It is currently Sat Feb 22, 2025 11:49 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7084
long time guy wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Quote:
their faith is frequently depicted as sanctioning pedophilia, coupled with intolerance for homosexuals and women.

Okay, where's the lie?

yep, statements regarding this are 100% accurate and can easily be backed up. Just try living as a gay man in Iran, as a woman in Saudi Arabia, or tell us about the child brides still relatively common in some MidEast countries.



You neglected to tell us how any of that makes them a threat to the United States.


Stopped reading after this. According to you, they can marry children and kill gays and women as long as they are not a threat to the United States, it's all good? :shock: Go crawl back under the rock you came from. You might even meet some of your buddies there.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
This has nothing to do with my point. If you can't understand that it doesn't then I'm not going to waste time explaining it.
It has everything to do with your point. This is why you won't respond to it. The fact is that you seemed to get confused on your "blame America for everything" playbook. You can't say that Muslims don't hate America when you also say that we have caused them to hate America because of our foreign policy of the past many decades.

So, which is it?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juiced wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Quote:
their faith is frequently depicted as sanctioning pedophilia, coupled with intolerance for homosexuals and women.

Okay, where's the lie?

yep, statements regarding this are 100% accurate and can easily be backed up. Just try living as a gay man in Iran, as a woman in Saudi Arabia, or tell us about the child brides still relatively common in some MidEast countries.



You neglected to tell us how any of that makes them a threat to the United States.


Stopped reading after this. According to you, they can marry children and kill gays and women as long as they are not a threat to the United States, it's all good? :shock: Go crawl back under the rock you came from. You might even meet some of your buddies there.


If you believe that this is the reason that the U.S. all of a sudden became interested in the Middle East then you really are ignorant. You can believe the propaganda. I'm not. If we truly were interested in their crimes against humanity we would align ourselves with Saudi Arabia. It's that simple. If you are going to play the morality card then don't be a hypocrite.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Any dislike was considered more of a political than it was a religious thing.


And here's where you seem to be getting confused. Islam is a political system as well as a religion. That's why someone like Maajid Nawaz- a Muslim himself who the group you are citing has declared an anti-Muslim bigot- isn't likely to succeed at reforming Islam. Who the fuck is Maajid Nawaz to change the rules set out by the Prophet? I believe it was Christopher Hitchens who liked to point out that Islam made a claim for itself that was different from other religions and quite dangerous- that the Koran is the final Word of God. It's pretty difficult to "reform" that.

See, I thought Corey McPherin had the Final Word.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
If ltg were really interested in the crimes against humanity of the United States he would leave and go to another country. IT's that simple. If you are going to play the morality card then don't be a hypocrite.

Or you know, it's complicated.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7084
leashyourkids wrote:

SPLC.

Joke of an organization that reasonable folks on both sides have denounced.[/quote]


Depends on what you consider to be reasonable.[/quote]
Not really. Reasonable people don't label Muslims who criticize aspects of Islam as terrorists. Not really a semantics debate. Sorry.[/quote]


I've never heard that. Is it any more unreasonable than people on the other side that constantly assert that each and every adherent to the religion of Islam is out to destroy the West?


Again it's funny how that sort of language was virtually non existent pre 9/11[/quote]

Just a guess, but that’s probably because Muslim fundamentalists ran commercial airliners into the World Trade Center on 9/11.[/quote]

:lol: His argument is we shouldn't view extreme Muslim's as a threat because we didn't before they flew a plan into World Trade Center and vowed to "destroy the west!" WTF is wrong with this guy?

LTG, If someone blew up your house and said they where going to destroy your whole block and even left a video telling you this, would you view them as a threat or just say, "I never had a problem with this person before they blew up my house. He even bought me a drink once. Good guy!"

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
This has nothing to do with my point. If you can't understand that it doesn't then I'm not going to waste time explaining it.
It has everything to do with your point. This is why you won't respond to it. The fact is that you seemed to get confused on your "blame America for everything" playbook. You can't say that Muslims don't hate America when you also say that we have caused them to hate America because of our foreign policy of the past many decades.

So, which is it?



What you fail to understand (unsurprisingly) is the basic premise. There was rarely any discussion of how Islam teaches Muslims to hate America pre 9/11. Any hatred of America was geologically linked. Post 9/11 the spin became about an inherent hatred of America on the part of Muslims. All of a sudden it was the religion that taught it's followers to "hate the West". That is propaganda which has been spun by ideologues in this country. It simply isn't factual.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
Juiced wrote:
:lol: His argument is we shouldn't view extreme Muslim's as a threat because we didn't before they flew a plan into World Trade Center and vowed to "destroy the west!" WTF is wrong with this guy?

