It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:55 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why would you see speaking fondly of one controlled substance different than speaking fondly of the other?

You don't think there's a difference between weed and meth?


I don't care about their effects, I care about their categorization as controlled substances, and whether speaking of consumption or desire to consume such substances should be allowed or otherwise rewarded on publicly-owned airwaves.

BAN WEED TALK!

God, you would be an awful legislator.


:lol: So defensive of a plant. Cannabis is not your friend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
It's sad that JLN doesn't want Danny Mac to ever work in radio again.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
I can't listen to The Score around my kid now.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I can't listen to The Score around my kid now.


I would think Danny B reading testimony about underage shower anal rape in his low thoughtful voice is the more damaging of the two

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Curious Hair wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why would you see speaking fondly of one controlled substance different than speaking fondly of the other?

You don't think there's a difference between weed and meth?

Seriously, I have a friend from high school who is suffering end stage liver failure from alcohol use. I don't know anyone dying of organ failure or OD's from weed.

I'm pretty sure Budweiser sponsors the station as well.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
:lol:

It'd weed, not crystal meth. Lighten up, Francis.


Why would you see speaking fondly of one controlled substance different than speaking fondly of the other?

One's deadly, one's pretty fun to use and not more unhealthy than alcohol or fast food. Shirley you see the difference.


Except alcohol and fast food aren't controlled substances.

So? What's your point? I answered your question sufficiently, and this isn't a rebuttal to it.


You weed degenerates get so defensive. SO?! IT'S NOT AS BAD AS MAINLINING ETHANOL!

I know it's not as bad, and it's probably healthier than booze, but the fact remains that it's a controlled substance, and it is probably better that hosts on a broadcast radio program on a medium licensed from the public and purportedly performed in the public interest, shouldn't be so gleefully talking about consuming controlled substances unlawfully.

It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I can't listen to The Score around my kid now.


I would think Danny B reading testimony about underage shower anal rape in his low thoughtful voice is the more damaging of the two

That was an important lesson to learn.

My kid looks up to Bernstein. Can't have him hear things like that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Hoenstly, if weed bothers you so much, then I rally hope you're also fighting for the return of the 18th Amendment and the Volstead Act. Otherwise you're a hypocrite.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.

shhh... he thinks Reefer Madness is scientifically accurate. :lol:

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.


As has been explained to you before: Making book is illegal in Illinois, placing a wager is not proscribed.

I trust this is the last time I see that false equivalency from you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.


As has been explained to you before: Making book is illegal in Illinois, placing a wager is not proscribed.

I trust this is the last time I see that false equivalency from you.

Placing a wager through a bookie is absolutely illegal, and it’s discussed often on the airwaves and has been for decades.

I trust you will learn what a false equivalency is next time you try to apply it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.

shhh... he thinks Reefer Madness is scientifically accurate. :lol:


Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I know it's not as bad, and it's probably healthier than booze,


You sure do love to misquote me. Gonna accuse me again of defending the Philando Castille shooting? Is that before or after you worship a cop killer?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.

shhh... he thinks Reefer Madness is scientifically accurate. :lol:

It’s his first bad thread in awhile. He was due.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
If JLN lived in the 1920s, he'd be the jerk ratting out the speakeasy's and the neighbors who were enjoying a nice glass of beer on a weekend.

Heck, in the 1850s he'd probably be looking for fugitive slaves because we must make sure we obey every awful law in the book and have no critical thinking as to whether something should be a law or not.

Edit: JLN, I'm not saying you would be pro-slavery, just that you are pro-bad laws and believe every law should be enforced without thought as to whether or not it is a just law or not.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Last edited by Ogie Oglethorpe on Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If JLN lived in the 1920s, he'd be the jerk ratting out the speakeasy's and the neighbors who were enjoying a nice glass of beer on a weekend.

No question.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.


As has been explained to you before: Making book is illegal in Illinois, placing a wager is not proscribed.

I trust this is the last time I see that false equivalency from you.

Placing a wager through a bookie is absolutely illegal, and it’s discussed often on the airwaves and has been for decades.

I trust you will learn what a false equivalency is next time you try to apply it.


Not when that bookie isn't in the State. There is no law proscribing online sports betting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If JLN lived in the 1920s, he'd be the jerk ratting out the speakeasy's and the neighbors who were enjoying a nice glass of beer on a weekend.

