It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:35 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:31 am
Posts: 1871
pizza_Place: Le Grand Pizza
I see that there has not been a post for days on the forum. Maybe it's an anomaly, maybe it's the end of interest in the team that will last until we get good again. What gives, guys?

Image Image

PG Jerian Grant
SG Kris Dunn :shock:
SF Quincy Pondexter :shock:
PF Lauri Markkanen
C Robin Lopez

PGRussell Westbrook
SGAndre Roberson
SFPaul George
PFJerami Grant
CDakari Johnson

Injuries
Nikola MiroticOUT
Justin HolidayOUT
Zach LaVineOUT
Cameron PayneOUT
David Nwaba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:43 pm
Posts: 2609
pizza_Place: Lucio's
Interest is arguably at an all time low in the post Jordan era. Here's hoping they get the top pick or no worse than a top 3. And Gar/Pax better not fuck it up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Hoiberg is so fucking clueless. The more he plays Grant and Dunn together, the more his offensive scheme seems stupid, and it stunts their growth as point guards. Which is all either of them could be, even with good coaching.

I swear to God Vinny del Negro was a better coach.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
IMU wrote:
Hoiberg is so fucking clueless. The more he plays Grant and Dunn together, the more his offensive scheme seems stupid, and it stunts their growth as point guards. Which is all either of them could be, even with good coaching.

I swear to God Vinny del Negro was a better coach.

Image

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
27-7 after 1 :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
FavreFan wrote:
27-7 after 1 :lol:

FUN BAD

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
IMU wrote:
Hoiberg is so fucking clueless. The more he plays Grant and Dunn together, the more his offensive scheme seems stupid, and it stunts their growth as point guards. Which is all either of them could be, even with good coaching.

I swear to God Vinny del Negro was a better coach.

I just don't think Grant will be a long term NBA player. He plays so incredibly timid.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
In the car listening and Wennington couldn't even talk because he was laughing so much over one of Westbrook's dunks. Then Swirsky started laughing.

City of Fools wrote:
I just don't think Grant will be a long term NBA player. He plays so incredibly timid.


Agree 100%.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
IMU wrote:
Hoiberg is so fucking clueless. The more he plays Grant and Dunn together, the more his offensive scheme seems stupid, and it stunts their growth as point guards. Which is all either of them could be, even with good coaching.

I swear to God Vinny del Negro was a better coach.

But just look how much more freeflowing and enjoyable to watch this offense is now!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
This year isn't an indicator of what kind of coach Hoiberg happens to be. The Bulls have the least talented team in the league. Yeah I know a better coach would have a much better record. Yadda yadda yadda.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
This year isn't an indicator of what kind of coach Hoiberg happens to be. The Bulls have the least talented team in the league. Yeah I know a better coach would have a much better record. Yadda yadda yadda.

And the first year wasn't either all because of those darned injuries. But the second year, where he scrapped into the playoffs in an East that was miles weaker than it is this year, was a definite indicator of his impeccable coaching prowess.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Well he certainly has physical practices, ask Niko.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
I see no development in any player under Hoiberg. I've seen players regress. I've seen him clash with multiple players. I've seen multiple instances of discord within the locker room. I see Hoiberg starting two PG's that can't shoot in the same lineup while touting that his offense needs many shooters on the court to space the offense.

He has failed as an NBA coach in every single way imaginable.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
This year isn't an indicator of what kind of coach Hoiberg happens to be. The Bulls have the least talented team in the league. Yeah I know a better coach would have a much better record. Yadda yadda yadda.

And the first year wasn't either all because of those darned injuries. But the second year, where he scrapped into the playoffs in an East that was miles weaker than it is this year, was a definite indicator of his impeccable coaching prowess.



Yeah no matter what he does he is going to be a terrible coach in your opinion. Let that be the premise and we can keep it moving.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
long time guy wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
This year isn't an indicator of what kind of coach Hoiberg happens to be. The Bulls have the least talented team in the league. Yeah I know a better coach would have a much better record. Yadda yadda yadda.

And the first year wasn't either all because of those darned injuries. But the second year, where he scrapped into the playoffs in an East that was miles weaker than it is this year, was a definite indicator of his impeccable coaching prowess.



