and recreation!" people. JLN seemingly did it earlier in the thread when he claimed that any gun owner should be able to give or sell their guns to anyone else they want with no government oversight at all. This is because George Washington would be upset even though we have no idea what his thoughts on modern guns would be. He still lived in a time when guns weren't even efficient enough to be the leading cause of death in war where people were actively trying to kill each other. It was a time when dueling was legally allowed. It was a time when the very concept of police was so rare that there wasn't an official police force in America during his life time.

Now, I think that gun ownership is an important right that should not be taken away. I would vote against the repeal of the 2nd amendment. However, I think it's terrible how the gun lobby has decided that any gun laws are basically a way to have the government eventually searching every house and taking the guns away. I mean, there are states right now pushing to make concealed carry legal like the states were having such a problem prior to that which made it important that a guy can be legally carrying a gun while walking through a mall or at Starbucks or at school.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
312player wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
The big city Liberal can’t possibly bring himself to believe that some people value rights over some imaginary “protection” by the government, and for some reason, the hillbilly with guns can’t bring himself to admit that he does. The hillbilly has been shamed into inventing reasons why he wants guns rather than stating how he really feels.

Not getting the imaginary protection by the government thing. What do you mean by that?


JORR hit on it a bit. The entire mindset of the American public has changed. Think about it for a second (Beardown vibe, I know)... it can definitely sound folksy and corny to say, but America was founded on protection from government. But you and I and probably everyone here were raised in a culture that looks to government to solve our problems. If you went back 200 years and there was rampant violence, those people would not look to government to solve their problems. It may not even occur to them. They would try to solve it on their own. And in this case, they might just consider it to be one of the necessary evils of life. That’s not an insensitive thing to say. It’s the reality that life is risky and messy - a reality that some people seem not to believe anymore. The government can’t solve all of life’s problems or risks.



Should gun owners be allowed to own an M4?


Really depends on how you look at it. A civilian version of an M$ is not functionally different than any other semi automatic rifle you can buy. I will admit it can accept a 30 round magazine and does look scary to people. Others may just think it looks cool though.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
312player wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
The big city Liberal can’t possibly bring himself to believe that some people value rights over some imaginary “protection” by the government, and for some reason, the hillbilly with guns can’t bring himself to admit that he does. The hillbilly has been shamed into inventing reasons why he wants guns rather than stating how he really feels.

Not getting the imaginary protection by the government thing. What do you mean by that?


JORR hit on it a bit. The entire mindset of the American public has changed. Think about it for a second (Beardown vibe, I know)... it can definitely sound folksy and corny to say, but America was founded on protection from government. But you and I and probably everyone here were raised in a culture that looks to government to solve our problems. If you went back 200 years and there was rampant violence, those people would not look to government to solve their problems. It may not even occur to them. They would try to solve it on their own. And in this case, they might just consider it to be one of the necessary evils of life. That’s not an insensitive thing to say. It’s the reality that life is risky and messy - a reality that some people seem not to believe anymore. The government can’t solve all of life’s problems or risks.



Should gun owners be allowed to own an M4?


Really depends on how you look at it. A civilian version of an M$ is not functionally different than any other semi automatic rifle you can buy. I will admit it can accept a 30 round magazine and does look scary to people. Others may just think it looks cool though.

Hold down the shift button


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Then there is the fact that most people see cars as a necessity in today's America. Many people dont view guns that way yet.


Right. Because most people assume that there will be someone else there (some "special" person with a gun) to protect them. It's for the same reason that we have to have warning labels that coffee is hot. The idea of self-reliance that the country was founded upon has almost disappeared.

It kind of reminds me of the way my wife drives. She's not a bad driver but she always assumes that every other driver is going to do the right thing, i.e follow the traffic laws. I never assume anything. When my light turns green, I still look both ways because once in awhile some asshole is flaying through on the red. Ultimately, everyone is responsible for himself.
I mostly agree with you. The problem with guns is that things can be done to make them safer and all of those things are fought against by the "I need it for protection and recreation!" people. JLN seemingly did it earlier in the thread when he claimed that any gun owner should be able to give or sell their guns to anyone else they want with no government oversight at all. This is because George Washington would be upset even though we have no idea what his thoughts on modern guns would be. He still lived in a time when guns weren't even efficient enough to be the leading cause of death in war where people were actively trying to kill each other. It was a time when dueling was legally allowed. It was a time when the very concept of police was so rare that there wasn't an official police force in America during his life time.