Heck, in the 1850s he'd probably be looking for fugitive slaves because we must make sure we obey every awful law in the book and have no critical thinking as to whether something should be a law or not.

Edit: JLN, I'm not saying you would be pro-slavery, just that you are pro-bad laws and believe every law should be enforced without thought as to whether or not it is a just law or not.


From "maybe hosts on public airwaves shouldn't talk about their weed consumption" to "you loved prohibition" and, ultimately, slavery.

Go fuck yourselves.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.


As has been explained to you before: Making book is illegal in Illinois, placing a wager is not proscribed.

I trust this is the last time I see that false equivalency from you.

Placing a wager through a bookie is absolutely illegal, and it’s discussed often on the airwaves and has been for decades.

I trust you will learn what a false equivalency is next time you try to apply it.


Not when that bookie isn't in the State. There is no law proscribing online sports betting.

Mac and Parkins have both made it clear their bookies lived nearby.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:38 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38332
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If JLN lived in the 1920s, he'd be the jerk ratting out the speakeasy's and the neighbors who were enjoying a nice glass of beer on a weekend.

Heck, in the 1850s he'd probably be looking for fugitive slaves because we must make sure we obey every awful law in the book and have no critical thinking as to whether something should be a law or not.

Edit: JLN, I'm not saying you would be pro-slavery, just that you are pro-bad laws and believe every law should be enforced without thought as to whether or not it is a just law or not.


From "maybe hosts on public airwaves shouldn't talk about their weed consumption" to "you loved prohibition" and, ultimately, slavery.

Go fuck yourselves.


Good chat.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.


As has been explained to you before: Making book is illegal in Illinois, placing a wager is not proscribed.

I trust this is the last time I see that false equivalency from you.

Placing a wager through a bookie is absolutely illegal, and it’s discussed often on the airwaves and has been for decades.

I trust you will learn what a false equivalency is next time you try to apply it.


Not when that bookie isn't in the State. There is no law proscribing online sports betting.

Mac and Parkins have both made it clear their bookies lived nearby.


I've only heard Parkins talk about online betting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If JLN lived in the 1920s, he'd be the jerk ratting out the speakeasy's and the neighbors who were enjoying a nice glass of beer on a weekend.

Heck, in the 1850s he'd probably be looking for fugitive slaves because we must make sure we obey every awful law in the book and have no critical thinking as to whether something should be a law or not.

Edit: JLN, I'm not saying you would be pro-slavery, just that you are pro-bad laws and believe every law should be enforced without thought as to whether or not it is a just law or not.


From "maybe hosts on public airwaves shouldn't talk about their weed consumption" to "you loved prohibition" and, ultimately, slavery.

Go fuck yourselves.

well you are supporting the prohibition of what is really a harmless plant so...

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
So we went from fake outrage to real outrage here from JLN.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If JLN lived in the 1920s, he'd be the jerk ratting out the speakeasy's and the neighbors who were enjoying a nice glass of beer on a weekend.

Heck, in the 1850s he'd probably be looking for fugitive slaves because we must make sure we obey every awful law in the book and have no critical thinking as to whether something should be a law or not.

Edit: JLN, I'm not saying you would be pro-slavery, just that you are pro-bad laws and believe every law should be enforced without thought as to whether or not it is a just law or not.


From "maybe hosts on public airwaves shouldn't talk about their weed consumption" to "you loved prohibition" and, ultimately, slavery.

Go fuck yourselves.

well you are supporting the prohibition of what is really a harmless plant so...


No, I'm not. Saying it shouldn't be discussed in glowing terms on the radio is not supporting the legal classification as a controlled substance.

I'm all for legalization, and guess what I won't complain about after legalization...?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.

Square

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
FavreFan wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.

Square


NARC!!! This guy is a narc!

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.

Do you also talk to your son when they introduce their tavern tour and tell him not to touch Bud Light?

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.

I feel unsafe.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.

Do you also talk to your son when they introduce their tavern tour and tell him not to touch Bud Light?



I would tell my 7 year old that Bud Light is trash and then hand him a Shiner Bock

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/11 thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.

Do you also talk to your son when they introduce their tavern tour and tell him not to touch Bud Light?



I would tell my 7 year old that Bud Light is trash and then hand him a Shiner Bock

Well you're raising him right IMO

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group