Yeah no matter what he does he is going to be a terrible coach in your opinion. Let that be the premise and we can keep it moving.

What are the Top 3 things you like about Hoiberg. What are the 3 things you can point to and give him credit for, or say he does well at?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
That was a great in bounds pass.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
I see no development in any player under Hoiberg. I've seen players regress. I've seen him clash with multiple players. I've seen multiple instances of discord within the locker room. I see Hoiberg starting two PG's that can't shoot in the same lineup while touting that his offense needs many shooters on the court to space the offense.

He has failed as an NBA coach in every single way imaginable.



He made the playoffs last season and exceeded the expectations of MANY of the experts on this very board.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
This year isn't an indicator of what kind of coach Hoiberg happens to be. The Bulls have the least talented team in the league. Yeah I know a better coach would have a much better record. Yadda yadda yadda.

And the first year wasn't either all because of those darned injuries. But the second year, where he scrapped into the playoffs in an East that was miles weaker than it is this year, was a definite indicator of his impeccable coaching prowess.



Yeah no matter what he does he is going to be a terrible coach in your opinion. Let that be the premise and we can keep it moving.

What are the Top 3 things you like about Hoiberg. What are the 3 things you can point to and give him credit for, or say he does well at?



I actually like his offensive sets.
I like the fact that his players make the extra pass.
Markannen appears to be developing nicely

He is a really good offensive coach.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
I see no development in any player under Hoiberg. I've seen players regress. I've seen him clash with multiple players. I've seen multiple instances of discord within the locker room. I see Hoiberg starting two PG's that can't shoot in the same lineup while touting that his offense needs many shooters on the court to space the offense.

He has failed as an NBA coach in every single way imaginable.



He made the playoffs last season and exceeded the expectations of MANY of the experts on this very board.

Making the playoffs and losing in the first round is not much of an accomplishment. Much of the board had the Bulls win total pretty much right where it ended up being. I had them at a game or two under .500.

If his crowning achievement in two years is making the playoffs once, with a carry over roster that had already made the playoffs a ton in the previous five seasons well... not sure I'm going to give him a lot of credit for that.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
long time guy wrote:
He is a really good offensive coach.

Bulls score the fewest points in the league. All Markannen does is shoot. He did not even have an assist until his 4th game. His offensive sets? "Do you have the ball? Are you behind the three point line? Shoot!" That isn't an offensive set.

I don't care who your players are. A "really good offensive coach" would not have a team dead last in terms of scoring. Or does your eye test tell you that the Bulls score all the time?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Last edited by IMU on Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
I see no development in any player under Hoiberg. I've seen players regress. I've seen him clash with multiple players. I've seen multiple instances of discord within the locker room. I see Hoiberg starting two PG's that can't shoot in the same lineup while touting that his offense needs many shooters on the court to space the offense.

He has failed as an NBA coach in every single way imaginable.



He made the playoffs last season and exceeded the expectations of MANY of the experts on this very board.

Making the playoffs and losing in the first round is not much of an accomplishment. Much of the board had the Bulls win total pretty much right where it ended up being. I had them at a game or two under .500.

If his crowning achievement in two years is making the playoffs once, with a carry over roster that had already made the playoffs a ton in the previous five seasons well... not sure I'm going to give him a lot of credit for that.



What do you expect him to do with this roster? You do realize that this roster was constructed in order to lose games.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
This year isn't an indicator of what kind of coach Hoiberg happens to be. The Bulls have the least talented team in the league. Yeah I know a better coach would have a much better record. Yadda yadda yadda.

And the first year wasn't either all because of those darned injuries. But the second year, where he scrapped into the playoffs in an East that was miles weaker than it is this year, was a definite indicator of his impeccable coaching prowess.



Yeah no matter what he does he is going to be a terrible coach in your opinion. Let that be the premise and we can keep it moving.

No, no matter what you're going to wave away any criticism of him all for the most glorious feat of reaching the 8th seed with a team that just two seasons prior should have been in the NBA finals (and would have been if they had the benefit of Hoiberg's offensive genius against the Cavs).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
PSA - The Blackhawks seem to have returned for at least this evening if you've tired of this "team".