LTG, If someone blew up your house and said they where going to destroy your whole block and even left a video telling you this, would you view them as a threat or just say, "I never had a problem with this person before they blew up my house. He even bought me a drink once. Good guy!"

I think we should fast forward to ltg, either subtly, or openly, stating that 9/11 was the fault of the United States. I predict it is coming.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If ltg were really interested in the crimes against humanity of the United States he would leave and go to another country. IT's that simple. If you are going to play the morality card then don't be a hypocrite.

Or you know, it's complicated.


Why would I have to leave? Thanks for further verification that you are nothing more than an apologist for American behavior.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
What you fail to understand (unsurprisingly) is the basic premise. There was rarely any discussion of how Islam teaches Muslims to hate America pre 9/11. Any hatred of America was geologically linked. Post 9/11 the spin became about an inherent hatred of America on the part of Muslims. All of a sudden it was the religion that taught it's followers to "hate the West". That is propaganda which has been spun by ideologues in this country. It simply isn't factual.
What you fail to understand is that you are probably the biggest proponent on here that the Middle East hates America and it happened before 9/11.

Anyways, I'm pretty sure the type of talk you are describing was taken up a notch when ISIS came to be as they are pretty open about it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If ltg were really interested in the crimes against humanity of the United States he would leave and go to another country. IT's that simple. If you are going to play the morality card then don't be a hypocrite.

Or you know, it's complicated.


Why would I have to leave? Thanks for further verification that you are nothing more than an apologist for American behavior.
For the same reasons the United States should cut all ties from Saudi Arabia.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juiced wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

SPLC.

Joke of an organization that reasonable folks on both sides have denounced.



Depends on what you consider to be reasonable.[/quote]
Not really. Reasonable people don't label Muslims who criticize aspects of Islam as terrorists. Not really a semantics debate. Sorry.[/quote]


I've never heard that. Is it any more unreasonable than people on the other side that constantly assert that each and every adherent to the religion of Islam is out to destroy the West?


Again it's funny how that sort of language was virtually non existent pre 9/11[/quote]

Just a guess, but that’s probably because Muslim fundamentalists ran commercial airliners into the World Trade Center on 9/11.[/quote]

:lol: His argument is we shouldn't view extreme Muslim's as a threat because we didn't before they flew a plan into World Trade Center and vowed to "destroy the west!" WTF is wrong with this guy?

LTG, If someone blew up your house and said they where going to destroy your whole block and even left a video telling you this, would you view them as a threat or just say, "I never had a problem with this person before they blew up my house. He even bought me a drink once. Good guy!"[/quote]


Islamic extremism should have been relegated to Bin Laden and Al Queda. Again the hypocrisy. Do Neo Nazis speak for all whites? Do they speak for all racists? MANY here have no problem providing distinctions when it comes to them yet Bin Laden somehow spoke for all Muslims.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7084
long time guy wrote:
Juiced wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Quote:
their faith is frequently depicted as sanctioning pedophilia, coupled with intolerance for homosexuals and women.

Okay, where's the lie?

yep, statements regarding this are 100% accurate and can easily be backed up. Just try living as a gay man in Iran, as a woman in Saudi Arabia, or tell us about the child brides still relatively common in some MidEast countries.



You neglected to tell us how any of that makes them a threat to the United States.


Stopped reading after this. According to you, they can marry children and kill gays and women as long as they are not a threat to the United States, it's all good? :shock: Go crawl back under the rock you came from. You might even meet some of your buddies there.


If you believe that this is the reason that the U.S. all of a sudden became interested in the Middle East then you really are ignorant. You can believe the propaganda. I'm not. If we truly were interested in their crimes against humanity we would align ourselves with Saudi Arabia. It's that simple. If you are going to play the morality card then don't be a hypocrite.


What are you talking about? I don't care why the the U.S. is interested in the Middle East. I care about what the Middle East is doing to their citizens and their view of the world.

In your messed up world, you would have sided with the Germans in WWII because the U.S. only got involved because Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. You would tell us not to believe the propaganda about the Jews being exterminated in camps and that if we where truly interested in the Germans crimes against humanity then we wouldn't have waited until we where bombed to do something about it.