Now, I think that gun ownership is an important right that should not be taken away. I would vote against the repeal of the 2nd amendment. However, I think it's terrible how the gun lobby has decided that any gun laws are basically a way to have the government eventually searching every house and taking the guns away. I mean, there are states right now pushing to make concealed carry legal like the states were having such a problem prior to that which made it important that a guy can be legally carrying a gun while walking through a mall or at Starbucks or at school.

This is pretty much where I'm at.

But Im kind of resigned to the fact that there will be no meaningful restrictions or laws passed, so it is what it is. This is the country we have chosen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
312player wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
The big city Liberal can’t possibly bring himself to believe that some people value rights over some imaginary “protection” by the government, and for some reason, the hillbilly with guns can’t bring himself to admit that he does. The hillbilly has been shamed into inventing reasons why he wants guns rather than stating how he really feels.

Not getting the imaginary protection by the government thing. What do you mean by that?


JORR hit on it a bit. The entire mindset of the American public has changed. Think about it for a second (Beardown vibe, I know)... it can definitely sound folksy and corny to say, but America was founded on protection from government. But you and I and probably everyone here were raised in a culture that looks to government to solve our problems. If you went back 200 years and there was rampant violence, those people would not look to government to solve their problems. It may not even occur to them. They would try to solve it on their own. And in this case, they might just consider it to be one of the necessary evils of life. That’s not an insensitive thing to say. It’s the reality that life is risky and messy - a reality that some people seem not to believe anymore. The government can’t solve all of life’s problems or risks.



Should gun owners be allowed to own an M4?


I don’t know... and I’m not saying that there should be no regulation. I’m just saying that sometimes the gun control advocates act as though the “gun rights” people are these blood-thirsty monsters (and simpletons) when that’s not the case. They have many reasonable arguments. We have just gotten to a point where people find it appalling that someone might value their rights over the occasional loss of human life. 200 years ago, that would have been the prevailing mindset.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Thousands of adults and children each year is occasional loss of life. I respect your callousness.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
leashyourkids wrote:
312player wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
The big city Liberal can’t possibly bring himself to believe that some people value rights over some imaginary “protection” by the government, and for some reason, the hillbilly with guns can’t bring himself to admit that he does. The hillbilly has been shamed into inventing reasons why he wants guns rather than stating how he really feels.

Not getting the imaginary protection by the government thing. What do you mean by that?


JORR hit on it a bit. The entire mindset of the American public has changed. Think about it for a second (Beardown vibe, I know)... it can definitely sound folksy and corny to say, but America was founded on protection from government. But you and I and probably everyone here were raised in a culture that looks to government to solve our problems. If you went back 200 years and there was rampant violence, those people would not look to government to solve their problems. It may not even occur to them. They would try to solve it on their own. And in this case, they might just consider it to be one of the necessary evils of life. That’s not an insensitive thing to say. It’s the reality that life is risky and messy - a reality that some people seem not to believe anymore. The government can’t solve all of life’s problems or risks.



Should gun owners be allowed to own an M4?


I don’t know... and I’m not saying that there should be no regulation. I’m just saying that sometimes the gun control advocates act as though the “gun rights” people are these blood-thirsty monsters (and simpletons) when that’s not the case. They have many reasonable arguments. We have just gotten to a point where people find it appalling that someone might value their rights over the occasional loss of human life. 200 years ago, that would have been the prevailing mindset.

Which regulations are you ok with?


Also, I think we should probably just stop with the references to the 1700's and what they would think. It was such a different time, it doesnt even matter.