They just scored as I typed this .... 4-1 good guys.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
This year isn't an indicator of what kind of coach Hoiberg happens to be. The Bulls have the least talented team in the league. Yeah I know a better coach would have a much better record. Yadda yadda yadda.

And the first year wasn't either all because of those darned injuries. But the second year, where he scrapped into the playoffs in an East that was miles weaker than it is this year, was a definite indicator of his impeccable coaching prowess.



Yeah no matter what he does he is going to be a terrible coach in your opinion. Let that be the premise and we can keep it moving.

No, no matter what you're going to wave away any criticism of him all for the most glorious feat of reaching the 8th seed with a team that just two seasons prior should have been in the NBA finals (and would have been if they had the benefit of Hoiberg's offensive genius against the Cavs).



There isn't a Bull from his first year as coach that is currently playing a prominent role on any of the contending teams. His team was injury riddled that first year.

He did a better job of coaching his team last year than the guy he replaced did with coaching his.

Do you care to discuss That?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Great game today.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
There isn't a Bull from his first year as coach that is currently playing a prominent role on any of the contending teams. His team was injury riddled that first year.
He did a better job of coaching his team last year than the guy he replaced did with coaching his.

Do you care to discuss That?

It's hilarious how you want to invoke the Thibs comparisons while now suddenly decrying the quality of the team Hoiberg inherited and completely missed the playoffs with. Even if I grant for the sake of argument the premise that the 2015-2016 Bulls did not feature any players with prominent roles on any of the currently contending teams (a notion that is strained to say the least given the starting positions that Rose, Butler, and Gasol currently play), that makes Thibodeau's achievements with a roster similarly lacking in such players a case of overachieving, not fireable underachieving. Trying to knock the roster of the team that Hoiberg failed to even make the playoffs with only makes what Thibodeau did the preceding season look better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
There isn't a Bull from his first year as coach that is currently playing a prominent role on any of the contending teams. His team was injury riddled that first year.
He did a better job of coaching his team last year than the guy he replaced did with coaching his.

Do you care to discuss That?

It's hilarious how you want to invoke the Thibs comparisons while now suddenly decrying the quality of the team Hoiberg inherited and completely missed the playoffs with. Even if I grant for the sake of argument the premise that the 2015-2016 Bulls did not feature any players with prominent roles on any of the currently contending teams (a notion that is strained to say the least given the starting positions that Rose, Butler, and Gasol currently play), that makes Thibodeau's achievements with a roster similarly lacking in such players a case of overachieving, not fireable underachieving. Trying to knock the roster of the team that Hoiberg failed to even make the playoffs with only makes what Thibodeau did the preceding season look better.


The Bulls had far more injuries in Hoibergs first than they had in Thibs last year. That was the difference. If Thibs is the coach that you keep suggesting then let's see what he will do with Minnesota. The Bulls thing is done. Time to move on.

Hoiberg didn't have the luxury of coaching that team. They were injury riddled.

Twice as many injuries. That is what the numbers say.


If Thibs is that guy then let's see what he does in Minnesota.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
This is a roster stacked with D leaguers and rotation guys. When the Bulls are good again there will only be 2 guys from this current team on the roster. Hoiberg will be gone too.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
There isn't a Bull from his first year as coach that is currently playing a prominent role on any of the contending teams. His team was injury riddled that first year.
He did a better job of coaching his team last year than the guy he replaced did with coaching his.

Do you care to discuss That?

It's hilarious how you want to invoke the Thibs comparisons while now suddenly decrying the quality of the team Hoiberg inherited and completely missed the playoffs with. Even if I grant for the sake of argument the premise that the 2015-2016 Bulls did not feature any players with prominent roles on any of the currently contending teams (a notion that is strained to say the least given the starting positions that Rose, Butler, and Gasol currently play), that makes Thibodeau's achievements with a roster similarly lacking in such players a case of overachieving, not fireable underachieving. Trying to knock the roster of the team that Hoiberg failed to even make the playoffs with only makes what Thibodeau did the preceding season look better.