You see how fucked up your viewpoint is?

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
What you fail to understand (unsurprisingly) is the basic premise. There was rarely any discussion of how Islam teaches Muslims to hate America pre 9/11. Any hatred of America was geologically linked. Post 9/11 the spin became about an inherent hatred of America on the part of Muslims. All of a sudden it was the religion that taught it's followers to "hate the West". That is propaganda which has been spun by ideologues in this country. It simply isn't factual.
What you fail to understand is that you are probably the biggest proponent on here that the Middle East hates America and it happened before 9/11.

Anyways, I'm pretty sure the type of talk you are describing was taken up a notch when ISIS came to be as they are pretty open about it.


You still aren't making much sense.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juiced wrote:

You see how fucked up your viewpoint is?


Why aren't we attacking Saudi Arabia? They are the worst of all the human rights violators in the region.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7084
long time guy wrote:


Islamic extremism should have been relegated to Bin Laden and Al Queda. Again the hypocrisy. Do Neo Nazis speak for all whites? Do they speak for all racists? MANY here have no problem providing distinctions when it comes to them yet Bin Laden somehow spoke for all Muslims.


Come on LTG, you know the situation in the Middle East is not just black and white. Bin Laden was killed and many in Al Queda eliminated, yet Islamic extremism is still going strong. I would say all whites that follow the swastika are Nazis and all Middle Easterners who follow the Koran are radicals. Just as many Christians are Christians, Catholics Catholic exc exc.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Islamic extremism should have been relegated to Bin Laden and Al Queda. Again the hypocrisy. Do Neo Nazis speak for all whites? Do they speak for all racists? MANY here have no problem providing distinctions when it comes to them yet Bin Laden somehow spoke for all Muslims.

Once again, you have constantly blamed our foreign policy for out hatred in the Middle East. Is that somehow no longer true?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juiced wrote:
long time guy wrote:


Islamic extremism should have been relegated to Bin Laden and Al Queda. Again the hypocrisy. Do Neo Nazis speak for all whites? Do they speak for all racists? MANY here have no problem providing distinctions when it comes to them yet Bin Laden somehow spoke for all Muslims.


Come on LTG, you know the situation in the Middle East is not just black and white. Bin Laden was killed and many in Al Queda eliminated, yet Islamic extremism is still going strong. I would say all whites that follow the swastika are Nazis and all Middle Easterners who follow the Koran are radicals. Just as many Christians are Christians, Catholics Catholic exc exc.



I meant extremism as it related to the U.S. Iraq wasn't an Islamic extremist nation either. Hussein was regarded as a secularist.

In terms of the region the two largest sponsors of terrorism are Saudi Arabia and Iran. We have yet to war with either of them. If we are going to stay true to our word and agenda then it would behoove us to engage in conflict with those two countries.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7084
long time guy wrote:
Juiced wrote:

You see how fucked up your viewpoint is?


Why aren't we attacking Saudi Arabia? They are the worst of all the human rights violators in the region.


I can't attack anyone, all I can do is vote. What the politicians do is out of my control. What do you want me to do? Run for president and attack Saudi Arabia?

We are talking Mulsim characteristics and why we are oppose to them. Don't confuse the governments actions with my stance on human rights. We are not one entity, but two separate things.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juiced wrote:
long time guy wrote:


Islamic extremism should have been relegated to Bin Laden and Al Queda. Again the hypocrisy. Do Neo Nazis speak for all whites? Do they speak for all racists? MANY here have no problem providing distinctions when it comes to them yet Bin Laden somehow spoke for all Muslims.


Come on LTG, you know the situation in the Middle East is not just black and white. Bin Laden was killed and many in Al Queda eliminated, yet Islamic extremism is still going strong. I would say all whites that follow the swastika are Nazis and all Middle Easterners who follow the Koran are radicals. Just as many Christians are Christians, Catholics Catholic exc exc.



I meant extremism as it related to the U.S. Iraq wasn't an Islamic extremist nation either. Hussein was regarded as a secularist.

In terms of the region the two largest sponsors of terrorism are Saudi Arabia and Iran. We have yet to war with either of them. If we are going to stay true to our word and agenda then it would behoove us to engage in conflict with those two countries.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Islamic extremism should have been relegated to Bin Laden and Al Queda. Again the hypocrisy. Do Neo Nazis speak for all whites? Do they speak for all racists? MANY here have no problem providing distinctions when it comes to them yet Bin Laden somehow spoke for all Muslims.