I mean, I think its possible the forefathers would take issue with the Newtown shooting. I dont think they'd laugh it off and say "well, that's the other side of liberty!" Im not saying they'd take guns away either. Who knows what they'd do. They had wooden teeth and slaves and invented the giant white wigs for judges.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
I'm all for returning to those halcyon days of the early 1800's so patriots like leash can be happy.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
312player wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
The big city Liberal can’t possibly bring himself to believe that some people value rights over some imaginary “protection” by the government, and for some reason, the hillbilly with guns can’t bring himself to admit that he does. The hillbilly has been shamed into inventing reasons why he wants guns rather than stating how he really feels.

Not getting the imaginary protection by the government thing. What do you mean by that?


JORR hit on it a bit. The entire mindset of the American public has changed. Think about it for a second (Beardown vibe, I know)... it can definitely sound folksy and corny to say, but America was founded on protection from government. But you and I and probably everyone here were raised in a culture that looks to government to solve our problems. If you went back 200 years and there was rampant violence, those people would not look to government to solve their problems. It may not even occur to them. They would try to solve it on their own. And in this case, they might just consider it to be one of the necessary evils of life. That’s not an insensitive thing to say. It’s the reality that life is risky and messy - a reality that some people seem not to believe anymore. The government can’t solve all of life’s problems or risks.



Should gun owners be allowed to own an M4?


Really depends on how you look at it. A civilian version of an M$ is not functionally different than any other semi automatic rifle you can buy. I will admit it can accept a 30 round magazine and does look scary to people. Others may just think it looks cool though.

Hold down the shift button


Oh My God!

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
IMU wrote:
Thousands of adults and children each year is occasional loss of life. I respect your callousness.


I know it’s fun for you to either imply or outright say that those who disagree with you are evil or Nazis, but let’s try to have a more nuanced conversation here.

The reality of the situation is that there are 100 more things people die from each day than guns. That doesn’t mean we don’t try to make society better or enact gun regulations, but there’s no need to act as though you have some moral high ground. You don’t.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Terry's Peeps wrote:
I'm all for returning to those halcyon days of the early 1800's so patriots like leash can be happy.


More condescension. Sad!

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
312player wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
The big city Liberal can’t possibly bring himself to believe that some people value rights over some imaginary “protection” by the government, and for some reason, the hillbilly with guns can’t bring himself to admit that he does. The hillbilly has been shamed into inventing reasons why he wants guns rather than stating how he really feels.

Not getting the imaginary protection by the government thing. What do you mean by that?


JORR hit on it a bit. The entire mindset of the American public has changed. Think about it for a second (Beardown vibe, I know)... it can definitely sound folksy and corny to say, but America was founded on protection from government. But you and I and probably everyone here were raised in a culture that looks to government to solve our problems. If you went back 200 years and there was rampant violence, those people would not look to government to solve their problems. It may not even occur to them. They would try to solve it on their own. And in this case, they might just consider it to be one of the necessary evils of life. That’s not an insensitive thing to say. It’s the reality that life is risky and messy - a reality that some people seem not to believe anymore. The government can’t solve all of life’s problems or risks.



Should gun owners be allowed to own an M4?


I don’t know... and I’m not saying that there should be no regulation. I’m just saying that sometimes the gun control advocates act as though the “gun rights” people are these blood-thirsty monsters (and simpletons) when that’s not the case. They have many reasonable arguments. We have just gotten to a point where people find it appalling that someone might value their rights over the occasional loss of human life. 200 years ago, that would have been the prevailing mindset.

Which regulations are you ok with?


Also, I think we should probably just stop with the references to the 1700's and what they would think. It was such a different time, it doesnt even matter.

I mean, I think its possible the forefathers would take issue with the Newtown shooting. I dont think they'd laugh it off and say "well, that's the other side of liberty!" Im not saying they'd take guns away either. Who knows what they'd do. They had wooden teeth and slaves and invented the giant white wigs for judges.


Do you really think I or anyone else is laughing off people’s deaths?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
It’s getting a little heavy for 8:00 AM. I should do some work.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
.


Last edited by Kirkwood on Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 568 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group