The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Except a court clerk has more of an ability to arbitrarily impact your life than a firefighter.

What's more, they aren't tasked by the government to investigate and report on people's lives to the extent that such reports will impact custody of children and, perhaps, other criminal prosecution.

This is an honest question because I don't know: Would Pat's testimony in court be given extra weight because of his profession? Are his words in court inherently treated as more worthy than those of a parent or guardian, at least as it pertains to a narrow issue?

Except a court clerk has more of an ability to arbitrarily impact your life than a firefighter.

What's more, they aren't tasked by the government to investigate and report on people's lives to the extent that such reports will impact custody of children and, perhaps, other criminal prosecution.

This is an honest question because I don't know: Would Pat's testimony in court be given extra weight because of his profession? Are his words in court inherently treated as more worthy than those of a parent or guardian, at least as it pertains to a narrow issue?

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

I think his bullshit vigilante stories of following evildoers down and confronting them with his "you don't want any of this" are probably the most troubling.

He's a glorified note taker. Have any of you interacted with a DCFS caseworker?

Yes. It's a lot of sitting in a cramped, mustard-yellow office and listening to them type. Occasionally, they'll ask a question or mutter something to themselves about how the system is down.

firefighters investigate routinely, though perhaps not on matters of child custody.

But here's the deal: any way you slice it, you're trying to justify the fact that you're not an SJW. You clearly are one. "I don't like what you say; Ima tell on you."

You're just as bad as the fat dyke with purple hair who screeches at someone for wearing an Atlanta Braves hat.

How triggered can you be? Isn't this what you're against?

It would be remarkably shitty, though, if someone on the board intentionally went about trying to get the guy fired--and then claim xie is doing a public service. That's bad faith, baby.

We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.

Except a court clerk has more of an ability to arbitrarily impact your life than a firefighter.

What's more, they aren't tasked by the government to investigate and report on people's lives to the extent that such reports will impact custody of children and, perhaps, other criminal prosecution.

This is an honest question because I don't know: Would Pat's testimony in court be given extra weight because of his profession? Are his words in court inherently treated as more worthy than those of a parent or guardian, at least as it pertains to a narrow issue?

We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.

If we're firing people who might let their prejudices affect their work...


We're gonna need a bigger boat.

IGO: Patrick, the good news is you get to keep your job based upon character references from @GovtFromage and @maddux_boy.

We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.

Well that clearly cuts both ways.


If we’re gonna cry for every person who gets fired for being an incendiary asshole online...

We’re gonna need a bigger tissue box.

Most likely it would.

Do you think I'm crying for this guy?

I've literally said it several times. It's not about that jack ass.

The let's get em fired thing is just bad on it's own.

It's his fault, he deserves no sympathy. Still lame to do it.

Then can we agree that such a position shouldn't be had by an explicit racist? Why is this so controversial?

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

What is Franky basing this on? Maybe you should ask him.

Then can we agree that such a position shouldn't be had by an explicit racist? Why is this so controversial?

A bad equivalency (taking someone's children away because of the color of their skin, or getting ANYWHERE close to that, versus caricatures is so well beneath you I'm shocked) with a tu quoque. Do better.

Then can we agree that such a position shouldn't be had by an explicit racist? Why is this so controversial?

You are a lawyer. You know how to pick apart credibility of a witness.

He would start to become a liability if everything he wrote on Twitter were known.

Is it racist for white people to hate on white people? Or is that some other word? (I'm literally asking.) It seems more like an underlying psychological condition, but it also seems racist in its implications.

QCP is a jackass extraordinaire.

White liberals seem to hate themselves.

https://twitter.com/you_are_a_white/sta ... 2534645760

What is Franky basing this on? Maybe you should ask him.

We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.

Because a DCFS investigator would likely be viewed by the trier of fact as acting solely in the best interest of the child and having less bias than say the mother, or other family member, and thus his testimony would be given greater weight.

You know it's true!!!

Look, the guy's a small-minded jag, but if someone here did it, he's even worse. Plus, it's gonna boomerang on us at some point if we start doing this.

Is it racist for white people to hate on white people? Or is that some other word? (I'm literally asking.) It seems more like an underlying psychological condition, but it also seems racist in its implications.

QCP is a jackass extraordinaire.