The Bulls had far more injuries in Hoibergs first than they had in Thibs last year. That was the difference. If Thibs is the coach that you keep suggesting then let's see what he will do with Minnesota. The Bulls thing is done. Time to move on.

Hoiberg didn't have the luxury of coaching that team. They were injury riddled.

Twice as many injuries. That is what the numbers say.


If Thibs is that guy then let's see what he does in Minnesota.

You're the last person who should tell anyone to move on since your weak defenses of Hoiberg are always accompanied by a Thibs reference, even when no one has been discussing him at all. One can think Thibs is the most overrated coach in the history of the league and still see that Hoiberg is a crap coach.

Your attempts to cite things Hoiberg actually does well are weak to say the least. His offensive sets have resulted in 2 seasons of below average offenses in pretty much every statistical category in the league. His plays off of timeouts for an offensive coach are especially terrible for such a supposed visionary. His player development has been awful and this is being highlighted even more now with the improvements that guys like Snell and McDermott have demonstrated once they got away from Hoiberg. This doesn't even get into his glaring weaknesses rather than his supposed strengths, such as the utter lack of any defensive discipline, the completely random and unjustified rotation decisions, and the awful atmosphere that's been allowed to fester under his watch.

I suppose none of this matters though because Bulls fans will always have that miraculous 2016-2017 season, where Coach Hoiberg miraculously led the Bulls to the 8th seed in the East thanks to his vision and leadership. We'll be talking about that season for years to come.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 11:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
There isn't a Bull from his first year as coach that is currently playing a prominent role on any of the contending teams. His team was injury riddled that first year.
He did a better job of coaching his team last year than the guy he replaced did with coaching his.

Do you care to discuss That?

It's hilarious how you want to invoke the Thibs comparisons while now suddenly decrying the quality of the team Hoiberg inherited and completely missed the playoffs with. Even if I grant for the sake of argument the premise that the 2015-2016 Bulls did not feature any players with prominent roles on any of the currently contending teams (a notion that is strained to say the least given the starting positions that Rose, Butler, and Gasol currently play), that makes Thibodeau's achievements with a roster similarly lacking in such players a case of overachieving, not fireable underachieving. Trying to knock the roster of the team that Hoiberg failed to even make the playoffs with only makes what Thibodeau did the preceding season look better.


The Bulls had far more injuries in Hoibergs first than they had in Thibs last year. That was the difference. If Thibs is the coach that you keep suggesting then let's see what he will do with Minnesota. The Bulls thing is done. Time to move on.

Hoiberg didn't have the luxury of coaching that team. They were injury riddled.

Twice as many injuries. That is what the numbers say.


If Thibs is that guy then let's see what he does in Minnesota.

You're the last person who should tell anyone to move on since your weak defenses of Hoiberg are always accompanied by a Thibs reference, even when no one has been discussing him at all. One can think Thibs is the most overrated coach in the history of the league and still see that Hoiberg is a crap coach.

Your attempts to cite things Hoiberg actually does well are weak to say the least. His offensive sets have resulted in 2 seasons of below average offenses in pretty much every statistical category in the league. His plays off of timeouts for an offensive coach are especially terrible for such a supposed visionary. His player development has been awful and this is being highlighted even more now with the improvements that guys like Snell and McDermott have demonstrated once they got away from Hoiberg. This doesn't even get into his glaring weaknesses rather than his supposed strengths, such as the utter lack of any defensive discipline, the completely random and unjustified rotation decisions, and the awful atmosphere that's been allowed to fester under his watch.

I suppose none of this matters though because Bulls fans will always have that miraculous 2016-2017 season, where Coach Hoiberg miraculously led the Bulls to the 8th seed in the East thanks to his vision and leadership. We'll be talking about that season for years to come.



You demonstrated that you don't have much in the way of objectivity last year. They outperformed what all the experts suggested and you still bashed the hell out of Hoiberg. I started on Thibs when the team underperformed. That is the difference.

You never provided an expectation as to where the team was supposed to be record wise so that you could leave a little room for your non stop Hoiberg bashing. I know Leash hates predictions but this is why they are good. You purposely attempted to be vague so that you could nuance your way to management bashing. It's old hat now.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group