Once again, you have constantly blamed our foreign policy for out hatred in the Middle East. Is that somehow no longer true?


You still don't comprehend the point. It's a waste of time to explain it. My position hasn't changed on that.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Islamic extremism should have been relegated to Bin Laden and Al Queda. Again the hypocrisy. Do Neo Nazis speak for all whites? Do they speak for all racists? MANY here have no problem providing distinctions when it comes to them yet Bin Laden somehow spoke for all Muslims.

Once again, you have constantly blamed our foreign policy for out hatred in the Middle East. Is that somehow no longer true?


You still don't comprehend the point. It's a waste of time to explain it. My position hasn't changed on that.

These types of responses are just an attempt to deflect. I'll make it easy.

When did the hatred of the West and the United States begin in the Middle East?
Why did the hatred of the West and the United States begin in the Middle East?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Islamic extremism should have been relegated to Bin Laden and Al Queda. Again the hypocrisy. Do Neo Nazis speak for all whites? Do they speak for all racists? MANY here have no problem providing distinctions when it comes to them yet Bin Laden somehow spoke for all Muslims.

Once again, you have constantly blamed our foreign policy for out hatred in the Middle East. Is that somehow no longer true?


You still don't comprehend the point. It's a waste of time to explain it. My position hasn't changed on that.

These types of responses are just an attempt to deflect. I'll make it easy.

When did the hatred of the West and the United States begin in the Middle East?
Why did the hatred of the West and the United States begin in the Middle East?



When your comprehension efforts improve I will answer. When you eliminate efforts to spin I will answer. If you can't understand the point then what's the point?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93623
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Islamic extremism should have been relegated to Bin Laden and Al Queda. Again the hypocrisy. Do Neo Nazis speak for all whites? Do they speak for all racists? MANY here have no problem providing distinctions when it comes to them yet Bin Laden somehow spoke for all Muslims.

Once again, you have constantly blamed our foreign policy for out hatred in the Middle East. Is that somehow no longer true?


You still don't comprehend the point. It's a waste of time to explain it. My position hasn't changed on that.

These types of responses are just an attempt to deflect. I'll make it easy.

When did the hatred of the West and the United States begin in the Middle East?
Why did the hatred of the West and the United States begin in the Middle East?



When your comprehension efforts improve I will answer. When you eliminate efforts to spin I will answer. If you can't understand the point then what's the point?
I'm asking questions. This is what you do to gain comprehension.

Your posts in this thread seem to be in direct contradiction to things you have said previously and your non-answers to it seem to indicate you can't even come up with a way to spin it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Here is the point. Post 9/11 propaganda spewers have repeatedly suggested that Islam teaches its followers to hate America and the West. It is CLEARLY stated in the Koran they say. If that were the case then why wasn't such talk prevalent pre 9/11?

They are taught to hate our values yadda yadda. Our culture stinks. You never heard much of such talk Pre 9/11. In order to justify U.S. actions in the region it became necessary that such language permeate American society.

U.S. actions in that region were and even today are still ignored. Read this board for a change and check its temperature. Assess how much shrift U.S. actions in that part of the world garners. Then compare it to how much attention is paid to every car bombing, mass shooting, or reckless driving incident.

I posted a link about Obama drone strikes and people could care less about it. That isn't an accident as I expected it.

As I told you my position has never wavered. If you can't understand it after I explained it again I don't know what to tell you.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
I remember hearing a lot of that after the 1993 bombing of the wtc. I remember a lot of that talk after the 2000 USS Cole bombing. Prior to the 90s we were funding many of these folks in a proxy war with Russia. We were "trying" to be allies.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Anti-American speech was prevalent in the Middle East before 9/11.

Surely no one thinks that started in 2001.

Right?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Bin Laden going on youtube and arguing with 9/11 truthers is hilarious, Im sorry.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Anti-American speech was prevalent in the Middle East before 9/11.

Surely no one thinks that started in 2001.

Right?


I'd never heard that it was specifically taught in the Koran until post 9/11.

What you reference backs up my argument regarding foreign policy and not religion. I know the great Ogie purveyor of truths and pervading falsehoods will somehow find a way to disagree.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Jesus taking revenge.

http://www.apnewsarchive.com/2017/A-pow ... aefd81684e

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group